Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 2/2021

14.12.2020 | Original Research

Meta-analysis of Duration of Continuous Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Late Stent Thrombosis After Second-Generation Drug Stent Implantation

verfasst von: Ming Liu, Wen-chao Xie, Ri-na Jiang, Ping Li

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic comparison of the incidence of late and extremely late stent thrombosis (ST) with short-term and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after a second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials using short-term and long-term DAPT and reporting late ST (30 days–1 year) and extremely late ST (longer than 1 year) after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES were searched and compared in the Life Sciences and Biomedical Information Bibliographic Database (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.com. ST was used as the primary endpoint of the therapeutic outcome, and the fixed-effects model (I2 < 50%) or random-effects model (I2 ≥ 50%) was adopted for the combined analysis. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to represent the results. P < 0.05 in the combined result indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

Results

A total of five randomized controlled trials consisting of 7142 patients were included, with 3556 cases of short-term DAPT (at most 6 months), and 3586 cases of long-term DAPT (at least 12 months). There was no significant difference between late ST and administration duration of DAPT (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.30–3.18; P = 0.97, I2 = 0%). There was also no significant difference between the incidence of extremely late ST and the duration of DAPT application (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.03–2.95; P = 0.31).

Conclusion

The duration of continuous DAPT application had no effect on the occurrence of late and extremely late ST.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayton TC, Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, et al. Risk score for predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):869.CrossRef Clayton TC, Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, et al. Risk score for predicting death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with stable angina, based on a large randomised trial cohort of patients. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):869.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease:collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1849–60.CrossRef Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease:collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1849–60.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent is chemic events (CURE) trial. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1202–8.CrossRef Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent is chemic events (CURE) trial. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1202–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1329–39.CrossRef CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996;348(9038):1329–39.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Anselmino M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials appraising the impact of cilostazol after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2008;155(6):1081–9.CrossRef Biondi-Zoccai GG, Lotrionte M, Anselmino M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials appraising the impact of cilostazol after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2008;155(6):1081–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.CrossRef Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Moliterno DJ. Healing Achilles–sirolimus versus paclitaxel. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(7):724–7.CrossRef Moliterno DJ. Healing Achilles–sirolimus versus paclitaxel. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(7):724–7.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation. 2004;109(16):1942–7.CrossRef Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation. 2004;109(16):1942–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(23):1773–80.CrossRef Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(23):1773–80.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, et al. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003;108(7):788–94.CrossRef Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, et al. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003;108(7):788–94.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(10):1215–23.CrossRef Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;294(10):1215–23.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Niu H. Research of influence factors by anti-platelet aggregation drug inducing upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Chin Pract Med. 2016;11(20):10–1. Niu H. Research of influence factors by anti-platelet aggregation drug inducing upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Chin Pract Med. 2016;11(20):10–1.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittl JA, Chew DP, Topol EJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherotomy, or laser angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(6):936–43.CrossRef Bittl JA, Chew DP, Topol EJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherotomy, or laser angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(6):936–43.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(12):701–6. CrossRef Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(12):701–6. CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation. 2007;115:1440–55.CrossRef Camenzind E, Steg PG, Wijns W. Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. Circulation. 2007;115:1440–55.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordmann AJ, Briel M, Bucher HC. Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(23):2784–814.CrossRef Nordmann AJ, Briel M, Bucher HC. Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(23):2784–814.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lange RA, Hillis LD. Second-generation drug-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1728–30.CrossRef Lange RA, Hillis LD. Second-generation drug-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1728–30.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Doostzadeh J, Clark LN, Bezenek S, et al. Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent. Coron Artery Dis. 2010;21:46–56.CrossRef Doostzadeh J, Clark LN, Bezenek S, et al. Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent. Coron Artery Dis. 2010;21:46–56.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, et al. Three-year outcomes with the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: individual-patient-data meta-analysis from the ABSORB randomized trials. Circulation. 2018;137(5):464–79.CrossRef Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, et al. Three-year outcomes with the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: individual-patient-data meta-analysis from the ABSORB randomized trials. Circulation. 2018;137(5):464–79.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Meta-analysis of Duration of Continuous Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Late Stent Thrombosis After Second-Generation Drug Stent Implantation
verfasst von
Ming Liu
Wen-chao Xie
Ri-na Jiang
Ping Li
Publikationsdatum
14.12.2020
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01575-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Advances in Therapy 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.