Management of irreducible unilateral facet joint dislocations in subaxial cervical spine: two case reports and a review of the literature

A 30-year-old Asian man became paraplegic after being involved in a motor vehicle accident. An emergency computed tomography (CT) examination showed approximately 50% anterior spondylolisthesis of C5 on the C6 body (Fig. 1). A three-dimensional reconstruction revealed unilateral facet dislocations on the left side (Fig. 2). A neurological examination showed weakness of his bilateral biceps muscles (strength of 2 on a 5-point scale), impaired wrist extension, and numb skin of forearm. Immediate skull traction was performed to restore cervical alignment. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed C5/6 disk rupture and extrusion and metamorphic signal intensity in his spinal cord and posterior ligament complex (Fig. 3). Cervical reduction from posterior approach was performed assisted with removal of a small part of C6 superior facet. The spinous processes of C5/6 were then stabilized with wire rope. Finally, anterior decompression and fixation of C5/6 were accomplished (Fig. 4). At the 12-month follow-up, sensory and motor function of extremities recovered compared to the preoperative status. A CT examination at 24 months postoperatively showed excellent bone consolidation and plate and screw stabilization (Fig. 5).

A 25-year-old Asian woman fell from a height of approximately 3 m, and her face contacted the floor first. On presentation to our hospital, she complained of severe neck pain, skin numbness of forearms, and weak limbs. A neurological examination showed impaired triceps brachii muscles (strength of 3+ on a 5-point scale). CT with three-dimensional reconstruction revealed an articular process fracture and unilateral facet dislocation on the right side at C6/7 (Fig. 6). MR imaging showed mild cord compression. Preoperative use of a cervical collar maintained her spinal alignment. Posterior reduction with wiring of the C6/7 spinous processes was performed after removal of the facet fragments. Anterior decompression and fixation using a cage with iliac bone and a plate was then performed. A halo vest was used postoperatively for the instability of the upper cervical spine due to atlas fracture. At 3 months postoperatively, loosening of the fixators had not occurred (Fig. 7), the aberrant skin sensation abated, and her muscle strength had improved. At the 6-month follow-up, consolidation of the graft bone was observed and her sensory and motor function had recovered completely.

The two patients were maintained in a supine position with a rigid cervical collar on admission, to prevent aggravation of neurological damage caused by an unstable spine and involuntary neck mobilization. Motor and sensory examinations were performed on the patients, following high-quality CT imaging and MR imaging. Early closed reduction with skull traction was applied prior to surgery, but failed.

After induction of general anesthesia, each patient was carefully turned to the prone position with the skull fixed to a head-holder device. Based on the exact orientation of the injured facet joint under intraoperative X-ray, an approximate 7-cm midline posterior incision was created. For unilateral facet dislocations, the interlocking zygapophyseal joint was identified, and a small periosteal elevator was inserted into the facet joint up to the front of inferior articular process of the dislocated vertebra. Through setting superior articular process of the lower vertebra as a supporting point, the inferior articular process of the upper vertebra was carefully pried backward to approach rear area of the lower articular process. The assistant surgeon simultaneously added gentle manual traction and slight rotation to the head. If these methods did not accomplish vertebral reduction, a rongeur was used to remove the zygapophyseal apex of the lower vertebra to assist reduction process. Reduction was confirmed by direct visualization. On affirmation of the cervical position, a steel wire rope was employed to truss up the spinous processes of the upper and lower cervical vertebrae.

Each patient was carefully turned to the supine position, and their neck was sterilized again. A median right cervical incision was made, and the soft tissue was separated deep within the space between the carotid sheath and trachea. The disk was removed by nucleus pulposus forceps, and thorough decompression was accomplished. Then a suitable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage or autologous bone was inserted into the intervertebral space. An anterior cervical plate was applied to secure the cage and obtain rigid anterior fixation.

It has been documented that CT screening with three-dimensional reconstructions has a higher sensitivity (99%) and specificity (100%) for the detection of cervical spine injury, compared with the low sensitivity (70%) of plain film radiographs [7]. Despite many advantages of CT imaging, some occult cervical ligamentous injuries are also reported to be not easily detected by CT imaging technique [8]. In unstable cervical injuries, MR imaging is helpful in assessing the status of the discoligamentous complex. However, controversies surrounding the application of MR evaluation before closed reduction have historically existed among clinicians and researchers. Those investigators who disagree with the application of MR worried about the delay of cervical reduction and poor long-term outcomes caused by waiting period for MR results [9]. In fact, with the development of imaging techniques and widespread presence of MR devices in trauma centers, the worry becomes unnecessary. Nowadays, patients can receive MR examination immediately after CT scan and clinicians can obtain MR imaging at any time by the nosocomial computer network. By contrast, investigators who agree with the application of MR evaluation argue that no delay has been proven to be associated with any deterioration in neurologic function [10]. Based on the updated guidelines for the management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries [11], although MR imaging is not recommended as equally as a CT scan, MR is still a promising technology in evaluating spinal cord injuries in subaxial cervical spine dislocations [3]. It has been suggested by Kaiser et al. that MR might be useful in the evaluation of soft tissue injuries, disk herniation, and hematomas, especially in neurologically injured patients with negative CT scan [12]. For facet dislocations associated with significant anterior disk herniation, it has been demonstrated that without reliable MR imaging before closed reduction, further retropulsion of a traumatic herniated disk prolapsing into the spinal canal during reduction maneuver would cause worsening neurological function [13]. In addition, MR may be critical for determining surgical approach as it assists in identifying ventral and dorsal compressive lesions.

Surgical treatment is indicated for patients with the following features: unilateral facet dislocations with any facet fractures, ligamentous injury, persistent cord compression, or neurological deficit; difficulty in closed reduction or unavailable cervical stability; more than 4 points based on the injury severity score (Subaxial Injury Classification System). Once surgical treatment is chosen, neurological decompression should be performed as soon as possible, when the patients’ clinical conditions permit.

Various surgical techniques for these injuries have been described, including the anterior approach alone with fusion and plating, the posterior approach alone with pedicle screws or wires, and a staged anterior-posterior-anterior approach. No consensus exists on the best surgical strategy [5, 14]. Each of these options mentioned above has its own merits and drawbacks.

Before the 1990s, posterior instrumentation was preferred by many surgeons because it was generally recognized that cervical dislocations were associated with damage to the posterior ligament complex or muscles [15]. Therefore, it is important to achieve a tension band effect against the mechanism of injury by segmental fixation at the rear with wire rope, or rod and pedicle screw [16]. Fixation from posterior approach has many advantages, including deformity reduction under direct visualization, decompression by removing the fractured bone fragments which compress the spinal cord or nerve root, and stabilization by reconstruction of the posterior ligament complex [17]. However, posterior treatment alone might complicate the procedure, when accompanied with concomitant disk herniation or ventral compression. A disadvantage of the posterior approach was suggested by Ye and colleagues that more cervical segments shall be fixed and fused than in the anterior approach [14]. In other words, the soft tissues are more broadly damaged.

With the advent of titanium locked plates and threaded cages, anterior fixation and fusion provides satisfactory results: without dislodgement of bone graft, significant late displacement, or kyphotic angulation [15]. As for the anterior approach, direct decompression of the neural elements is achieved by removing ventral compressive structures such as disk and bone fragments. Furthermore, since the anterior approach is minor surgical trauma, it rarely causes iatrogenic soft tissue injury. However, the anterior approach alone can be technically challenging when intraoperative reduction is required [18], particularly when locked facet joints are irreducible by traction; it would increase the risk of secondary spinal injury in patients with neurological deficits under forcible reduction. Kim et al. [19] biomechanically demonstrated that combined anterior cervical decompression and fusion followed by posterior screw and rod fixation produces the greatest overall biomechanical stability. However, this procedure leads to extensive soft tissue injury, long operation time, large estimated blood loss volume, and high technical complexity of the operation [14].

Although both anterior and posterior approaches were applied in this study, the treatment method differed from the above-described procedure; the innovative surgical technique applied by our team minimized the postoperative complications to the greatest extent possible. Firstly, the posterior procedure was performed, in order to reduce locked facet dislocations instead of to accomplish final and solid fixation. Reduction of cervical spine was achieved by prying the dislocated joints by using a microdissector, as previously described. If the cervical spine was still hard to reduce, the zygapophyseal apex of the lower vertebra of locked facet would be drilled off or removed, to restore normal alignment. However, this position cannot be maintained without pressure and fixation when severe ligamentous rupture exists. Therefore, wire rope fixation of the adjacent spinous process was used as a posterior tension band. Wire rope has an advantage of decreasing the risk of neurological or vascular injury [20]. An anterior plate provides immediate stability to the cervical spine, by acting like a buttress in flexion and a tension band during extension. Combined with the interspinous wire rope, which restricts excessive flexion of the involved segments, anterior fixation proved to be sufficient for both segmental stability and final fusion.

The staged procedure described by Bartels and Donk [21] and Hassan [22] in the treatment of delayed traumatic cervical dislocations involved traction, posterior laminectomy or facetectomy, repeated traction, and anterior plating and fusion. This sequence led to long hospital stays. Moreover, patients had to remain on bed rest during the entire course of traction. In contrast, our technique has many advantages in terms of decreased blood loss, less operative time, and a shorter hospital stay. The main advantage of our method is its ease of operation, safe reduction via posterior approach, and decreased risk of progressive neurologic injury.