Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2010

01.11.2010

Management of esophageal perforations

verfasst von: Sven Christian Schmidt, Stefan Strauch, Thomas Rösch, Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker, Sven Jonas, Johann Pratschke, Henning Weidemann, Peter Neuhaus, Guido Schumacher

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Esophageal perforations remain a life-threatening event requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. Surgical repair and interventional endoscopic or conservative treatment are the common treatment methods.

Methods

From 1998 to 2006, the authors retrospectively analyzed 62 patients treated for esophageal perforation. Data were evaluated for cause of perforation, symptoms, therapeutic regimen, complications, and mortality.

Results

The causes of perforation were iatrogenic or suicidal (n = 33) or spontaneous (n = 29). In the first group, the causes were dilation of stenosis (n = 16), endoscopy (n = 7), transesophageal echography (n = 4), ingestion of acid or leach (n = 2), intubation (n = 2), ingestion of a foreign body (n = 1), and migration of a screw after osteosynthesis (n = 1). The spontaneous perforations were caused by tumors (n = 19), Boerhaave syndrome (n = 6), unknown origin (n = 3), and Barrett’s ulcer (n = 1). The most frequent symptoms were dysphagia (n = 50), pain (n = 35), fever (n = 24), and vomiting (n = 18). At the time of perforation, 28 patients presented with cancer. Of these 28 patients, 18 had esophageal cancer. The treatment included surgery (n = 32), which consisted of double-layer suture (n = 26) or esophageal resection (n = 6). A total of 30 patients were treated interventionally with a stent (n = 21), clips (n = 1), or without further measures (n = 8). The patients in the surgery group presented with severe primary and postoperative general conditions including renal failure (25%), respiratory insufficiency (65.5%), and need for catecholamines (62.5%). This multiorgan involvement was found only occasionally in the conservative group. The overall hospital mortality rate was 14.5%, involving 9 patients (5 in the surgery group and 4 in the conservative group). Early treatment led to better survival than late treatment with a delay exceeding 24 h.

Conclusion

The treatment method still must be chosen on an individual basis. It appears that surgical treatment is necessary in cases of severe general conditions. The data from this study show that surgical repair and conservative treatment may be used successfully. The best outcome was obtained after immediate treatment.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones WG II, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53:534–543CrossRefPubMed Jones WG II, Ginsberg RJ (1992) Esophageal perforation: a continuing challenge. Ann Thorac Surg 53:534–543CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483CrossRefPubMed Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kollmar O, Lindemann W, Richter S, Steffen I, Pistorius G, Schilling MK (2003) Boerhaave’s syndrome: primary repair vs esophageal resection: case reports and metaanalysis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 7:726–734CrossRefPubMed Kollmar O, Lindemann W, Richter S, Steffen I, Pistorius G, Schilling MK (2003) Boerhaave’s syndrome: primary repair vs esophageal resection: case reports and metaanalysis of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 7:726–734CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Okten I, Cangir AK, Ozdemir N, Kavukcu S, Akay H, Yavuzer S (2001) Management of esophageal perforation. Surg Today 31:36–39CrossRefPubMed Okten I, Cangir AK, Ozdemir N, Kavukcu S, Akay H, Yavuzer S (2001) Management of esophageal perforation. Surg Today 31:36–39CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021 discussion 1021–1013CrossRefPubMed Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021 discussion 1021–1013CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Holscher AH, Metzger R (2009) Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 23:2258–2262CrossRefPubMed Leers JM, Vivaldi C, Schafer H, Bludau M, Brabender J, Lurje G, Herbold T, Holscher AH, Metzger R (2009) Endoscopic therapy for esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with a self-expandable metallic stent. Surg Endosc 23:2258–2262CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Ascioti AJ (2007) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2003–2007 discussion 2007–2008CrossRefPubMed Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Ascioti AJ (2007) Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 83:2003–2007 discussion 2007–2008CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller RE, Bossart PW, Tiszenkel HI (1987) Surgical management of complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal dilation including laser therapy. Am Surg 53:667–671PubMed Miller RE, Bossart PW, Tiszenkel HI (1987) Surgical management of complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and esophageal dilation including laser therapy. Am Surg 53:667–671PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr (2007) Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 63:1173–1184CrossRefPubMed Wu JT, Mattox KL, Wall MJ Jr (2007) Esophageal perforations: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. J Trauma 63:1173–1184CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Habr-Gama A, Waye JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13:193–201CrossRefPubMed Habr-Gama A, Waye JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13:193–201CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer JP, Barrett JA, Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP (1987) Mandatory vs selective exploration for penetrating neck trauma: a prospective assessment. Arch Surg 122:592–597PubMed Meyer JP, Barrett JA, Schuler JJ, Flanigan DP (1987) Mandatory vs selective exploration for penetrating neck trauma: a prospective assessment. Arch Surg 122:592–597PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimenez A, Franquet T, Erasmus JJ, Martinez S, Estrada P (2002) Thoracic complications of esophageal disorders. Radiographics 22(Spec no.):S247–S258PubMed Gimenez A, Franquet T, Erasmus JJ, Martinez S, Estrada P (2002) Thoracic complications of esophageal disorders. Radiographics 22(Spec no.):S247–S258PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivasan R, Haywood T, Horwitz B, Buckman RF, Fisher RS, Krevsky B (2000) Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1725–1729CrossRefPubMed Srinivasan R, Haywood T, Horwitz B, Buckman RF, Fisher RS, Krevsky B (2000) Role of flexible endoscopy in the evaluation of possible esophageal trauma after penetrating injuries. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1725–1729CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Eroglu A, Can Kurkcuogu I, Karaoganogu N, Tekinbas C, Yimaz O, Basog M (2004) Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Dis Esophagus 17:91–94CrossRefPubMed Eroglu A, Can Kurkcuogu I, Karaoganogu N, Tekinbas C, Yimaz O, Basog M (2004) Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair. Dis Esophagus 17:91–94CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bufkin BL, Miller JI Jr, Mansour KA (1996) Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1447–1451 discussion 1451–1442CrossRefPubMed Bufkin BL, Miller JI Jr, Mansour KA (1996) Esophageal perforation: emphasis on management. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1447–1451 discussion 1451–1442CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, Markkula HT, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO, Mattila SP (1993) Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1088–1091PubMed Salo JA, Isolauri JO, Heikkila LJ, Markkula HT, Heikkinen LO, Kivilaakso EO, Mattila SP (1993) Management of delayed esophageal perforation with mediastinal sepsis. Esophagectomy or primary repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1088–1091PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bladergroen MR, Lowe JE, Postlethwait RW (1986) Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 42:235–239CrossRefPubMed Bladergroen MR, Lowe JE, Postlethwait RW (1986) Diagnosis and recommended management of esophageal perforation and rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 42:235–239CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA (1992) Esophageal perforation: an 8-year review of a multispecialty clinic’s experience. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1112–1119PubMed Kim-Deobald J, Kozarek RA (1992) Esophageal perforation: an 8-year review of a multispecialty clinic’s experience. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1112–1119PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Management of esophageal perforations
verfasst von
Sven Christian Schmidt
Stefan Strauch
Thomas Rösch
Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
Sven Jonas
Johann Pratschke
Henning Weidemann
Peter Neuhaus
Guido Schumacher
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1054-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.