nach oben

Abdominal Radiology

Erschienen in:

04.08.2017 | Invited article

Management implications and outcomes of LI-RADS-2, -3, -4, and -M category observations

verfasst von: Donald G. Mitchell, Mustafa R. Bashir, Claude B. Sirlin

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A radiologist issuing a LI-RADS category is, implicitly or explicitly, a member of a multidisciplinary team. If the definite diagnosis of a benign or malignant entity is not possible, categorizing the uncertainty as LR-2, -3, -4, or -M has important management implications. In this article, we discuss the range of options for management or further diagnostic testing and how a LR category may affect the choice between them. We then review recent published data regarding eventual diagnoses following assignment of a LR category.

Mitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, et al. (2015) LI-RADS (liver imaging reporting and data system): summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS management working group and future directions. Hepatology 61(3):1056–1065CrossRefPubMed

Holland AE, Hecht EM, Hahn WY, et al. (2005) Importance of small (≤20-mm) enhancing lesions seen only during the hepatic arterial phase at MR imaging of the cirrhotic liver: evaluation and comparison with whole explanted liver. Radiology 237(3):938–944CrossRefPubMed

Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Semelka RC, et al. (2003) Early-enhancing non-neoplastic lesions on gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the liver. Clin Radiol 58(10):778–786CrossRefPubMed

Jeong YY, Mitchell DG, Hann HWL, et al. (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma after systemic chemotherapy: gadolinium-enhanced mr measurement of necrosis by volume histogram. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(4):624–628CrossRefPubMed

Bosniak MA (1986) The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 158(1):1–10CrossRefPubMed

Poulose KP, Reba RC, Gilday DL, et al. (1970) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. A correlative study of the clinical, scan, and angiographic findings. Br Med J 3(5714):67–71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Petruzzi N, Mitchell D, Guglielmo F, et al. (2013) Hepatocellular carcinoma likelihood on MRI exams: evaluation of a standardized categorization system. Acad Radiol 20(6):694–698CrossRefPubMed

Tanabe M, Kanki A, Wolfson T, et al. (2016) Imaging outcomes of liver imaging reporting and data system version 2014 category 2, 3, and 4 observations detected at CT and MR imaging. Radiology 281(1):129–139CrossRefPubMed

Mitchell DG, Saini S, Weinreb J, et al. (1994) Hepatic metastases and cavernous hemangiomas: distinction with standard- and triple-dose gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 193(1):49–57CrossRefPubMed

10.

Darnell A, Forner A, Rimola J, et al. (2015) Liver imaging reporting and data system with MR imaging: evaluation in nodules 20 mm or Smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US. Radiology 275(3):698–707CrossRefPubMed

11.

Choi JY, Cho HC, Sun M, et al. (2013) Indeterminate observations (liver imaging reporting and data system category 3) on MRI in the cirrhotic liver: fate and clinical implications. AJR 201(5):993–1001CrossRefPubMed

12.

Burke LM, Sofue K, Alagiyawanna M, et al. (2016) Natural history of liver imaging reporting and data system category 4 nodules in MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(9):1758–1766CrossRef

13.

Choi SH, Byun JH, Kim SY, et al. (2016) Liver Imaging reporting and data system v2014 with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: validation of LI-RADS category 4 and 5 criteria. Invest Radiol 51(8):483–490CrossRefPubMed

14.

Sofue, K., Burke, L., Nilmini, V., et al. (2017) Liver imaging reporting and data system category 4 observations in MRI: Risk factors predicting upgrade to category 5. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.25627

Titel: Management implications and outcomes of LI-RADS-2, -3, -4, and -M category observations
verfasst von: Donald G. Mitchell
Mustafa R. Bashir
Claude B. Sirlin
Publikationsdatum: 04.08.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1251-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Management implications and outcomes of LI-RADS-2, -3, -4, and -M category observations

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and combined tumor on MRI using liver imaging and data system (LI-RADS) version 2014

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

LI-RADS and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver-directed therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

LI-RADS M (LR-M): definite or probable malignancy, not specific for hepatocellular carcinoma

Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie