Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2021

17.01.2021 | Scientific Review

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Jisheng Zhu, Guiyan Wang, Peng Du, Jianpeng He, Yong Li

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) for pancreatic head or periampullary lesions is being utilized with increasing frequency. However, few data are available for the elderly. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of MIPD in elderly population, by making a comparison with conventional open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) and with non-elderly population.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search to identify all eligible studies in Cochrane Library, Ovid, and PubMed from their inception up to April 2020.

Results

Seven retrospective studies involving 2727 patients were included. Of these, 3 compared MIPD and OPD in elderly patients, 2 compared MIPD in elderly and non-elderly patients, and 2 included both outcomes. Compared to those with OPD, elderly patients who underwent MIPD were associated with less 90-day mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32–0.97; P = 0.04) and fewer delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.88; P = 0.01). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in terms of 30-day mortality, major morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B/C), postoperative hemorrhage, reoperation, 30-day readmission, and operative time. For patients who have treated with MIPD, elderly did not reveal worse outcomes than non-elderly.

Conclusion

MIPD is a safe and feasible procedure for select elderly patients if performed by experienced surgeons from high-volume pancreatic surgery centers. However, further randomized studies are required to confirm this.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations (2019) Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019: Ten Key Findings United Nations (2019) Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2019: Ten Key Findings
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramai D, Ofosu A, Singh J et al (2019) Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with ampullary cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) cohort study. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 65:85–90PubMed Ramai D, Ofosu A, Singh J et al (2019) Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with ampullary cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) cohort study. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 65:85–90PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Carrère N, Mathonnet M, Mirallié É et al (2013) Surgical treatment. Ann Endocrinol 74:191–195CrossRef Carrère N, Mathonnet M, Mirallié É et al (2013) Surgical treatment. Ann Endocrinol 74:191–195CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104:1443–1450CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC et al (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104:1443–1450CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the padulap randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268:731–739CrossRefPubMed Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O et al (2018) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the padulap randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 268:731–739CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:199–207CrossRefPubMed van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K et al (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:199–207CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng L, Zhou Z, Cao Z et al (2019) Long-term oncological outcomes in laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29:759–769CrossRefPubMed Peng L, Zhou Z, Cao Z et al (2019) Long-term oncological outcomes in laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 29:759–769CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Urbonas K, Gulbinas A, Smailyte G et al (2015) Factors influencing survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma depend on patients’ age. Dig Surg 32:60–67CrossRefPubMed Urbonas K, Gulbinas A, Smailyte G et al (2015) Factors influencing survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma depend on patients’ age. Dig Surg 32:60–67CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki Y, Kokudo T, Amikura K et al (2016) Age does not affect complications and overall survival rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center experience and systematic review of literature. Biosci Trends 10:300–306CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki Y, Kokudo T, Amikura K et al (2016) Age does not affect complications and overall survival rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center experience and systematic review of literature. Biosci Trends 10:300–306CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat El Nakeeb A, Atef E, El Hanafy E et al (2016) Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 15:419–427CrossRefPubMed El Nakeeb A, Atef E, El Hanafy E et al (2016) Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 15:419–427CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM et al (2010) Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg 34:2109–2114CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM et al (2010) Outcomes of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients older than 70 years: a comparative study. World J Surg 34:2109–2114CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tee MC, Croome KP, Shubert CR et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients. HPB 17:909–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tee MC, Croome KP, Shubert CR et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy does not completely mitigate increased perioperative risks in elderly patients. HPB 17:909–918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P et al (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 32:2239–2248CrossRefPubMed Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P et al (2018) Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 32:2239–2248CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng L, Xia Q, Cai Y et al (2019) Impact of patient age on morbidity and survival following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:378–382CrossRefPubMed Meng L, Xia Q, Cai Y et al (2019) Impact of patient age on morbidity and survival following laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 29:378–382CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang Y, Zhao L, Jiang C et al (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 34:2028–2034CrossRefPubMed Liang Y, Zhao L, Jiang C et al (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 34:2028–2034CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan Y, Tang T, Zhang Y et al (2020) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy a comparative study in elderly people. Updates Surg 72(3):701–707CrossRefPubMed Tan Y, Tang T, Zhang Y et al (2020) Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy a comparative study in elderly people. Updates Surg 72(3):701–707CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8:336–341CrossRefPubMed Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2010) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 8:336–341CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRefPubMed Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Delitto D, Luckhurst CM, Black BS et al (2016) Oncologic and perioperative outcomes following selective application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1343–1349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Delitto D, Luckhurst CM, Black BS et al (2016) Oncologic and perioperative outcomes following selective application of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1343–1349CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Youngwirth LM et al (2016) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve use or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1026–1033CrossRefPubMed Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Youngwirth LM et al (2016) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve use or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1026–1033CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Sharpe S et al (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 213:512–515CrossRefPubMed Kantor O, Talamonti MS, Sharpe S et al (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma provides short-term oncologic outcomes and long-term overall survival rates similar to those for open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 213:512–515CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Halpern A et al (2019) Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers. Ann Surg 270:1147–1155CrossRefPubMed Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Halpern A et al (2019) Comparing short-term and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy across low and high volume centers. Ann Surg 270:1147–1155CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sowmya N, Martin Allison N, Turrentine Florence E et al (2018) Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J Surg Res 231:304–308CrossRef Sowmya N, Martin Allison N, Turrentine Florence E et al (2018) Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J Surg Res 231:304–308CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264:640–649CrossRefPubMed Zureikat AH, Postlewait LM, Liu Y et al (2016) A multi-institutional comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 264:640–649CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L et al (2017) Defining a hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 152:336–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L et al (2017) Defining a hospital volume threshold for minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg 152:336–342CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutlu OC, Lee JE, Katz MH et al (2018) Open pancreaticoduodenectomy case volume predicts outcome of laparoscopic approach: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg 267:552–560CrossRefPubMed Kutlu OC, Lee JE, Katz MH et al (2018) Open pancreaticoduodenectomy case volume predicts outcome of laparoscopic approach: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg 267:552–560CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Qu H, Sun GR, Zhou SQ, He QS (2013) Clinical risk factors of delayed gastric emptying in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:213–223CrossRefPubMed Qu H, Sun GR, Zhou SQ, He QS (2013) Clinical risk factors of delayed gastric emptying in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 39:213–223CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220:831–838CrossRefPubMed Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B et al (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors. J Am Coll Surg 220:831–838CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F et al (2018) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surg Endosc 32:1234–1247CrossRefPubMed Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F et al (2018) Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Surg Endosc 32:1234–1247CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Guo X, Xia J et al (2018) Comparison of totally 3-dimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 47:592–600CrossRefPubMed Zhang H, Guo X, Xia J et al (2018) Comparison of totally 3-dimensional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas 47:592–600CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Chen JZ, Zhan Q et al (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc 29:3698–3711CrossRefPubMed Chen S, Chen JZ, Zhan Q et al (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc 29:3698–3711CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Jisheng Zhu
Guiyan Wang
Peng Du
Jianpeng He
Yong Li
Publikationsdatum
17.01.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05945-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

World Journal of Surgery 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.