Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 6/2016

Open Access 10.06.2016 | Review

Management of Pemphigus Vulgaris

verfasst von: Mimansa Cholera, Nita Chainani-Wu

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 6/2016

insite
INHALT
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Introduction

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, autoimmune, vesiculobullous disease. As a result of the relative rarity of PV, published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited, which makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens in this disease. This also precludes conduct of a meta-analysis.

Methods

English-language publications describing treatment outcomes of patients with PV were identified by searches of electronic databases through May 2015, and additionally by review of the bibliography of these publications. A total of 89 papers, which included 21 case reports, 47 case series, 8 RCTs, and 13 observational studies, were identified. The findings from these publications, including information on disease course and prognosis, medications used, treatment responses, and side effects, are summarized in the tables and text of this review.

Results

Prior to availability of corticosteroid therapy, PV had a high fatality rate. Early publications from the 1970s reported high-dose, prolonged corticosteroid use and significant associated side effects. Later reports described use of corticosteroids along with steroid-sparing adjuvants, which allows a reduction in the total dose of corticosteroids and a reduction in observed mortality and morbidity. For the majority of patients in these reports, a long-term course on medications lasting about 5–10 years was observed; however, subgroups of patients requiring shorter courses or needing longer-term therapy have also been described. Early diagnosis of PV and early initiation of treatment were prognostic factors. In recent publications, commonly used initial regimens include corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate or azathioprine; whereas, for patients with inadequate response to these regimens, adjuvants such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or rituximab are used.

Conclusion

The review findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis, early initiation of treatment, and use of steroid-sparing adjuvants to allow a reduced total dose and duration on corticosteroids. Also highlighted is the need for more RCTs.
Hinweise

Enhanced content

To view enhanced content for this article go to http://​www.​medengine.​com/​Redeem/​A1D4F0601A5546F4​.

Introduction

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, autoimmune, mucocutaneous, vesiculobullous disease [1].
The word pemphigus comes from the Greek word pemphix, which means blister [2]. It is a rare disease with estimated worldwide annual incidence of 0.1–0.5 per 100,000 [3]. It occurs in all racial and ethnic groups with the highest incidence seen in Ashkenazi Jews [4]. Occurrence is most common during the fifth and sixth decades of life, although a few cases have been reported in children [5].
In the majority of cases, PV initially presents with lesions on the oral mucosa [3]. Often the first sites affected are those exposed to frictional trauma including the buccal and lateral tongue mucosa along the occlusal level, or the gingiva, but PV can occur on any oral site particularly if exposed to sharp or acidic foods. The lesions start as vesicles which rupture easily leaving erosions and ulcers.
The pathogenesis of pemphigus involves the presence of circulating and tissue-bound autoantibodies to the keratinocyte cell surface desmosomal molecules desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) and desmoglein 1 (Dsg1). Dsg3 and Dsg1 belong to the cadherin superfamily involved in cell–cell adhesion. These autoantibodies cause loss of cell–cell adhesion between epithelial cells, which results in suprabasilar intraepithelial vesicle formation [4, 6].
Diagnostic tests include perilesional mucosal or skin biopsy for histologic examination and direct immunofluoresence testing. Histologic findings include presence of intraepithelial blisters and suprabasilar acantholysis; direct immunofluorescence findings include IgG deposits and less commonly IgM and C3 deposits in intercellular spaces in the epithelium. Blood tests include ELISA testing for Dsg3 and Dsg1 autoantibodies [7].
Prior to availability of corticosteroid therapy in the 1950s, PV had a very high fatality rate. While many treatment options are now available, corticosteroids in combination with other drugs still form the mainstay of treatment. Mortality from pemphigus has decreased significantly in the last half century and is now usually due to adverse effects of the medications used [8, 9].
As a result of the relative rarity of pemphigus, there are very few randomized controlled trials. However, numerous observational studies, case reports, and case series have been published that report on the treatment of pemphigus. The objective of this review was to summarize the findings from all of the reported human studies including observational studies and case reports.

Methods

Publications relating to treatment of PV were identified by searches of electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar through May 2015. Keywords used included pemphigus vulgaris, autoimmune vesiculobullous disease, corticosteroids, azathioprine, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, and IVIg. The full-text versions of the papers identified were obtained. The bibliography of these papers was also reviewed to identify any additional papers that did not appear in the electronic search. Only English-language papers describing treatment outcomes of patients with PV were included in this review. A total of 89 papers, which included 21 case reports, 47 case series, 8 RCTs, and 13 observational studies, were included. These papers were reviewed to obtain information on publication date, type of study done, age of the patients, extent of lesion involvement (skin and mucosa), previous treatments if any, medications used, duration of use of previous medications before new ones were started, duration to first improvement after the start of medications, follow-up duration, concomitant medication used along with main drug, outcome, duration on medication, adverse effects of drugs, and antibody titer changes after treatment. This information is summarized in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Table 1
Corticosteroids
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age at the beginning of follow-up period Range/mean (years)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease symptoms before CS were started
CS dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ryan [40]/1972
Case series
N = 41 
M/F = 23/18
26–80
Mucocutaneous
NM
NM
500–1000 mg cortisone equivalents
Berger et al. [41]/1973
Case report
1/M
3.5
Oral mucosal lesions
NM
NM
Prednisone = 15–120 mg/day
Rosenberg et al. [42]/1976
Case series
N = 85 PV + 5 P vegetans
14–88
Oral mucosa = 80, Skin = 52
NM
NM
Prednisone = 60–180 mg/day
Lozada, Silvermann, Cram [14]/1982
Case series
N = 6 
M/F = 3/3
24–89
Mucocutaneous = 6
Pred
NM
Prednisone = 40–80 mg/day
Lever and Schaumburg-Lever et al. [12, 13]/1984
Case series
N = 84
20–79/mean = 51
Mucocutaneous
NM
NM
Prednisone = 40–350 mg/day
Aberer et al. [43]/1986
Case series
N = 29 M/F = 12/17
At onset of disease—mean 59.9 ± 9.0 years
At initiation of therapy—61.6 ± 8.1 years
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MTX
NM
Prednisone = 80–200 mg/day
Seidenbaum et al. [44]/1988
Case series
N = 88 PV + 27 (PF, PE, P vegetans)
M/F = 46/69
40–60
Oral mucosa = 50; Cutaneous = 33; Mucocutaneous = 32
NM
NM
Prednisone = 60–120 mg/day
David et al. [15]/1988
Case series
N = 4 
M/F = 2/2
11–17
Mucocutaneous = 3, Oral mucosa = 1
NM
NM
Prednisone = 60–80 mg/day
Laskaris and Stoufi [45]/1990
Case report
1/F
6
Extensive oral mucosal lesions
None as no diagnosis was made when symptoms were first noted at age of 2
4
Prednisolone = 30 mg/day for 3 weeks. Prednisolone maintained to 10 mg/day every other day after clinical improvement
Lamey et al. [16]/1992
Case series
N = 30 
M/F = 10/20
24–68/Mean = 48.1
Cutaneous = 4; Mucosal = 26 (Oral mucosa = 25)
NM
2–9 mo (Mean = 3.5 mo)
Prednisone = 20–120 mg/day in 29 pts. No Rx in 1 pt
Werth [46]/1996
Retrospective case controlled study
N = 15 
M/F = 10/5
28–72
Mucosal = 6; Cutaneous = 1; Mucocutaneous = 8
None
Mean. Control grp = 3.1 ± 1.2 mo; Pulsed grp = 4.1 ± 1.0 mo
Control grp (N = 6)
Pulsed grp (N = 9). Methylprednisolone sodium succinate pulse
Pred = 95 ± 22.5 mg
Pred before pulse = 82 ± 15.8, after pulse = 78 ± 7.6 mg/d. Pulse dose = 250–1000 mg/24 h
Robinson et al. [47]/1997
Case series
N = 12 
M/F = 3/9
3–66/Mean = 32
Oral mucosa = 12, Cutaneous = 7
NM
NM (Newly diagnosed pts)
Prednisone = 10–80 mg/day
Kaur and Kanwar et al. [17]/1990
Case series
N = 45 PV + 5 PF
M/F = 24/21
15–55
NM
NM
3 mo to 5 years
Dexamethasone = 136 mg dissolved in 5 % dextrose given by a slow iv drip over 1–2 h and repeated on 3 consecutive days
Mignogna et al. [48]/1999
Retrospective analysis
N = 16 
M/F = 5/11
26–76/Mean = 51
Oral mucosa = 16, Cutaneous = 6
NM
1–3 mo (Mean = 55 days)
Deflazacort = 120 mg/daily
Scully et al. [49]/1999
Case series
N = 32, Additional 23 pts referred to dermatology and with limited available data
M/F = 22/23
16–83/Mean = 50.2
Mucosal = 55, cutaneous lesions later developed = 13
NM
3–192 weeks (Mean = 27.2 weeks) from 42 patients with available data
Prednisolone = 20–80 mg/day
Herbst and Bystryn et al. [29]/2000
Case series
N = 40 
M/F = 15/25
14–73/Mean = 51
Mucocutaneous
NM
NM
Prednisone = 15–90 mg/day
Kanwar et al. [18]/2002
Retrospective analysis
N = 32
21–75/Mean = 49
Mucocutaneous = 27; Mucosal = 1; Cutaneous = 4
NM
NM
136 mg iv Dexamethasone for 3 consecutive days (2–8 pulses required for PR) and (8–32 pulses required for CR) + 500 mg CyclP on day 2
Ljubojevic et al. [50]/2002
Retrospective analysis
N = 154 
M/F = 57/97
19–89/Mean = 53
Mucocutaneous
NM
>5 years
Prednisone = 100–150 mg daily for first 4–6 weeks. Then gradually tapered to maintenance dose of 5–20 mg. In 14 pts with refractory PV I.M. gold given up to 50 mg per week
Femiano et al. [51]/2002
Case series
N = 20 
M/F = 8/12
35–57/Mean = 43
Mucocutaneous
NM
NM
Oral Pred (N = 10)
125 mg/day to 5 mg once a week for 1 mo
Oral Pred alternated with iv betamethasone (N = 10)
Pred 50 mg/day to 5 mg/d once a week for 1 week/20 mg/d iv to to 8 mg/d iv for 4 days
Robinson et al. [32]/2004
Case report
1/M
47
Oral lesions
NM
3 mo
Prednisolone = 1 mg/kg/day (80 mg); topical 0.1 % triamcinolone acetonide
Chams davatchi et al. [38]/2005
Case series
N = 1111 M/F = 492/717
4–82/Mean = 42
Mucocutaneous = 782; Mucosal = 200; Cutaneous = 129. Oral cavity involved in 978 pts
None
NM
Prednisone dose NM
Alonso et al. [33]/2005
Case series
N = 14 
M/F = 4/10
21–87
Oral mucosa = 9; Mucocutaneous = 5
NM
0.75–72 mo (Mean = 11.66 mo)
0.5 % Triamcinolone corticosteroids + 60 mg/day systemic Pred in 12 pts for 1 mo/Intralesional corticoid infiltration (parametasone) in 1 pt every 15 days during 45 days of therapy
Ben lagha et al. [31]/2005
Case report
1/F
71
Mucocutaneous
NM
4 mo
Prednisone = 0.5 mg/kg/d; 20–40 mg/day
Ariyawardana et al. [5]/2005
Case report
1/F
14
Oral mucosal lesions
None
10 days
Systemic Prednisolone = 10 mg/day; 0.1 % triamcinolone acetonide in orabase twice a day maintenance dose for 3 mo
Yazganoglu et al. [39]/2006
Case series
N = 5 
M/F = 3/2
7–15 years
Mucocutaneous
NM
NM
Prednisolone = 1–2 mg/kg/day
Mentink et al. [19]/2006
Randomized controlled trial
N = 20 
M/F = 13/7
26–71/Mean = 49
Mucocutaneous
Systemic and topical CS, AZA, antibiotics
NM
DP (Dexamethasone pulse therapy) (N = 11)
Oral dexamethasone in 300 mg pulses 3 days/mo, 5.44 pulse courses
PP (placebo pulse therapy) (N = 9)
6 Placebo tablets 3 days/mo, 6.44 pulse courses
Chaidemenos et al. [52]/2007
Prospective cohort study
N = 74 Studied = 68 
M/F = 21/47
24–83 years
Oral mucosa = 68; cutaneous = 33; genital and nasal lesions = 14
NM
0.15–18 mo/mean = 3.6 mo
Prednisone = 40 mg/day
Chams davatchi et al. [53]/2007
Randomized controlled open label trial
N = 120 M/F = 71/40
Mean = 40 years
Mucocutaneous = 74; mucosal = 29; cutaneous = 8. Oral cavity involved in 76 pts
None
3–12 mo/1 year
Mean total dose (P = Prednisolone)
Pred (30)
11631 mg (2 mg/kg/day)
Pred/AZA (30)
7712 mg (2 mg/kg/day P + 2.5 mg/kg/day AZA
Pred/MMF (30)
9798 mg (2 mg/kg/day P + 2 g/d MMF)
Pred/CyclP (30)
8276 mg (2 mg/kg/day P + 1 g iv CyclP monthly)
Dagistan et al. [30]/2008
Case report
1/F
35
Oral lesions
Sultamisilin, flurbiprofen
2 mo
Prednisolone = 80 mg/day initially for 14 days and increased to 100 mg for a period of 14 days
Tran et al. [54]/2013
Retrospective chart
N = 23 
M/F = 11/12
26–72/Mean = 54
Mucosal = 19, cutaneous = 4
Pred, AZA, MMF, dapsone, Rtx, IVIg, etanercept, chlorquine
2 mo to 10 years (Mean = 23 mo)
Prednisone = 35 mg/daily (mean dose)
Mignogna et al. [55]/2010
Case series
N = 35 
M/F = 13/22
17–72/Mean = 45
Oral pharyngeal
NM
NM
Total CS + immunosuppressive therapy + PITAinjections (N = 16)
4894 mg (75–100 mg/day) + 2–8 sessions of PITA injections
Total CS + Immunosuppressive therapy only (N = 19)
5312 mg (75–100 mg/day)
Author/year
Duration to initial improvement in symptoms after CS
Follow up period
Concomitant Rx
Outcome
Duration on medication (corticosteroid) and adjuncta
PV antibody titer changes after Rx
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ryan [40]/1972
NM
Variable F/U periods, maximum = 20 years
MTX, Mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Death = 24 pts; CR off = 5 which lasted for 2–156 mo before relapse; 11 pts were on long term medication with occasional flares; Lost to follow-up = 1
1–18 years
NM
DM, Cushingoid features, furuncles, hyperkalemia, osteoporosis, melena, purpura, hypocalcemia, acidosis, electrolyte imbalance,phlebitis
Berger et al. [41]/1973
NM
7.5 years
None
Patient was treated with prednisone intermittently during the f/u period. Controlled activity of disease at the last f/u visit
6.5 years
IIF was positive intercellularly at 1:10 before and after treatment
Cushingoid, retarded bone age, osteoporosis of long bone
Rosenberg et al. [42]/1976
NM
1 to >15 years
AZA or MTX in 3 pts
Death related to PV or drug = 28; Death unrelated to PV = 9
48 survivors. Many d/c therapy and fewer required 15 mg of Pred
NM
NM
Cushingoid symptoms, Infections, GI tract ulceration, CHF, HTN, Diabetes, Osteporosis, thromboembolic phenomenon, etc
Lozada, Silvermann, Cram [14]/1982
2–8 weeks
9–27 months
Levamisole = 100–200 mg/week
Symptoms of pain resolved = 6, PR (oral lesions) = 3, PR (skin lesions) = 2, CR (oral lesions) = 3, CR (skin lesions) = 4
1.5–13 years
NM
Chills, malaise which disappeared on d/c levamisole and did not recur on restart
Lever and Schaumburg-Lever et al. [12, 13]/1984
NM
5–22 years
AZA, MTX in 3 pts which was replaced by AZA
Death = 15; still being treated = 11; CR off = 47; CR on = 11
5 months to 8 years in CR off pts
NM
No significant
Aberer et al. [43]/1986
NM
4–16 years (29 Pts)
AZA = 2–3 mg/kg body weight
Still being treated = 5; CR on = 11 pts, mean duration of Pred use before taper to low dose was 6 months (10 mg QOD); CR off = 13 pts, mean duration of F/U after d/c of medication was 4 years without relapse
AZA tapered to 1–2 mg/kg in 6 months. Pred and AZA D/c in 13 pts after maintenance therapy from 6 months to several years. Mean duration of therapy = 6.9 ± 3.8 years
Antibody titers before treatment were >160 monitored by IIF. After treatment: Negative in 13 CR off pts. >80 in 6 pts despite good clinical response
Leukopenia, herpes simplex, bacterial infection
Seidenbaum et al. [44]/1988
NM
4–24 years
AZA 100–150 mg/day
Death = 25 (11 PV) Still treated = 45, CR on = 10, CR off = 35
NM
NM
NM
David et al. [15]/1988
1 months
4–19 years
None
CR on = 1, mean duration of Pred use before taper to low dose was 4 years after 2 relapses. CR off = 1 within 1 year of medication, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 6 years without relapse. CR off = 1 within 1 mo of medication, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 4 years without relapse. (PR = 1 on homeopathy, did not take Pred)
Rx d/c in 2 pts after CR in 1 mo and 1 years after gradually tapering Pred
NM
NM
Laskaris and Stoufi [45]/1990
NM
Lost to follow up after 2 years
None
Clinical improvement
2 years until last f/u. Pred tapered and maintained to 10 mg/day from 30 mg/day
NM
NM
Lamey et al. [16]/1992
4–8 weeks
5–20 years
AZA, Cyclp in 3 pts. Gold in diabetes mellitus pt
CR on = 27 within 4–8 weeks of start of therapy. Pred tapered to 10 mg/day or on alternate days in other patients
NM
NM
Diabetes mellitus, HTN, duodenal ulcers
Werth [46]/1996
NM
At least 500 days
AZA, MTX, CyclP, Dapsone, Gold
Pulsed grp: Improvement = 6, CR off = 4 within mean 269 days of start of therapy and mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 714 days without any relapses Control grp: No remission in any 6 pts
NM
NM
Well tolerated. Transient increase in blood glucose levels treated successfully with insulin
Robinson et al. [47]/1997
NM
8–11 years (Mean = 4.5)
AZA, levamisole, cyclosporine, MTX, dapsone, topical dexamethasone, fluocinonide, clobetasol, clotrimazole
PR on = 3; CR on = 9, within 1.5–42 mo of start of therapy
All pts were on medication at the end of f/u
NM
Cushingoid symptoms, Infections, GI upset, weight gain, fatigue, mood changes, constipation, osteoporosis, diabetes, insomnia, acute psychosis
Kaur and Kanwar et al. [17]/1990
3–4 days
2 years
CyclP 500 mg added to dexamethasone and 50 mg orally each day, Pred (30–40 mg) in 7 pts
Still being treated = 28; death due to septicemia = 3 pts; lost to F/U = 13; no improvement & hence Rx changed = 6
All pts were on medication at the end of f/u
NM
Cardiac arrhythmia in 1 pt and Ischemic heart disease in 1 pt
Mignogna et al. [48]/1999
NM
NM
AZA = 50–100 mg/d or CyclP = 50 mg daily
PR within 2–8 weeks of start of therapy = 14, CR off = 2
1–8 years
NM
Cushingoid symptoms, Infections, GI upset, weight gain, fatigue, mood changes, constipation, diabetes, osteoporosis, insomnia, psychosis
Scully et al. [49]/1999
NM
At least 3 months
AZA (1–3 mg/kg/day), MTX, CyclP, dapsone
Death = 2, Relapses and still being treated at time of publication = 21, PR on = 4, CR off = 5pts within 3 mo of start of therapy. (NM whether on or off of therapy)
NM
NM
Lethargy, cushingoid faces, adrenal suppression, candidiasis, HTN
Herbst and Bystryn et al. [29]/2000
NM
2–19/Mean = 7.7 years
AZA, CyclP, dapsone, gold, cyclosporine, Pl
Death = 2; PR = 8; CR off = 30, within 18–35 mo of start of therapy
Rx for 2–19 years (mean = 7.7 years)
NM
NM
Kanwar et al. [18]/2002
NM
2–12 years (Mean = 4.2)
50 mg orally each day, Pred
CR off = 32 within 20–32 mo (Mean = 24 mo) of start of therapy
1 year (Pulse therapy for 6 mo followed by oral CyclP 50 mg orally for 1 year
NM
HTN, pulmonary tuberculosis, leucopenia, diarrhea, cataract, oligomenorrhea, sinus bradycardia
Ljubojevic et al. [50]/2002
19 years
NM
AZA (100–150 mg); Pl in 5 pts with NR to AZA and Pred
Death = 14; PR on = 15; CR off = 5, mean duration of f/u after d/c of therapy was 5 mo to 5 years without relapse. Complications due to Pred, Rx d/c = 74, lost to follow up = 46
NM
NM
Sepsis, arterial HTN, cardiorespiratory diseases, skin infections
Femiano et al. [51]/2002
NM
NM
150 mg/d Ranitidine, 1 ml Nystatin suspension bid
 
Oral Pred
Pred/iv bms
NM
NM
Gastritis, hyperglycemia, HTN, increased body weight, mood change, altered Ca and P levels
Symptom resolved
15 d
12 d
Clinical resolution
30 d
25 d
Robinson et al. [32]/2004
2 weeks
8 mo
Cimetidine, nystatin, calcium supplements
CR on within 3 mo of start of therapy
Pred tapered over 8 mo to 10 mg/day
NM
None
Chams davatchi et al. [38]/2005
NM
3.8 years, lost to F/U = 200
MMF/AZA, CyclP/Gold/Dapsone
Death = 66; Still being treated = 350; Maintenance Rx = 471; CR off = 112 (Nothing else mentioned about duration to achieve remission and duration on medication)
Mean 4.5 years
NM
Candidiasis, HTN, osteoporosis, abnormal liver function test, infection, diabetes mellitus
Alonso et al. [33]/2005
NM
NM
None
Improvement in all pts. Additional details were NM
45 days
NM
NM
Ben lagha et al. [31]/2005
NM
12 mo
MTX 10–20 mg/week
CR on within 9 mo of start of therapy. Therapy was stopped at sixth mo after starting Pred and resumed after healing of fracture of femur
Rx contd at dose of 10 mg/d at the end of f/u
NM
Stress fracture in neck of femur
Ariyawardana et al. [5]/2005
1 mo
12 mo
Dapsone 100 mg/day
CR off within 4 mo of starting therapy. No relapses
Systemic Pred. d/c at 1 mo and topical d/c in 3 mo after that
NM
NM
Yazganoglu et al. [39]/2006
NM
4 pts were followed for 2–4 years. 1 patientt was lost to F/U
MMF in1 patient, dapsone in 1 patient
Relapses in all 4 cases which were controlled with Pred and MMF in 1 case
Treatment continued in all pts at end of f/u
NM
Cushingoid appearance and acneiform eruption in 2 pts
Mentink et al. [19]/2006
19 wks in 4 DP and 6 PP pts
1 year
AZA = 3 mg/kg/day, Pred = 80 mg/day
CR on = 8 in DP within 173.2 days of starting therapy, CR on = 9 in PP within 175.6 days of starting therapy
Pred tapered to 0 from 80 mg/day over 19 weeks and treatment was given for 1 year
NM
Weight gain, increased blood glucose, wound infection, HTN, candidiasis, myopathy, diarrhea, leukopenia etc
Chaidemenos et al. [52]/2007
NM
26–180 mo
AZA (100 mg/day)
Death = 2; CR on = 57, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 27 ± 29 mo without relapses; Dropped out = 6; Rx changed = 9;
2–138 mo. In 6–14 mo Pred tapered at a rate of 5 mg/mo and AZA tapered until 0 in 1 year
NM
Tuberculosis reactivation, toxic hepatitis, bone marrow depression, disturbed WBC counts
Chams davatchi et al. [53]/2007
NM
1 year
Nine were lost to F/U
MMF, AZA, CyclP
CR on; failures; complications (Rx d/c)
 
Duration on Rx = 1 year Tapering of Pred started in mean 17.2 ± 7.2 days until it was reached 7.5 mg/day
NM
Candidiasis, hyperlipidemia, herpes simplex, hyperglycemia, fungal and viral skin infections, gastritis, cataract, psychosis, infections
Pred
23, 6, 1
Pred/AZA
24, 1, 2
Pred/MMF
21, 8, 1
Pred/CyclP
22, 2
Dagistan et al. [30]/2008
NM
1 year
AZA 50 mg twice a day
CR on (Additional details NM)
Pred tapered at end of 7 weeks by 30 mg/day. Treatment lasted for 1 year
NM
Hepatitis C
Tran et al. [54]/2013
NM
NM
Mean MTX = 18.9 (15–25) mg/week
Rx d/c in 2 due to adverse events. Lost to f/u = 4, Still being treated = 4; clinical improvement in 21 pts of which pred d/c in 16 pts. CR off = 3, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication = 26 mo until end of f/u
Pred d/c in mean 18 mo in 16 pts. In other five patients low dose pred in range of 2–10 mg/day was given. MTX d/c in 3 pts and tapered in 8 pts
NM
Fatigue, GI side effects
Mignogna et al. [55]/2010
NM
Mean = 5.3 years
PITA grp: AZA 50–150 mg/day; CyclP 50–100 mg/day. No PITA grp: AZA 100 mg/day; CyclP 50 mg/day
Death 3 years after CR = 1; CR on = 21; CR off = 13; complete clinical remission within mean 126.6 days of starting therapy in grp with PITA. Complete clinical remission within mean 153.2 days of starting therapy in grp without PITA
NM
NM
Candidiasis in 3 pts, yellowish gingival pellets, gingival neurovascularization in PITA pts. Candidiasis in 7 pts without PITA
Pred prednisone, CS corticosteroid, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, AZA azathioprine, MTX methotrexate, DCP dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse, IVIg intravenous immunoglobulin, Rtx rituximab, CyclP cyclophosphamide, Pl plasmapheresis, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, R relapse, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, wks weeks, d days, NM not mentioned, PITA perilesional/intralesional triamcinolone acetonide
aDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
Table 2
Azathioprine
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age range/mean (years)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease before AZA
AZA dose, prednisone dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Mourellou et al. [56]/1995
Retrospective analysis
N = 48
NM
NM
NM
NM
40–100 mg Pred
>100 mg Pred
40 mg Pred + 100 mg AZA
25 pts
8 pts
15 pts
Chaidemenos et al. [1]/2010
Retrospective bi center comparative study
N = 36 
M/F = 16/20
Mean = 54
Mucosal
NM
4 mo
Monotherapy of Pred (N = 17)
Alternate day Pred + daily AZA (N = 19)
Starting dose = 1.5 mg/kg/day
40 mg Pred every other day + 100 mg/d AZA
Chams-Davatchi et al. [57]/2013
Randomized double blind controlled study
N = 56 M/F = 23/33
10–75
Mucocutaneous = 33; mucosal = 15; cutaneous = 8
None
5–10 mo
Placebo grp (Pred + placebo)
AZA grp (Pred + AZA)
Pred: 2 mg/kg up to 120 mg/day
Pred: 2 mg/kg up to 120 mg/day
Placebo: 2.5 mg/kg
AZA: 2.5 mg/kg
Author/year
Duration to initial improvement of symptoms after AZA
Follow up period
Concomitant Rx
Outcome
Duration on all medicationsa
PV antibody titer changes after Rx
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Mourellou et al. [56]/1995
NM
Up to 10 years
Pred
CR off = 5; CR on = 22; death = 12, still being treated = 6, lost to follow-up = 3
14/15 pts treated effectively in AZA + Pred grp. No deaths in that grp
Total duration on medications NM. Therapy d/c once patient was in remission for 6 mo
NM
NM
Chaidemenos et al. [1]/2010
Monotherapy grp = mean 19. 2 days;
Pred + AZA grp = mean 58.53 days
24 mo
Pred
Monotherapy
Alternate day Pred + daily AZA
24 mo
CR and PR on therapy in mean 119.6 days and off therapy in 234.4 days
NM
Weight gain, GI disturbances, hair loss, HTN, arrhythmias, eye disease, internal infection, muscle weakness, redistribution of body fat etc
PR on
3
PR on
4
PR off
2
PR off
2
CR on
9
CR on
7
CR off
1
CR off
2
Death
1
Death
0
Rx failure
1
Rx failure
4
Chams-Davatchi et al. [57]/2013
NM
12 mo
Pred
Placebo
AZA
Medications given for 5–22 mo.
NM
Abnormal liver function test, sepsis, abnormal CBC
CR on (6–11 months)
13
CR on (8–11 months)
16
NR
11
NR
6
Dropped
4
Dropped
6
Pred prednisone, AZA azathioprine, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, PR on partial remission on therapy, PR off partial remission off therapy, R relapse, NR no response, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, d days, pts patients, NM not mentioned
aDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
Table 3
Mycophenolate mofetil
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age range/mean (years)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease before MMFa
MMF dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Enk and Knop [58]/1999
Case series
N = 12 
M/F = 5/7
42–64
NM
Pred, AZA
4–8 mo
2 g/day
Grundmann-Kollmann et al. [59]/1999
Case report
1/F
76
NM
Pred, AZA
7 years
2 g/day
Grundmann-Kollmann et al. [59]/1999
Case report
1/F
66
Cutaneous
Pred, AZA
2 years
2 g/day
Powell et al. [21]/2002
Case series
N = 12 
M/F = 4/8
41–78
Mucocutaneous = 8; mucosal = 4
AZA, Pred, MTX, CyclP, IVIg, dapsone, gold, thalidomide, minocin
6–168 mo
750 mg to 3.5 g (Mean = 2.5 g/day)
Mimouni et al. [60]/2003
Case series
N = 31 PV + 11 PF
M/F = 21/21
6–74 (Mean = 47.2)
NM
Pred, AZA
NM
35–45 mg/kg per day
S. Beissert et al. [61]/2006
Multicenter randomized controlled non-blinded clinical trial
N = 33 PV + 7 PF; 21 PV pts treated with MMF
M/F = 16/23
Mean = 56.5
Cutaneous = 39;
mucosal = 28
NM
NM
MMF = 1 g twice daily
AZA = 2 mg/kg/d
Strowd et al. [62]/2010
Retrospective chart review
N = 18 
M/F = 8/10
29–67/52
Mucocutaneous = 12, mucosal only = 6
Pred, Pred + MMF in 1 pt only
1–6 yrs
2–3 g/day
S. Beissert et al. [63]/2010
Multicenter placebo controlled non-blinded trial
N = 94 
M/F = 38/56
75 completed study
18–70/45.5
Mucocutaneous
NM
Mean = 4 mo
Placebo + Pred
36pts
MMF2 g/d + Pred
21 pts
MMF3 g/d + Pred
37 pts
Bongiorno et al. [64]/2010
Case series
N = 9 
M/F = 5/4
18–75
NM
Pred + AZA
14.4 mo
Enteric coated—mycophenolate sodium 1440 mg/day (given in 2 divided doses)
Ionnaides et al. [65]/2011
Randomized prospective non-blinded clinical trial
N = 36 PV + 11 PF
M/F = 18/29
Mean = 53
Cutaneous = 47; oral = 24
NM
Monotherapy = 4.35 mo; combination = 4.04 mo
Pred alone
Pred + MMF
1 mg/kg
1 mg/kg + 3 g/day
Author/year
Duration to initial improvement in symptoms after MMF
Follow up period
Concomitant Rx
Outcome
Duration on all medicationb
PV antibody titer changes after Rx
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Enk and Knop [58]/1999
NM
9–12 mo
Prednisone
CR on = 11 within 2 months of start of therapy; one pt opted out of study
Medication given for 4–20 mo. Pred tapered to median dose of 2.5 mg/day, MMF was contd at last f/u
NM
Mild GI symptoms and mild lymphopenia
Grundmann-Kollmann et al. [59]/1999
10 days
8 mo
Prednisone
CR on within 9 weeks of start of therapy
Total duration on medication = 7 years and 8 mo. Pred tapered and stopped after 4 weeks of starting therapy, MMF continued at last f/u
NM
None
Grundmann-Kollmann et al. [59]/1999
3 weeks
8 mo
None
CR on within 8 weeks of start of therapy
Total duration on medication = 2 years and 8 mo. MMF continued at last f/u
NM
None
Powell et al. [21]/2002
Within average 15 mo of therapy
27 mo
Prednisone
Still being treated = 1, flare = 1, opted out = 2, CR on = 4 Controlled = 3, CR off = 1
Medication given for 6–195 mo. Pred tapered at 12 and 18 mo. MMF d/c in CR off patient at 24 mo
ELISA: Negative in 5 pts and IIF: Negative in 6 pts after Rx. Gradually decreasing in rest other pts with Rx
Lymphopenia, nausea, depression
Mimouni et al. [60]/2003
NM
6–49 mo (Mean = 22 mo)
Prednisone
Rx failure: 8; PR = 1; CR on = 22 within mean 9 mo of start of therapy
Duration on medication = mean 22 mo (6–49 mo)
Rapid decrease in titers
GI symptoms, cytopenia, musculoskeletal pain
S. Beissert et al. [61]/2006
Within 30 ± 7 days in MMF and AZA grp
24 mo
Prednisone = 2 mg/kg/daily
MMF grp: NR = 1. CR on = 20 within 91 ± 113 days of start of therapy
Duration on medication was at least 720 days
NM
Infection, dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, cushing syndrome
AZA grp: Rx d/c due to side effects = 2, NR = 2, lost to f/u = 1, CR on = 13 within 74 ± 127 days of start of therapy
Strowd et al. [62]/2010
75 % clearance within 1–18 mo (mean = 4.5 mo)
Total = 5–130 mo (mean = 35.2 mo); after CR = 1–74 mo (mean = 23 mo)
Prednisone = 35–100 mg/day (mean = 60 mg/day)
CR on = 14; MMF failed in 4 pts of which Rtx given to 2 of which CR on = 1; CR off = 1; referred elsewhere = 2;
Total CR off = 3/18 pts eventually after therapy
Medications given for 1 mo to 8 years. Pred and MMF d/c in 3 CR off patients after an average 3 years and are in CR for >than 1 year without relapse. Prednisone and MMF dose tapered with improvement in rest others
NM
NM
S. Beissert et al. [63]/2010
MMF grp
Placebo grp
52 week
Prednisone = 1–2 mg/kg/day
Death = 1; lost to f/u = 6; NR = 4 due to adverse effects. Rx withdrawn = 22, Improvement in 40/58 pts of MMF combined grp; in 23/36 pts of placebo grp
Prednisone dose tapered to 10 mg/day every 4 weeks up to 52 weeks
Dsg1 and Dsg3 decreased in both grps. Dsg 3 decreased more in placebo grp
Pyrexia, nausea, cough, oral candidiasis, arthralgia, headache, upper respiratory tract infection
24.1 week
31.3 week
Bongiorno et al. [64]/2010
30–45 days
18 mo
Prednisone = 75 mg once daily
No response = 1. CR on = 6, mean duration of therapy before taper to low dose was 18 mo. CR off = 2 at mean duration of f/u after d/c of therapy was 16 mo without any R
Medications given for 32.4 mo. Pred and EC- MPS dose tapered at 6 mo and at 18 mo. Pred was again tapered at 18 mo. EC-MPS was d/c in 2 pts at 16 mo
Reduced Dsg 1 and Dsg 3 in 8/9 pts
Headache, increased fasting blood glucose
Ionnaides et al. [65]/2011
Mean 12 days in monotherapy mean 11.79 days in combination
12 mo
Methylprednisone
Monotherapy: CR on within 144.5 days = 12; CR off within 186.83 days = 6; PR on within 132 days = 2; PR off within 150 days = 3
Combination: CR on within 141.9 days = 13; CR off within 175 days = 7; PR on within 144.5 days = 2; PR off within 129.6 days = 2
Duration on medication was at least 12 mo. MMF and Pred tapered gradually every 2 weeks as per the control of diseases activity. MMF reduced to 2 g/day
NM
Weight gain, muscle weakness, fatigue, GI disturbances, glycaemia, HTN, redistribution of body fat, eye disease, Internal infection
Mycophenolate used in patients with refractory pemphigus vulgaris (previous treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine was unsuccessful in achieving remission) are reported in Table 3
Pred prednisone, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, AZA azathioprine, MTX methotrexate, IVIg intravenous immunoglobulin, CyclP cyclophosphamide, Pl plasmapheresis, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, R relapse, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, d days, NM not mentioned
aMost patients had been previously treated with other medications before MMF was started
bDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
Table 4
Intravenous immunoglobulin
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age range/mean (years)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease before IVIg
IVIg dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Bystryn et al. [66]/2002
Case series
N = 6 
M/F = 5/1
57–78
Mucocutaneous = 1; cutaneous = 3; mucosal = 2
Pred
2 mo to 5 years
400 mg/kg/day for 5 days. 1–3 courses
Amagai et al. [67]/2009
Multicenter randomized controlled double-blind trial
N = 40 PV + 21 PF
M/F = NM
Mean: placebo grp = 53.1 yrs; 200 mg grp = 57 yrs; 400 mg grp = 50.1 yrs
Mucocutaneous
Pred
Mean 24 mo
IV infusion 200 or 400 mg/kg/day in divided doses over 5 days. IV saline for 5 days in Placebo grp
Placebo grp
13 pts
200 mg grp
14 pts
400 mg grp
13 pts
Stojanovic et al. [68]/2009
Case report
1/F
44
NM
Pred, CyclP
3 years
400 mg/kg/day for 5 days followed by long term single doses of 400 mg/kg every 6 weeks for 1 year
Stojanovic et al. [68]/2009
Case report
1/F
64
NM
Pred, AZA
NM
400 mg/kg/day for 5 days followed by long term single doses of 400 mg/kg every 6 weeks for 6 mo
Author/year
Duration to initial improvement in symptoms after IVIg
Follow up period
Concomitant Rx
Outcome
Duration on medication (IVIg)a
PV antibody titer changes after Rx
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Bystryn et al. [66]/2002
Within 2 wks skin lesions healed by 80 % and oral lesions by 40 %
2–4 mo
Prednisone, CyclP (100–150 mg/day)
Controlled disease activity in all 6 pts. Additional details on duration NM.
Medications given for 2 mo to 5.4 years. Pred tapered in median 16 days after start of IVIg. 1–3 courses given
IIF: IC IgG Reduced by 72 %. At 2 weeks total IgG reduced to normal levels and 1.7 % below baseline
Mild stroke in 1 pt with HTN
Amagai et al. [67]/2009
8–15 days
After Rx = 90 days; Total = 2 years
Prednisone
10 pts withdrawn. Significant Improvement in 400 and 200 mg grp pts by day 85. No significant Improvement in placebo group from baseline. Additional details NM
Up to 2 years
ELISA: Anti Dsg1 (%): Placebo grp: remained same; 200 mg grp: 100–60; 400 mg grp: 100–60 Anti Dsg3 (%): Placebo grp: 100–75; 200 mg grp: 100–70; 400 mg grp: 100–50 in 90 days
Headache, hepatitis C, lymphopenia, constipation, nausea, abdominal discomfort, palpitations etc
Stojanovic et al. [68]/2009
NM
NM
CyclP, pyridiostigmine bromide for concomitant myasthenia gravis
Stable Remissionb
1 year
NM
NM
Stojanovic et al. [68]/2009
NM
NM
Pred, pyridiostigmine bromide for concomitant myasthenia gravis
Stable remission after last infusionb
6 months
NM
NM
Pred prednisone, AZA azathioprine, IVIg intravenous immunoglobulin, CyclP cyclophosphamide, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, PR on partial remission on therapy, PR off partial remission off therapy, R relapse, NR no response, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, d days, pts patients, NM not mentioned, IIF indirect Immunofluorescence, ELISA Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Dsg1 and Dsg3 desmoglein 1 and 3
aDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
bNot mentioned whether on medication or not
Table 5
Methotrexate
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age range/mean (years)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease before MTX
MTX dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lever and Goldberg et al. [69]/1969
Case series
N = 5 
M/F = 4/1
26–79
Mucocutaneous
Pred
11 mo to 7 years
25–150 mg/week
Jablonska et al. [70]/1970
Case series
N = 10
32–83 (mean = 58.8)
NM
Pred, triamcinolone
NM
25 mg/week
Piamphongsant and sivayathorn et al. [71]/1975
Case series
N = 3
33–48 (Mean = 43.8)
NM
Pred, MTX in 1 pt
NM
12.5–25 mg/week
Lever and Schaumburg-Lever, Lever et al. [72, 73]/1977
Case series
N = 41
20–79 (mean = 51)
Mucocutaneous
None
NM
20–50 mg/week
Mashkilleyson et al. [74]/1988
Case series
N = 53
26–75 (mean = 56)
NM
Pred
NM
25–50 mg/week
Smith and Bystryn et al. [75]/1999
Case series
N = 9 M/F = 8/1
Mean = 59
NM
Pred
NM
12.2 mg/week (13 courses)
Baum et al. [76]b/2012
Retrospective study
N = 30
NM
NM
NM
NM
15 mg/week
Author/year
Duration to initial improvement in symptoms after MTX
Follow up period
Concomitant Rx
Outcome
Duration on medication (MTX)a
PV antibody titer changes after Rx
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Lever and Goldberg et al. [69]/1969
NM
5–7 years
Pred
CR on = 4, improvement = 1. additional details NM
Pred d/c in 1 patientt at fifth year. Tapered in rest on clinical improvement. MTX continued In all patients at end of f/u
IIF: Pt1—1:640 to 1:80 to 1:10 to neg
Pt21:40 to 1:10
Pt31:40 to 1:10
Pt41:20 to 1:40 to 0
Pt51:80 to 1:40 to 0 to 1:10
Nausea, lassitude
Jablonska et al. [70]/1970
1–30 weeks
NM
Pred, triamcinolone
Improvement in 8/9 pts after 1–30 weeks of treatment. Death = 1 due to bronchopneumonia. Whether PR or CR—NM
Duration of MTX 1–7.5 mo. MTX discontinued in six patients due to its side effects
NM
Bronchopneumonia, cerebral thrombosis, septicemia, bronchitis, anemia, diarrhoea, leucopenia, bacterial infection
Piamphongsant and sivayathorn et al. [71]/1975
NM
NM
Pred
Death = 1 due to Pred side effects; CR on = 2
Duration of MTX 33–78 days maintenance dose contd at end of f/u
NM
NM
Lever and Schaumburg-Lever, Lever et al. [72, 73]/1977
NM
11–15 years
Prednisone = 40–360 mg/day
Death = 4 unrelated to MTX; CR on = 8, PR on = 15, CR off = 14
MTX D/c in 14 pts with CR off therapy, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was mean 2.6 years (3 mo to 8 years) without any relapse. Rx contd in others at end of f/u
NM
Nausea, leucopenia, pyoderma
Mashkilleyson et al. [74]/1988
2–3 days
NM
Pred
Not effective in nine patients, CR on = 31; PR on = 11
MTX discontinued in two patients due to its side effects
NM
Pneumonia, exacerbation of gastric ulcer, pyoderma, moniliasis, necrtotizing gingivitis, TB of larynx
Smith and Bystryn et al. [75]/1999
NM
NM
Prednisone = 3–40 mg/day
CR on = 6 pts within 6 mo of start of therapy. Additional details NM
Pred d/c in 6 pts within 6 mo after start of MTX therapy. MTX continued in all as flare-ups were seen within 23 days of discontinuing MTX at end of f/u
NM
Nausea, mild elevations of transaminase
Baum et al. [76]b/2012
NM
NM
Pred
Improvement in 21 pts at 6 mo of treatment. Additional details NM
Pred dose tapered
NM
Mild adverse effects
Pred prednisone, MTX methotrexate, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, PR on partial remission on therapy, PR off partial remission off therapy, R relapse, NR no response, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, d days, pt patient, NM not mentioned, IIF indirect immunofluorescence, Dsg1 and Dsg3 desmoglein 1 and 3
aDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
bOnly abstract is available for Baum et al. [75]/2012
Table 6
Rituximab
Author/year
Type of study
N
M/F
Age range/mean (yrs)
Type of pemphigus vulgaris
Previous Rx
Duration of disease before Rtx
Rituximab dose
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Salopek et al. [77]/2002
Case report
1/F
29
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, Pulsed iv CyclP, Pl, IVIg, MMF
9 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA—6 infusions over 8 weeks
Cooper et al. [78]/2002
Case report
1/M
54
Cutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Pl, IVIg, CyclP
20 mo
375 mg/m2 BSAonce weekly for 4 weeks
Espana et al. [79]/2003
Case report
1/M
39
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, Pl, CyclP
NM
375 mg/m2 BSAonce weekly for 4 weeks
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
Case report
1/M
51
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MTX, Dapsone, AZA, minocycline, IVIg MMF, CyclP
56 mo
375 mg/m2 BSAonce weekly for 4 weeks
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
Case report
1/M
37
Cutaneous
CyclP, Pred, Pl, Dapsone, IVIg
70 mo
375 mg/m2 BSAonce weekly for 4 weeks
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
Case report
1/F
47
Mucocutaneous
AZA, MMF, IVIg, CyclP,
30 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Virgolini Marzocchi [25]/2007
Case report
1/F
53
Cutaneous
Pred, CyclP, MTX
120 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Wenzel et al. [81]/2004
Case report
1/F
55
Cutaneous
Pred, AZA, CyclP, MTX, MMF, IVIg
156 mo
600 mg (corresponding 375 mg/m2 BSA) once weekly within 5 weeks
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Case report
1/F
34
Mucocutaneous
Pred, CyclP
144 mo
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks) ×2 at 6 mo interval
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Case report
1/F
42
Mucocutaneous
AZA, MTX, Pred, MMF, IVIg, extracorporeal photopheresis cyclosporine
60 mo
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks) ×2 at 6 mo interval
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Case report
1/M
20
Cutaneous
Pred, dapsone, gold compounds, MMF, IVIg, Pl
24 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Kong et al. [83]/2005
Case report
1/F
17
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, MP, IVIg, Pl
84 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Case report
1/F
60
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, AZA
8 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Case report
1/F
26
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, AZA, MTX
3 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Case report
1/F
27
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, AZA, MTX
3 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Case report
1/F
57
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, AZA
14 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Schmidt et al. [84]/2005
Case report
1/M
14
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA. Dapsone, MMF, CyclP, staphyloccocal protein A immunoadsorption
2.5 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Case report
1/F
17
Mucocutaneous
Pred, IVIg, AZA, MMF, MTX
30 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Case report
1/F
39
Mucocutaneous
Pred, IVIg, AZA
79 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Case report
1/F
68
Mucocutaneous
Pred, IVIg, MMF, dexamethasone-cyclP pulse
64 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Case report
1/F
81
Mucocutaneous
Dexamethasone-cyclP pulse
7 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Ahmed et al. [86]/2006
Case series
N = 11 M/F = 5/6
15–68
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, AZA, MTX, Dapsone, Gold,CyclP,Cyclosporine, colchine, tacrolimus
31–219 mo (mean = 68.8 mo)
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 3 weeks; fourth week—IVIg; 10 infusions of Rtx in 9 pts
Goh et al. [87]/2007
Open label pilot study
N = 5 
M/F = 3/2
46–62/57
Mucocutaneous
AZA, MMF, IVIg, Pl, iv cyclP, cyclosporine, gold
2–96 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Marzano et al. [88]/2007
Case series
N = 3 
M/F = 2/1
Pt1: 51
Pt2: 50
Pt3: 55
Mucocutaneous
AZA, MMF, IVIg, Pred, CyclP
Pt 1: 6 years;
Pt 2: 5 years;
Pt 3: 4 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks; 2 more infusions for pt 3 (one each mo)
Antonucci et al. [89]/2007
Case series
N = 5 
M/F = 4/1
28–35
Mucocutaneous = 2
Cutaneous = 3
AZA, MMF, IVIg, Pred, CyclP, MTX Pl, Cyclosporine
3–7 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Cianchini et al. [90]/2007
Case series
N = 10 
M/F = 5/5
27–63
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Pl, CyclP, cyclosporine, extracorporeal photopheresis
1–9 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks. Additional Rtx infusion in only one patient
Joly et al. [91]/2007
Case series
N = 14 
M/F = NM
Mean = 53.7
Mucocutaneous
Pred, IVIg, AZA, MTX, MMF, cyclosporine
4–168 mo (mean = 70.2 mo)
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Shimanovich et al. [92]/2007
Case series
N = 5 
M/F = 1/4
37–71
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Pl, MTX, cyclosporine, Cyclp dexamethasone, dapsone
3–76 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Eming et al. [93]/2008
Case series
N = 11 
M/F = 5/6
37–70/52.1
Mucocutaneous = 7, mucosal = 2; cutaneous = 2
Ped, AZA, MMF
NM
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Faurschou and Gniadecki [94]/2008
Case report
1/M
68
Mucocutaneous
Pred, MMF, IVIg
3 years
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks) ×2 at 6 mo interval
Faurschou and Gniadecki [94]/2008
Case report
1/F
46
Mucosal
Pred, MTX, MMF, IVIg
NM
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks) × 2 at 6 mo interval
Pfutze et al. [95]/2009
Case series
N = 5 
M/F = 2/3
Mean = 55
Mucosal dominant
CS, MMF
NM
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Fuertes et al. [96]/2010
Case report
1/M
1.5
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, Cyclosporine, Dapsone, Gold
Newly diagnosed
Mucocutaneous
Kasperkiewicz et al. [97]/2011
Pilot study
N = 17 
M/F = 8/9
38–75/mean = 55
Mucocutaneous = 7; mucosal = 6; cutaneous = 4
AZA, cyclosporine, CyclP, MTX, MMF, dapsone, IVIg, PAIA, Pl, Pred, dexamethasone, hydroxychlorquine
3–144 mo
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart. Additional Rtx cycle in 2 pts
Craythorne et al. [98]/2011
Case series
N = 6 
M/F = 3/3
45–71
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, cyclosporine
0–13 years
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 8 weeks then monthly ranging from 4 to 10 mo in all pts
Kasperkiewicz et al. [99]/2011
Case series
N = 8 
M/F = 4/4
43–65
Cutaneous = 1; Mucosal = 7
AZA, MMF, Pred, dapsone, cyclosporine, dexamethasone
3–72 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks = 3 pts; 1000 mg twice 2 wks apart = 5
Kim et al. [100]/2011
Retrospective study
N = 25 PV + 2 PF
M/F = 12/13
24–83
Mucocutaneous = 20; cutaneous = 3; mucosal = 2
AZA, MMF, IVIg, CyclP, steroid pulse therapy, cyclosporine
12–15.5 mo
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly)
2 wks
11 pts
3 wks
11 pts
4 wks
1 pt
5 wks
2 pts
Reguiai et al. [101]/2011
Case series
N = 9 
M/F = 3/6
14–61
Mucocutaneous
Pred, IVIg, AZA, MMF
NM
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Horvath et al. [102]/2011
Case series
N = 12 
M/F = 8/4
34–80
Mucocutaneous
AZA, Pred, MMF, dapsone, doxyycline, CyclP, IVIg, dexamethasone, nicotinic acid, mycophenolic acid
2–12 years
Two Rtx infusions of 500 mg at interval of 2 weeks in 10 pts and at an interval of 4 and 3 weeks in 2 pts
Feldman et al. [103]/2011
Retrospective analysis
N = 19 
M/F = 14/5
Mean = 52
Mucocutaneous = 14; mucosal only = 5
Pred with or without immunosuppressive agent
NM
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly—12 infusions over 6 mo period
Leshem et al. [104]/2012
Case series
N = 42 PV + 3 PF
18–83
Mucosal only = 40
Pred, MTX, AZA, IVIg, Dapsone, Rtx (lymphoma protocol), CyclP
0–163 mo (mean = 25 mo)
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart
Cianchini et al. [37]/2012
Case series
N = 37 PV + 5 PF
M/F = 13/29
27–75
Mucous or mucocutaneous involvement. No’s NM
Pred, immunosuppressants
1–13 years; (mean = 4.2 years)
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart. Additional 500 mg Rtx infusion on PR or no response 6 mo after initial infusion
Lunardon et al. [105]/2012
Case series
N = 24 
M/F = 13/11
26–86/50
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Dapsone, CyclP, IVIg, Cyclosporine
3–234 mo (mean = 41 mo)
(375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks) ×13 pts. (Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart) × 11 pts.
1 Rtx cycle = 6 pts
2 Rtx cycle = 8 pts
3 Rtx cycle = 7 pts
4 Rtx cycle = 2 pts
6 Rtx cycle = 1 pt
Kasperkiewicz and Eming et al. [106]/2012
Case series
N = 33 PV + 3 PF
M/F = 16/20
15–76/52
Mucosal = 29
Pred, AZA, MMF, Pl, MTX,PAIA, IVIg, CyclP, chloroquine, leflunomide
0.1–16 years (mean = 4)
4 × 375 mg/m2 = 9 pts.
2 × 1000 mg = 25 pts.
Two cycles of 4 × 375 mg/m2 = 1 pt.
7 × 375 mg/m2 = 1 pt
Balighi et al. [107]/2013
Phase 2 clinical trial
N = 40 
M/F = 33/7
40–50
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Dapsone, IVIg, CyclP
Mean = 35 ± 32 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Kanwar et al. [108]/2013
Open label pilot study
N = 9 
M/F = 5/4
9–60
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, dapsone, dexamethasone pulse
4–72 mo (mean = 18 mo)
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks = 1 pt;
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart = 7 pts; 1 × 1000 mg + 1 × 140 mg = 1 pt
Kolesnik et al. [109]/2014
Case series
N = 6 
M/F = 3/3
48–81
Mucocutaneous
Pred, AZA, MMF, Dapsone, PAIA, Rtx in 1 pt
1–240 mo
375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 3 to 6 weeks in combination with PAIA
Heelan et al. [35]/2014
Case series
N = 84 PV + 8 PF
M/F = 37/55
13–77/43
Mucocutaneous = 61, mucosal = 20, cutaneous = 11
Pred, AZA, MMF, IVIg, MTX, dapsone, CyclP, gold, cyclosporine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate sodium
0–256 (mean = 24 mo)
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart; 1000 or 500 mg 6 mo or more after induction if required
Kanwar et al. [110]/2014
Randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study
N = 15 
M/F = 8/7
Mean = 33 years
Mucocutaneous
Dexamethasone pulse therapy, AZA, Pred, IVIg, MMF
0.3–6 years
High dose grp: Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart = 7 pts; Low dose grp: Two infusions of 500 mg 2 wks apart = 8 pts
Ojami et al. [111]/2014
Case series
N = 14 
M/F = 7/7
30–75 (mean = 54.3)
Mucosal = 14;
MMF, AZA, Pred
NM
Two infusions of 1000 mg 2 wks apart; 375 mg/m2 BSA once weekly for 4 weeks
Author/year
Concomitant Rx
Duration to initial improvement in symptoms after Rtx
Follow up period
Outcome
Duration on medication (Rituximab and previous)a
PV Antibody titer changes after Rx (U ml−1)
Adverse effects
 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Salopek et al. [77]/2002
Pred 1 mg/kg daily
92 days after last infusion
After Rtx = 6.3 mo, total = 18.9 mo
PR occasional minor flare ups
18.9 mo. Rx continued with IVIg and CyclP at end of f/u
1:4000 to 0 at 5 mo after first infusion; and at 8 mo from 0 to 1:1000
NM
Cooper et al. [78]/2002
Pred, MMF
In 2 weeks after first infusion
After Rtx = 6 mo, total = 26 mo
PR. Clinical improvement
20 mo. Pred tapered over 3 mo; MMF d/c after 4 mo of start of therapy
IIF: No change in titer. Stable at 1:1280
NM
Espana et al. [79]/2003
Pred
6 weeks after first infusion
40 weeks
CR on
Duration on medication NM. Pred tapered; AZA d/c before Rtx infusion
Anti Dsg1: 77 to 7; Anti Dsg3: 160 to 90 at 28 wks., ICS = 1:160 to 1:10
NM
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
Pred, CyclP
4 wks after first infusion 95 % re-epithelization
After Rtx = 18 mo
CR on. Mean duration of medication use before taper to low dose was 18 mo
66 mo. Pred d/c 9 mo after Rtx; CyclP d/c 10 mo after Rtx
IIF: 1:2560 to 1:640 to 1:40 in 10 mo
NM
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
CyclP, IVIg, Pred
4 mo after last infusion—free of all lesions
After Rtx = 4 mo, total = 52 mo
Death in 5 mo after Rtx from Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
6 years. IVIg d/c before starting Rtx; Pred and Cyclp were not changed and contd at end of f/u
IIF: 1:320 to 1:160
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
Morrison et al. [80]/2004
CyclP
After last infusion and contd to improve over next 9 mo
After Rtx = 9 mo; total = 35 mo
PR
39 mo and CyclP d/c twice but restarted and contd at low doses at end of f/u
IIF: 1:2560 to 1:640 to 1:320
NM
Virgolini Marzocchi [25]/2007
Pred, CyclP
3 mo after last infusion complete healing of lesions
After Rtx = 10 mo; total = 130 mo
CR on within 3 mo of start of therapy
About 121 months.
NM
None
Wenzel et al. [81]/2004
Pred
Between second and sixth wk after last infusion
After Rtx = 3 mo
CR on
159 mo and Rx contd. With prednisone at end of f/u
IIF: 1:640 to 1:40
None
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Pred, AZA
third wk after first infusion improvement was noticed. second course due to worsening of lesions
After Rtx = 9.8 mo, total = 35 mo
No significant improvement
152 mo. Pred tapered by fifth mo after first infusion but increased again due to flare up and maintained
IIF: 1:500 to 1:200
Community acquired pneumonia after first course. None after second course
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Pred, MMF cyclosporine
First course: improvement from second wk after first infusion; second course: improvement in 3 wks after first infusion
After Rtx = 17 mo, total = 77 mo
CR within 4 mo after first course with a flare up at sixth mo; after second course CR on therapy at 6 mo of therapy
Pred tapered from week 10 after first infusion but increased again during second course due to flare up
IIF: first course: 1:200 to 0 in 2 mo to 1:500 in 11 mo
second course: 0 in 6 mo
Facial edema, P aeruginosa hip arthritis
Dupuy et al. [82]/2004
Pred
Clinical improvement observed from week 7 after starting Rtx infusion
After Rtx = 9 mo, total = 33 mo
CR on within third month after first Rtx infusion
30 mo and Pred tapered and contd. at sixth mo after Rtx therapy at end of f/u
IIF: 1:1600 to 1in 3 mo and 0 until end of F/U
NM
Kong et al. [83]/2005
Pred
Clinical improvement in 10 days after starting Rtx
After Rtx = 17 mo, total = 101 mo
CR off
Total duration on medication = 101 mo. 17 mo of Rtx therapy. Pred tapered over 2 wks after 10 days of remarkable improvement on Rtx therapy and d/c. But maintenance infusions of Rtx contd every 8–12 weeks at end of f/u
Anti Dsg 1: 1:2079 to 1:33 Anti Dsg3: 1:4616 to 1:564
NM
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Pred, MMF
NM
After Rtx = 24 mo; total = 120 mo
CR on
Medication given for 10 years and MMF continued at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1: 0–20
Anti Dsg3: 100 to 75 to 100 again
No serious events. Nausea, vomiting, chills or cough, facial edema
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Pred, MTX
NM
After Rtx = 10 mo; total = 46 mo
PR
Medication given for 46 mo and MTX + Pred contd at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1: 15 to 0 to 15
Anti Dsg3: 100 to 0
No serious events. Nausea, vomiting, chills or cough, facial edema
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Pred, MTX
NM
After Rtx = 10 mo; total = 46 mo
PR
Medication given for 46 mo and MTX + Pred contd at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1: 20 no change
Anti Dsg3: 100 to 75 to 100 again
No serious events. Nausea, vomiting, chills or cough, facial edema
Arin et al. [34]/2005
Pred, MMF
NM
After Rtx = 36 mo; total = 204 mo
CR on
Medication given for 17 years and Pred contd at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1: 200 to 100
Anti Dsg3: 175 to 8
No serious events. Nausea, vomiting, chills or cough, facial edema
Schmidt et al. [84]/2005
Pred, MMF, IVIg (after first and fourth infusion)
Improvement 10 wks after first infusion and CR in 9 mo
After Rtx = 24 mo; total = 54 mo
CR off
Medication given for 4.5 years. Pred and MMF d/c after 18 and 21 mo of starting Rtx therapy, respectively
Anti Dsg3 and Dsg1: 875 to 0 in 7 mo and stable at 0 after that
Hypergammaglobulinemia after 1st infusion
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Pred, MMF
PR after 6 mo of Rtx
After Rtx = 7 mo
PR
Medication given for 37 mo. MMF + Pred contd at end of f/u
ELISA: Anti Dsg3: 7708 to 517
None
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
AZA, Pred
PR after 3 mo of Rtx
After Rtx = 21 mo
PR
Medication given for 100 mo. AZA + Pred contd at end of f/u
ELISA: Anti Dsg3: 806 to 108
None
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
MMF, Pred
PR after 3 mo of Rtx
After Rtx = 9 mo
CR on
Medication given for 73 mo. MMF contd at end of f/u
ELISA: Anti Dsg3: 877 to 27
None
Schmidt et al. [85]/2006
Dexamethasone-cyclP pulse
PR after 3 mo of Rtx
After Rtx = 68 mo
CR off at 12 mo F/U
Rx d/c after 12 mo
ELISA: Anti Dsg3:222 to 0 Anti Dsg1:985 to 0
Bacterial pneumonia, pulmonary embolism
Ahmed et al. [86]/2006
NM
Within 3–6 wks (mean = 4 wks)
After Rtx = 15–37 mo; (mean 32.5 mo)
CR off = 9 within 7–9 wks after Rtx infusion between seventh and ninth infusion; R = 2 at 6 mo after tenth Rtx infusion and recent CR in 15 and 24 mo resp
Medication given for mean 50.6 mo (range = 31–225 mo) and prednisone continued at end of f/u
Antikeratinocyte antibodies: reduced from Mean 1:1280 (1:5120 to 1:320) to 1:40
None
Goh et al. [87]/2007
Pred, AZA, MMF, cyclosporine
Clinical response ranged between 2 and 8 mo
After Rtx = 13–18 mo
CR off = 1 CR on = 2 PD = 2; CR within 13–18 mo after start of Rtx therapy
Medication given for 2–114 mo. Rx d/c after 13 mo of start of therapy in CR off pt
IIF: 1:1280, 1:60,1:10, to 0 in 16 to 18 mo after Rtx in all 5 pts
Transient fatigue in 3 pts, neutropenia, community acquired pneumonia
Marzano et al. [88]/2007
Pred
Pt 1: 2 wks after last rtx infusion. Pt 2: 5 mo after last Rtx infusion. Pt 3: 3 mo after first Rtx infusion, total 6 Rtx infusions for third pt
Pt 1: 24 mo;
Pt 2: 21 mo;
Pt 3: 2 mo
Pt 1: CR on;
Pt 2: PR;
Pt 3:MR (minimal response)
Medication given for 8 years (Pt1), 6.8 years (Pt2), 4.2 years (Pt3) and Rx continued in all patients at end of f/u
Pt1: Anti Dsg1—125 to 0; Anti Dsg3—175 to 125. Pt2: Anti Dsg1—50 to 0; Anti Dsg3—225 to 25 at end of F/U. Pt3: NM
Facial edema, chills, precordial pain only in first and second infusion
Antonucci et al. [89]/2007
Pred
Pt1: 2 wks after last rtx infusion; Pt2: 4 wks after last Rtx infusion. Pt3: 3 wks afterlast Rtx infusion Pt4: 8 wks after first Rtx infusion Pt5: 5 wks after last Rtx infusion
After Rtx = 11–13 mo
Pt 1: R after 12 mo of CR; CR off again after second cycle of Rtx with no relapse
Pt2: CR off in 4 weeks after Rtx therapy Pt3: CR on Pt4: CR off in 12 mo after Rtx therapy Pt5: CR on
Pt1: 6–7 years. Pred d/c 1 mo after end of Rtx therapy. Pt2: 4.1 years. Pred tapered and d/c after 1 mo of Rtx. Pt 3: 4.1 years. Pred tapered and contd. Pt4: 8 years. Pred d/c in 10 weeks Pt5: 3.2 years
ELISA: Anti Dsg 3: Pt1: 200 to 60 in 24 mo Pt2: 200 to 55 in 24 mo Pt3: 200 to 60 in 24 mo Pt4: 180 to 175 in 48 mo Pt5: 200 to 100 in 24 mo
None
Cianchini et al. [90]/2007
Pred, AZA, CyclP
NM
16–18 mo
CR on within 6 mo after Rtx infusion = 2
CR on within 2 mo after Rtx infusion = 2
CR on within 1 mo after Rtx infusion = 2
CR on within 1 yr after Rtx infusion = 2
PR within 6 mo after Rtx infusion = 2
Medication given for 1.1–9.1 years. Prednisone maintenance dose continued in all patients at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1:
Pt1:125-0 in 18 mo Pt2: stable at 0
Pt3: 175-10 in 12 mo
Pt4: 150-0 in 12 mo
Pt5: 200-100 in 12 mo Pt6: 240-140 in 6 mo pt7: 260-75 in 6 mo Pt8: 250-0 in 6 mo Pt9: 210-75 in 6 Pt10: 25-0 in 6 mo Anti Dsg3: Pt1: 290-75 in 18 mo Pt2: 175-0 in 18 mo Pt3: 120-0 in 15 mo Pt4: 140-25 in 15 mo Pt5: 120-25 in 15 mo Pt6: 200-50 in 6 mo Pt7: 150-0 in 6 mo Pt8: 100-25 in 6 mo Pt9: 200-50 in 6 mo Pt10: 140-60 in 6 mo
Tachycardia in one patient
Joly et al. [91]/2007
Prednisone in all but 3 pts
NM
26–45 mo (mean = 34 mo)
CR on = 14 PV pts within 3 mo in 12 pts; within 6 mo in 1 pt; within 12 mo in 1 pt
R in 6 pts after a mean of 18.9 mo. CR at end of F/U in 18/21 pts with PV and PF
Medication given for (range = 4–213 mo) mean 52.1 mo. Corticosteroids tapered by 10 % twice a month after Rtx started controlling disease. 8/21 pts with PV and PF d/c Rx
Reduction in 9/14 pts with CR. High titers even on CR in 5 pts
Headache, asthenia, fever, chills, nausea, pyelonephritis
Shimanovich et al. [92]/2007
PAIA, IVIg
Within 4 weeks of Rx
13–30 mo
2 pts failed to show improvement with Rtx who improved on subsequent IVIg; CR on = 4; CR off = 1 within 6 mo of start of therapy
Medication given for 6 mo up to 106 mo Rx d/c within 6 mo of start of therapy in CR off pt
ELISA: Anti Dsg1: Negative in all 5 pts at end of F/U
Anti Dsg3:
Pt1: 465-neg in 27 mo Pt2: 1179-40 in 30 mo Pt3: 1170-44 in 21 mo Pt4: 257-neg in 13 mo Pt5: 230-23 in 27 mo
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, deep venous thrombosis, P. carinii pneumonia. Resolved with appropriate management
Eming et al. [93]/2008
Prednisone
Within 6 mo after Rtx therapy
>12 mo in 10 pts. 3 mo in 1 pt
Between 6 and 12 mo of Rtx therapy CR on = 8 and R = 3
Pred tapered acc to clinical response. MMF or AZA given for 6 mo after Rtx and tapered acc to clinical remission
Anti Dsg3 IgG:
100 to 25 in 12 mo in 8 CR pts
60 to 25 in 6 mo to 75 in 12 mo in 3 R pts
NM
Faurschou and Gniadecki [94]/2008
Pred, MMF
6 wks after first Rtx infusion
6 mo after second course
CR on after second course which was 6 mo after first course
Medication given for 3.8 years. Pred tapered, MMF continued at end of f/u
IIF: 1:1280 to 1:640
NM
Faurschou and Gniadecki [94]/2008
Pred
3 wks after first Rtx infusion
Total = 4 years
CR on after second course which was 6 mo after first course
Medication given for 4 years. Pred tapered, MMF continued at end of f/u
NM
NM
Pfutze et al. [95]/2009
Pred, MMF
1 mo and 6 mo after Rtx therapy in 4 and 1 pt resp. And improved over 12 mo
After Rtx = 12 mo
CR on = 5 within 12 mo of start of therapy
Pred tapered and d/c by 12 mo. MMF continued at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1:40 ± 9.5 % to 6.1 ± 11.5 % in 12 mo
Anti Dsg3:44 ± 34.7 % to 8.3 ± 22.1 % in 12 mo
NM
Fuertes et al. [96]/2010
None
1 mo after start of Rtx therapy
After Rtx = 18 mo; total = 16 years
CR off started within 6 mo of start of Rtx therapy. No relapse
No other drugs other than Rtx
Anti Dsg1: reduced to 2U/ml. Anti Dsg3: reduced to 11 U/ml
None
Kasperkiewicz et al. [97]/2011
PAIA, AZA, MMF, dexamethasone pulses
Mean 2.7 wks after therapy
11–43 mo; mean = 29 mo
PR = 2; MD = 1; CR on = 8; CR off = 6; R before CR = 4. CR within mean 8.4 mo
Medication given for 3–183 mo. d/c of Rx in 6 CR off pts in 6–39 mo. Rx continued in rest others at end of f/u
Anti Dsg 1 and 3: Mean: 100 to 0 at last testing of F/U
NM
Craythorne et al. [98]/2011
Immunosuppressant
NM
20–35 mo
CR off = 6 within 5–20 weeks of start of therapy
Medication given for 1 mo to 13.2 years Immunosuppressant withdrawn
NM
Nausea, cough, chills
Kasperkiewicz et al. [99]/2011
AZA, CyclP, MMF, Pred, Dexamethasone, clobetasol propionate, IVIg, PAIA
NM
12–59 mo/mean = 24.9 mo
CR off = 6 within 12–59 mo(mean 18.6 mo); CR on = 1 within 26–28 mo(mean 5.4 mo); PR = 1 within 27 mo; R in 9–24 mo after first Rtx infusion before CR = 4
Medication given for 3–99 mo. Rx d/c in 12 mo in 3 CR off pts. Rx contd in others at end of f/u
Anti Dsg1 and 3: Decreased by 49–100 % (mean 90 %) at end of F/U
Dyspnea, hypotonia, vomiting
Kim et al. [100]/2011
NM
4 wks after last Rtx infusion
3–43 mo; mean = 15.7 mo
CR off = 16 within 186 days; PR = 5 within 135 days; R = 8 within 11.5 mo F/U in pts with 2 Rtx infusions. Death = 1
Medication given for 3 mo to 71 mo.
Anti Dsg1: 176.2–18.9
Anti Dsg3: 189.2–66.3
None
Reguiai et al. [101]/2011
Prednisone
Within 3 mo after Rtx cycle.
After Rtx = 12–71 mo (mean = 41 mo); total = 81 mo
CR on minimal therapy for mean 27 mo after last Rtx cycle = 4; CR under Pred 3 mo after last Rtx cycle = 1. CR off, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 31 mo after last Rtx cycle = 4
Pred discontinued 12 mo after last Rtx cycle
Moderate to high titers of Abs even though pts were in CR in 6/9 pts
None
Horvath et al. [102]/2011
Mycophenolic acid, AZA, Pred, MMF
Within 2–24 weeks (median = 7 weeks)
32–152 weeks (mean = 94)
PR on = 4; PR off = 2; CR on = 3; CR off = 3; R = 5 (CR within 36 wks after re-treatment). CR in median 51 wks, PR in 34.5 median wks
Medication given for 2–13.5 years. Rx d/c in CR off pts at 39–64 weeks
Anti Dsg3: Decreased in all but Relapsed pts. Anti Dsg1: 5 pts with positive titers before Rx showed decrease. *One pt with CR off had high titers throughout the Rx period
Nausea, fatigue, neutropenia, sepsis, herpes zoster, flu like symptoms
Feldman et al. [103]/2011
IVIg
NM
Long term CR pts = 29.6 ± 11.2 mo; R = 40 ± 7 mo
Long term CR pts off = 11; R = 8 (total 15 relapses) retreatment in R grp lead to long term CR
Pred and immunosuppressive agents tapered and d/c long before Rtx therapy ended
Anti Dsg1 levels increased during relapse in pts with mucocutaneous lesions
NM
Leshem et al. [104]/2012
Pred, AZA, MMF
Mean within 4 mo of first Rtx cycle
Mean = 18 ± 12 mo
No Remission = 4. PR on = 5; PR off = 2; CR on = 15; CR off = 19; CR in median time of 1–4 mo after start of therapy
Medications given for 0–181 mo. d/c in few months after achieving CR
NM
Infusion reaction with first Rtx infusion cycle which could be managed well
Cianchini et al. [37]/2012
Pred
NM
12–51 mo (mean = 26.5 mo)
PR = 6; CR on = 7; CR off = 29; (CR within 30–150 days, mean = 70 days); R = 20 within 8–64 mo (CR in all PR and R pts with additional 500 mg infusion of Rtx 6 mo after initial infusion)
Medications given for 1–14 years. Immunosuppressant d/c with start of Rtx therapy. Pred tapered gradually
NM
None
Lunardon et al. [105]/2012
Pred, AZA, MMF, Dapsone, CyclP, MTX, IVIg
NM
12–80 mo
PR on = 7; PR off = 3; CR on = 3; CR off = 11; CR in mean 19 mo
Medication given for 3–251 mo. Concomitant drugs d/c after first Rtx infusion
Data of only 10 pts available. Titer decreased by median—80 %
Perirectal phlegmon and intrapelvic abscesses in one pt
Kasperkiewicz and Eming et al. [106]/2012
Pred, AZA, MMF, MTX,PAIA, IVIg
NM
1–37 mo (mean = 11)
No response = 2; PR = 11; CR on = 20
Medications given for 0.1–16.6 years
Anti Dsg1: returned to normal in 14/24 pts
Anti Dsg3: returned to normal in 11/32 pts
Infusion related reactions, allergic reactions and infections
Balighi et al. [107]/2013
Pred
1–20 week. At mean 6.35 weeks
3–46 mo. (mean = 12 mo)
Initial PR = 21, CR on = 19, R = 21 in mean 8 mo
Final, CR = 40 within mean 10.13 mo (between 0.5 and 23 mo) after start of therapy
Medication given for 3–46 mo after starting Rituximab. Duration on medication before Rituximab: NM. All immunosuppressant d/c 1 week prior to start of Rtx therapy. Pred tapered gradually as per improvement
NM
Lung abscess, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, generalized arthralgia, Steven Johnson’s syndrome
Kanwar et al. [108]/2013
Pred in 8 pts, P + MMF in one pt
Within 5 weeks (5–12 weeks)
24–48 weeks. (Mean = 33.4 weeks)
Death due to sepsis = 1; PR on = 2; CR on = 3; CR off = 3; CR within mean 8 weeks after start of therapy
Medications given for 2–21 mo. D/c in 8 weeks in CR off pts
ELISA Index values: Anti Dsg1: Pt1: 1372-0.12 Pt2: 327-0.73; Pt3: 34.69- 10.01; Pt3: 32.55-2.2; Pt4: 1517.2-23.05; Pt5: 95.7-0; Pt6: 117.3-14.15.
Anti Dsg3: Pt1:888-42; Pt2: 872-82; pt3: 1162-3; pt4: 124-132; Pt5: 63-0.97; Pt6: 25-0; pt7: 839-138
Infusion related angioedema and sepsis
Kolesnik et al. [109]/2014
PAIA, Pred, AZA, Dapsone
Within first 4 weeks of therapy
0–45 mo (mean = 22 mo)
PR = 1; CR on = 4, mean duration of therapy use before taper to low dose was 3 to 12.5 mo; CR off = 1, mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 34 mo, No relapse. CR within 6.6 mo after first Rtx infusion
Medications given for 1–252 mo
Anti Dsg1: decreased by 3–85 %
Anti Dsg3: decreased by 0.3–107 %
None
Heelan et al. [35]/2014
Prednisone, immunosuppressant agents
NM
45–78 mo (mean = 51 mo)
PR on = 2; CR on = 26; CR off = 64; mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 51 mo with multiple R transformed into CR on retreatment. Median time to R = 15 mo
Medications given for 0–334 mo
NM
No serious events. Infusion reactions
Kanwar et al. [110]/2014
AZA
Within 4–16 weeks
48 weeks
PR = all 15 pts in 4 to 24 wks; R in 4 high dose grp pt and 7 low dose grp pt in 32–36 wks of therapy; CR off = all 15 pts mean duration of f/u after d/c of medication was 4–40 wks subsequent to PR without relapse
Medications given for 0.3 to 7 years. All Immunosuppressant agents d/c 4 weeks prior to Rtx therapy
ELISA Index values: High Dose grp:
Anti Dsg1: 400 to 150 in 48 wks; Anti Dsg3: 90 to 20 in 48 wks
Low dose grp:
Anti Dsg1: 310 to 60 in 48 wks
Anti Dsg3: 180 to 70 in 48 wks
Mild Infusion reaction, upper respiratory infection, diarrhea, striae, acneiform eruptions
Ojami et al. [111]/2014
MMF, Pred
Within 3 mo
NM
R = 1; Controlled (PR) = 9 within 3–24 mo after start of therapy; CR on = 4 within 24–36 mo of start of therapy
Medications given for 0.4–10 years. Pred tapered to 10 mg/day
NM
Post infusion febrile reaction
Rtx rituximab, Pred prednisone, AZA azathioprine, IVIg intravenous immunoglobulin, CyclP cyclophosphamide, Pl plasmapheresis, MTX methotrexate, CR off complete remission off therapy, CR on complete remission on therapy, PR partial remission, PR on partial remission on therapy, PR off partial remission off therapy, CI (PR) clinical Improvement (PR) on doses greater than minimal therapy, R relapse, NR no response, F/U follow-up, d/c discontinue, mo months, d days, pts patients, NM not mentioned, IIF indirect immunofluorescence, ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, Dsg1 and Dsg3 desmoglein 1 and 3
aDuration on medication included the time period on medication prior to the start of follow-up to this paper
Definitions for some of the terms relating to treatment outcomes listed in the tables are described in a consensus statement published in 2008 [10] as follows:
Complete remission off therapy: Absence of new and/or established lesions while the patient is off all systemic therapy for at least 2 months.
Complete remission on therapy: Absence of new or established lesions while the patient is receiving minimal therapy.
Minimal therapy: Less than, or equal to, 10 mg/day of prednisone (or the equivalent) and/or minimal adjuvant therapy for at least 2 months.
Minimal adjuvant therapy: Half of the dose required to be defined as treatment failure.
Failure of therapy: Failure to control disease activity (i.e., relapse/flare) with full therapeutic doses of systemic treatments.
Partial remission off therapy: Presence of transient new lesions that heal within 1 week without treatment and while the patient is off all systemic therapy for at least 2 months.
Partial remission on minimal therapy: Presence of transient new lesions that heal within 1 week while the patient is receiving minimal therapy, including topical steroids [10].
However not all papers included in this review have described their specific definition for these terms. If these terms were mentioned in the publication, we have listed them in the tables as mentioned in the publication.
This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Results

Corticosteroids (CS)

Since the time of their approval in the 1950s, corticosteroids have been the mainstay of treatment of PV.

Mechanism of Action

Corticosteroids have strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. They affect almost every aspect of the immune system. They are potent inhibitors of NFkappa B activation and have effects on leukocyte movement, leukocyte function, and humoral factors. In addition they have inhibitory effects on many known cytokines [11].
The first case series on corticosteroid use in PV was published in 1972.
The publications reporting use of corticosteroids in PV are summarized in Table 1. This table includes papers that had systemic corticosteroids as the primary medication used. Topical steroids were also used in many of the reports. In addition, adjuvant drugs were added in most cases. These adjuvants included azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, dapsone, gold, levamisole, cyclosporine, and mycophenolate. Adjuvants were usually administered one at a time; however, they were changed when lack of response was noted, and therefore some patients had multiple adjuvants used sequentially over the period of treatment.

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

Seventeen case series were found, with the number of cases included in the individual papers ranging from 4 to 1111 cases (a total of 1704 patients were included in the 17 case series, of which 1681 had PV and 23 had either pemphigus foliaceous, pemphigus vegetans, or pemphigus erythematous). Six case reports describing single patients, one prospective cohort study (n = 74), two randomized controlled trials (n = 20 and n = 120), and five retrospective cohort studies (n = 15, n = 16, n = 23, n = 32, and n = 154) are summarized in the Table 1. In all, the total number of cases in these 31 publications was 2164 out of which 2141 were PV patients, and the rest had pemphigus foliaceous or pemphigus vegetans or pemphigus erythematous. These 31 reports originated from the USA, Israel, Iran, Sri Lanka, India, Scotland, Italy, Greece, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Singapore and Turkey.
Age at initial diagnosis of PV in these publications ranged from 4 to 89 years.

Medication Use

Prednisone and prednisolone were the most commonly used corticosteroids. Starting doses ranged from 15 to 180 mg prednisone equivalent daily in all but one of the reports where doses as high as 400 mg daily were used [12, 13].

Duration of PV Before Corticosteroids Were Started

This ranged from 0.15 months to 6 years.

Duration of Total Follow-up

Duration of total clinical follow-up of the individual patients ranged from 9 months to 22 years.

Duration Before Any Clinical Improvement Was Noted

Seven publications reported on the duration before any clinical improvement after the start of corticosteroids was apparent, and this ranged from 3 days to 19 weeks [1420].

Duration to Start of Taper of Corticosteroids

Information regarding tapering of corticosteroids was reported in seven publications. The duration before the start of taper of corticosteroids ranged from 0.5 to 12 months in these seven publications comprising of 156 patients.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off Therapy)

Duration to complete remission on therapy was reported in 15 articles, and ranged from 1.5 to 42 months (3.5 years), in 797 patients.
Duration to complete remission off therapy was reported in 15 articles, and ranged from 4 to 120 months (10 years) in 321 patients.

Remission

Of a total of 2141 patients reported on in Table 1, at the end of follow-up 97 patients had achieved partial remission on therapy, 797 patients had achieved complete remission on therapy, and 321 patients had achieved complete remission off therapy. A total of 485 patients were still being treated at the time of publication, 156 patients were lost to follow-up, death occurred in 177 patients, and 47 patients were classified as non-responders and referred elsewhere for treatment.

Duration of Medication Use

Total duration of medication use for all reported patients including those still on therapy at the time of publication ranged from 1.5 to 240 months (20 years).

Follow-up Duration After Discontinuation of Medications

Follow-up ranged from 2 to 156 months (13 years) after discontinuation of treatment in the 321 patients with complete remission off therapy, during which time there was no recurrence.

Mortality

Death occurred in a total of 177 of 2141 patients (8.26 %) with PV in all reports. These included deaths from all causes. Of these, the reports published between 1970 and 1980 included 127 patients with 61 deaths (48.03 %), between 1981 and 1990 included 183 patients with 26 deaths (14.2 %), between 1991 and 2000 included 190 patients with 7 deaths (3.6 %), and those published between 2001 and 2010 included 1589 patients with 83 deaths (5.2 %).

Adverse Effects

Adverse effects from corticosteroids reported in these papers included Cushingoid symptoms, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, hypertension, insomnia, GI upset, increased weight, candidiasis, tuberculosis, mood change, abnormal liver function test, fungal and viral infection, fatigue, acute psychosis, hyperglycemia, electrolyte imbalance, hypocalcemia, acidosis, hyperkalemia, phlebitis, herpes simplex, hyperlipidemia, bone marrow depression, cataract, and myopathy.

Azathioprine (AZA)

Azathioprine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1968 as an immunosuppressant to prevent organ transplant rejection.

Mechanism of Action

This drug restricts synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins by inhibiting metabolism of purine. It also interferes with cellular metabolism and mitosis [8].

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

The studies reporting use of AZA in PV are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Of the 31 papers in Table 1, 17 had included azathioprine as one of the treatment modalities. Table 2 includes only those publications that reported on comparative analyses of outcomes for patients on prednisone alone vs. those on prednisone in combination with azathioprine. The first case series on use of AZA in PV was published in 1986.
One randomized double blind controlled study (n = 56) and two retrospective cohort studies (n = 48 and n = 36) are summarized in Table 2. In all, a total of 140 patients were included in these three reports.
Age at initial diagnosis of PV in these publications ranged from 16 to 83 years.

Medication Use

The dosage of azathioprine used was 40 mg/day up to 3 mg/kg/day in all reports. Prednisone was used concomitantly with azathioprine in all reports. Azathioprine was added at the onset of treatment in the three reports in Table 2 and sometime after onset of corticosteroid use in the reports in Table 1.

Duration of PV Before Azathioprine Was Started in the Reports Summarized in Table 2

This ranged from 4 to 10 months.

Duration of Follow-up in the Reports Summarized in Table 2

Duration of clinical follow-up of the individual patients on azathioprine in these reports ranged from 12 months to 10 years.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off therapy) for the Azathioprine Plus Prednisone Group in Table 2

Duration to complete remission on therapy was reported in three articles and, ranged from 6 to 12 months, in 67 patients.
Duration to complete remission off therapy was reported in two articles and, ranged from 6 to 12 months, in eight patients.
Patients on prednisone and azathioprine had better responses as compared to patients on prednisone alone, with more patients achieving remission, and with fewer side effects.

Remission

Of a total of 140 patients, at the end of follow-up 11 patients had achieved partial remission and mean duration to achieve that was 234.4 days, 67 patients had achieved complete remission on therapy, and eight patients had achieved complete remission off therapy. Six patients were still being treated at the time of publication. No response was seen in 17 patients. Treatment failed in five patients. Death occurred in 13 patients and 13 patients were lost to follow-up.

Adverse Effects Reported in Table 2

Adverse effects in patients on azathioprine and corticosteroids reported in these publications included leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, hepatotoxicity, hypertension, gastrointestinal problems, lethargy, weight gain, muscle weakness, adrenal suppression, alopecia, and rash-like skin disorders.

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)

Mycophenolate Mofetil was approved by the FDA in 1995 as an immunosuppressant to prevent organ transplant rejection.

Mechanism of Action

After oral administration, mycophenolate is absorbed rapidly and then gets converted to the active metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA). This active metabolite inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase selectively and hence inhibits de novo pathway of purine synthesis in T and B cells, which results in inhibition of T and B cell proliferation [20].
Publications reporting use of MMF as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in PV were included in Table 1. Additional papers which have reported on the use of mycophenolate in patients with refractory PV (previous treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine was unsuccessful in achieving remission) are summarized in Table 3. Of 31 papers in Table 1, three had included MMF as one of the treatment modalities.

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

The first case series on use of MMF in PV patients was published in 1999.
Four case series were included, with the number of cases included in the individual papers ranging from 9 to 31 cases (a total of 64 patients in four case series); two were case reports describing single patients and two were randomized prospective trials (n = 94 and n = 21, respectively). One additional randomized clinical trial enrolled both PV and PF patients [n = 36 (PV) + 11 (PF); results were not reported separately for the PV and PF patients in this study] and one retrospective analysis (n = 18) is summarized in the tables. The total number of patients treated with MMF in these 10 reports was 247.
Age at initial diagnosis of PV in these publications ranged from 6 to 78 years.

Medication Use and Duration of PV Before MMF Was Started

Medication use and duration of PV before MMF was started ranged from 1 month to 14 years. During this period patients were on a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine. At the time mycophenolate was added, the azathioprine was discontinued; however, the patients continued to be on corticosteroids. One publication (Powell et al.) reported on patients in whom multiple medications like methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, IVIg, dapsone, gold, thalidomide, and minocycline along with azathioprine and corticosteroids were tried prior to addition of mycophenolate [21].
The starting dosage of mycophenolate mofetil used was 2–3 g/day in all reports.

Duration of Follow-up

Duration of clinical follow-up of the individual patients after the start of MMF therapy ranged from 5 to 130 months.

Duration Before Any Clinical Improvement Was Noted

First improvement in lesions was noted after 2–24 weeks after addition of mycophenolate to the existing medication regimen.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off Therapy) After Addition of MMF

Duration to complete remission on therapy was reported in six articles and, ranged from 2 to 16 months, in 104 patients.
Duration to complete remission off therapy was reported in one article and, ranged from 24 to 36 months, in 17 patients.

Remission

Of a total of 247 patients, 104 patients achieved complete remission on therapy and 17 patients achieved complete remission off therapy. A total of 76 patients achieved partial remission, and the duration to achieve that ranged from 129 to 150 days after the start of therapy. Failure of MMF was mentioned in four reports (N = 176) in 18 patients who were referred for treatment with rituximab or IVIg. Two patients were still being treated at the time of publication, 29 patients were lost to follow-up or withdrawn from study, and death occurred in one patient.

Adverse Effects

Adverse effects in patients on mycophenolate and corticosteroids reported in these publications included gastrointestinal problems, myalgia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia, which were the most common side effects reported. Headache, increased fasting blood glucose level, and hypertension, nausea, depression, pyrexia, redistribution of body fat, eye disease, weight gain, fatigue, and arthralgia were also reported.
In the one publication where enteric coated mycophenolate sodium was used, the side effects reported were headache and increased fasting blood glucose level.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg)

IVIg was approved by the FDA for primary immune deficiency in 1952 [22].

Mechanism of Action

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are obtained from a plasma pool of thousands of donors [22].
These immunoglobulins neutralize and slow down the production of circulating pemphigus antibodies [23].

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

The studies reporting use of IVIg in PV are summarized in Table 4. The first case series on IVIg in PV was published in 2002.
One case series (n = 6), two case reports describing single patients, and one randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial (n = 40) are summarized in Table 4, with a total of 48 patients included in these four papers. These reports included patients previously treated with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, and methotrexate without adequate response, prior to start of IVIg.
Age at initial diagnosis of PV in these publications ranged from 41 to 78 years.

Medication Use

The dosage of IVIg used was 400 mg/kg/day for 5 days followed by long- or short-term single doses of 400 mg/kg/day every 6 weeks for 6 months to 1 year. Concomitant drugs mainly used were corticosteroids in the published studies.

Duration of PV Before IVIg Was Started

This ranged from 2 months to 5 years.

Duration of Total Follow-up

Duration of total clinical follow-up of the individual patients ranged from 2 months to 2 years.

Duration Before Any Clinical Improvement Was Noted

First improvement in lesions was reported within 2–3 weeks of first IVIg infusion in all 48 patients.

Duration to Start of Taper of Corticosteroids

Only one case series of six patients described the duration to the start of taper of corticosteroids and only mentioned that the median time was 16 days after the start of IVIg infusions.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off Therapy)

This information was not available from the publications. However, all reports discussed improvement in all patients treated with IVIg; in six patients this was achieved within 3 weeks and in 29 patients within 3–12 months. Thirteen patients in the placebo group had no improvement.

Adverse Effects in Patients on IVIg Reported in Table 4

Headache, abdominal discomfort, nausea, constipation, lymphopenia, hepatitis C, and palpitations.

Methotrexate

Methotrexate was approved by the FDA for psoriasis in 1971 and for rheumatoid arthritis in 1988.

Mechanism of Action

Methotrexate inhibits the metabolism of folic acid and is used as a chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive agent. Methotrexate allosterically inhibits dihydrofolate reductase, which plays a role in tetrahydrofolate synthesis. As folic acid is essential for normal cell growth and replication, methotrexate is effective against malignant cell growth and has anti-inflammatory effects [24].

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

The studies reporting use of methotrexate in PV are summarized in Table 5. The first case series on MTX in PV was published in 1969.
Publications reporting use of methotrexate in PV were included in Table 1 (7 of 31 papers included methotrexate), and additional papers that reported on the use of methotrexate as the initial adjunctive treatment to corticosteroids are summarized in Table 5.
Six case series were included, with the number of cases included in the individual papers ranging from 3 to 53 cases (total of 121 patients in six case series), and one retrospective cohort study (n = 30) are summarized in the tables. In all, a total of 151 patients treated with MTX are reported in seven studies.
Age at initial diagnosis of PV in these publications ranged from 20 to 83 years.

Medication Use

The dosage of MTX used in these publications ranged from 12.5 to 150 mg/week. Concomitant drug used along with methotrexate was prednisone.

Duration of PV Before Methotrexate Was Started

This ranged from 11 months to 7 years.

Duration of Follow-up

Duration of clinical follow-up of the individual patients after the start of MTX ranged from 5 to 15 years.

Duration Before Any Clinical Improvement Was Noted

First improvement in lesions was reported within 1–30 weeks after the start of methotrexate therapy.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off Therapy)

Duration to complete remission on therapy was reported in six articles and, ranged from 1 to 30 weeks, in 51 patients.
Duration to complete remission off therapy was reported in one article and, ranged from 3 months to 8 years, in 14 patients.

Remission

Of a total of 151 patients, at the end of follow-up, 56 patients had achieved partial remission and the duration to achieve that was within 6 months after the start of MTX therapy; 51 patients had achieved complete remission on therapy; and 14 patients had achieved complete remission off therapy. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. Treatment was not effective in nine patients. Death unrelated to MTX occurred in six patients.

Adverse Effects in Patients on MTX Reported in Table 5

Nausea, leukopenia, GI upset, fatigue, bacterial infection, bronchopneumonia, septicemia, necrotizing gingivitis, diarrhea, and pyoderma.

Rituximab

Rituximab was approved in 1997 by the FDA to treat B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and in 2006 to treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Mechanism of Action

Rituximab is a human–mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody to CD20 antigen on B cells. CD20 is a membrane protein that is involved in activation and proliferation of B cell [25].

Publication Type, Patient Profiles, and Sample Sizes

The studies reporting use of rituximab in PV are summarized in Table 6. The first case series on PV treated by rituximab was published in 2002.
Publications which have reported on the use of rituximab in patients with refractory PV (previous treatment with corticosteroids, azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, IVIg, and cyclophosphamide were unsuccessful in achieving remission) are summarized in Table 6.
Nineteen case series were included, with the number of cases included in the individual papers ranging from 3 to 84 cases (total of 339 patients in 19 case series), 24 were case reports describing single patients, three open label pilot studies (n = 5, n = 9, and n = 17), one randomized prospective trial (n = 15), two retrospective analysis (n = 25 and n = 19), and one phase 2 clinical trial (n = 40) are summarized in the tables. In all, a total of 493 patients were treated with rituximab.
Age of patients treated with rituximab for PV in these publications ranged from 15 to 86.

Medication Use

The dosage of rituximab used was 375 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) once weekly for 4 weeks or two infusions of 1000 mg at 2 weeks apart. Previously failed treatments before rituximab were prednisone, MMF, AZA, IVIg, MTX, dapsone, CyclP, plasmapheresis, protein A immunoadsorption, cyclosporine, dexamethasone, and gold. Concomitant drug used was prednisone, MMF, AZA, and IVIg.

Duration of PV Before Rituximab Was Started

This ranged from 1 months to 23 years.

Duration of Follow-up

Duration of clinical follow-up of the individual patients after the start of rituximab therapy ranged from 6 to 80 months.

Duration Before Any Clinical Improvement Was Noted

First improvement in lesions was reported within 2 weeks to 8 months after the first rituximab infusion.

Duration to Complete Remission (On and Off Therapy)

Duration to complete remission on therapy was reported in 32 articles and, ranged from 1 to 36 months, in 184 patients.
Duration to complete remission off therapy was reported in 22 articles and, ranged from 2 to 59 months, in 229 patients.

Remission

Of a total of 493 patients reported in Table 6, at the end of follow-up, 80 patients had achieved partial remission, and duration to achieve that ranged from 3 to 27 months; 184 patients achieved complete remission on therapy; and 229 patients achieved complete remission off therapy. Death due to sepsis occurred in three patients. Relapses were seen in nine patients. No response to rituximab was seen in 11 patients. However, these patients had response after addition of IVIg or additional cycles of rituximab.

Adverse Effects in Patients on Rituximab Reported in Table 6

Local pain, nausea, cough, chills, sepsis, and angioedema related to infusion.

Other Medications

Other Less Commonly Used Adjuvants from Studies Listed in Table 1

Gold salts These are widely used in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Their action is related to their T cell-mediated immunosuppressive properties [23].
Plasmapheresis This is used for removing antibodies from the circulation. Reduction in antibodies triggers production of new antibodies as a result of a feedback mechanism [23].
Immunoadsorption With plasmapheresis protective immunoglobulins, albumin, and clotting factors are removed along with harmful pemphigus antibodies. Immunoadsorption selectively traps the harmful pemphigus antibodies through the sulfhydryl filtering membrane. Thus, protective antibodies and plasma components are returned [23].
Cyclophosphamide It has been widely used in the treatment of cancer and also as an immunosuppressant. This drug is converted in the liver to its active metabolites aldophosphamide and phosphoramide mustard. These bind to DNA and inhibit its replication, which leads to cell death. It can be given orally as well as intravenously. One report described cyclophosphamide use in seven patients for treating PV in combination with corticosteroids and azathioprine [26].
Nicotinamide and tetracycline These were used as steroid-sparing agent in combination with corticosteroids and azathioprine in one study of six patients with PV. Their mechanism of action is unclear [27].

Discussion

In this paper, we have summarized the published literature on the management of PV. The published papers were mostly case reports, case series, observational studies, and only eight randomized controlled trials.
As a result of the relative rarity of pemphigus, published randomized trials are limited, which makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens in this disease. This also precludes conduct of a meta-analysis. A Cochrane review published in 2009 concluded that “there is inadequate information available at present to ascertain the optimal therapy for pemphigus vulgaris” [28]. While this remains the case, a summary of the literature provides information on disease course and prognosis as well as medication options, treatment responses, and side effects, which are of relevance to clinicians who treat this disease and patients who suffer from it.
The treatment options for PV have increased over the years. The early publications from the 1970s reported use of high corticosteroid doses over prolonged intervals and significant associated side effects. Later reports on PV management described use of corticosteroids along with steroid-sparing adjuvants, which allows a reduction in the total dose of corticosteroids used over the course of the treatment with a reduction in observed morbidity. The more commonly used steroid-sparing medications in the published reports include azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil. More recently, IVIg and rituximab have been used, mainly in patients with recalcitrant PV.
Overall, the mortality and morbidity from PV and the medications used in its treatment are considerably lower in the more recent publications than in the early reports.
The reported treatment response in patients with PV has varied significantly. Prognostic factors that have been identified include initial severity and extent of disease, with higher severity being predictive of poorer prognosis. [29]. Perhaps related to this is the fact that early initiation of treatment before the disease becomes too severe or widespread has been associated with improved prognosis [30, 31]. Once treatment is initiated, good initial response to treatment has also been found to be indicative of a better prognosis [32].
Most reports described medication courses of long duration before remission off therapy was achieved (between 5 and 10 years in the majority of patients with the range across all studies being 3 months to 27 years). However, Herbst and Bystryn described a group of 40 patients in whom 10 (25 %) patients achieved complete and long-lasting remission within 2 years of treatment; a subgroup of patients with PV, with a mild course of the disease requiring short courses of systemic medications or topical medication alone to induce remission [5, 32, 33]; and at the other extreme a subgroup that is resistant to treatment and required high doses and prolonged therapy have also been described [29, 32, 35].
The role of baseline laboratory tests, such as quantification of antibodies as predictors of disease course, has not been established. A recent study reported that a higher level of anti-Dsg1 autoantibodies (≥100 U/mL) at diagnosis was associated with poorer prognosis in univariate analyses; however, this did not remain significant after adjustment for age [36].
Periodic antibody titers measured by indirect immunofluorescence or ELISA testing have not consistently shown correlation with clinical activity of PV [37]. Most authors in the listed papers reported using clinical response alone to guide medication taper.
Reports using rituximab described remission off therapy in a shorter time frame (ranging from 2 months to 5 years) as compared to other medication combinations; this observation suggested that while the initial side effects may be significant, a shorter total duration of therapy may be possible with use of rituximab. Because rituximab is a more recent drug, first introduced in 1997, long-term side effects are not well characterized at this time.

Conclusion

The findings from this review emphasize the importance of early diagnosis of PV, early initiation of treatment, and use of a treatment regimen which includes a steroid-sparing adjuvant to allow a reduced total dose and duration on corticosteroids. For the majority of patients in these reports, a long-term course on medications lasting about 5–10 years was observed; however, subgroups of patients requiring shorter courses or those needing longer-term therapy were also described. In recent publications, commonly used initial regimens include corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate or azathioprine; whereas, for patients with inadequate response to these regimens, adjuvants such as IVIG or rituximab were used [21, 38, 39]. This review also highlights the need for more controlled trials to determine optimal treatment regimens for patients with PV.

Acknowledgments

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Disclosures

Mimansa Cholera and Nita Chainani-Wu have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any studies of human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​4.​0/​), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
insite
INHALT
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Allgemeinmedizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Allgemeinmedizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der allgemeinmedizinischen Zeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Allgemeinmedizin-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaidemenos G, Apalla Z, Koussidou T, Papagarifallou I, Ioannides D. High dose oral prednisone vs. prednisone plus azathioprine for the treatment of oral pemphigus: a retrospective, bi-centre, comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(2):206–10. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03753.x [Epub 2010 Jun 21].PubMedCrossRef Chaidemenos G, Apalla Z, Koussidou T, Papagarifallou I, Ioannides D. High dose oral prednisone vs. prednisone plus azathioprine for the treatment of oral pemphigus: a retrospective, bi-centre, comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25(2):206–10. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1468-3083.​2010.​03753.​x [Epub 2010 Jun 21].PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Burgan SZ, Sawair FA, Napier SS. Case report: oral pemphigus vulgaris with multiple oral polyps in a young patient. Int Dent J. 2003;53(1):37–40.PubMedCrossRef Burgan SZ, Sawair FA, Napier SS. Case report: oral pemphigus vulgaris with multiple oral polyps in a young patient. Int Dent J. 2003;53(1):37–40.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Iamaroon A, Boonyawong P, Klanrit P, Prasongtunskul S, Thongprasom K. Characterization of oral pemphigus vulgaris in Thai patients. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(1):43–6.PubMedCrossRef Iamaroon A, Boonyawong P, Klanrit P, Prasongtunskul S, Thongprasom K. Characterization of oral pemphigus vulgaris in Thai patients. J Oral Sci. 2006;48(1):43–6.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ariyawardana A, Tilakaratne WM, Dissanayake M, et al. Oral pemphigus vulgaris in children and adolescents: a review of the literature and a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(4):287–93.PubMedCrossRef Ariyawardana A, Tilakaratne WM, Dissanayake M, et al. Oral pemphigus vulgaris in children and adolescents: a review of the literature and a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15(4):287–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyhimi P, Tavakoli P. Study of apoptosis in oral pemphigus vulgaris using immunohistochemical marker Bax and TUNEL technique. J Oral Pathol Med. 2013;42(5):409–14. doi:10.1111/jop.12022 [Epub 2012 Nov 27].PubMedCrossRef Deyhimi P, Tavakoli P. Study of apoptosis in oral pemphigus vulgaris using immunohistochemical marker Bax and TUNEL technique. J Oral Pathol Med. 2013;42(5):409–14. doi:10.​1111/​jop.​12022 [Epub 2012 Nov 27].PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Endo H, Rees TD, Matsue M, Kuyama K, Nakadai M, Yamamoto H. Early detection and successful management of oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report. J Periodontol. 2005;76(1):154–60.PubMedCrossRef Endo H, Rees TD, Matsue M, Kuyama K, Nakadai M, Yamamoto H. Early detection and successful management of oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report. J Periodontol. 2005;76(1):154–60.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bystryn JC, Steinman NM. The adjuvant therapy of pemphigus. An update. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(2):203–12.PubMedCrossRef Bystryn JC, Steinman NM. The adjuvant therapy of pemphigus. An update. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(2):203–12.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker KL, editor. Principles and practice of endocrinology and metabolism, 3rd ed. 2001. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Becker KL, editor. Principles and practice of endocrinology and metabolism, 3rd ed. 2001. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Immunosuppressants and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris: therapeutic results obtained in 63 patients between 1961 and 1975. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(9):1236–41.PubMedCrossRef Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Immunosuppressants and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris: therapeutic results obtained in 63 patients between 1961 and 1975. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(9):1236–41.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Results obtained in 84 patients between 1961 and 1982. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(1):44–7.PubMedCrossRef Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Results obtained in 84 patients between 1961 and 1982. Arch Dermatol. 1984;120(1):44–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lozada F, Silverman S, Cram D. Pemphigus vulgaris. A study of six cases treated with levamisole and prednisone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(2):161–5.PubMedCrossRef Lozada F, Silverman S, Cram D. Pemphigus vulgaris. A study of six cases treated with levamisole and prednisone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54(2):161–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat David M, Zaidenbaum M, Sandbank M. Juvenile pemphigus vulgaris: a 4- to 19-year follow-up of 4 patients. Dermatologica. 1988;177(3):165–9.PubMedCrossRef David M, Zaidenbaum M, Sandbank M. Juvenile pemphigus vulgaris: a 4- to 19-year follow-up of 4 patients. Dermatologica. 1988;177(3):165–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lamey PJ, Rees TD, Binnie WH, Wright JM, Rankin KV, Simpson NB. Oral presentation of pemphigus vulgaris and its response to systemic steroid therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74(1):54–7.PubMedCrossRef Lamey PJ, Rees TD, Binnie WH, Wright JM, Rankin KV, Simpson NB. Oral presentation of pemphigus vulgaris and its response to systemic steroid therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;74(1):54–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaur S, Kanwar AJ. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Int J Dermatol. 1990;29(5):371–4.PubMedCrossRef Kaur S, Kanwar AJ. Dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Int J Dermatol. 1990;29(5):371–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Thami GP. Long-term efficacy of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Dermatology. 2002;204(3):228–31.PubMedCrossRef Kanwar AJ, Kaur S, Thami GP. Long-term efficacy of dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in pemphigus. Dermatology. 2002;204(3):228–31.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mentink LF, Mackenzie MW, Tóth GG, et al. Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant oral dexamethasone pulse therapy in pemphigus vulgaris: PEMPULS trial. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(5):570–6 (Erratum in: Arch Dermatol. 2006 Aug;142(8):1014. Dosage error in article text).PubMedCrossRef Mentink LF, Mackenzie MW, Tóth GG, et al. Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant oral dexamethasone pulse therapy in pemphigus vulgaris: PEMPULS trial. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(5):570–6 (Erratum in: Arch Dermatol. 2006 Aug;142(8):1014. Dosage error in article text).PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ransom JT. Mechanism of action of mycophenolate mofetil. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17(6):681–4.PubMedCrossRef Ransom JT. Mechanism of action of mycophenolate mofetil. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17(6):681–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell AM, Albert S, Al Fares S, et al. An evaluation of the usefulness of mycophenolate mofetil in pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(1):138–45.PubMedCrossRef Powell AM, Albert S, Al Fares S, et al. An evaluation of the usefulness of mycophenolate mofetil in pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(1):138–45.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheinfeld NS. Intravenous immunoglobulin. Drugs Dis Proced. Medscape Reference; 2011. Web 14 Mar 2016. Scheinfeld NS. Intravenous immunoglobulin. Drugs Dis Proced. Medscape Reference; 2011. Web 14 Mar 2016.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuruta D, Ishii N, Hashimoto T. Diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus. Immunotherapy. 2012;4(7):735–45.PubMedCrossRef Tsuruta D, Ishii N, Hashimoto T. Diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus. Immunotherapy. 2012;4(7):735–45.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Virgolini L, Marzocchi V. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Successful result in refractory pemphigus vulgaris: report of a case. Haematologica. 2003;88(7):ELT24.PubMed Virgolini L, Marzocchi V. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Successful result in refractory pemphigus vulgaris: report of a case. Haematologica. 2003;88(7):ELT24.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischli ME, Valek RH, Pandya AG. Pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(1):57–61.PubMedCrossRef Fleischli ME, Valek RH, Pandya AG. Pulse intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(1):57–61.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaffins ML, Collison D, Fivenson DP. Treatment of pemphigus and linear IgA dermatosis with nicotinamide and tetracycline: a review of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28(6):998–1000.PubMedCrossRef Chaffins ML, Collison D, Fivenson DP. Treatment of pemphigus and linear IgA dermatosis with nicotinamide and tetracycline: a review of 13 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28(6):998–1000.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst A, Bystryn JC. Patterns of remission in pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(3):422–7.PubMedCrossRef Herbst A, Bystryn JC. Patterns of remission in pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(3):422–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagistan S, Goregen M, Miloglu O, Cakur B. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report with review of the literature. J Oral Sci. 2008;50(3):359–62.PubMedCrossRef Dagistan S, Goregen M, Miloglu O, Cakur B. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report with review of the literature. J Oral Sci. 2008;50(3):359–62.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben Lagha N, Poulesquen V, Roujeau JC, Alantar A, Maman L. Pemphigus vulgaris: a case-based update. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(9):667–72.PubMed Ben Lagha N, Poulesquen V, Roujeau JC, Alantar A, Maman L. Pemphigus vulgaris: a case-based update. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(9):667–72.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson NA, Yeo JF, Lee YS, Aw DC. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report and literature update. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(4 Suppl):63–8.PubMed Robinson NA, Yeo JF, Lee YS, Aw DC. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a case report and literature update. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33(4 Suppl):63–8.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Camacho-Alonso F, López-Jornet P, Bermejo-Fenoll A. Pemphigus vulgaris. A presentation of 14 cases and review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(4):282–8.PubMed Camacho-Alonso F, López-Jornet P, Bermejo-Fenoll A. Pemphigus vulgaris. A presentation of 14 cases and review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10(4):282–8.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Arin MJ, Engert A, Krieg T, Hunzelmann N. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) in the treatment of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(3):620–5.PubMedCrossRef Arin MJ, Engert A, Krieg T, Hunzelmann N. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) in the treatment of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(3):620–5.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heelan K, Al-Mohammedi F, Smith MJ, et al. Durable remission of pemphigus with a fixed-dose rituximab protocol. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(7):703–8.PubMedCrossRef Heelan K, Al-Mohammedi F, Smith MJ, et al. Durable remission of pemphigus with a fixed-dose rituximab protocol. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(7):703–8.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Baican A, Chiorean R, Leucuta DC, et al. Prediction of survival for patients with pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: a retrospective cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;22(10):48. doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0263-4.CrossRef Baican A, Chiorean R, Leucuta DC, et al. Prediction of survival for patients with pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: a retrospective cohort study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015;22(10):48. doi:10.​1186/​s13023-015-0263-4.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Cianchini G, Lupi F, Masini C, Corona R, Puddu P, De Pità O. Therapy with rituximab for autoimmune pemphigus: results from a single-center observational study on 42 cases with long-term follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):617–22. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.007 [Epub 2012 Jan 13].PubMedCrossRef Cianchini G, Lupi F, Masini C, Corona R, Puddu P, De Pità O. Therapy with rituximab for autoimmune pemphigus: results from a single-center observational study on 42 cases with long-term follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):617–22. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jaad.​2011.​11.​007 [Epub 2012 Jan 13].PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chams-Davatchi C, Valikhani M, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Pemphigus: analysis of 1209 cases. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44(6):470–6.PubMedCrossRef Chams-Davatchi C, Valikhani M, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Pemphigus: analysis of 1209 cases. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44(6):470–6.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Yazganoğlu KD, Baykal C, Küçükoğlu R. Childhood pemphigus vulgaris: five cases in 16 years. J Dermatol. 2006;33(12):846–9.PubMedCrossRef Yazganoğlu KD, Baykal C, Küçükoğlu R. Childhood pemphigus vulgaris: five cases in 16 years. J Dermatol. 2006;33(12):846–9.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan JG. Pemphigus. A 20-year survey of experience with 70 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1971;104(1):14–20.PubMedCrossRef Ryan JG. Pemphigus. A 20-year survey of experience with 70 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1971;104(1):14–20.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg FR, Sanders S, Nelson CT. Pemphigus: a 20-year review of 107 patients treated with corticosteroids. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112(7):962–70.PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg FR, Sanders S, Nelson CT. Pemphigus: a 20-year review of 107 patients treated with corticosteroids. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112(7):962–70.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Aberer W, Wolff-Schreiner EC, Stingl G, Wolff K. Azathioprine in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. A long-term follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16(3 Pt 1):527–33.PubMedCrossRef Aberer W, Wolff-Schreiner EC, Stingl G, Wolff K. Azathioprine in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. A long-term follow-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;16(3 Pt 1):527–33.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidenbaum M, David M, Sandbank M. The course and prognosis of pemphigus. A review of 115 patients. Int J Dermatol. 1988;27(8):580–4.PubMedCrossRef Seidenbaum M, David M, Sandbank M. The course and prognosis of pemphigus. A review of 115 patients. Int J Dermatol. 1988;27(8):580–4.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Laskaris G, Stoufi E. Oral pemphigus vulgaris in a 6-year-old girl. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69(5):609–13 (Review).PubMedCrossRef Laskaris G, Stoufi E. Oral pemphigus vulgaris in a 6-year-old girl. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;69(5):609–13 (Review).PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Werth VP. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with brief, high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(12):1435–9.PubMedCrossRef Werth VP. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with brief, high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(12):1435–9.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson JC, Lozada-Nur F, Frieden I. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a review of the literature and a report on the management of 12 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(4):349–55.PubMedCrossRef Robinson JC, Lozada-Nur F, Frieden I. Oral pemphigus vulgaris: a review of the literature and a report on the management of 12 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(4):349–55.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Mignogna MD, Lo Muzio L, Mignogna RE, Carbone R, Ruoppo E, Bucci E. Oral pemphigus: long term behaviour and clinical response to treatment with deflazacort in sixteen cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29(4):145–52.PubMedCrossRef Mignogna MD, Lo Muzio L, Mignogna RE, Carbone R, Ruoppo E, Bucci E. Oral pemphigus: long term behaviour and clinical response to treatment with deflazacort in sixteen cases. J Oral Pathol Med. 2000;29(4):145–52.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Scully C, Paes De Almeida O, Porter SR, Gilkes JJ. Pemphigus vulgaris: the manifestations and long-term management of 55 patients with oral lesions. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(1):84–9.PubMedCrossRef Scully C, Paes De Almeida O, Porter SR, Gilkes JJ. Pemphigus vulgaris: the manifestations and long-term management of 55 patients with oral lesions. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(1):84–9.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljubojević S, Lipozencić J, Brenner S, Budimcić D. Pemphigus vulgaris: a review of treatment over a 19-year period. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(6):599–603.PubMedCrossRef Ljubojević S, Lipozencić J, Brenner S, Budimcić D. Pemphigus vulgaris: a review of treatment over a 19-year period. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(6):599–603.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Femiano F, Gombos F, Scully C. Pemphigus vulgaris with oral involvement: evaluation of two different systemic corticosteroid therapeutic protocols. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(4):353–6.PubMedCrossRef Femiano F, Gombos F, Scully C. Pemphigus vulgaris with oral involvement: evaluation of two different systemic corticosteroid therapeutic protocols. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(4):353–6.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaidemenos GCh, Mourellou O, Koussidou T, Tsatsou F. An alternate-day corticosteroid regimen for pemphigus vulgaris. A 13-year prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(10):1386–91.PubMedCrossRef Chaidemenos GCh, Mourellou O, Koussidou T, Tsatsou F. An alternate-day corticosteroid regimen for pemphigus vulgaris. A 13-year prospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(10):1386–91.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Chams-Davatchi C, Esmaili N, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(4):622–8 Epub 2007 Jun 21.PubMedCrossRef Chams-Davatchi C, Esmaili N, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(4):622–8 Epub 2007 Jun 21.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Mourellou O, Chaidemenos GC, Koussidou T, Kapetis E. The treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Experience with 48 patients seen over an 11-year period. Br J Dermatol. 1995;133(1):83–7.PubMedCrossRef Mourellou O, Chaidemenos GC, Koussidou T, Kapetis E. The treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Experience with 48 patients seen over an 11-year period. Br J Dermatol. 1995;133(1):83–7.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Chams-Davatchi C, Mortazavizadeh A, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Randomized double blind trial of prednisolone and azathioprine, vs. prednisolone and placebo, in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(10):1285–92. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04717.x [Epub 2012 Oct 15].PubMed Chams-Davatchi C, Mortazavizadeh A, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. Randomized double blind trial of prednisolone and azathioprine, vs. prednisolone and placebo, in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27(10):1285–92. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1468-3083.​2012.​04717.​x [Epub 2012 Oct 15].PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Enk AH, Knop J. Mycophenolate is effective in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(1):54–6.PubMedCrossRef Enk AH, Knop J. Mycophenolate is effective in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(1):54–6.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Grundmann-Kollmann M, Korting HC, Behrens S, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil: a new therapeutic option in the treatment of blistering autoimmune diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(6 Pt 1):957–60.PubMedCrossRef Grundmann-Kollmann M, Korting HC, Behrens S, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil: a new therapeutic option in the treatment of blistering autoimmune diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(6 Pt 1):957–60.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Mimouni D, Anhalt GJ, Cummins DL, Kouba DJ, Thorne JE, Nousari HC. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus with mycophenolate mofetil. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(6):739–42.PubMedCrossRef Mimouni D, Anhalt GJ, Cummins DL, Kouba DJ, Thorne JE, Nousari HC. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus with mycophenolate mofetil. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(6):739–42.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Beissert S, Werfel T, Frieling U, et al. A comparison of oral methylprednisolone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(11):1447–54.PubMedCrossRef Beissert S, Werfel T, Frieling U, et al. A comparison of oral methylprednisolone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of pemphigus. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(11):1447–54.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Beissert S, Mimouni D, Kanwar AJ, Solomons N, Kalia V, Anhalt GJ. Treating pemphigus vulgaris with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(8):2041–8. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.91 [Epub 2010 Apr 22].PubMedCrossRef Beissert S, Mimouni D, Kanwar AJ, Solomons N, Kalia V, Anhalt GJ. Treating pemphigus vulgaris with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(8):2041–8. doi:10.​1038/​jid.​2010.​91 [Epub 2010 Apr 22].PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Bystryn JC, Jiao D, Natow S. Treatment of pemphigus with intravenous immunoglobulin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(3):358–63.PubMedCrossRef Bystryn JC, Jiao D, Natow S. Treatment of pemphigus with intravenous immunoglobulin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(3):358–63.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakocević-Stojanović V, Rakocević I, Perić S, Lavrnić D. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in two patients with myasthenia gravis and pemphigus vulgaris. Acta Myol. 2009;28(3):101–2.PubMedPubMedCentral Rakocević-Stojanović V, Rakocević I, Perić S, Lavrnić D. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in two patients with myasthenia gravis and pemphigus vulgaris. Acta Myol. 2009;28(3):101–2.PubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Lever WF, Goldberg HS. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with methotrexate. Arch Dermatol. 1969;100(1):70–8.PubMedCrossRef Lever WF, Goldberg HS. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with methotrexate. Arch Dermatol. 1969;100(1):70–8.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Jablonska S, Chorzelski T, Blaszczyk M. Immunosuppressants in the treatment of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 1970;83(2):315–23 (Review).PubMedCrossRef Jablonska S, Chorzelski T, Blaszczyk M. Immunosuppressants in the treatment of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 1970;83(2):315–23 (Review).PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Piamphongsant T, Sivayathorn A. Pemphigus: combined treatment with methotrexate and prednisone. J Med Assoc Thai. 1975;58(3):171–6.PubMed Piamphongsant T, Sivayathorn A. Pemphigus: combined treatment with methotrexate and prednisone. J Med Assoc Thai. 1975;58(3):171–6.PubMed
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Immunosuppressants and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris: therapeutic results obtained in 63 patients between 1961 and 1975. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(9):1236–41.PubMedCrossRef Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G. Immunosuppressants and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris: therapeutic results obtained in 63 patients between 1961 and 1975. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(9):1236–41.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Lever WF. Methotrexate and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris. Therapeutic results obtained in 36 patients between 1961 and 1970. Arch Dermatol. 1972;106(4):491–7.PubMedCrossRef Lever WF. Methotrexate and prednisone in pemphigus vulgaris. Therapeutic results obtained in 36 patients between 1961 and 1970. Arch Dermatol. 1972;106(4):491–7.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Mashkilleyson N, Mashkilleyson AL. Mucous membrane manifestations of pemphigus vulgaris. A 25-year survey of 185 patients treated with corticosteroids or with combination of corticosteroids with methotrexate or heparin. Acta Derm Venereol. 1988;68(5):413–21.PubMed Mashkilleyson N, Mashkilleyson AL. Mucous membrane manifestations of pemphigus vulgaris. A 25-year survey of 185 patients treated with corticosteroids or with combination of corticosteroids with methotrexate or heparin. Acta Derm Venereol. 1988;68(5):413–21.PubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ, Bystryn JC. Methotrexate as an adjuvant treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(10):1275–6.PubMedCrossRef Smith TJ, Bystryn JC. Methotrexate as an adjuvant treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(10):1275–6.PubMedCrossRef
76.
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Salopek TG, Logsetty S, Tredget EE. Anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody (rituximab) for the treatment of recalcitrant, life-threatening pemphigus vulgaris with implications in the pathogenesis of the disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(5):785–8.PubMedCrossRef Salopek TG, Logsetty S, Tredget EE. Anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody (rituximab) for the treatment of recalcitrant, life-threatening pemphigus vulgaris with implications in the pathogenesis of the disorder. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(5):785–8.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper HL, Healy E, Theaker JM, Friedmann PS. Treatment of resistant pemphigus vulgaris with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28(4):366–8.PubMedCrossRef Cooper HL, Healy E, Theaker JM, Friedmann PS. Treatment of resistant pemphigus vulgaris with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Clin Exp Dermatol. 2003;28(4):366–8.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat España A, Fernández-Galar M, Lloret P, Sánchez-Ibarrola A, Panizo C. Long-term complete remission of severe pemphigus vulgaris with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy and immunophenotype correlations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(6):974–6.PubMedCrossRef España A, Fernández-Galar M, Lloret P, Sánchez-Ibarrola A, Panizo C. Long-term complete remission of severe pemphigus vulgaris with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody therapy and immunophenotype correlations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(6):974–6.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison LH. Therapy of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(5):817–9.PubMedCrossRef Morrison LH. Therapy of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;51(5):817–9.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenzel J, Bauer R, Bieber T, Tüting T. Successful rituximab treatment of severe pemphigus vulgaris resistant to multiple immunosuppressants. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(2):185–6.PubMed Wenzel J, Bauer R, Bieber T, Tüting T. Successful rituximab treatment of severe pemphigus vulgaris resistant to multiple immunosuppressants. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(2):185–6.PubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Dupuy A, Viguier M, Bédane C, et al. Treatment of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody). Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):91–6.PubMedCrossRef Dupuy A, Viguier M, Bédane C, et al. Treatment of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody). Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(1):91–6.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Kong HH, Prose NS, Ware RE, Hall RP 3rd. Successful treatment of refractory childhood pemphgus vulgaris with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22(5):461–4.PubMedCrossRef Kong HH, Prose NS, Ware RE, Hall RP 3rd. Successful treatment of refractory childhood pemphgus vulgaris with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22(5):461–4.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt E, Herzog S, Bröcker EB, Zillikens D, Goebeler M. Long-standing remission of recalcitrant juvenile pemphigus vulgaris after adjuvant therapy with rituximab. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(2):449–51.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt E, Herzog S, Bröcker EB, Zillikens D, Goebeler M. Long-standing remission of recalcitrant juvenile pemphigus vulgaris after adjuvant therapy with rituximab. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(2):449–51.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt E, Seitz CS, Benoit S, Bröcker EB, Goebeler M. Rituximab in autoimmune bullous diseases: mixed responses and adverse effects. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(2):352–6.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt E, Seitz CS, Benoit S, Bröcker EB, Goebeler M. Rituximab in autoimmune bullous diseases: mixed responses and adverse effects. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(2):352–6.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed AR, Spigelman Z, Cavacini LA, Posner MR. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab and intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1772–9.PubMedCrossRef Ahmed AR, Spigelman Z, Cavacini LA, Posner MR. Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris with rituximab and intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1772–9.PubMedCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh MS, McCormack C, Dinh HV, Welsh B, Foley P, Prince HM. Rituximab in the adjuvant treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a prospective open-label pilot study in five patients. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):990–6 [Epub 2007 Mar 13].PubMedCrossRef Goh MS, McCormack C, Dinh HV, Welsh B, Foley P, Prince HM. Rituximab in the adjuvant treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a prospective open-label pilot study in five patients. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):990–6 [Epub 2007 Mar 13].PubMedCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Marzano AV, Fanoni D, Venegoni L, Berti E, Caputo R. Treatment of refractory pemphigus with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Dermatology. 2007;214(4):310–8.PubMedCrossRef Marzano AV, Fanoni D, Venegoni L, Berti E, Caputo R. Treatment of refractory pemphigus with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab). Dermatology. 2007;214(4):310–8.PubMedCrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonucci A, Negosanti M, Tabanelli M, Varotti C. Treatment of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab): five cases. J Dermatol Treat. 2007;18(3):178–83.CrossRef Antonucci A, Negosanti M, Tabanelli M, Varotti C. Treatment of refractory pemphigus vulgaris with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab): five cases. J Dermatol Treat. 2007;18(3):178–83.CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Cianchini G, Corona R, Frezzolini A, Ruffelli M, Didona B, Puddu P. Treatment of severe pemphigus with rituximab: report of 12 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(8):1033–8 (Review).PubMedCrossRef Cianchini G, Corona R, Frezzolini A, Ruffelli M, Didona B, Puddu P. Treatment of severe pemphigus with rituximab: report of 12 cases and a review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(8):1033–8 (Review).PubMedCrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Joly P, Mouquet H, Roujeau JC, et al. A single cycle of rituximab for the treatment of severe pemphigus. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):545–52.PubMedCrossRef Joly P, Mouquet H, Roujeau JC, et al. A single cycle of rituximab for the treatment of severe pemphigus. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(6):545–52.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimanovich I, Nitschke M, Rose C, Grabbe J, Zillikens D. Treatment of severe pemphigus with protein A immunoadsorption, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(2):382–8 [Epub 2007 Dec 6].PubMedCrossRef Shimanovich I, Nitschke M, Rose C, Grabbe J, Zillikens D. Treatment of severe pemphigus with protein A immunoadsorption, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158(2):382–8 [Epub 2007 Dec 6].PubMedCrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfütze M, Eming R, Kneisel A, Kuhlmann U, Hoyer J, Hertl M. Clinical and immunological follow-up of pemphigus patients on adjuvant treatment with immunoadsorption or rituximab. Dermatology. 2009;218(3):237–45. doi:10.1159/000187431 Epub 2008 Dec 16.PubMedCrossRef Pfütze M, Eming R, Kneisel A, Kuhlmann U, Hoyer J, Hertl M. Clinical and immunological follow-up of pemphigus patients on adjuvant treatment with immunoadsorption or rituximab. Dermatology. 2009;218(3):237–45. doi:10.​1159/​000187431 Epub 2008 Dec 16.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuertes I, Guilabert A, Mascaró JM Jr, Iranzo P. Rituximab in childhood pemphigus vulgaris: a long-term follow-up case and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2010;221(1):13–6. doi:10.1159/000287254 (Epub 2010 Apr 9. Review).PubMedCrossRef Fuertes I, Guilabert A, Mascaró JM Jr, Iranzo P. Rituximab in childhood pemphigus vulgaris: a long-term follow-up case and review of the literature. Dermatology. 2010;221(1):13–6. doi:10.​1159/​000287254 (Epub 2010 Apr 9. Review).PubMedCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasperkiewicz M, Shimanovich I, Meier M, et al. Treatment of severe pemphigus with a combination of immunoadsorption, rituximab, pulsed dexamethasone and azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study of 23 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(1):154–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10585.x [Epub 2011 Oct 17].PubMedCrossRef Kasperkiewicz M, Shimanovich I, Meier M, et al. Treatment of severe pemphigus with a combination of immunoadsorption, rituximab, pulsed dexamethasone and azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil: a pilot study of 23 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(1):154–60. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2133.​2011.​10585.​x [Epub 2011 Oct 17].PubMedCrossRef
104.
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasperkiewicz M, Eming R, Behzad M, Hunzelmann N, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in pemphigus: experience of the German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10(10):727–32. doi:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.07931.x [Epub 2012 May 11].PubMed Kasperkiewicz M, Eming R, Behzad M, Hunzelmann N, et al. Efficacy and safety of rituximab in pemphigus: experience of the German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10(10):727–32. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1610-0387.​2012.​07931.​x [Epub 2012 May 11].PubMed
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Balighi K, Daneshpazhooh M, Khezri S, Mahdavi-nia M, Hajiseyed-javadi M, Chams-Davatchi C. Adjuvant rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a phase II clinical trial. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(7):862–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.5847.x (Erratum in: Int J Dermatol. 2013 Oct;52(10):1292. Kamran, Balighi [corrected to Balighi, Kamran]; Maryam, Daneshpazhooh [corrected to Daneshpazhooh, Maryam]; Somayeh, Khezri [corrected to Khezri, Somayeh]; Mostafa, Mahdavi-nia [corrected to Mahdavi-nia, Mostafa]; Mahsa, Hajiseyed-javadi [corrected to Hajiseyed-javadi, Mahsa]; Cheyda, Chams-Davatchi [corrected to Chams-Davatchi, Cheyda]).PubMedCrossRef Balighi K, Daneshpazhooh M, Khezri S, Mahdavi-nia M, Hajiseyed-javadi M, Chams-Davatchi C. Adjuvant rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a phase II clinical trial. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(7):862–7. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-4632.​2012.​5847.​x (Erratum in: Int J Dermatol. 2013 Oct;52(10):1292. Kamran, Balighi [corrected to Balighi, Kamran]; Maryam, Daneshpazhooh [corrected to Daneshpazhooh, Maryam]; Somayeh, Khezri [corrected to Khezri, Somayeh]; Mostafa, Mahdavi-nia [corrected to Mahdavi-nia, Mostafa]; Mahsa, Hajiseyed-javadi [corrected to Hajiseyed-javadi, Mahsa]; Cheyda, Chams-Davatchi [corrected to Chams-Davatchi, Cheyda]).PubMedCrossRef
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolesnik M, Becker E, Reinhold D, et al. Treatment of severe autoimmune blistering skin diseases with combination of protein A immunoadsorption and rituximab: a protocol without initial high dose or pulse steroid medication. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(6):771–80. doi:10.1111/jdv.12175 [Epub 2013 May 8].PubMedCrossRef Kolesnik M, Becker E, Reinhold D, et al. Treatment of severe autoimmune blistering skin diseases with combination of protein A immunoadsorption and rituximab: a protocol without initial high dose or pulse steroid medication. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(6):771–80. doi:10.​1111/​jdv.​12175 [Epub 2013 May 8].PubMedCrossRef
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanwar AJ, Vinay K, Sawatkar GU, et al. Clinical and immunological outcomes of high- and low-dose rituximab treatments in patients with pemphigus: a randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(6):1341–9. doi:10.1111/bjd.12972.PubMedCrossRef Kanwar AJ, Vinay K, Sawatkar GU, et al. Clinical and immunological outcomes of high- and low-dose rituximab treatments in patients with pemphigus: a randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(6):1341–9. doi:10.​1111/​bjd.​12972.PubMedCrossRef
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Ojaimi S, O’Connor K, Lin MW, Schifter M, Fulcher DA. Treatment outcomes in cohort of patients with mucosal-predominant pemphigus vulgaris. Intern Med J. 2015;45(3):284–92. doi:10.1111/imj.12674.PubMedCrossRef Ojaimi S, O’Connor K, Lin MW, Schifter M, Fulcher DA. Treatment outcomes in cohort of patients with mucosal-predominant pemphigus vulgaris. Intern Med J. 2015;45(3):284–92. doi:10.​1111/​imj.​12674.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Management of Pemphigus Vulgaris
verfasst von
Mimansa Cholera
Nita Chainani-Wu
Publikationsdatum
10.06.2016
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0343-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Advances in Therapy 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.