Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2018

20.09.2018 | Review

Micro-invasive interventions for managing non-cavitated proximal caries of different depths: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yuee Liang, Zilong Deng, Xingzhu Dai, Jinhui Tian, Wanghong Zhao

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to further evaluate the caries-arresting effectiveness of micro-invasive interventions for non-cavitated proximal caries and analyze their efficacy for caries lesions of different depths.

Materials and methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of micro-invasive interventions for non-cavitated proximal caries were included in this study. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on May 25, 2017, without restrictions. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, a meta-analysis of the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and a publication bias analysis were conducted using Stata 12.0.

Results

After 2195 citations were screened, 8 citations of seven studies with follow-up periods from 12 to 36 months were included. The subgroup analysis showed that resin infiltration and resin sealant, but not glass ionomer cement (GIC), could reduce the caries progression rate (resin infiltration: OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.24; resin sealant: OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.58; GIC: OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.65). Further analysis of their efficacies for caries lesions of different depths indicated that resin infiltration could arrest progression of enamel caries and caries around the enamel-dentin junction (EDJ) (enamel: OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.35; EDJ: OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.70). However, when the outer third of the dentin was involved, resin infiltration yielded significantly different results compared with the control group (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.10). Resin sealant seemed to be ineffective regardless of the caries depth (enamel: OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.00; EDJ: OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.15; dentin: OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.63).

Conclusions

Resin infiltration is effective in arresting the progression of non-cavitated proximal caries involved in EDJ, while the therapeutic effects of resin sealant for different caries depths still needs to be further confirmed.

Clinical relevance

Based on existing evidence, dentists should carefully select appropriate micro-invasive interventions according to the different depths of non-cavitated proximal caries.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390:1211–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2 CrossRef GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators (2017) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390:1211–1259. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(17)32154-2 CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McCune RJ, Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, Cvar J (1973) Pit and fissure sealants: one-year results from a study in Kalispell, Montana. J Am Dent Assoc 87:1177–1180CrossRefPubMed McCune RJ, Horowitz HS, Heifetz SB, Cvar J (1973) Pit and fissure sealants: one-year results from a study in Kalispell, Montana. J Am Dent Assoc 87:1177–1180CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez SS, Emilson CG, Corvalan GC, Quiroz MD, Moran MPH (2014) Efficacy of sealing the mesial surfaces of first permanent molars with respect to the status of the distal surfaces of the second primary molars in children at high caries-risk. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 15:65–73CrossRefPubMed Gomez SS, Emilson CG, Corvalan GC, Quiroz MD, Moran MPH (2014) Efficacy of sealing the mesial surfaces of first permanent molars with respect to the status of the distal surfaces of the second primary molars in children at high caries-risk. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 15:65–73CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trairatvorakul C, Itsaraviriyakul S, Wiboonchan W (2011) Effect of glass-ionomer cement on the progression of proximal caries. J Dent Res 90:99–103CrossRefPubMed Trairatvorakul C, Itsaraviriyakul S, Wiboonchan W (2011) Effect of glass-ionomer cement on the progression of proximal caries. J Dent Res 90:99–103CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkilzy M, Berndt C, Meller C, Schidlowski M, Splieth C (2009) Sealing of proximal surfaces with polyurethane tape: a two-year clinical and radiographic feasibility study. J Adhes Dent 11:91–94PubMed Alkilzy M, Berndt C, Meller C, Schidlowski M, Splieth C (2009) Sealing of proximal surfaces with polyurethane tape: a two-year clinical and radiographic feasibility study. J Adhes Dent 11:91–94PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen LJ, Li RY, Chen XH, Xie SM, Xie LQ, Van Natta RH, Gao P, Zhang LL (2013) Oral histopathology. Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, China, pp 212–213 Shen LJ, Li RY, Chen XH, Xie SM, Xie LQ, Van Natta RH, Gao P, Zhang LL (2013) Oral histopathology. Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, China, pp 212–213
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ismail AI, Bader JD, ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and Division of Science, Journal of the American Dental Association (2004) Evidence-based dentistry in clinical practice. J Am Dent Assoc 135:78–83CrossRefPubMed Ismail AI, Bader JD, ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and Division of Science, Journal of the American Dental Association (2004) Evidence-based dentistry in clinical practice. J Am Dent Assoc 135:78–83CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverstone LM (1973) Structure of carious enamel, including the early lesion. Oral Sci Rev 3:100–160PubMed Silverstone LM (1973) Structure of carious enamel, including the early lesion. Oral Sci Rev 3:100–160PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez S, Uribe S, Onetto JE, Emilson CG (2008) SEM analysis of sealant penetration in posterior approximal enamel carious lesions in vivo. J Adhes Dent 10:151–156PubMed Gomez S, Uribe S, Onetto JE, Emilson CG (2008) SEM analysis of sealant penetration in posterior approximal enamel carious lesions in vivo. J Adhes Dent 10:151–156PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Fusayama T, Kurosaki N (1972) Structure and removal of carious dentin. Int Dent J 22:401–411PubMed Fusayama T, Kurosaki N (1972) Structure and removal of carious dentin. Int Dent J 22:401–411PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hujoel PP (1998) Design and analysis issues in split mouth clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26:85–86CrossRefPubMed Hujoel PP (1998) Design and analysis issues in split mouth clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26:85–86CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Riordan PJ, FitzGerald PE (1994) Outcome measures in split mouth caries trials and their statistical evaluation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22:192–197CrossRefPubMed Riordan PJ, FitzGerald PE (1994) Outcome measures in split mouth caries trials and their statistical evaluation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22:192–197CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Micro-invasive interventions for managing non-cavitated proximal caries of different depths: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Yuee Liang
Zilong Deng
Xingzhu Dai
Jinhui Tian
Wanghong Zhao
Publikationsdatum
20.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2605-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

Clinical Oral Investigations 8/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.