Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020

06.04.2020 | Dynamic Manuscript

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases

verfasst von: Ziad T. Awad, Syed Abbas, Ruchir Puri, Brian Dalton, David J. Chesire

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Esophagectomy is the mainstay of therapy for esophageal cancer but is a complex operation that is associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. The primary aim of this study is to report our perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE).

Methods

IRB approved retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective MILE from September 2013 to November 2017 at University of Florida, Jacksonville.

Results

Primary diagnosis was esophageal cancer (n = 96) and benign esophageal disease (n = 4). Anastomotic leak rate was observed in 6%; 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2% and 3%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.3 days; 87 patients were discharged to home, while 12 patients were discharged to rehabilitation facility, and there was one in-hospital mortality secondary to graft necrosis. At a mean follow-up was 37 months (2–74), the 3- and 5-year overall survivals are 63.9 ± 5.0% (95% CI 53.3–72.7%) and 60.5 ± 5.3% (95% CI 49.4–69.9%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival is 75.0 ± 4.8% (95% CI 64.2–83.0%) and 70.4 ± 5.5% (95% CI 58.0–80.0%).

Conclusion

MILE can be performed with low perioperative mortality, and favorable long-term overall and disease-free survival.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Accessed 10 May 2018 National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Accessed 10 May 2018
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, Krantz S, Howington JA, Kim KW (2017) Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29(2):244–253PubMedCrossRef Mitzman B, Lutfi W, Wang CH, Krantz S, Howington JA, Kim KW (2017) Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent survival to open esophagectomy: an analysis of the national cancer database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29(2):244–253PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Eng J Med 349:2241–2252CrossRef Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Eng J Med 349:2241–2252CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med 346:1128–1137CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thoracic Surg 96:1919–1926CrossRef Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thoracic Surg 96:1919–1926CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson MK, Martin TR, Reeder LB, Olak J (1997) Mortality after esophagectomy: risk factor analysis. World J Surg. 21(6):599–603 (discussion 603–604) PubMedCrossRef Ferguson MK, Martin TR, Reeder LB, Olak J (1997) Mortality after esophagectomy: risk factor analysis. World J Surg. 21(6):599–603 (discussion 603–604) PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(1):7–11PubMed Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37(1):7–11PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E (1995) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5(1):1–5PubMed DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, de Paula RA, Grecco E (1995) Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5(1):1–5PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, De Hoyos A, Maddaus MA, Nguyen NT, Benson AB, Fernando HC (2009) Results of a phase II multicenter study of MIE (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J Clin Oncol. 27(suppl):15s (Abstract 4516) Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, De Hoyos A, Maddaus MA, Nguyen NT, Benson AB, Fernando HC (2009) Results of a phase II multicenter study of MIE (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J Clin Oncol. 27(suppl):15s (Abstract 4516)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position. An experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position. An experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Verhage R, Hazebroek E, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systemic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64:135–146PubMed Verhage R, Hazebroek E, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R (2009) Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systemic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 64:135–146PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a mutlicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a mutlicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Does mininally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systemic review. J Gastrointestinal Surg 16:486–494CrossRef Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Does mininally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systemic review. J Gastrointestinal Surg 16:486–494CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta analysis. Arch Surg 147:768–776PubMedCrossRef Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD (2012) Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta analysis. Arch Surg 147:768–776PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256(1):95–103PubMedCrossRef Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256(1):95–103PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Giugliano D, Berger A, Rosato E, Palazzo F (2016) Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(6):747–756PubMedCrossRef Giugliano D, Berger A, Rosato E, Palazzo F (2016) Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(6):747–756PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mungo B, Lidor A, Stem M, Molena D et al (2016) Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program. Surg Endosc 30(4):1692–1698PubMedCrossRef Mungo B, Lidor A, Stem M, Molena D et al (2016) Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program. Surg Endosc 30(4):1692–1698PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486–494 discussion 494–495 PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238(4):486–494 discussion 494–495 PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ, Alvelo-Rivera M (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82(2):402–407PubMedCrossRef Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ, Alvelo-Rivera M (2006) Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 82(2):402–407PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan PS, Vaithiswaran V, Rajapandian S, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P, Palanivelu C (2010) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy for carcinoma oesophagus—approaches and options in high volume tertiary center. J Ind Med Assoc 188(10):642–644 Rajan PS, Vaithiswaran V, Rajapandian S, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P, Palanivelu C (2010) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy for carcinoma oesophagus—approaches and options in high volume tertiary center. J Ind Med Assoc 188(10):642–644
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248(6):1081–1091PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 248(6):1081–1091PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN (2012) Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 26(1):162–167PubMedCrossRef Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, Howard D, Rossidis G, Hochwald SN (2012) Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc 26(1):162–167PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24(7):1621–1629PubMedCrossRef Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24(7):1621–1629PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, Tsiamis A, Karaliotas C, Lang H (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55(11):3031–3040PubMedCrossRef Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, Tsiamis A, Karaliotas C, Lang H (2010) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 55(11):3031–3040PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB (2012) Short term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 255(2):197–203PubMedCrossRef Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB (2012) Short term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 255(2):197–203PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, Lerut T, Li H (2016) Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3873–3881PubMedCrossRef Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, Lerut T, Li H (2016) Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3873–3881PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou C, Ma G, Li X, Li J, Yan Y, Liu P, He J, Ren Y (2015) Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 13:269PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhou C, Ma G, Li X, Li J, Yan Y, Liu P, He J, Ren Y (2015) Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 13:269PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Qi W, Zixiang W, Tianwei Z, Shuai F, Sai Z, Gang S, Ming W (2018) Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 117(5):957–969PubMedCrossRef Qi W, Zixiang W, Tianwei Z, Shuai F, Sai Z, Gang S, Ming W (2018) Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 117(5):957–969PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Liu X, Wang R, Wang Y, Zhang T, Gao D, Gao L (2017) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: experience of 251 patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 17:54–60CrossRef Chen L, Liu X, Wang R, Wang Y, Zhang T, Gao D, Gao L (2017) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer according to the location of the tumor: experience of 251 patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 17:54–60CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rosman C, Roig J, Scheepers JJ, Cuesta MA, Luyer MD, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Workum F, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL (2017) Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers. Surg Endosc 31(1):119–126PubMedCrossRef Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rosman C, Roig J, Scheepers JJ, Cuesta MA, Luyer MD, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Workum F, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL (2017) Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers. Surg Endosc 31(1):119–126PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH (2016) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 101(4):1281–1288PubMedCrossRef Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH (2016) Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 101(4):1281–1288PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Muniappan A, Lanuti M, Donahue DM, Morse CR (2016) Outcomes With open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, Muniappan A, Lanuti M, Donahue DM, Morse CR (2016) Outcomes With open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 101(3):1097–1103PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A, Evans NR, Sendecki JA, Keith S, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg 220(4):672–679PubMedCrossRef Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A, Evans NR, Sendecki JA, Keith S, Chojnacki KA, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg 220(4):672–679PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, Sugarbaker DJ, De Hoyos A, Maddaus MA, Nguyen NT, Benson AB, Fernando HC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study. Ann Surg 261(4):702–707PubMedCrossRef Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y, Catalano PJ, Swanson S, Sugarbaker DJ, De Hoyos A, Maddaus MA, Nguyen NT, Benson AB, Fernando HC (2015) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study. Ann Surg 261(4):702–707PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J (2015) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 29(9):2614–2619PubMedCrossRef Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J (2015) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 29(9):2614–2619PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizvi FH, Rizvi SS, Syed AA, Khattak S, Khan AR (2014) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first experience from Pakistan. Int J Surg Oncol 2014:864705PubMedPubMedCentral Rizvi FH, Rizvi SS, Syed AA, Khattak S, Khan AR (2014) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: the first experience from Pakistan. Int J Surg Oncol 2014:864705PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ (2013) South Coast Cancer Collaboration - Oesophago-Gastric (SC3-OG) A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 26(3):263–271PubMedCrossRef Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ (2013) South Coast Cancer Collaboration - Oesophago-Gastric (SC3-OG) A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 26(3):263–271PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Burdall OC, Boddy AP, Fullick J et al (2015) A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:431–437PubMedCrossRef Burdall OC, Boddy AP, Fullick J et al (2015) A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:431–437PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098PubMedCrossRef Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1090–1098PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ et al (2015) Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1350–1356CrossRefPubMedCentral van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJ et al (2015) Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1350–1356CrossRefPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurien LA, Tepas JJ 3rd, Lind DS, Chesire DJ, Sabra MJ, Dalton BG, Awad ZT (2018) How safe is the safety net? Comparison of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a safety-net hospital using the NSQIP database. J Am Coll Surg 226(4):680–684PubMedCrossRef Gurien LA, Tepas JJ 3rd, Lind DS, Chesire DJ, Sabra MJ, Dalton BG, Awad ZT (2018) How safe is the safety net? Comparison of Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a safety-net hospital using the NSQIP database. J Am Coll Surg 226(4):680–684PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Boselli DM et al (2019) Quality improvement in minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcome improvement through data review. Ann Surg Oncol 26:177–187PubMedCrossRef Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Boselli DM et al (2019) Quality improvement in minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcome improvement through data review. Ann Surg Oncol 26:177–187PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Spector R, Zheng Y, Yeap BY, Wee JO, Lebenthal A, Swanson SJ, Marchosky DE, Enzinger PC, Mamon HJ, Lerut A, Odze R, Srivastava A, Agoston AT, Tippayawang M, Bueno R, Brigham Esophageal Study Team (2015) The 3-hole minimally invasive esophagectomy: a safe procedure following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 27:205–215PubMedCrossRef Spector R, Zheng Y, Yeap BY, Wee JO, Lebenthal A, Swanson SJ, Marchosky DE, Enzinger PC, Mamon HJ, Lerut A, Odze R, Srivastava A, Agoston AT, Tippayawang M, Bueno R, Brigham Esophageal Study Team (2015) The 3-hole minimally invasive esophagectomy: a safe procedure following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 27:205–215PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobel T, Tan KS, Barbetta A et al (2019) Does pyloric drainage have a role in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy? Surg Endosc 33:3218–3227PubMedCrossRef Nobel T, Tan KS, Barbetta A et al (2019) Does pyloric drainage have a role in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy? Surg Endosc 33:3218–3227PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaur P, Swanson SJ (2014) Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy? Dis Esophagus 27(6):568–573PubMedCrossRef Gaur P, Swanson SJ (2014) Should we continue to drain the pylorus in patients undergoing an esophagectomy? Dis Esophagus 27(6):568–573PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Arya S, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2015) The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Dis Esophagus 28(4):326–335PubMedCrossRef Arya S, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2015) The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Dis Esophagus 28(4):326–335PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Tapias LF, Morse CR (2014) Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 218:1130–1140PubMedCrossRef Tapias LF, Morse CR (2014) Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 218:1130–1140PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A, Gould Rothberg BE, Kim AW, Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ (2014) Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations (Phila) 9:286–291CrossRef Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A, Gould Rothberg BE, Kim AW, Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ (2014) Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations (Phila) 9:286–291CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou C, Zhang L, Wang H, Ma X, Shi B, Chen W, He J, Wang K, Liu P, Ren Y (2015) Superiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy in reducing in-hospital mortality of patients with resectable oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132889PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhou C, Zhang L, Wang H, Ma X, Shi B, Chen W, He J, Wang K, Liu P, Ren Y (2015) Superiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy in reducing in-hospital mortality of patients with resectable oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132889PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, Nilsson M, Markar SR, Lagergren J (2019) Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 270(6):1005–1017PubMedCrossRef Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, Nilsson M, Markar SR, Lagergren J (2019) Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 270(6):1005–1017PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM (2006) Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 82(5):1857–1862PubMedCrossRef Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM (2006) Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg 82(5):1857–1862PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Correa A, Mehran RJ, Rice D, Roth J, Vaporciyan A, Hofstetter WL (2012) Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(5):1146–1150CrossRef Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Correa A, Mehran RJ, Rice D, Roth J, Vaporciyan A, Hofstetter WL (2012) Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(5):1146–1150CrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenkman HJ, Parry K, Noble F, van Hillegersberg R, Sharland D, Goense L, Kelly J, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ, Ruurda JP et al (2017) Hiatal hernia after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103:1055–1062PubMedCrossRef Brenkman HJ, Parry K, Noble F, van Hillegersberg R, Sharland D, Goense L, Kelly J, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ, Ruurda JP et al (2017) Hiatal hernia after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 103:1055–1062PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Kent MS, Luketich JD, Tsai W, Churilla P, Federle M, Landreneau R, Alvelo-Rivera M, Schuchert M (2008) Revisional surgery after esophagectomy: an analysis of 43 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 86(3):975–983PubMedCrossRef Kent MS, Luketich JD, Tsai W, Churilla P, Federle M, Landreneau R, Alvelo-Rivera M, Schuchert M (2008) Revisional surgery after esophagectomy: an analysis of 43 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 86(3):975–983PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases
verfasst von
Ziad T. Awad
Syed Abbas
Ruchir Puri
Brian Dalton
David J. Chesire
Publikationsdatum
06.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07529-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.