Skip to main content
main-content

01.01.2012 | Original Article | Ausgabe 1/2012

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2012

Meta-analysis of docetaxel-based doublet versus docetaxel alone as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Zeitschrift:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Wei-Xiang Qi, Zan Shen, Yang Yao

Abstract

Purpose

To compare docetaxel-based doublet with single-agent docetaxel as second-line treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared docetaxel-based doublet with single-agent docetaxel in patients with histologically proven non-small-cell lung cancer. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, overall response rate, 1-year survival rate, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 10.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Eight randomized clinical trials (totally 2,126 patients) were eligible. Meta-analysis showed that there was significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96, P = 0.013) and overall response rate (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13–1.80, P = 0.03) in docetaxel-based doublet group, compared with docetaxel alone, though the pooled HR for overall survival (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80–1.07, P = 0.308) showed no significant difference between the two groups. However, there were more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.00–1.45, P = 0.05), thrombocytopenia (OR 4.53, 95% CI 1.75–11.75, P = 0.002), and diarrhea (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.16–2.74, P = 0.008) in docetaxel-based doublet group. With regard to the risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.62–6.17, P = 0.25), fatigue (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.75–1.59, P = 0.66), and nausea and vomiting (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.78–3.91, P = 0.17), there was no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

This was the first meta-analysis of docetaxel-based doublet versus single-agent docetaxel as second-line therapy in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The results indicated that docetaxel-based doublet therapy did not gain any benefit in survival but significantly improved PFS and better ORR versus single-agent docetaxel. However, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea were observed in docetaxel-based doublet group.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Innere Medizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise