Community-dwelling consumers of healthcare are increasing, many aging with life-limiting conditions and deteriorating cognition. However, few have had advance care planning discussions or completed documentation to ensure future care preferences are acted upon. This study examines the awareness, attitudes, and experiences of advance care planning amongst older people and unrelated offspring/caregivers of older people residing in the community.
Qualitative descriptive research, which included focus groups with older people (55+ years) and older people’s offspring/caregivers living in an Australian city and surrounding rural region. Data was analysed using an inductive and comparative approach. Sampling was both convenience and purposive. Participants responded to web-based, newsletter or email invitations from an agency, which aims to support healthcare consumers, a dementia support group, or community health centres in areas with high proportions of culturally and linguistically diverse community-dwellers.
Eight focus groups were attended by a homogenous sample of 15 older people and 27 offspring/caregivers, with 43% born overseas. The overarching theme, ‘shades of grey’: struggles in transition, reflects challenges faced by older people and their offspring/caregivers as older people often erratically transition from independence and capacity to dependence and/or incapacity. Offspring/caregivers regularly struggled with older people’s fluctuating autonomy and dependency as older people endeavoured to remain at home, and with conceptualising “best times” to actualise advance care planning with substitute decision maker involvement. Advance care planning was supported and welcomed, x advance care planning literacy was evident. Difficulties planning for hypothetical health events and socio-cultural attitudes thwarting death-related discussions were emphasised. Occasional offspring/caregivers with previous substitute decision maker experience reported distress related to their decisions.
Advance care planning programs traditionally assume participants are ‘planning ready’ to legally appoint a substitute decision maker (power of attorney) and record end-of-life treatment preferences in short time frames. This contrasts with how community dwelling older people and offspring/caregivers conceive future care decisions over time. Advance care planning programs need to include provision of information, which supports older people’s advance care planning understanding and management, and also supports offspring/caregivers’ development of strategies for broaching advance care planning with older people, and preparing for potential substitute decision maker roles. Development and integration of strategies to support older people’s decision-making when in the ‘grey zone’, with fluctuating cognitive capacities, needs further consideration. Findings support an advance care planning model with conversations occurring at key points across a person’s lifespan.
Means R, Richards S, Smith S. Community care, policy and practice. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
Bartel R. Conversations: creating choice in end of life care. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Health Research (ACHR). 2016. http://www.achr.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Conversations-Choice-in-End-of-Life-Care-ACHR-20161.pdf. Accessed 22 Jul 2016.
Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association. Advance care planning in Canada: A national framework and implementation. Advance Care Planning in Canada: National Roundtable Proceedings. Canada. 2009. http://www.chpca.net/media/7443/acp_national_roundtable_meeting_proceedings_may_09.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2016.
Swerissen H, Duckett S. Dying Well. Grattan Institute, Australia. 2014. http://www.grattan.edu.au/. Accessed 2 Jul 2016.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Older people at a glance, 4th ed. Cat. no. AGE 52. Canberra. 2007. http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6442454209. Accessed 22 Jul 2016.
Institute of Medicine. Dying in america: improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
Decision Assist. Australia: Palliative Care Australia. http://palliativecare.org.au/decision-assist/. Accessed 22 Jul 2016.
Seymour J. Beyond planning for incompetency: Reshaping advance care planning for frail older people. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;5:A21–22. CrossRef
Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research 3e: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. CrossRef
World Health Organisation. Definition of an older or elderly person. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/. Accessed 22 Jul 2016.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Ageing. http://www.aihw.gov.au/ageing/. Accessed 7 Nov 2016.
Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights. Who gets to decide? Right to legal capacity for persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities. France: Council of Europe Publishing. 2012. https://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/source/prems/IP_LegalCapacity_GBR.pdf. Accessed 21 Jul 2016.
Dewing J. Participatory research: a method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia. 2007;6:11–25. CrossRef
- Managing ‘shades of grey’: a focus group study exploring community-dwellers’ views on advance care planning in older people
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II