Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2006

01.08.2006

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization

verfasst von: Gaelle Godiris-Petit, MD, Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, MD, Isabelle Honigman, MD, Pierre Cattan, MD, PhD, Emile Sarfati, MD PhD

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Esophagectomy carries high morbidity, mainly respiratory. Minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to improve postoperative outcome in digestive surgery, without impairment of oncological results. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate feasibility, postoperative outcome, and mid-term oncological results of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in cancer.

Methods

From July 2001 to August 2005, 25 patients underwent esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) for epidermoid carcinoma (n = 15) or adenocarcinoma (n = 10). Tumors were located on the cardia (n = 6), on the lower third (n = 14), or on the median third (n = 5) of the esophagus. Following LGM, transthoracic esophagectomy was performed.

Results

Complete LGM was achieved in all patients but 1. Mean operative time for LGM was 191 ± 49 minutes. Fifteen patients (60%) developed complications, mainly respiratory. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients, with a favorable outcome. Pylorospasm (n = 1) was the only intra-abdominal complication. Median hospital stay was 18 days. Two patients died (8%). Twenty-three patients underwent R0 resection. A mean of 12 ± 4 lymph nodes (range 4–19 nodes) were analyzed. With a mean follow-up of 14 months (1–46 months), actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years was, respectively, 73% and 56%.

Conclusion

Esophagectomy with LGM is feasible with few specific complications. However, no decrease in morbidity and hospital stay could be observed. Mid-term oncological results seem comparable to those of conventional surgery. Further studies are required to evaluate the extent of lymphadenectomy and the oncologic safety of MIE.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002;236:759–766PubMedCrossRef Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002;236:759–766PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–2059CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237PubMedCrossRef Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005;241:232–237PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91:975–982PubMedCrossRef Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91:975–982PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Patti MG, Fisichella PM, Perretta S, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:698–703PubMedCrossRef Patti MG, Fisichella PM, Perretta S, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a decade of change. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:698–703PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:285–297PubMedCrossRef Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:285–297PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635–643PubMedCrossRef Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, et al. Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;231:635–643PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–222PubMedCrossRef Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:217–222PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:381–390PubMed Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:381–390PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1662–1669PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–313PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:306–313PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gossot D, Fritsch S, Halimi B, et al. Can a reduction of morbidity of esophagectomy be expected with the thoracoscopic approach? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1995;19:176–181PubMed Gossot D, Fritsch S, Halimi B, et al. Can a reduction of morbidity of esophagectomy be expected with the thoracoscopic approach? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1995;19:176–181PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gossot D, Fourquier P, Celerier M. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:667–670PubMedCrossRef Gossot D, Fourquier P, Celerier M. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:667–670PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–494PubMed Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486–494PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:906–911PubMedCrossRef Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Christie NA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:906–911PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:328–332PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999;188:328–332PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:920–925PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg 2000;135:920–925PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108–113PubMedCrossRef Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, et al. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 2003;90:108–113PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:902–913PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:902–913PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:353–361.CrossRef Siewert JR, Feith M, Werner M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1002 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:353–361.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, et al. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996;83:540–542PubMed Jagot P, Sauvanet A, Berthoux L, et al. Laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Br J Surg 1996;83:540–542PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 2002;19:160–164PubMedCrossRef Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Young JE, et al. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Surg 2002;19:160–164PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400PubMedCrossRef Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg 1999;230:392–400PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldminc M, Maddern G, Le Prise E, et al. Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993;80:367–370PubMed Goldminc M, Maddern G, Le Prise E, et al. Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 1993;80:367–370PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 2000;87:873–878PubMedCrossRef Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg 2000;87:873–878PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2004;91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Collard JM. Role of videoassisted surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995;84:209–214PubMed Collard JM. Role of videoassisted surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1995;84:209–214PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997;337:161–167PubMedCrossRef Bosset JF, Gignoux M, Triboulet JP, et al. Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus. N Engl J Med 1997;337:161–167PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin DJ, Bessell JR, Chew A, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef Martin DJ, Bessell JR, Chew A, et al. Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy: initial experience and outcomes. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1597–1601PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bizekis CS, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In: The 52nd Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2005, p 62 Bizekis CS, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In: The 52nd Southern Thoracic Surgical Association Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2005, p 62
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2006;20:428–433PubMedCrossRef Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2006;20:428–433PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Collins G, Johnson E, Kroshus T, et al. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20:298–301PubMedCrossRef Collins G, Johnson E, Kroshus T, et al. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20:298–301PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, et al. Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1177–1183PubMedCrossRef Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I, et al. Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1177–1183PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef Rentz J, Bull D, Harpole D, et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy: a prospective study of 945 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1114–1120PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, et al. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338–344PubMedCrossRef Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, et al. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg 2001;233:338–344PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Fotiadis RJ, Badvie S, Weston MD, et al. Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91:828–841PubMedCrossRef Fotiadis RJ, Badvie S, Weston MD, et al. Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2004;91:828–841PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001;358:1487–1492PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, et al. Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after esophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 2005;93:509–513PubMedCrossRef Gabor S, Renner H, Matzi V, et al. Early enteral feeding compared with parenteral nutrition after esophageal or oesophagogastric resection and reconstruction. Br J Nutr 2005;93:509–513PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization
verfasst von
Gaelle Godiris-Petit, MD
Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, MD
Isabelle Honigman, MD
Pierre Cattan, MD, PhD
Emile Sarfati, MD PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2006
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0627-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2006

World Journal of Surgery 8/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.