The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2261-14-96) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
FA conceived the original idea for the study and led on the development of the funding bid that supported the work with input from SJC. All authors contributed to the development of the search strategy, data analysis and synthesis development. JH conducted the search with input from FA and SJC. FA led on manuscript development; all authors contributed to the draft, read and approved the final manuscript.
Coronary heart disease is an incurable condition. The only approach known to slow its progression is healthy lifestyle change and concordance with cardio-protective medicines. Few people fully succeed in these daily activities so potential health improvements are not fully realised. Little is known about peoples’ experiences of managing lifestyle change. The aim of this study was to synthesise qualitative research to explain how participants make lifestyle change after a cardiac event and explore this within the wider illness experience.
A qualitative synthesis was conducted drawing upon the principles of meta-ethnography. Qualitative studies were identified through a systematic search of 7 databases using explicit criteria. Key concepts were identified and translated across studies. Findings were discussed and diagrammed during a series of audiotaped meetings.
The final synthesis is grounded in findings from 27 studies, with over 500 participants (56% male) across 8 countries. All participants experienced a change in their self-identity from what was ‘familiar’ to ‘unfamiliar’. The transition process involved ‘finding new limits and a life worth living’ , ‘finding support for self’ and ‘finding a new normal’. Analyses of these concepts led to the generation of a third order construct, namely an ongoing process of ‘reassessing past, present and future lives’ as participants considered their changed identity. Participants experienced a strong urge to get back to ‘normal’. Support from family and friends could enable or constrain life change and lifestyle changes. Lifestyle change was but one small part of a wider ‘life’ change that occurred.
The final synthesis presents an interpretation, not evident in the primary studies, of a person-centred model to explain how lifestyle change is situated within ‘wider’ life changes. The magnitude of individual responses to a changed health status varied. Participants experienced distress as their notion of self identity shifted and emotions that reflected the various stages of the grief process were evident in participants’ accounts. The process of self-managing lifestyle took place through experiential learning; the level of engagement with lifestyle change reflected an individual’s unique view of the balance needed to manage ‘realistic change’ whilst leading to a life that was perceived as ‘worth living’. Findings highlight the importance of providing person centred care that aligns with both psychological and physical dimensions of recovery which are inextricably linked.
World Health Organisation: Global Health Observatory Data Repository. 2013, WHO, http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/en/index.html,
World Health Organisation: Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013-2010. 2013, WHO, http://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/index.html,
Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, Albus C, Benlian P, Boysen G, Cifkova R, Deaton C, Ebrahim S, Fisher M, Germano G, Hobbs R, Hoes A, Karadeniz S, Mezzani A, Prescott E, Ryden L, Scherer M, Syvänne M, op Reimer WJ S, Vrints C, Wood D, Zamorano JL, Zannad F, European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG): European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012, 2012 (33): 1635-1701.
World Health Organisation: Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. 2013, WHO, http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_full_report.pdf,
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH: Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1988, 15: 175-183. CrossRef
Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 1997, New York: WH Freeman and Company
Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D: The Commonsense Representations of Illness Danger. Contributions to Medical Psychology. Edited by: Rachman S. 1980, New York: Pergamon Press, 2: 17-30.
Battersby M, Von Korff M, Schaefer J, Davis C, Ludman E, Greene S, Parkerton M, Wagner EH: Twelve evidence-based principles for implementing self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010, 36: 561-570. PubMed
Pruitt SD, Epping-Jordan JE: Preparing the 21st century global healthcare workforce. Br Med J. 2005, 330: 637-639. CrossRef
WHO: Health Systems Strengthening Glossary. 2013, http://www.who.int/healthsystems/hss_glossary/en/index8.html,
Cochrane Reviews. 2013, http://www.cochrane.org/,
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD): Systematic Reviews CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. 2008, Accessed at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/pdf/Systematic_reviews.pdf
Noblit GW, Hare RD: Meta-Ethnography: Synthesising Qualitative Studies. 1988, London: Sage Publications CrossRef
Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL: Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet. 2005, 3: 825-831. CrossRef
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. 2013, http://www.casp-uk.net/,
Pawson R: Digging for nuggets: how ‘bad’ research can yield ‘good’ evidence. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2006, 9: 127-142. CrossRef
Ritchie J, Lewis J: Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2003, London: Sage Publications
Fram SM: The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2013, 18: 1-25.
Boutin-Foster C: Getting to the heart of social support: a qualitative analysis of the types of instrumental support that are most helpful in motivating cardiac risk factor modification. Heart & Lung. 2005, 34 (1): 22-29. CrossRef
Doiron-Maillet N, Meagher-Stewart D: The uncertain journey: women’s experiences following a myocardial infarction. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003, 13: 14-23. PubMed
Gambling TS: A qualitative study into the informational needs of coronary heart disease patients. Int J Health Promot Educ. 2003, 41: 68-76. CrossRef
Gregory S, Backett-Milburn K, Bostock Y: Recovery from and management of coronary heart disease: an exploratory study of patients’ vews and experiences. Edinburgh, Research Unit in Health, Behaviour and Change. Working Paper. 2005, 2: 1-40.
Johnson JL, Morse JM: Regaining control: the process of adjustment after myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1990, 19: 126- PubMed
MacInnes JD: The illness perceptions of women following acute myocardial infarction: Implications for behaviour change and attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. Women Health. 2006, 42: 105-121. CrossRef
McGillion M, Watt-Watson J, LeFort S, Stevens B: Positive shifts in the perceived meaning of cardiac pain following a psychoeducation program for chronic stable angina. Can J Nurs Res. 2007, 39: 48-65. PubMed
Sjostrom-Strand A, Fridlund B: Women’s descriptions of coping with stress at the time of and after a myocardial infarction: a phenomenographic analysis. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006, 16: 5-12. PubMed
Charmaz K: Loss of self. Sociol Health Illn. 2008, 2: 168-195.
Kubler-Ross E: On Death and Dying. 1969, New York: Macmillan
Van Manen M: Modalities of body experience in health and illness. Qual Health Res. 2006, 8: 7- CrossRef
- Managing lifestyle change to reduce coronary risk: a synthesis of qualitative research on peoples’ experiences
S Jose Closs
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie
Mail Icon II