A broad selection of soccer talent identification studies are considered and their methodology, in terms of design, validity, and utility, is evaluated. |
Four major methodological limitations are identified and discussed: the use of performance levels as the criterion; the focus on components as predictors of soccer performance; the influence of restriction of range on the generalization of findings; and the impact on the base rate on the utility of talent identification procedures. |
To increase the robustness of its research practices, we propose that future soccer talent identification studies should adopt more individual soccer performance outcomes, high-fidelity predictors, where possible correct for range restriction, and take the base rate into account. |
1 Introduction
2 Methodological Issues
2.1 Operationalizing the Criterion
Study | Prognostic period (follow-up) | Age at assessment |
N
| Criterion | Predictors | Considers restriction of range |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reilly et al. 2000 [3] | Cross-sectional | U17 | 16 15 | Elite Sub-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—7 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, strength (physiological—10 variables) Dribbling and shooting (soccer-specific—2 variables) Anxiety intention and direction, anticipation, motivation (psychological—11 variables) | Partially—authors briefly consider if findings will replicate in highly selected players who are exposed to more systematic training |
Vaeyens et al. 2006 [73] | Cross-sectional | U13–U16 | 490a | Elite Sub-elite Non-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight (physical—3 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, strength (physiological—10 variables) Dribbling, shooting, passing, juggling (soccer-specific—4 variables) | Yes—authors consider that differentiating the ability of performance indicators might be dependent on competitive age class, and relate findings to homogeneity of sample due to preselection |
Toering et al. 2009 [75] | Cross-sectional | U12–U18 | 159 285 | Elite Non-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Self-regulation (psychological—6 variables) | No, but authors did control for effects of age |
Coelho e Silva et al. 2010 [84] | Cross-sectional | U14 | 69 45 | Elite Local |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (3 variables) Height, weight, body composition (physical—3 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, and power (physiological—5 variables) Dribbling, shooting, passing (4 variables) Task and ego orientation (psychological—2 variables)
Other:
Soccer experience (1 variable) | No |
Waldron and Worsfold 2010 [40] | Cross-sectional | U14 | 69 32 | Elite Sub-elite |
High-fidelity:
Attempted, successful and unsuccessful skill involvements in a match, such as passing, shooting, tackling (18 variables) | No |
Kavussanu et al. 2011 [42] | Cross-sectional | U13–U17 | 69 49 | Elite Non-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Task and ego orientation, perceived parental environment (psychological—11 variables) | No |
Waldron and Murphy 2013 [100] | Cross-sectional | U15 | 15 16 | Elite Sub-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, strength, agility (physiological—5 variables) Dribbling (soccer-specific—2 variables)
High-fidelity:
Attempted, successful and unsuccessful skill involvements in a match, such as passing, shooting, tackling (6 variables) Physiological performance during games, such as intensity movements and distance covered (9 variables)
Other:
Heart rate and perceived exertion (2 variables) | No |
Haugaasen et al. 2014 [44] | Cross-sectional | U14–U22 | 615 81 | Non-professional Professional |
Other:
Engagement in soccer-specific activities (sociological—4 variables) | Partially—authors specifically examine participation in soccer-specific activities in different age categories, but do not relate their findings to the homogeneity of the sample, due to preselection |
Verburgh et al. 2014 [77] | Cross-sectional | U9–U17 | 84 42 | Highly-talented Amateur |
Low-fidelity:
Executive functions (psychological—8 variables) | Partially—authors briefly state that findings can only be considered in the context of the samples, but authors do not examine the differentiating ability of predictors per age category, and did not control for age |
Baláková et al. 2015 [79] | Cross-sectional | U14 | 91a | Talented Less-talented |
Low-fidelity:
Cognitive functions (psychological—16 variables) | No |
Goto et al. 2015 [54] | Cross-sectional | U9–U10 | 14 20 | Retained Released |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (1 variable)
High-fidelity:
Physiological performance during games, such as intensity movements and distance covered (6 variables) | No |
Huijgen et al. 2015 [41] | Cross-sectional | U14–U18 | 47 41 | Elite Sub-elite |
Low-fidelity:
Lower and higher cognitive functions (psychological—6 variables) | No |
Fenner et al. 2016 [69] | Cross-sectional | U10 | 16 | Rating of technical performance in SSGb |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, strength (physiological—3 variables)
High-fidelity:
Individual performance in SSGs, time–motion characteristics (5 variables) | Yes—authors compare findings to a similar study with older players, and suggest that these findings did not replicate due to the increased homogeneity of technical skills in the older players. |
Bennett et al. 2017 [101] | Cross-sectional | U12–U16 | 36 37 | High-level Low-level |
High-fidelity:
Attempted, successful and unsuccessful skill involvements in a match, such as passing, shooting, dribbling (13 variables) | No |
Den Hartigh et al. 2017 [55] | Cross-sectional | U11 | 49 39 | Selected Non-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Game reading based on video images (1 variable) | No |
Rowat et al. 2017 [71] | Cross-sectional | U18 | 27 | Technical performance in SSG ratingb |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (1 variable) Speed, endurance (physiological—2 variables) Dribbling, passing, shooting (soccer-specific—4 variables) | No |
Wilson et al. 2017 [39] | Cross-sectional | NA | 32 | Individual performance in 1-vs-1 and 11-a-side gamesb |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—7 variables, 2 latent variables) Speed, strength, balance (physiological—7 variables, 3 latent variables) Dribbling, juggling, shooting, passing (soccer-specific—5 variables, 2 latent variables) | No |
Gil et al. 2007 [107] | < 1 year | U15–U18 | 126 68 | Selected Non-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—22 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, power (physiological—10 variables) | Partially—authors briefly consider that technical, tactical and psychological skills may have more discriminative power for selected players at later ages, when growth differences are less important |
Gravina et al. 2008 [46] | < 1 year | U11–U14 | 44 22 | First team Reserves |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—13 variables) Speed, strength (physiological—10 variables) | Partially—authors very briefly relate findings to extended population, but do not discuss homogeneity of the sample due to preselection |
Huijgen et al. 2014 [52] | < 1 year | U17–U19 | 76 47 | Selected Deselected |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, endurance (physiological—4 variables) Dribbling (soccer-specific—4 variables) Tactical characteristic questionnaire (4—variables) Task and ego orientation, anxiety, concentration, motivation (psychological—8 variables) | No, but authors did control for effects of age |
Lago-Penas et al. 2014 [63] | < 1 year | U15/U17/U20 | 156a | Selected Non-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—6 variables) Speed, endurance, strength (physiological—3 variables) | No |
Zuber and Conzelmann 2014 [70] | < 1 year | U13 | 140 | Overall soccer performance ratingb |
Low-fidelity:
Achievement motive (psychological—2 latent variables) Speed, endurance, strength, agility (physiological—4 variables, 1 latent variable) Dribbling, juggling and ball control (soccer-specific—3 variables, 1 latent variable) | Yes—authors relate findings to homogeneity of the sample due to preselection |
Aquino et al. 2017 [57] | < 1 year | U17 | 28 38 | Selected Non-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (1 variable) Height, body composition (physical—3 variables) Speed, endurance, strength (physiological—7 variables) Shooting, ball control, dribbling, tactical skills questionnaire (soccer-specific—4 variables) | No |
Gil et al. 2014 [53] | 1 year | U10–U11 | 21 43 | Selected Non-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (3 variables) Height, weight, body composition (physical—9 variables) Speed, endurance, strength (physiological—7 variables)
Other:
Soccer experience (1 variable) | No |
Vestberg et al. 2012 [78] | < 2 years | Adult | 29 28 | High division Low division Goals scored and assistsb |
Low-fidelity:
Executive functions (psychological—3) | Yes—authors also have results for non-soccer players, and are therefore able to compare results with the general population |
Vestberg et al. 2017 [80] | < 2 years | U13–U20 | 30 | Goals scored and assistsb |
Low-fidelity:
Executive functions (psychological—4 variables) | Yes—authors also have results for non-soccer players, and are therefore able to compare results with the general population |
Figueiredo et al. 2009 [47] | 2 years | U12–U15 | 36 90 33 | Drop-out Club Elite |
Low-fidelity:
Height, weight, body composition (physical—6 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, and power (physiological—6 variables) Dribbling, shooting, passing (soccer-specific—4 variables) Task and ego orientation (psychological—2 variables)
Other:
Soccer experience (1 variable) Rating of player’s potential (1—variable) | No |
Deprez et al. 2015 [48] | 2 years | U10–U17 | 633 231 29 29 | Club Drop-out Contract No contract Total minutes played in first teamb |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (2 variables) Height, weight, body composition (physical—3 variables) Speed, power, endurance, motor coordination (physiological—8 variables) Dribbling (soccer-specific—2 variables) | Yes—authors examine the discriminatory power of variables per age group and discuss these results in relation to the homogeneity of each age group, in terms of physical abilities. They also briefly relate their findings to the extended, unselected population |
Zuber et al. 2015 [50] | 2 years | U13 | 10 82 | National team Elite—not selected |
Low-fidelity:
Achievement motivation, achievement goal orientation, self-determination (psychological—5 variables) | Yes—authors investigate distinct clusters formed of the different variables, for each age category. They also briefly consider homogeneity of the sample on examined variables |
Zuber et al. 2016 [49] | 3 years | U12 | 12 39 68 | National Regional No talent card |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (1 variable) Net hope (psychological—2 variables) Speed, endurance, strength (physiological—3 variables) Dribbling, passing, juggling (soccer-specific—3 variables) | Yes—authors investigate distinct clusters formed of the different variables, for each age category. They also note that results should only be considered in the context of their homogenous sample, and cannot directly be translated to the general population |
Zibung et al. 2016 [51] | 3 years | U13 | 10 30 64 | National talent card Regional talent card No talent card |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, endurance, agility (physiological—3 variables) Dribbling, passing, juggling (soccer-specific—3 variables) | Yes—authors briefly discuss the decrease of variance in performance over time, as a result of increasing homogeneity of the sample due to preselection |
Huijgen et al. 2013 [82] | 1–3 years | U12–U19 | 269 50 | Selected De-selected |
Low-fidelity:
Passing: Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (soccer-specific—2 variables) | Partially—authors take the development of skills into account and relate the results to different age categories, but only very briefly consider homogeneity of the sample due to preselection |
Höner and Feichtinger 2016 [21] | 4 years | U12 | 308 2369 | Youth academy No youth academy |
Low-fidelity:
Achievement motive, ego orientation, sport orientation, volition, self-concept, self-efficacy, anxiety (psychological—17 variables) | Yes—authors relate their findings to the homogeneity of the sample due to preselection |
Kannekens et al. 2011 [83] | 3—5 years | U17—U19 | 52 53 | Professional Amateur |
Low-fidelity:
Tactical skills questionnaire (soccer-specific—4 variables)
Other:
Soccer experience, practice per week, non-specific sport practice | No |
Gonaus and Müller 2012 [56] | 1–6 years | U14–U17 | 821 3912 | Drafted Non-drafted |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, endurance, strength, agility (physiological—12 variables) | Yes—authors consider the homogeneity of the sample and relate the discriminating power of variables to a specific age group |
le Gall et al. 2010 [64] | 4–6 years | U14–U16 | 48 167 235 | International Professional Amateur |
Low-fidelity:
Maturity (3 variables) Height, weight, body composition (physical—3 variables) Speed, endurance, agility, and power (physiological—14 variables) | Partially—authors examine the discriminative power of performance characteristics per age group, but only very briefly consider how homogeneity of their sample due to preselection may affect findings |
Höner and Votteler 2016 [43] | 4–7 years | U12 | 195 731 1025 20,892 | National Regional Academy Not selected |
Low-fidelity:
Sprinting, agility (physiological—2 variables) Dribbling, ball control, shooting (soccer-specific—3 variables) | Yes—authors mention restriction of range, relate findings to homogeneity of the sample due to preselection, and consider that discriminatory power may vary according to age group and homogeneity of the sample |
Höner et al. 2017 [45] | 8–10 years | U12 | 89 913 13,176 | Professional Semi-professional Non-professional |
Low-fidelity:
Relative age (1 variable) Height, weight (physical—2 variables) Speed, agility (physiological—2 variables) Dribbling, shooting, ball control (soccer-specific—3 variables) | Partially—authors briefly consider how predictive value may differ for different age categories, but do not discuss homogeneity of their sample due to preselection |
Van Yperen 2009 [76] | 15 years | U15–U18 | 18 47 | Successful Unsuccessful |
Low-fidelity:
Goal commitment, coping, social support (psychological—3 variables)
Other:
Assessment of initial performance by coaches (1 variable) | No, but the author did control for initial performance level |
Martinez-Santos et al. 2016 [74] | 2–18 years | Adult | 74 161 | First/second division Semi-professional |
Low-fidelity:
Speed, strength (physiological—3 variables) | No |