Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2015

01.09.2015 | Original Article

Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy

verfasst von: Carolin Eva Hach, Joschka Krude, Andre Reitz, Michael Reiter, Axel Haferkamp, Stephan Buse

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Robotic assistance simplifies laparoscopic procedures. We hypothesize that robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy is a rapid and safe procedure with satisfying short-term and midterm functional results.

Methods

After informed consent, we enrolled 101 consecutive patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy at Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany. After a median follow-up of 22 months, we assessed midterm functional results as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included surgical duration, blood loss, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications. We described frequencies as counts (percent) and continuous data as median [interquartile range (Q1–Q3)] or mean [standard deviation (SD)], as appropriate.

Results

We enrolled 101 patients. The mean age was 69 years (SD 11); 75 women (74.3 %) had undergone previous abdominal surgery. Among the patients, 95 (94.1 %) presented with anterior vaginal wall prolapse Baden-Walker grade 2–3, 74 (73.3 %) vaginal vault prolapse, and 9 (8.9 %) concomitant rectocele. Fifty (50 %) patients underwent a modified Burch procedure in addition to sacrocolpopexy. The median surgical duration was 96 min (Q1–Q3 83–130). There were six (5.9 %) minor intraoperative complications but no conversions to open surgery. Postoperatively, we registered five (4.9 %) Clavien-Dindo grade I complications, three (3.0 %) grade II complications, and one (1.0 %) grade III complication. After a median follow-up of 22 months (Q1–Q3 12–49), the patients reported significant decreased impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on quality of life as well as bother resulting from POP symptoms. The overall success rate, defined as none or minor impact of POP on quality of life, was 75 %.

Conclusions

In this single-surgeon study, robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy was a safe and rapidly performed procedure that achieved good medium-term functional results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305CrossRefPubMed Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98(4):646–651CrossRefPubMed Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 98(4):646–651CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY (2001) The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1496–1501, discussion 1501–1503CrossRefPubMed Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY (2001) The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184(7):1496–1501, discussion 1501–1503CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R et al (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55(5):1089–1103CrossRefPubMed Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R et al (2009) The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol 55(5):1089–1103CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E, Querleu D, Crépin G (2002) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and Burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. JSLS 6(2):115–119PubMedCentralPubMed Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E, Querleu D, Crépin G (2002) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and Burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. JSLS 6(2):115–119PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizée D et al (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizée D et al (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, Kozlowski P, Kobashi KC (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 21(8):926–930CrossRefPubMed Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, Kozlowski P, Kobashi KC (2007) Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 21(8):926–930CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279CrossRefPubMed Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O’Brien MM, McBride AW (2009) A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(3):273–279CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1752–1758CrossRefPubMed Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C (2005) Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(5):1752–1758CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundaram CP, Venkatesh R, Landman J, Klutke CG (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 18(7):620–623, discussion 623–624CrossRefPubMed Sundaram CP, Venkatesh R, Landman J, Klutke CG (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 18(7):620–623, discussion 623–624CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394CrossRefPubMed Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J (2007) Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int 100(4):875–879CrossRefPubMed Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J (2007) Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int 100(4):875–879CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176(2):655–659CrossRefPubMed Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176(2):655–659CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206CrossRefPubMed Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol 23(4):655–658CrossRefPubMed Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol 23(4):655–658CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(3):176–181. doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x, discussion 181CrossRefPubMed Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S (2005) P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(3):176–181. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-004-1225-x, discussion 181CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy
verfasst von
Carolin Eva Hach
Joschka Krude
Andre Reitz
Michael Reiter
Axel Haferkamp
Stephan Buse
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2688-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.