Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

24.03.2020 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Xiaoping Liu, Tingting Li, Bo Wang, Xuefen Xiao, Xiaoyan Liang, Rui Huang

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of mild ovarian stimulation protocol and conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Methods

This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted from September 2013 to September 2015, including 191 patients who met the Bologna criteria of POR. Ninety-seven patients allocated to the mild ovarian stimulation group (MS group) were stimulated according to the letrozole/antagonist protocol, while 94 patients in the controlled ovarian stimulation group (COS group) were stimulated according to a high dose of gonadotropin (Gn) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) stop protocol. The cumulative live birth rate was the primary outcome. Chinese clinical trial number ChiCTR-TRC-13003454.

Results

Comparing with the COS group, both the stimulation duration and the total gonadotropin dose were significantly shorter and lower in the MS group (P < 0.001). A higher number of retrieved oocytes (P = 0.003) and transferrable embryos (P = 0.029) were obtained in the COS group. The cumulative live birth rates (OR 1.103; 95% CI 0.53 to 2.28; P = 0.791) were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

The increase of Gn dose during ovulation stimulation was associated with a higher number of transferrable embryos for POR patients, but this increase did not lead to a concomitant improvement of reproductive outcome, especially in terms of the cumulative live birth rate. Using a mild stimulation protocol was economically preferential while it was as effective as higher doses of Gn stimulation protocol in reproductive outcome for POR patients.
Literatur
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Requena A, Martinez-Salazar FJ, Landazabal A, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C (2000) High doses of gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Hum Reprod 15(11):2292–2296. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.11.2292 CrossRefPubMed Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Requena A, Martinez-Salazar FJ, Landazabal A, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C (2000) High doses of gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Hum Reprod 15(11):2292–2296. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​humrep/​15.​11.​2292 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Youssef MA, van Wely M, Al-Inany H, Madani T, Jahangiri N, Khodabakhshi S, Alhalabi M, Akhondi M, Ansaripour S, Tokhmechy R, Zarandi L, Rizk A, El-Mohamedy M, Shaeer E, Khattab M, Mochtar MH, van der Veen F (2017) A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod 32(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew282 CrossRefPubMed Youssef MA, van Wely M, Al-Inany H, Madani T, Jahangiri N, Khodabakhshi S, Alhalabi M, Akhondi M, Ansaripour S, Tokhmechy R, Zarandi L, Rizk A, El-Mohamedy M, Shaeer E, Khattab M, Mochtar MH, van der Veen F (2017) A mild ovarian stimulation strategy in women with poor ovarian reserve undergoing IVF: a multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial. Hum Reprod 32(1):112–118. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​humrep/​dew282 CrossRefPubMed
9.
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu L, Bu Z, Guo Y, Su Y, Zhai J, Sun Y (2014) Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria. Int J Clin Exp Med 7(4):1128–1134PubMedPubMedCentral Hu L, Bu Z, Guo Y, Su Y, Zhai J, Sun Y (2014) Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria. Int J Clin Exp Med 7(4):1128–1134PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kumakiri J, Jinushi M, Shinjo A, Ozaki R, Ikemoto Y, Katoh N, Takeda S (2016) Minimum ovarian stimulation involving combined clomiphene citrate and estradiol treatment for in vitro fertilization of Bologna-criteria poor ovarian responders. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42(2):178–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12862 CrossRefPubMed Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kumakiri J, Jinushi M, Shinjo A, Ozaki R, Ikemoto Y, Katoh N, Takeda S (2016) Minimum ovarian stimulation involving combined clomiphene citrate and estradiol treatment for in vitro fertilization of Bologna-criteria poor ovarian responders. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 42(2):178–183. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jog.​12862 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilborg CV, Oudshoorn SC, Eijkemans MJC, Manger PAP, Brinkhuis E, van Heusden AM, Kuchenbecker WKH, Smeenk JMJ, Kwee J, Verhoeve HR, Lambalk CB, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Torrance HL, Broekmans FJM (2016) Optimization of outcome through individualized dosing in predicted poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI; the OPTIMIST randomized controlled trial, NTR2657. Hum Reprod 31:16–17 Tilborg CV, Oudshoorn SC, Eijkemans MJC, Manger PAP, Brinkhuis E, van Heusden AM, Kuchenbecker WKH, Smeenk JMJ, Kwee J, Verhoeve HR, Lambalk CB, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Torrance HL, Broekmans FJM (2016) Optimization of outcome through individualized dosing in predicted poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI; the OPTIMIST randomized controlled trial, NTR2657. Hum Reprod 31:16–17
Metadaten
Titel
Mild stimulation protocol vs conventional controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in poor ovarian response patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Xiaoping Liu
Tingting Li
Bo Wang
Xuefen Xiao
Xiaoyan Liang
Rui Huang
Publikationsdatum
24.03.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05513-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Osteoporose-Indizes offenbar wenig sinnvoll bei jüngeren Frauen

In einer US-Studie war keiner von drei getesteten Osteoporose-Indizes verlässlich genug, um bei postmenopausalen Frauen unter 65 Jahren ein klinisch relevantes Frakturrisiko zu erkennen.

Einleitung bei Zwillingsgeburt mit Sectiorisiko assoziiert

Einleitung ja oder nein? Besonders bei Schwangerschaften mit Zwillingen ist diese Entscheidung relevant. Wird die Geburt eingeleitet, steigt das Risiko für eine Sectio deutlich. Das hat nun eine Studie aus der Schweiz ergeben.

Junge Brustkrebspatientinnen zum Durchhalten motivieren

Patientinnen, die in jungen Jahren an Hormonrezeptor-positivem Brustkrebs erkranken, neigen dazu, die adjuvante endokrine Therapie auszusetzen oder abzubrechen. Die schlechte Therapiepersistenz scheint die Rückkehr des Tumors zu begünstigen.

Krebsscreeningprogramme erreichen Menschen mit kognitiver Beeinträchtigung schlechter

Daten aus den Niederlanden zeigen, dass Krebsfrüherkennungsmaßnahmen für Menschen mit Störungen der Intelligenzentwicklung häufig nicht zugänglich sind. Wie kann diese Lücke geschlossen werden?

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.