Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2014 | Review | Ausgabe 1/2014 Open Access

Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2014

MicroRNA-binding site polymorphisms in hematological malignancies

Zeitschrift:
Journal of Hematology & Oncology > Ausgabe 1/2014
Autor:
Agnieszka Dzikiewicz-Krawczyk
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13045-014-0083-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
ALL
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
AML
Acute myeloid leukemia
CDS
Coding sequence
CML
Chronic myeloid leukemia
ceRNA
Competing endogenous RNA
DFS
Disease-free survival
DLBCL
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
HL
Hodgkin lymphoma
miRNA
microRNA
miRSNP
miRNA-binding site polymorphism
MM
multiple myeloma
NHL
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
OR (95% CI)
Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
OS
Overall survival
PFS
Progression-free survival
RFS
Relapse-free survival
SNP
Single nucleotide polymorphism
UTR
3’ untranslated region

Introduction

The non-protein coding parts of the genome have been recognized as key players in the regulation of gene expression. Among various classes of non-coding RNAs, the best known are microRNAs (miRNA), small (~22 nucleotide) RNA molecules. MiRNAs bind to complementary target sequences usually located in the 3’ untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNAs and act predominantly by negatively regulating gene expression [1]. According to the miRBase database, a catalog of miRNA sequences in animals, plants and viruses, so far over 2500 mature human miRNAs have been characterized [2]. Since miRNAs are predicted to regulate over 60% of human protein-coding genes [3], it is not surprising that they have been shown to regulate a plethora of biological processes, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and metabolism [4]. Several lines of evidence have demonstrated that miRNAs are required for normal hematopoiesis, while miRNA dysregulation has been associated with the pathogenesis of hematological malignancies [5],[6].
The crucial step in the process of miRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression is recognition of the target transcript by miRNA. In animals this recognition is based on pairing of the nucleotides 2-7 of miRNA (so called `seed’ region) with complementary sequences in the mRNA, which are usually located in the 3’UTR, but can also be present in the 5’UTR or in the coding region. In addition, pairing of nucleotides 13-16 of the miRNA enhances the miRNA-mRNA interaction and the efficiency of miRNA binding depends also on target site accessibility and secondary structure of the miRNA-target duplex [7]. The requirement for a strict Watson-Crick pairing between the `seed’ region of miRNA and its target transcript implies that genetic variability in the 3’UTR can affect miRNA binding by destroying existing sites or creating new miRNA-mRNA interactions. Computational analysis identified hundreds of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located within predicted and experimentally verified miRNA-binding sites or potentially creating novel sites for miRNA binding. Moreover, there is evidence for a strong negative selection on SNPs in miRNA-binding sites (miRSNPs) as compared to the entire 3’UTR sequence [8]-[10], which supports the functional significance of those sites. In the recent years several studies have shown association of miRSNPs with cancer and other diseases [11],[12]. In the field of hematological malignancies the first evidence for a disease-associated miRSNP came in 2012 [13] and since then six other studies have been published. Here I will systematically review the so far presented evidence for the relevance of miRSNPs for leukemias, lymphomas and myeloma.

KRT81 and XPO5 in lymphomas and myeloma

The prognostic value of six SNPs located in either genes encoding proteins involved in the miRNA biogenesis or in miRNA-binding sites located in myeloma-related genes was evaluated in 137 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation [13]. Association with survival was observed for two SNPs: CC genotype of rs3660 in KRT81 conferred longer overall survival (OS), while patients with CC/AC genotype of rs11077 in XPO5 had significantly longer OS and progression-free survival (PFS) (Table 1). KRT81 belongs to a family of hair keratins which are involved in maintaining cell integrity and regulating cell motility and growth in epithelial cells, and have been described as prognostic markers in epithelial tumors [14]. The C allele of rs3660 in KRT81 reduced significantly the protein level in luciferase reporter assay in one of two myeloma cell lines (RPMI-8226). Also in healthy lymphocytes a significant reduction of KRT81 protein, but not mRNA, level was observed. Furthermore, a significant decrease of the proliferation rate of RPMI-8226 cells was observed upon silencing of the KRT81 gene, which indicates the possible mechanism underlying the better prognosis in myeloma patients carrying the CC genotype of KRT81 _rs3660. However, although the authors indicate that according to bioinformatics prediction the C allele destroys binding sites for several miRNAs, results of their experiments indicate otherwise – that in myeloma cell lines and healthy lymphocytes this SNP enhances binding of some miRNAs, which results in decreased protein levels. Since levels of specific miRNAs were not controlled in the luciferase assay, it is not clear whether the observed effect is a consequence of altered miRNA binding, and if so – of which specific miRNA. rs3660 in KRT81 was also studied in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) [15]. Here, the GG genotype was found more frequently in patients (30.9%) than in the European population (18.3%, data from the HapMap project) but this should be validated in a control group ethnically matched with patients. Further analysis showed that although rs3660 had no influence on survival of HL patients, the GG genotype is an independent risk factor for treatment-related neurological toxicity. In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), in turn, distribution of rs3660 genotypes did not differ between patients and control group but carriers of CC and CG genotypes had significantly longer OS compared to the GG genotype [16]. The studies in lymphomas did not attempt to verify whether rs3660 in KRT81 affects miRNA binding and what are the functional consequences of the polymorphism.
Table 1
Polymorphisms in miRNA-binding sites in hematological malignancies
Gene
SNP ID
Variants
Predicted to affect binding of
Disease
Cases
Controls
Parameter
OR (95% CI), p value
Effect on miRNA binding and gene/protein expression
Ref.
KRT81
rs3660
G > C
miR-17, miR-20a/b, miR-93, miR-106a/b, miR-519d
MM
137
 
OS
p = 0.037
Effect on protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay and in vivo
[13]
 
HL
139
 
Treatment-related toxicity
6.65 (1.33-33.26), p = 0.021
Not examined
[15]
 
NHL
210
 
OS
p = 0.012
Not examined
[16]
XPO5
rs11077
A > C
miR-4763-5p
MM
137
 
OS
p = 0.012
Effect on protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay
[13]
PFS
p = 0.013
 
HL
127
 
Treatment-related toxicity
0.49 (0.006-0.376), p = 0.004
Not examined
[15]
DFS
p = 0.039
OS
p = 0.033
TP53
187 novel SNVs
 
majority of SNVs located in miRNA-binding sites
DLBCL
491
 
OS
p = 0.019
Effect of three SNVs on miR-125b binding and protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay
[18]
PFS
p = 0.018
in patients with mutated p53 CDS
C14orf101
rs4901706
G > A
 
NHL
359
 
OS
p = 0.015
Effect on protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay
[19]
 
NHL
210
233
Risk
NS
Not examined
[16]
OS
NS
NPM1
rs34351976
T > -
miR-337-5p, miR-887
AML
93
 
OS
p = 0.016
Effect on miR-337-5p binding and protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay, effect on mRNA levels confirmed in vivo
[21]
RFS
p = 0.007
ETV6
rs1576313
T > C
miR-34c-5p, miR-449b-5p
Childhood ALL
101
471
Risk
1.9 (1.16-3.11), p = 0.0107
Effect on miR-34c-5p and miR-449b-5p binding and protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay
[22]
TLX1
rs2742038
C > T
miR-492
Childhood ALL
101
471
Risk
3.97 (1.43-11.02), p = 0.0081
No effect on miR-492 binding and protein expression observed in gene reporter assay
[22]
PML
rs9479
G > A
miR-510-5p, miR-589-3p
Childhood ALL
101
471
Risk
0.55 (0.36-0.85), p = 0.0079
Effect on miR-510-5p binding and protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay; no effect observed for miR-589-3p
[22]
AML
87
471
Risk
0.6 (0.38-0.97), p = 0.0372
ARHGAP26
rs187729
T > C
miR-18a-3p
CML
140
471
Risk
1.63 (1.07-2.47), p = 0.0213
Effect on miR-18a-3p binding and protein expression confirmed in gene reporter assay
[22]
IRF8
rs10514611
C > T
miR-330-3p
CML
140
471
Risk
2.4 (1.12-5.15), p = 0.0246
No effect on miR-330-3p binding and protein expression observed in gene reporter assay
[22]
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CDS, coding sequence; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; DFS, disease-free survival; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; MM, multiple myeloma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NS, not significant; OR (95% CI), odds ratio (95% confidence interval); OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RFS, relapse-free survival.
The second polymorphism found to affect survival of patients with multiple myeloma was rs11077 in XPO5. This miRSNP, apart from its potential impact on expression of XPO5, can also affect the whole miRNA-ome of the cell as XPO5 encodes for exportin-5, which is required for the export of precursor miRNAs from nucleus to cytoplasm where they are subject to further steps of maturation [17]. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that the C allele of XPO5 _rs11077 creates a new binding site for miR-4763-5p. Indeed, luciferase reporter assay showed a significant reduction in protein levels in two myeloma cell lines. Also, in healthy lymphocytes the CC genotype was associated with slightly decreased XPO5 protein levels, but the difference did not reach statistical significance [13]. However, it remains to be established whether miR-4763-5p or another miRNA is responsible for the observed effect. Also, the mechanism by which reduced XPO5 levels could contribute to a better prognosis in multiple myeloma needs to be elucidated. rs11077 in XPO5 was also studied in Hodgkin lymphoma [15]. Here, the AC genotype was associated with longer overall and disease-free survival (DFS), as well as with lower rate of bleomycin-associated pulmonary toxicity. Better performance of heterozygous patients seems somewhat unusual and probably a replication in a larger cohort of patients could indicate which allele is associated with a better prognosis. This study did not provide any further clues for the functional significance of XPO5 _rs11077.

TP53 and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Analysis of the sequence of a known tumor suppressor TP53 in a cohort of 491 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients revealed a widespread variation in the TP53 3’UTR. A total of 187 novel single nucleotide variants (nSNV) and 6 known SNPs were identified. Interestingly, impact of these nSNVs on survival depended on the mutation status in the TP53 coding sequence (CDS): in patients with the wild type TP53 CDS nSNVs conferred better 5-year OS and PFS, while in patients with mutated CDS nSNVs were associated with poorer OS and PFS. Bioinformatics analysis showed that majority of the nSNVs were located in validated or putative miRNA-binding sites. Furthermore, it was shown in vitro that 3 nSNVs disrupting the binding site for miR-125b increase p53 protein levels (Table 1). However, no correlation was observed between the presence of nSNVs and expression of p53 in tumor samples, regardless of the mutational status of the TP53 CDS. This could be due to the fact that all nSNVs were analyzed collectively, while some of them may have positive and some negative effect on the p53 expression [18]. This study highlights the relevance of the interplay between miRSNPs and mutations in the coding sequence of a gene. Since the predicted effect of the majority of nSNVs was disruption of miRNA-binding sites, elevated levels of wild type tumor-suppressive p53 would be beneficial, while increased expression of mutated, oncogenic p53 would be unfavourable.

C14orf101/TMEM260 in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Four polymorphisms chosen from a larger set of previously reported miRSNPs [9] were examined for association with cancer risk and prognosis in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. None of them was identified as a risk factor but genotyping was performed on a small sample (96 patients and 90 controls) and should be replicated in a larger cohort. rs4901706 in C14orf101 was associated with overall survival: the AA genotype was identified as an independent predictor of longer survival in a group of 359 NHL patients. Luciferase reporter assay in the HeLa cell line showed that the G allele significantly reduced protein levels (Table 1) [19]. However, the study provided no indication as to binding of which miRNA might be affected nor the potential functional significance of altered expression of C14orf101. Since nothing is known about the functions of C14orf101, other than it encodes for a transmembrane protein, it is hard to speculate how altered levels of the protein may affect the prognosis of NHL patients. Interestingly, a team from the same university also studied rs4901706 in a group of 233 controls and 210 NHL patients who were treated at the same hospital and during the same period, and they did not report any association of the SNP with NHL risk or prognosis [16]. This discrepancy highlights the need for studying the functional relevance of miRSNPs to corroborate the findings from association studies.

NPMin acute myeloid leukemia

Significance of a polymorphic nucleotide T deletion (rs34351976) in the 3’UTR of NPM1 was studied in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). NPM1 encodes for nucleophosmin, a molecular chaperone shuffling between nucleus and cytoplasm. Mutations in NPM1 are found in about one-third of adult AML patients but the exact mechanism by which the mutant NPM1 protein contributes to leukemogenesis remains unclear [20]. Although no difference in the frequency of delT polymorphism was observed between AML patients and healthy controls, Cheng et al. showed that overall and relapse-free survival was significantly worse in patients carrying the homozygous delT. Bioinformatics analysis combined with luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that the delT polymorphism creates an illegitimate binding site for miR-337-5p, which results in decreased protein levels. This finding was confirmed in patient samples: levels of NPM1 mRNA were significantly lower in patients homozygous for the delT polymorphism than in the non-homozygotes (Table 1). The mechanism by which reduced levels of nucleophosmin resulting from the homozygous delT polymorphism influence outcome of AML patients remains to be elucidated [21].

miRSNPs in lymphoblastic and myeloid leukemias

Bioinformatics analysis of SNPs in the 3’UTRs of 137 leukemia-associated genes revealed 111 putative miRSNPs. Based on the concordance of at least two algorithms used in the analysis and the expression of predicted miRNAs in blood cells or leukemias and lymphomas, the authors selected 10 miRSNPs for genotyping in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), adult chronic (CML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and healthy controls. The study showed that homozygous polymorphic genotypes of ETV6 _rs1573613 and TLX1 _rs2742038 were associated with increased ALL risk, while carriers of the variant allele of PML _rs9479 were at lower risk of ALL and AML. Homozygous polymorphic genotypes of ARHGAP26 _rs187729 and IRF8 _rs10514611 conferred increased risk of CML. Furthermore, additive effect of risk genotypes was demonstrated in ALL and CML. Risk increased with each additional risk genotype carried by a patient and surpassed the sum of individual ORs, reaching 13.91 (4.38-44.11) for carriers of three or more risk genotypes in ALL and 4.9 (1.27-18.85) for carriers of two risk genotypes in CML. Effect of significant miRSNPs on miRNA binding was evaluated by luciferase reporter assay and confirmed for three miRSNPs: variant alleles of ARHGAP26 _rs187729, ETV6 _rs1573613 and PML _rs9479 were shown to affect binding of miR-18a-3p, miR-34c-5p/miR-449b-5p and miR-510-5p, respectively. TLX1 _rs2742038 and IRF8 _ rs10514611 were predicted to enhance binding of miR-492 and miR-330-3p, respectively, but this was not confirmed experimentally (Table 1) [22]. The study demonstrated the relevance of polymorphisms in miRNA-binding sites for various types of leukemia, however, the findings should be validated in larger patient cohorts and the effect of miRSNPs on the expression of genes and proteins should be verified in vivo in patients samples. Also the mechanisms by which the miRSNPs modulate leukemia risk still needs to be elucidated, especially that the effect of miRSNPs in ETV6 and PML on miRNA binding was not in line with their role as tumor suppressors. This suggests that more complicated miRNA regulatory networks might be affected, according to the concept of `competing endogenous RNAs’ (ceRNA) [23].

Conclusions

More evidence is accumulating for the involvement of deregulated miRNA networks in cancer development. Polymorphisms in miRNA-binding sites of target genes may disrupt miRNA-mediated regulation of gene expression by not only affecting the levels and function of the given protein, but can also interfere with expression of other genes targeted by the same miRNA.
So far only a few studies demonstrated the relevance of miRNA target site polymorphisms for hematological malignancies, but this number will doubtless grow in the next years. The studies presented in this review explored the significance of miRSNPs for the risk or prognosis of blood cancers to a different degree: some did not go beyond reporting a significant association, while others pursued the functional consequences of the miRSNPs. Based on the work described in this review, it is evident that a comprehensive study of miRSNPs in disease should include several carefully planned and performed stages (Figure 1). The first step is the selection of candidate miRSNPs. Thorough scrutiny at this stage will increase the probability of finding miRSNPs of functional importance and facilitate interpretation of the results. Preferably, candidate SNPs should be searched for in genes with proven relevance for the disease in question, which will already give hint for their functional significance. Several tools are available for the prediction of the impact of SNPs on miRNA binding, e.g. miRanda [24], PITA [25], SNPinfo [26] and PolymiRTS [27], and since they use different algorithms for miRNA target prediction, it is advisable to select miRSNPs with the highest support from the available tools. The set of thus selected miRSNPs should be further narrowed down to those predicted to affect binding of miRNAs that are expressed in the relevant cell type, using databases integrating data on miRNA expression across different tissues and cell types, such as mimiRNA [28] or the non-coding RNA body map [29]. Allele and genotype frequencies of the selected miRSNPs are then assessed in appropriate patient and control groups to identify miRSNPs associated with disease risk or prognosis. For statistically significant miRSNPs their impact on binding of miRNAs predicted by the in silico analysis should be verified, ideally both in vitro and in vivo. Gene reporter assays (e.g. luciferase assay) allow to identify specific miRNAs which bind differentially to the wild-type and variant 3’UTRs. Depending on whether or not the miRNA of interest is expressed in the cell line used in luciferase assay, miRNA mimics and/or inhibitors need to be used in the assay to ensure that the observed effect can be attributed to the specific miRNA. mRNA and protein expression should be also compared between different genotypes in vivo in relevant samples, taking into account levels of specific miRNAs in individual samples. Finally, based on the known functions of the protein encoded by the gene bearing the miRSNP, appropriate tests should be performed to unravel functional consequences of the miRSNP, which could explain their impact on the disease risk or prognosis. In case no significant effects are observed, an alternative possibility worth considering is an indirect impact of a miRSNP on expression of other genes targeted by the same miRNA through changes in the pool of miRNA available for binding in the cell. It has been proposed that different classes of RNA transcripts – mRNAs, pseudogenes and long non-coding RNAs – compete for miRNA binding, intertwined in a large regulatory network. The “competing endogenous RNA” (ceRNA) hypothesis assumes that RNAs communicate with each other through miRNAs and miRNA recognition sequences [23]. Thus, the effect of a miRSNP may extend beyond expression of the gene bearing the polymorphism, and influence other RNAs regulated by the same miRNA.
In conclusion, polymorphisms in miRNA-binding sites not only offer a possibility of novel diagnostic and prognostic markers in hematological malignancies, but can also help to understand complex regulatory networks of miRNAs in health and disease. With the development of more sophisticated bioinformatics algorithms and accumulation of data from sequencing of cancer genomes, identification of miRSNPs of clinical utility and functional relevance for hematological malignancies should be facilitated.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant no N N401 570740.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Competing interests

The author reports no conflicts of interest.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Onkologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Onkologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Onkologie, den Premium-Inhalten der onkologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten onkologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Zusatzmaterial
Authors’ original file for figure 1
13045_2014_83_MOESM1_ESM.gif
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Journal of Hematology & Oncology 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Onkologie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise