nach oben

International Journal of Public Health

Erschienen in:

09.03.2017 | Original Article

Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

verfasst von: Katrien Beeckman, Lucy Frith, Helga Gottfreðsdóttir, Annette Bernloehr

Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

Measuring of antenatal care utilisation is important from a public health perspective. The Content and Timing of care in Pregnancy tool (CTP) focuses on the care process and includes aspects on quality of care. The aim of the study is to gain insight in the applicability of the CTP tool across Europe.

Methods

National guidelines for routine antenatal care were examined, analysing the degree to which the four items in the CTP tool were included in these guidelines.

Results

From the 30 countries, 22 had a national guideline for routine antenatal care. The CTP tool is applicable in over 60% of the European countries with a national guideline.

Conclusions

The CTP tool can be used to measure antenatal care delivery in Europe. The tool is useful to evaluate the care process, focusing on rates of interventions as the closest approximation to the delivery of health care, with a focus on content of visits rather than simply the number of visits. Together with indicators measuring structure and outcome of health care, conclusions about the quality of care can be made.

Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M (2001) Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep 116:306–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Al-Qutob R, Mawajdeh S, Bin RF (1996) The assessment of reproductive health services: a conceptual framework for prenatal care. Health Care Women Int 17:423–434PubMed

American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstitricians and Gynecologists (2007) Antepartum Care. In: lockwood CJ, Lemons JA (eds) Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 6th edn Washington, pp 83–137

Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. Clinical PracticeGuidelines (2015) Antenatal Care – Module II. Australian Government Department of Health.

Beeckman K, Louckx F, Masuy-Stroobant G, Downe S, Putman K (2011) The development and application of a new tool to assess the adequacy of the content and timing of antenatal care. BMC Health Serv Res 11:213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beeckman K, Louckx F, Downe S, Putman K (2013a) The relationship between antenatal care and preterm birth: the importance of content of care. Eur J Public Health 23:366–371CrossRefPubMed

Beeckman K, Louckx F, Putman K (2013b) Content and timing of antenatal care: predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of antenatal care trajectories. Eur J Public Health 23:67–73CrossRefPubMed

Bernloehr A (2007) Antenatal care in the European Union: Equal chances for all new citizens of the community. University of Surrey, Guildford

Bernloehr A, Smith P, Vydelingum V (2005) Antenatal care in the European Union: a survey on guidelines in all 25 member states of the Community. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 122:22–32CrossRefPubMed

Braeken MA, Kemp A, Outhred T, Otte R, Monsieur G, Jones A, Van den Bergh BR (2013) Pregnant mothers with resolved anxiety disorders and their offspring have reduced heart rate variability: implications for the health of children. PLoS ONE 8,12: e83186CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, Ryan C, Leap N, Teate A, Homer CS (2015) Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007622

De Gauquier K, Remacle A (2007) Prenatale zorg in België in 2005, studie van het Intermutualistisch Agentschap, Intermutualistisch Agenschap, p 61. http://www.nic-ima.be/IMG/pdf/prenatale-zorg-in-2005---ima.pdf

Donabedian A (1997) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? 1988. Arch Pathol Lab Med 121:1145–1150PubMed

Donabedian A (2003) An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press, Oxford

EURO-PERISTAT project (2008) European Perinatal Health Report. Better statistics for better health for pregnant women and their babies. http://www.europeristat.com/images/doc/EPHR/european-perinatal-health-report.pdf

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316CrossRefPubMed

Gyselaers W, Jonckheer P, Ahmadzai N, Ansari MT, Carville S, Dworzynski K, Gaudet J, Jones K, Miller P, Terzlaff JM, Alexander S, Allegaert K, Beeckman K, Ceusens G, Christiane Y, de Ronne N, de Thysebaert B, Dekker N, Denys A, Eeckeleers P, Hernandez A, Mathieu E, Seuntjens L, Verleye L, Stordeur S (2015) What are the recommended clinical assessment and screening tests during pregnancy? Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), KCE Reports 248. D/2015/10.273/58, Brussels

Handler A, RAnkin k, Rosenberg D, Sinha K (2012) Extent of documented adherence to recommended prenatal care content: provider site differences and effect on outcomes among low-income women. Matern Child Health J 16:393–405CrossRefPubMed

Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD (1998) The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981–1995, using different prenatal care indices. JAMA 279:1623–1628CrossRefPubMed

Korenbrot CC, Wong S, Steward A (2005) Health promotion and psychosocial services and women’s assessments of interpersonal prenatal care in Medicaid managed care. Matern Child Health J 9:135–149CrossRefPubMed

Kotelchuck M (1994) An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health 84:1414–1420CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lodewyckx (2004) Nationale richtlijn prenatale zorg: een basis voor een klinisch pad voor de opvolging van zwangerschappen. KCE reports Vol. 6 A

Loomans EM, Van dijk E, Vrijkotte T, van Eijsden M, Stronks K, Gemke R, Van den Bergh BR (2013) Psychosocial stress during pregnancy is related to adverse birth outcomes: results from a large multi-ethnic community-based birth cohort. Eur J Public Health 23:485–491CrossRefPubMed

Loomans EM, Van den Bergh BR, Schelling M, Vrijkotte T, van Eijsden M (2014) Maternal long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid status during early pregnancy and children’s risk of problem behavior at age 5–6 years. J Pediatr 164:762–768CrossRefPubMed

McDuffie RS Jr, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M (1996) Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 275:847–851CrossRefPubMed

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008). Antenatal care. Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62

Ng R, Macdonald E, Loutfy M, Yudin M, Raboud J, Masinde K, Bayoumi A, Tharao W, Brophy J, Glazier R, Antoniou T (2015) Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study. BMC Public Health 15:514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nothnagle M, Marchi K, Egerter S, Braveman P (2000) Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Matern Child Health J 4:251–259CrossRefPubMed

Odegard RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KA, Austgulen R (2000) Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre-eclampsia. BJOG 107:1410–1416CrossRefPubMed

Otte RA, Donkers F, Braeken M, Van den Bergh B (2015) Multimodal processing of emotional information in 9-month-old infants II: prenatal exposure to maternal anxiety. Brain Cogn 95:107–117CrossRefPubMed

Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft C, Abehaim H (2012) Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years. Am J Perinatol 29:787–793CrossRefPubMed

Petrou S, Kupek E, Vause S, Maresh M (2001) Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med 52:1123–1134CrossRefPubMed

Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N, Heinonen S (2007) Under-attending free antenatal care is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. BMC Public Health 7:268CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reveiz L, Gyte GML, Uervo LG (2007) Treatments for iron-deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003094

Ricketts SA, Murray E, Schwalberg R (2005) Reducing low birthweight by resolving risks: results from Colorado’s prenatal plus program. Am J Public Health 95:1952–1957CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sibai BM, Gordon T, Thom E, Caritis SN, Klebanoff M, McNellis D, Paul RH (1995) Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women: a prospective multicenter study. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:642–648CrossRefPubMed

Stamilio DM, Sehdev HM, Morgan MA, Propert K, Macones GA (2000) Can antenatal clinical and biochemical markers predict the development of severe preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:589–594CrossRefPubMed

Tayebi T, Zahrani S, Mohammadpour R (2013) Relationship between adequacy of prenatal care utilization index and pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Nurs. Midwifery 18:360–366

Taylor CR, Alexander GR, Hepworth JT (2005) Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions. Matern Child Health J 9:125–133CrossRefPubMed

Vanderweele TJ, lantos J, Siddigue J, Lauderdale D (2008) A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: Comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 62:438–445CrossRefPubMed

White DE, Fraser-Lee N, Tough S, Newburn-Cook CV (2006) The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada. Health Care Women Int 27:777–792CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?
verfasst von: Katrien Beeckman
Lucy Frith
Helga Gottfreðsdóttir
Annette Bernloehr
Publikationsdatum: 09.03.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-0959-4

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Acculturation and health-related quality of life: results from the German National Cohort migrant feasibility study

Relative contribution of health-related behaviours and chronic diseases to the socioeconomic patterning of low-grade inflammation

Harmful drinking after job loss: a stronger association during the post-2008 economic crisis?

Influence of kindergarten on numbers of multiple developmental delays in preschoolers: an analysis over 14 years

Factors associated with self-rated health among migrant workers: results from a population-based cross-sectional study in Almaty, Kazakhstan

Structural properties and psychometric improvements of the Health Literacy Questionnaire in a Slovak population