The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
HF conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. BB participated in the data acquisition and data analysis. BM participated in the study design and coordination. SL participated in the data analysis and helped draft the manuscript. AW participated in the data analysis, helped with the study coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Tolerance of ambiguity, or the extent to which ambiguous situations are perceived as desirable, is an important component of the attitudes and behaviors of medical students. However, few studies have compared this trait across the years of medical school. General practitioners are considered to have a higher ambiguity tolerance than specialists. We compared ambiguity tolerance between general practitioners and medical students.
We designed a cross-sectional study to evaluate the ambiguity tolerance of 622 medical students in the first to sixth academic years. We compared this with the ambiguity tolerance of 30 general practitioners. We used the inventory for measuring ambiguity tolerance (IMA) developed by Reis (1997), which includes three measures of ambiguity tolerance: openness to new experiences, social conflicts, and perception of insoluble problems.
We obtained a total of 564 complete data sets (return rate 90.1%) from medical students and 29 questionnaires (return rate 96.7%) from general practitioners. In relation to the reference groups defined by Reis (1997), medical students had poor ambiguity tolerance on all three scales. No differences were found between those in the first and the sixth academic years, although we did observe gender-specific differences in ambiguity tolerance. We found no differences in ambiguity tolerance between general practitioners and medical students.
The ambiguity tolerance of the students that we assessed was below average, and appeared to be stable throughout the course of their studies. In contrast to our expectations, the general practitioners did not have a higher level of ambiguity tolerance than the students did.
Ellsberg D: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart J Econ. 1961, 75: 643-669. 10.2307/1884324. CrossRef
Tatzel M: Tolerance for ambiguity in adult college students. Psychol Rep. 1980, 47: 377-378. 10.2466/pr0.1922.214.171.1247. CrossRef
Furnham A, Ribchester T: Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Cur Psychol. 1995, 14: 179-199. 10.1007/BF02686907. CrossRef
Kvale J, Berg L, Groff JY, Lange G: Factors associated with residents’ attitudes toward dying patients. Fam Med. 1999, 31: 691-696. PubMed
Nevalainen M, Kuikka L, Sjoberg L, Eriksson J, Pitkala K: Tolerance of uncertainty and fears of making mistakes among fifth-year medical students. Fam Med. 2012, 44: 240-246. PubMed
Fox RC: Training for uncertainty. 1957, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press CrossRef
Reis J: Ambiguitätstoleranz. Beiträge zur Entwicklung eines Persönlichkeitskonstrukts. 1997, Heidelberg: Asanger
Schwarzer A, Gregor F: Medizinerreport 2012 – Berufsstart und Berufsverlauf von Humanmedizinerinnen und Humanmedizinern. HIS Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH. 2012, 5:
Kopetsch T: Dem deutschen Gesundheitswesen gehen die Ärzte aus!. Bundesärztekammer und Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. 2010, 94-95.
Fox RC: Is there a “new” medical student?: a comparative view of medical socialization in the 1950’s and 1970’s. 1974, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences
Matteson MT, Smith SV: Selection of medical specialties: preferences versus choices. J Med Educ. 1977, 52: 548-554. PubMed
- Measuring the ambiguity tolerance of medical students: a cross-sectional study from the first to sixth academic years
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II