Background
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in North American men, although the rate has been declining in part from the use of statin drugs for unrelated medical conditions [
1]. In spite of recent reports that place into question the benefit of dietary supplementation with respect to overall survival following diagnosis of PCa, preclinical studies continue to reveal significant benefits using micronutrient cocktails as preventative regimens in spontaneous mouse models of PCa [
2].
Among the many micronutrients tested for their anticancer properties, vitamin E, a major intracellular antioxidant, remains one of the most studied [
3‐
8]. We have previously determined that the effect of vitamin E in PCa is mediated, at least in part, by the induction of cell cycle arrest through the modulation of the cdk inhibitor, p27
Kip1
[
7]. Selenium has been implicated in playing a chemopreventive role in various cancers, including PCa [
8,
9]. We have shown that selenium also induces cell cycle arrest
in vitro but only in the presence of a functional androgen receptor [
10]. Finally, the carotenoid, lycopene, has shown considerable clinical benefits in both diabetic and PCa patients, particularly when combined with other tomato nutrients [
11]. Lycopene has also been proven to act synergistically as a chemopreventive agent when combined with ketosamines
in vitro [
12]. Aside from the well reported intracellular mechanisms of these micronutrients as single agents, no studies have surfaced to suggest how the host responds to the combination of these micronutrients that may suppress tumor growth. The rationale herein to use all three in combination comes from previous studies conducted in our laboratory [
2,
13]. We have reported synergistic properties between vitamin E and selenium that induce growth arrest of LNCaP cells
in vitro over either antioxidant alone [
14]. As well, lycopene as a single agent has similarly been shown to be effective
in vitro, yet this response is not necessarily reflected
in vivo (unpublished data). Thus, we tested all three in combination for their ability to induce the production of functional biomarkers that could potentially be responsible for the delayed progression of prostate cancer observed in the
Lady mouse model of PCa [
13].
We present here a proteomic approach that has deciphered an anti-angiogenesis response in vivo by the combined administration of vitamin E, selenium and lycopene (E/S/L) in a spontaneous mouse model of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. We have found that these micronutrients can induce the expression of PF-4, a megakaryocyte-specific protein that is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis. We propose the mechanism that the subsequent upregulation of PF-4 in platelets upon terminal differentiation of the megakaryocyte allows for the delivery of the elevated protein to the tumor, thereby suppressing tumor-dependant angiogenesis and promoting a dormant phenotype in the Lady mouse.
Methods
Mice and dietary conditions
Female Lady transgenic mice (12T-10) were obtained from Dr. Robert J. Matusik (Vanderbilt Prostate Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN). All animals were housed and maintained according to institutional guidelines set forth by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada and in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Animal research reported in the manuscript has been performed with the approval of the Sunnybrook Research Ethics Board and conducted as per institutional guidelines set forth by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada and in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Animals were fed either standard chow or a chow supplemented with the antioxidants, vitamin E (α-tocopherol succinate) (800IU), selenium (seleno-DL methionine) (200 μg) and lycopene (50 mg) (Purina Mills Test Diet, Richmond, Indiana). The latter diet is abbreviated henceforth, E/S/L. All animals were maintained on each diet for a period of 42 weeks.
Serum processing and Surface-enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization - Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (SELDI-ToF MS)
All mice were anaesthetized by inhalation (Isoflurane-4% induction/2% maintenance) prior to whole blood collection via cardiac puncture using a 1cc syringe fitted with a 26 gauge/0.5 cm needle. The blood was quickly dispensed into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes and allowed to clot on ice. The clotted blood was then centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 minutes followed by collection of the top phase (serum) and storage at -80°C until processing time. Serum (20 μL) was fractionated by anion-exchange chromatography adopted from the Expression Difference Mapping (EDM) Serum Fractionation protocol (Ciphergen, Fremont, CA) in a 96-well format filter plate.
Expression difference mapping (EDM) on ProteinChip arrays was carried out using carboxymethyl ProteinChip arrays (CM10 ProteinChip arrays; Ciphergen, Fremont, CA) and readings were performed using the Protein Biology System IIC (PBSIIC) processed with the ProteinChip Software Biomarker Edition®, Version 3.2.0 (Ciphergen, Fremont, CA). After baseline subtraction, spectra were normalized by means of a total ion current. Peak detection was performed by using Biomarker Wizard software (Ciphergen, Fremont, CA) using a minimum peak detection criteria of a signal-to-noise ratio greater than 3.
Gel purification and sequencing of candidate peptides
A 20 μL sample of the peptide-containing fraction was resolved on NuPAGE
® Novex Bis-Tris Gels polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and a SeeBlue
® Plus2 Pre-Stained Standard (Invitrogen) was loaded into a single well as reference markers. SilverQuest™ Silver Staining Kit (Invitrogen) was used according to manufacture's protocol to stain peptides after resolving. Extraction of peptides with apparent molecular weights corresponding to those found to be significantly different between the two groups of mice (Table
1) were excised from the gels using a fine (1 mm) pasture pipet. The protein-containing band was in-gel digested with try sin and processed for sequencing according to previously published procedures [
15] and subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis (Agilent 1100 HPLC-chip and 6340 ion trap MSD system, Agilent Technologies). Raw MS/MS results were searched against NCBInr restricted to mammals' subset database, using Spectrum Mill MS Proteomics Workbench (Agilent Technologies). Proteins with two or more peptides identified from MS/MS search were reported.
Table 1
Candidate serum biomarkers of E/S/L-supplementation.
9.0 | 4479.11 | 0.0019 | 0.424 | 0.624 |
9.0 | 7489.44 | 0.0041 | 0.379 | 0.224 |
7.0 | 6267.37 | 0.0065 | 2.105 | 3.963 |
7.0 | 6483.69 | 0.0012 | 0.176 | 0.481 |
7.0 | 6824.78 | 0.0065 | 2.805 | 5.143 |
7.0* | 8963.14 | 0.0025 | 0.239 | 0.531 |
4.0 | 2297.16 | 0.0065 | 2.566 | 1.182 |
4.0 | 2927.47 | 0.0065 | 1.090 | 0.571 |
4.0 | 5586.30 | 0.0019 | 1.163 | 0.659 |
3.0 | 2902.33 | 0.0055 | 0.585 | 0.240 |
Tissue sampling and immunohistochemistry
All animals were examined for gross abnormalities according to previously described methods [
2,
13]. Prostate glands were fixed in 10% (v/v) buffered formalin, paraffin-embedded and cut into 5 μm sections mounted onto glass slides. The sections were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated and boiled for 10 min in citrate buffer (pH 7.0). They were then blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol followed by normal serum and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody against mouse PF-4 (anti-PF-4, mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa-Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:70 in PBS) or against anti-CD41 (anti-CD41, rat monoclonal antibody (Abcam) diluted 1:50 in PBS). Slides were then reacted with biotin-labeled anti-mouse IgG/anti-rat IgG and incubated with preformed avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted. The expressions of both PF-4 and CD41 were scored based on the intensity of staining (absence of staining, weak or strong) by two independent investigators.
Discussion
The micronutrients, vitamin E, selenium and lycopene are known to provide cells with an incredibly efficient free-radical scavenging system, therefore substantially reducing cancer-promoting DNA damage. While the literature evidence and current understanding of each supplement strongly supports this view, we report an unprecedented finding here that the combination of these three supplements together, but not individually, is also antiangiogenic by virtue of its ability to induce the expression of a megakaryocyte-specific, endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, PF-4. Furthermore, E/S/L has the ability to promote platelet binding to an activated endothelium and therefore concentrate this inhibitor at susceptible sites; i.e., tumor-adjacent vasculature.
The initial goal of this study was to conduct a full serum proteomic analysis to identify and characterize functional biomarkers of antioxidant supplementation likely to have an impact on the course of prostate cancer in a spontaneous PCa mouse model. We have previously reported an extended survival benefit in the
Lady transgenic mouse supplemented with an E/S/L cocktail and therefore wanted to further investigate the molecular mechanisms
in vivo governed by their synergistic properties that could ultimately be capable of maintaining the extrinsically mutated prostate epithelium in check [
2,
13]. Individually, these antioxidants imparted no benefits compared to those observed in the combination group; i.e., reduced tumor burden and extended survival [
2]. Serum profiling was therefore restricted to compare
Lady transgenic mice receiving a standard diet with those receiving E/S/L-supplementation, as the latter group alone clearly exhibited the benefits. It is important to note that while we have successfully identified PF-4 as a biomarker of dietary response by differential expression, validation and isolation, univariate data analysis of the complete proteome validated an additional 9, differentially expressed peptides (p < 0.01) between these two groups of mice (Table
1). These peptides ranged in molecular weights of 2200-7400 Da. Their identifications, however, have been hampered largely by inadequate resolving power of gel electrophoresis. It is conceivable, therefore, that the expression patterns of other proteins, in addition to PF-4, may be playing as intricate a role in controlling the progression of early-stage prostate cancer.
Having identified PF-4 as a dietary biomarker of E/S/L-supplementation implicates a very intricate biologic pathway that alters the hemostatic balance
in vivo to subsequently suppress the activated endothelium in the cancerous prostate. This response likely lies initially at the level of the megakaryocyte since it is the sole source for PF-4 that is currently known
in vivo [
16‐
18]. In fact, our findings here indicate that the prostate gland stained negatively for PF-4 and that the intense staining pattern was restricted to the intravascular regions of the gland, but only in mice receiving the E/S/L cocktail. In light of a recent report suggesting that upregulation of PF-4 may play a crucial role in the early stages of several cancers [
19], we propose here that upregulation of this peptide in our study was crucial in preventing angiogenesis at the tumor site in early prostate cancer. More importantly, this response could have only been initially mediated via a biologic modulation of the megakaryocyte located at a distant site from the tumor itself (bone marrow and spleen). Platelets, being the endpoint of megakaryocyte differentiation, now carrying an increased load of PF-4, would later bind to the activated endothelium of the cancerous prostate where it would subsequently suppress the angiogenic drive induced by the developing tumor following its angiogenic switch. The existence of such a switch has been long proposed and recently proven in tumor biology [
20,
21]. Overall, our findings of elevated PF-4 and improved shuttling of the protein suggest that
in vivo, such properties can preclude the angiogenic drive of most tumors, particularly following initiation mutations governing the angiogenic switch. In doing so, the tumor can be kept in check by the host during its earliest stages and prevented from further localized invasion and metastatic spread, albeit in the presence of E/S/L. This is the preclinical interpretation that we propose in light of our findings herein and the current literature pertaining to tumor angiogenesis.
We have considered an additional mechanism to our observed benefit of E/S/L-supplementation in the Lady mouse. Platelet activation and binding, which are intrinsic functions of platelets and occur irrespective of dietary supplementation, should have occurred in both groups of animals, which indeed was the case. However, mice receiving the cocktail exhibited a greater degree of platelet binding capacity (↑α2β-integrin) to the activated endothelium of the cancerous prostate. Although any mechanism suggested at this stage would be purely speculative we have considered that differences in platelet numbers alone between the two groups (reduced in tumor-bearing animals versus elevated in treated animals) may have perhaps contributed to such apparent differences. However, for E/S/L-supplementation to promote platelet production it would necessitate having to increase the number of its megakaryocyte precursors in the hematopoietic compartments of Lady mice. Analysis of spleens obtained from both groups indicated no such differences in the current study (data not shown). Furthermore, there has been no indication in our studies that changes in platelet numbers results from progressive disease or to dietary supplementation (unpublished results).
Conclusions
The findings we are reporting here outline a completely novel biologic mechanism involving the use of well documented micronutrients as a preventative therapy for the progression of prostate cancer. We have provided unprecedented data to prove that this combined supplementation is a
natural antiangiogenic therapy by virtue of its ability to upregulate an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis, PF-4 (p = 0.0025). While a family of micronutrients, referred to in the literature as neutriceuticals, have shown to be antiangiogenic, these studies have supported such a role through altered signalling pathways related to oxidative stress in endothelial cells [
22,
23]. We, however, have serendipitously discovered this particular antioxidant cocktail to be antiangiogenic by an indirect physiological pathway involving the platelet precursor, the megakaryocyte. Implicit in this finding is the potential clinical benefit that can be achieved through dietary supplementation, particularly during the earliest stages of cancer development and at a time when they become angiogenesis-dependant.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
DC was involved in conducting the experiments, BP designed and conducting experiments, NAV assisted with the experiments, LMS assisted in the pathology and interpretation of results, RKN provided intellectual input, NEF assisted in the design and intellectual input as well as in the statistical component, LHK helped with the design and intellectual input as well as data interpretation, VV coordinated the study in terms of design, interpretation, intellectual contribution and manuscript drafting.
All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.