Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

10.02.2017 | Review Article

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

verfasst von: Chinock Cheong, Nam Kyu Kim

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 5(1):89–94PubMedPubMedCentral Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 5(1):89–94PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Coldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1(3):144–150 Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Coldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1(3):144–150
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology 6(7):477–484. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. The Lancet Oncology 6(7):477–484. doi:10.​1016/​s1470-2045(05)70221-7 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726. doi:10.​1016/​s0140-6736(05)66545-2 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet (London, England) 344(8914):58CrossRef Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet (London, England) 344(8914):58CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Jr HM, Flanagan R, Jr PW, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662 . doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762discussion 662-654CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Jr HM, Flanagan R, Jr PW, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662 . doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318155a762​discussion 662-654CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, Group CIS (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa1414882 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators AL (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12009 CrossRefPubMed Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J, Investigators AL (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​12009 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cima RR, Pattana-arun J, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH (2008) Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):946–950 . doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.021discussion 950-942CrossRefPubMed Cima RR, Pattana-arun J, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Wolff BG, Pemberton JH (2008) Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies. J Am Coll Surg 206(5):946–950 . doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2007.​12.​021discussion 950-942CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat The HALS Study Group, Demetrius EM, Litwin M, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J, Kelly JJ et al (2000) Hand-Asisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg 231:715–723CrossRefPubMedCentral The HALS Study Group, Demetrius EM, Litwin M, Darzi A, Jakimowicz J, Kelly JJ et al (2000) Hand-Asisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with the HandPort system initial experience with 68 patients. Ann Surg 231:715–723CrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques 20(4):191–204. doi:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181ed86c6 CrossRef Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques 20(4):191–204. doi:10.​1097/​SLE.​0b013e3181ed86c6​ CrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Jun SH (2010) Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen. Dis Colon rectum 53(11):1473–1479. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1cc17 Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Jun SH (2010) Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen. Dis Colon rectum 53(11):1473–1479. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e3181f1cc17​
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982(69):613–616CrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery-the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982(69):613–616CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagtegaal ID, van Krieken JH (2002) The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer-an overview. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 38(7):964–972CrossRef Nagtegaal ID, van Krieken JH (2002) The role of pathologists in the quality control of diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer-an overview. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 38(7):964–972CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J, Edye M, Jagelman DG, Wexner SD (1996) Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 171(1):47–50 discussion 50-41CrossRefPubMed Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J, Edye M, Jagelman DG, Wexner SD (1996) Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 171(1):47–50 discussion 50-41CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82(3):295–298CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82(3):295–298CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032651 CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa032651 CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Strohlein MA, Grutzner K-U, Jauch K-W, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon rectum 51:385–391 Strohlein MA, Grutzner K-U, Jauch K-W, Heiss MM (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic vs. open access surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective analysis. Dis Colon rectum 51:385–391
25.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group UMCT (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758 CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, Group UMCT (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​09.​7758 CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10529 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2015.​10529 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19(1):117–119. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9 CrossRefPubMed Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19(1):117–119. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-004-9004-9 CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 14(4):e134–e156. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02907.x CrossRef Trastulli S, Farinella E, Cirocchi R, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Sciannameo F, Gulla N, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 14(4):e134–e156. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2011.​02907.​x CrossRef
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R, Koga F, Gotoh N, Konishi K, Maehara S, Sugimachi K (2002) Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 16(8):1187–1191. doi:10.1007/s004640080154 CrossRefPubMed Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R, Koga F, Gotoh N, Konishi K, Maehara S, Sugimachi K (2002) Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endosc 16(8):1187–1191. doi:10.​1007/​s004640080154 CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2731-4 CrossRefPubMed D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-012-2731-4 CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0435-3 CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-009-0435-3 CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D'Isidoro C, Cobuccio L, Marciano E, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Use of the new da Vinci Xi (R) during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si (R). Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1728 Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D'Isidoro C, Cobuccio L, Marciano E, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Use of the new da Vinci Xi (R) during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si (R). Int J Med Robot. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1728
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620. doi:10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3 CrossRefPubMed Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Biffi R, Garcia-Aguilar J, Baek JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1614–1620. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-010-0909-3 CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kim NK, Lim DR, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY (2013) Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2625–2632. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-2895-8 CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kim NK, Lim DR, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY (2013) Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2625–2632. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-013-2895-8 CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho MS, Kim CW, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients. Surgery 157(6):1121–1129. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.010 CrossRefPubMed Cho MS, Kim CW, Baek SJ, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2015) Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients. Surgery 157(6):1121–1129. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2015.​01.​010 CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Stamopoulos P, Theodoropoulos GE, Papailiou J, Savidis D, Golemati C, Bramis K, Panoussopoulos SG, Leandros E (2009) Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23(12):2665–2674. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0507-2 CrossRefPubMed Stamopoulos P, Theodoropoulos GE, Papailiou J, Savidis D, Golemati C, Bramis K, Panoussopoulos SG, Leandros E (2009) Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23(12):2665–2674. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-009-0507-2 CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones OM, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (2009) Preservation of sexual and bladder function after laparoscopic rectal surgery. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 11(5):489–495. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01642.x CrossRef Jones OM, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (2009) Preservation of sexual and bladder function after laparoscopic rectal surgery. Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 11(5):489–495. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2008.​01642.​x CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318269d03b CrossRefPubMed Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318269d03b​ CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, Lee KY, Lee WH, Sohn SK, Min JS (2002) Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 45(9):1178–1185. doi:10.1097/01.dcr.0000027125.03278.26 Kim NK, Aahn TW, Park JK, Lee KY, Lee WH, Sohn SK, Min JS (2002) Assessment of sexual and voiding function after total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in males with rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 45(9):1178–1185. doi:10.​1097/​01.​dcr.​0000027125.​03278.​26
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19(8):2485–2493. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1 CrossRefPubMed Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19(8):2485–2493. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2262-1 CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132. doi:10.1002/bjs.4989 CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​4989 CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, Marijnen CA, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rodel C, Bujko K, Pahlman L, van de Velde CJ (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(7):1175–1183. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.039 CrossRef den Dulk M, Putter H, Collette L, Marijnen CA, Folkesson J, Bosset JF, Rodel C, Bujko K, Pahlman L, van de Velde CJ (2009) The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45(7):1175–1183. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2008.​11.​039 CrossRef
51.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Selvindos PB, Ho YH (2008) Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon rectum 51(11):1710–1711. doi:10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4 Selvindos PB, Ho YH (2008) Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon rectum 51(11):1710–1711. doi:10.​1007/​s10350-008-9322-4
53.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94(3):341–345. doi:10.1002/bjs.5621 CrossRefPubMed Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F (2007) Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 94(3):341–345. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5621 CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378CrossRefPubMed Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M (1994) Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 81:1376–1378CrossRefPubMed
57.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2013) Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 27(1):48–55. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2405-2 CrossRefPubMed Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2013) Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 27(1):48–55. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-012-2405-2 CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim NK, Lim D, AlAsari SF (2013) Robotic hemi-levator excision for low rectal cancer: a novel technique for sphincter preservation. OA Robotic Surgery 1(1):3. doi:10.13172/2053-3225-1-1-531 Kim NK, Lim D, AlAsari SF (2013) Robotic hemi-levator excision for low rectal cancer: a novel technique for sphincter preservation. OA Robotic Surgery 1(1):3. doi:10.​13172/​2053-3225-1-1-531
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, Carrere S, Gutowski M, Quenet F, Saint-Aubert B, Colombo PE (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon rectum 56(4):408–415. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182756fa0 Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, Carrere S, Gutowski M, Quenet F, Saint-Aubert B, Colombo PE (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon rectum 56(4):408–415. doi:10.​1097/​DCR.​0b013e3182756fa0​
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, Larach S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Techniques in coloproctology 18(5):473–480. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-1095-7 CrossRefPubMed Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, deBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Hunter L, Larach S (2014) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): results and experience with the first 20 patients undergoing curative-intent rectal cancer surgery at a single institution. Techniques in coloproctology 18(5):473–480. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-013-1095-7 CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martinez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27(9):3165–3172. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2872-0 CrossRefPubMed de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, Tasende MM, Fernandez M, Delgado S, Sylla P, Martinez-Palli G (2013) Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: “down-to-up” total mesorectal excision (TME)—short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 27(9):3165–3172. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-2872-0 CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Verheijen PM, Consten EC, Broeders IA (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: experience with a first case. Int J Med Robot 10(4):423–426. doi:10.1002/rcs.1594 CrossRefPubMed Verheijen PM, Consten EC, Broeders IA (2014) Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: experience with a first case. Int J Med Robot 10(4):423–426. doi:10.​1002/​rcs.​1594 CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x CrossRefPubMed Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30(8):3210–3215. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4615-x CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives
verfasst von
Chinock Cheong
Nam Kyu Kim
Publikationsdatum
10.02.2017
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.