Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Letter to the Editor

Metabolic Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes in BMI <35: A Surgeon’s View

verfasst von: Keith Scharf, John Morton

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

We read Dr. Lebovitz's literature review and opinion regarding metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes with BMI <35 with great interest. This is a relevant topic since more than 25 million adults in the USA are type 2 diabetic and 79 million are pre-diabetic. This number continues to grow, nearly tripling in the past 20 years [1, 2]. Current treatment for type 2 diabetics with a BMI <35 is intensive medical management, however, with poor to mixed results. The look AHEAD research group recently published their results of cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. The trial was stopped early at mean follow-up of 9.6 years when futility analysis showed an intensive lifestyle intervention focusing on weight loss did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes [3]. We now have several randomized, observational and retrospective trials looking at metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes in patients with BMI <35. As the author discussed, Shimizu et al. reviewed 18 studies with 477 patients. They were able to achieve a 64.7 % remission rate (FPG <126 mg/dl, HgbA1c <6.5 %, off medications), and 86.8 % of patients had their anti-diabetic medications discontinued [4]. Blue Cross and Blue Shield technology evaluation center (TEC) published their review of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetic patients with BMI <35. Their goal was to determine if bariatric surgery improved outcomes for patients with BMI <35 and type 2 diabetes. Their review of the literature showed remission rates ranging from 48 to 100 % at 1 year. The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Advisory Medical Panel recommended gastric bypass for type 2 diabetics with BMI <35 as the evidence met TEC criteria [5]. In addition, Schauer et al. published their randomized controlled trial of bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for obese patients with diabetes. In this study, 34 % of the subjects had a BMI <35. They reported statistically significant remission rates for diabetes in the gastric bypass group versus the medical therapy group at 1 year (42 and 12 %, respectively) [6]. Ikramuddin et al. published the Diabetes Surgery Study Randomized Clinical Trial comparing gastric bypass to intensive medical management for control of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in obese patients. They had 120 patients followed for 12 months. Primary ADA endpoints were HgbA1c <7 %, LDL <100 mg/dl, and systolic blood pressure <130. Sixty percent of the patients in the gastric bypass group and 58 % in the medical group had a BMI <35. Primary endpoints were achieved in 49 % of the gastric bypass patients versus 19 % of the medically managed patients. HgbA1c <7 % was achieved in 75 % of the gastric bypass patients at 1 year compared to 32 % from the medical group. HgbA1c <6 % was achieved in 44 % of the gastric bypass patients compared to 9 % in the medical group [7]. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse-U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Diabetes Overview National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse-U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Diabetes Overview
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Diabetes Data & Trends: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number of civilian, non-institutionalized persons with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2011. 2011 Diabetes Data & Trends: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number of civilian, non-institutionalized persons with diagnosed diabetes, United States, 1980–2011. 2011
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Look AHEAD Research Group, Wing RR, Bolin P, Brancati FL, et al. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):145–54.PubMedCrossRef Look AHEAD Research Group, Wing RR, Bolin P, Brancati FL, et al. Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):145–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu H, Timratana P, Schauer PR, et al. Review of metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes in patients with a BMI <35 kg/m2. J Obesity. 2012;2012:147256.CrossRef Shimizu H, Timratana P, Schauer PR, et al. Review of metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes in patients with a BMI <35 kg/m2. J Obesity. 2012;2012:147256.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Technology Evaluation Center. Bariatric surgery in patients with diabetes and body mass index less than 35 kg/m2. Assessment Program. 2012; Volume 27; No. 2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Technology Evaluation Center. Bariatric surgery in patients with diabetes and body mass index less than 35 kg/m2. Assessment Program. 2012; Volume 27; No. 2.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery vs. intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery vs. intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikramuddin S, Korner J, Lee W, Connett J, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The Diabetes Surgery Study Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2240–9.PubMedCrossRef Ikramuddin S, Korner J, Lee W, Connett J, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. intensive medical management for the control of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The Diabetes Surgery Study Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2240–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D, et al. Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care. 2009;47(5):531–5.PubMedCrossRef Encinosa WE, Bernard DM, Du D, et al. Recent improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes. Med Care. 2009;47(5):531–5.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304(4):435–42.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Masoomi H, Magno CP, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Metabolic Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes in BMI <35: A Surgeon’s View
verfasst von
Keith Scharf
John Morton
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1098-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Obesity Surgery 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.