Management of toxicities associated with targeted therapies for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach is the key to success

The 20 oncologists at the meeting were from Oncology Units treating ≥ 150 breast cancer cases per year, across the entire national territory. All had used CDK4/6 inhibitors in their clinical practice; 60% within a clinical trial. In their experience, hematologic toxicities have the greatest impact on both clinical management of the disease and on patients. The toxicities associated with the new treatments result in more visits to the physician and in more time and attention devoted to patients. However, they are considered to be manageable, with no need for the oncologist to consult with specialist physicians.

Drug interactions are an important cause of morbidity. The most relevant pharmacokinetic interactions involve drugs that can inhibit or induce enzymes in the hepatic cytochrome P450 system [16]. Members of the CYP3A family of P450 enzymes are probably the most important of all drug-metabolizing enzymes because of their abundance and ability to process a large number of chemically unrelated drugs from almost every drug class [16]. Strong CYP3A4 enzyme inhibitors in clinical use include the antibiotics clarithromycin, telithromycin, and erythromycin, and the antifungal agents ketoconazole and voriconazole; grapefruit juice is also a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Strong CYP3A4 inducers include the antibiotic rifampicin and antiepileptic agents such as barbiturates, phenytoin, and carbamazepine; herbal preparations (St. John’s wort) can also induce CYP3A4. Predicting drug interactions is not easy. A factor that further complicates the understanding of drug interactions is the finding that inhibitors/inducers and substrates of CYP3A4 overlap with those of the drug-transporter protein P-glycoprotein (P-gp) [16]. P-gp acts as an efflux pump-exporting drugs, for example, into the intestinal lumen.

Everolimus and the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are administered orally and have different half-lives, undergo predominantly hepatic metabolism, and are substrates of CYP3A4; everolimus is also a substrate of P-gp (Table 1) [20‐23]. The concomitant use of everolimus or a CDK4/6 inhibitor with inhibitors of CYP3A4 (or P-gp for everolimus) may, therefore, result in an increased plasma concentrations and pharmacological effect of the targeted agent, while their concomitant use with an inducer of CYP3A4 (or P-gp for everolimus) may lead to lower plasma concentrations and decreased pharmacological effect. According to the labels of the four targeted agents, the concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers is not recommended (everolimus) or should be avoided (CDK4/6 inhibitors). If unavoidable, the dose of everolimus or CDK4/6 inhibitors should be adjusted as recommended (Table 2). Liver function tests should be performed before initiating treatment with abemaciclib and ribociclib and repeated every 2 weeks for the first two cycles, monthly for the next two cycles, then as clinically indicated [10, 12]. An additional relevant interaction exists for ribociclib with anti-arrhythmic drugs and other medications that prolong the QT interval on the electrocardiogram (ECG). Such medications should be avoided in patients receiving ribociclib. Ribociclib is also a strong to moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4 and should be used with caution with CYP3A4 substrates that have a narrow therapeutic index. With the exception of palbociclib, the targeted agents can be taken regardless of food intake. Palbociclib should be taken with food, as its absorption and drug exposure were shown to be low in the fasted state [11, 24].

Overall, to minimize the risk of harm due to drug interactions, it is important to be aware of possible interactions. It is imperative to ask patients about the use of other medications, including herbal products. At the same time, patients should be informed about drug interactions and instructed to not take any additional medication (including over-the-counter and herbal products) during treatment with targeted therapies without first consulting with the oncologist. Recommended measures to reduce the risk of adverse effects include using an alternative treatment, adjustment of the dose of targeted agent, and close patient monitoring.

Class-effect toxicities associated with the use of mTOR inhibitors include stomatitis, which encompasses inflammation and ulceration of the oral mucosal lining, non-infectious pneumonitis (a non-malignant inflammatory infiltration of the lung), infections, and metabolic adverse events (hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia) [13].

According to a recent meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant in women with advanced breast cancer, the most frequent adverse event (all grades) in the group treated with the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy was neutropenia (65%) followed by diarrhea (49%), infections (44%), nausea (40%), fatigue (39%), and leukopenia (35%) [25]. Other safety issues reported in clinical trials include hepatobiliary toxicity (ribociclib, abemaciclib), prolongation of the QT interval on ECG (ribociclib), and venous thromboembolism (abemaciclib) [10, 12].

In the BOLERO-2 trial, everolimus-related toxicities included stomatitis, pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia [26]. These toxicities were generally of mild or moderate severity and, with the exception of pneumonitis, occurred early after everolimus initiation (within 8 weeks). Adverse events were generally manageable with dose reduction and interruption for a median duration of 7 days. Of note, appropriate dose reductions for toxicity did not have a negative impact on efficacy [27]. In a meta-analysis of five randomized, double-blind phase three clinical trials of everolimus in patients with solid tumors, including breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, carcinoid tumors, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, the rate of stomatitis was 67% [16]. Stomatitis was mostly grade 1–2, with grade 3–4 reported in < 10% of patients. Stomatitis did not adversely affect PFS. Of note, prophylactic use of a steroid mouthwash has been shown to substantially reduce the incidence and severity of stomatitis in patients undergoing combination therapy with everolimus and an aromatase inhibitor [28].

Cases of severe gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding during targeted therapy with everolimus have been reported [29‐31]. In two of these reports, gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) was identified as the likely cause of bleeding [29, 30]; GI bleeding was successfully treated with endoscopic hemostasis using argon plasma coagulation after treatment discontinuation. In another case, GI bleeding was associated with treatment initiation and resolved following discontinuation [31]. Endoscopy revealed that the bleeding was secondary to erosive gastritis, and several endoscopic interventions were needed to achieve hemostasis.

The rapidly proliferating GI epithelium is one of the most vulnerable tissues to the effects of antiproliferative drugs. Indeed, GI events including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are shared by most anticancer drugs. A meta-analysis of four studies with CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib) was performed to assess the risk of GI toxicities associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors [32]. Adding CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy was found to marginally increase the incidence of any-grade decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea with no significant increase in the risk of high-grade GI toxicities compared with control. In the MONARCH 2 study, which demonstrated that abemaciclib significantly extends PFS when added to fulvestrant in women with advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed while on endocrine therapy, the most common adverse events in the abemaciclib–fulvestrant versus fulvestrant alone arms were diarrhea (86.4% vs. 24.7%), neutropenia (46.0% vs. 4.0%), nausea (45.1% vs. 22.9%) and fatigue (39.9% vs. 26.9%) [6]. In most cases, diarrhea was effectively managed using supportive treatment, such as antidiarrheal medications and/or dose adjustments. Diarrhea was also the most frequent adverse event in the MONARCH-3 trial investigating abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer [3]. Diarrhea was reported by 81.3% of patients, but was mostly of grade 1 (44.6%). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 event was neutropenia (21.1% vs. 1.2% in the group with a NSAI alone), diarrhea (9.5% vs. 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% vs. 0.6%). Low-grade diarrhea was managed in most cases with conventional antidiarrheal medications and dose adjustment.

The frequencies of CDK4/6 inhibitor-related grade 3–4 neutropenia reported in RCTs were highest with palbociclib (54–66%, PALOMA-2 and 3 trials) and ribociclib (27–59%, MONALEESA-2 trial) and lowest with abemaciclib (21–27%, MONARCH-2 and 3) [1‐3, 6, 18, 33‐35]. According to a detailed safety analysis of the PALOMA-3 trial comparing fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant alone (median follow-up, 8.9 months), neutropenia was the most common grade 3 (55%) and 4 (10%) adverse event in patients receiving combination therapy [18]. However, febrile neutropenia was reported only in 0.9% and 0.6% of patients treated with fulvestrant–palbociclib and fulvestrant alone, respectively. Dose modifications for grade 3–4 neutropenia did not compromise PFS. The consequences of myelosuppression experienced during palbociclib treatment are different from those associated with chemotherapy-induced myeloablation [18]. The neutropenia associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors is effectively and rapidly managed by dose delay, interruption, or reduction and without the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF). This suggests that mature white blood cells are present in the bone marrow and can rapidly enter the blood circulation when drug levels decrease [18]. In contrast, chemotherapy results in the destruction of progenitor cells leading to more persistent and severe neutropenia.

The CDK4/6 inhibitors, ribociclib and abemaciclib, have been associated with hepatobiliary toxicity [3, 4, 34, 35]. In the MONALEESA-2 study, grade 3 or 4 elevations in alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported in 9.3% and 5.7%, respectively, of patients receiving ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone and have also been observed with other CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with aromatase inhibitors. Most cases of liver-enzyme elevation were asymptomatic and reversed by dose adjustment. A detailed analysis of the safety and health-related quality of life from the MONALEESA-2 trial confirmed that hepatobiliary toxicity was more common in patients treated with ribociclib plus letrozole than in those treated with letrozole alone, with the onset of such events more common during the first 12 months of treatment (21.3% vs. 9.5% for ribociclib plus letrozole vs. letrozole alone) [34].

Abemaciclib was also associated with a higher rate of hepatic transaminase elevations in the abemaciclib arm of the MONARCH-3 trial [3]. These were generally manageable with dose reduction or dose omission and were resolved with drug discontinuation.

Some drugs can cause a delay in cardiac repolarization, measured as prolongation of the QT interval on ECG. Delay in cardiac repolarization can increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, most notably torsades de pointes [3]. In the MONALEESA-2 trial comparing ribociclib combined with letrozole versus letrozole alone for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, the most frequent adverse event in the ribociclib arm was neutropenia (74.3% vs. 5.2% in the letrozole alone arm), followed by nausea (51.5% vs. 28.5%), infections (50.3% vs. 42.4%), fatigue (36.5% vs. 30.0%), and diarrhea (35.0% vs. 22.1%) [33]. These events were mostly grade 1 or 2. An increase of more than 60 ms from baseline in the QTcF (QT corrected by Fridericia) interval occurred in nine patients (2.7%) in the ribociclib group and in no patients in the placebo group. In the second interim analysis of the MONALEESA-2 trial (at a median follow-up of 26.4 months), safety results were comparable with those reported in the first analysis [4]. A > 60 ms prolongation from baseline in the QT interval occurred in ten patients (3.0%) in the ribociclib plus letrozole group and one patient (0.3%) in the letrozole group. A total of 12 (3.6%) patients receiving ribociclib plus letrozole had at least one QT of > 480 ms versus two patients (0.6%) in the control arm; in the ribociclib plus letrozole group, 11 of these patients had been reported at the time of the first analysis. Two of the 12 patients in the ribociclib plus letrozole group had received a concomitant prohibited medication with a known risk to prolong QT; three of the 12 patients had dose interruption, but this was due to QT prolongation only in 1 patient. No arrhythmia (torsades de pointes) was reported in the ribociclib group. Together these findings confirm that ECG changes observed with targeted therapies are mostly asymptomatic and that QT prolongations are managed effectively by adjusting the ribociclib dose.

Dose adjustments and/or temporary interruption due to adverse reactions are recommended for all targeted agents based on individual safety and tolerability [9‐12]. Table 2 shows the dose modifications recommended in the labels of everolimus, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Of note, the labels state that if further dose reduction is required below the lowest dose indicated, treatment should be permanently discontinued. Overall, dose adjustment is usually not required for adverse reactions of grade 1, while treatment should be discontinued when the adverse reactions are grade 4. For grade 2 and 3 adverse reactions, temporary treatment interruption should be considered until symptoms improve to grade ≤ 1. When this improvement is achieved, treatment should be resumed at the next lower dose. For example, in patients developing grade 2 everolimus-related non-infectious pneumonitis, everolimus should be interrupted until symptoms improve to grade ≤ 1; treatment should be reinitiated at 5 mg daily. If symptoms fail to improve within 4 weeks, treatment should be permanently discontinued. The same is recommended for grade 3 non-infectious pneumonitis; in this case, if toxicity recurs at grade 3 after resuming treatment at 5 mg daily, everolimus should be permanently discontinued. If patients develop grade 2 stomatitis, everolimus should be interrupted until recovery to grade ≤ 1 and reinitiated at the same dose; if stomatitis recurs at grade 2, treatment should be interrupted until recovery to grade ≤ 1 and reinitiated at 5 mg daily. In the case of grade 3 stomatitis, everolimus should be interrupted until recovery to grade ≤ 1 and resumed at 5 mg daily. The approach to management of other relevant safety issues related to targeted therapies is discussed in detail below.

Neutropenia induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors is reversible and can be readily managed by dose interruption or modification without compromising treatment efficacy. The propensity to develop higher-grade neutropenia during treatment with CD4/6 inhibitors can generally be recognized within the first months of treatment [18]. Appropriately tailored dose adjustments should be promptly implemented to reduce the risk of recurrent episodes of severe neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia [18]. It is, therefore, important to monitor absolute neutrophil counts early during treatment so that timely dose adjustments can be implemented in patients experiencing grade 3–4 neutropenia.

Figure 1 shows the recommended algorithm for the management of neutropenia associated with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib [10‐12]. Options for management of neutropenia and infections include dose reduction or drug interruption. Patients who develop grade 2 neutropenia during treatment have an increased risk of developing higher-grade neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. They should, therefore, be closely monitored (complete blood count) throughout treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. As for infections secondary to neutropenia, antibacterial prophylaxis should be administered only if grade 4 neutropenia persists for > 7 days and particularly in the presence of mucositis. Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae before initiating therapy and annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all patients. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines recommend hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening in all cancer patients treated with conventional chemotherapy or targeted therapies [36]. Based on the serological profile of HBV infection, a different therapeutic strategy will be needed (i.e., treatment or prevention of viral reactivation) [37].

In the absence of signs of infection, diarrhea should generally be managed using non-pharmacologic interventions, including hydration, appropriate diet, and avoidance of diarrhea-inducing agents. However, in the case of abemaciclib, the Summary of Product Characteristics directs that treatment with antidiarrheal agents, such as loperamide, should be started at the first sign of loose stools [10]. Recurrent or high-grade diarrhea requires dose reduction. Antidiarrheal medication (loperamide) can also be used. Nausea and vomiting should be treated with antiemetics, including metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, haloperidol, or serotonin-receptor antagonists as needed. Caution should be taken when prescribing symptomatic therapies because of potential drug interactions (Table 1). Particular attention is needed with the concomitant administration of ribociclib with antiemetics (e.g., intravenous ondansetron, dolasetron, metoclopramide, diphenhydramine, haloperidol) because of the risk of QT interval prolongation [38, 39]. With regards to palbociclib, rabeprazole (a proton pump inhibitor) decreases its serum concentration and H2-receptor antagonists or locally acting antacids should be used for the management of nausea. Dexamethasone and aprepitant may, respectively, decrease or increase serum levels of palbociclib; possible alternatives are metoclopramide and domperidone [32].

Prolongation of the QT interval has been frequently associated with cancer therapies, with or without targeted agents [40]. Substantial prolongation of QT (> 500 ms) is more frequent with targeted therapies [40]. Of note, the incidence of major arrhythmias and myocardial infarction caused by therapy-related QT prolongation is very low [40]. Patients at risk of QT prolongation or with QT prolongation before or during cancer therapy should be assessed as outlined in Fig. 2 [40]. In cancer patients, altered electrolyte levels (hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia) are often due to reduced electrolyte intake, diarrhea, vomiting, fever with sweating, use of laxatives, and therapy with steroids. Furthermore, the use of drugs with potentially synergic effects on QT prolongation (Table 1) and structural cardiomyopathy can also contribute to QT prolongation. A cardiologist should be consulted in the following cases: QT prolongation > 500 ms; prolonged QT during treatment and presence of symptoms of heart disease; history of arrhythmias; history of presyncope or syncope with a likely cardiac origin; prolonged QT and bradycardia < 60 bpm (these patients should undergo ECG monitoring in a cardiology unit).

When initiating treatment with ribociclib, the following points should be kept in mind: (1) QT > 500 ms, severe arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death related to targeted therapies are very rare; (2) At the first manifestation of QT prolongation, a manual measurement should be performed; (3) If prolonged QT is confirmed, reversible electrolyte alterations should be excluded; (4) Treatment with ribociclib can be initiated in patients with QT < 450 ms; (5) Avoid concomitant administration of drugs that can prolong the QT; (6) ECG should be measured at baseline, 14 days from the beginning of treatment, and at the beginning of the second cycle of treatment; (7) Electrolyte levels should be measured before initiating treatment and if there is an indication for additional monitoring.

A significant proportion of patients with breast cancer are aged ≥ 65 years. Management of toxicities related to targeted therapies may be particularly challenging in this age group because of the presence of comorbidities and frailty. Due to the frequent use of polytherapy by older patients, the management of drug interactions may be particularly complex. Older patients are generally underrepresented in oncology clinical trials, including those that have investigated targeted therapies for HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [41]. Subgroup analyses and a recent systematic review have shown that adding everolimus or a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy is, however, a feasible strategy in patients aged ≥ 65 years, resulting in improved survival, response rates, and clinical benefit [19, 27, 41]. In these analyses, the safety profile of everolimus and CDK4/6 inhibitors was consistent with that observed for the overall study population [41]. As a consequence, according to the prescribing information, there is no need for dose adjustments of everolimus and CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients aged ≥ 65 years, based exclusively on age [9‐12]. Subgroup analyses have also shown that the toxicities induced by targeted therapies in older patients were effectively managed by dose interruptions or reductions, as in the overall population [19].

Based on published evidence, current guidelines, and personal experience, we strongly recommend initiating targeted therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in elderly patients at the full licensed dose. Close monitoring to ensure the early detection of adverse events is highly recommended, as toxicities may rapidly worsen in older individuals. Currently, no data are available regarding the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with organ dysfunction; these patients should be managed as recommended in the labels of the various targeted agents.