Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

26.05.2022 | Original Article

Minimum resection length to ensure a pathologically negative distal margin and the preservation of a larger remnant stomach in proximal gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer

verfasst von: Yasufumi Koterazawa, Manabu Ohashi, Masaru Hayami, Rie Makuuchi, Satoshi Ida, Koshi Kumagai, Takeshi Sano, Souya Nunobe

Erschienen in: Gastric Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In proximal gastrectomy (PG), a longer distal margin (DM) length should be maintained to obtain a pathologically negative DM. However, a shorter DM length is preferred to preserve a large remnant stomach for favorable postoperative outcomes. Evidence regarding the minimum DM length to ensure a pathologically negative DM is useful.

Methods

Patients who underwent PG or total gastrectomy for cT1N0M0 gastric cancer limited to the upper third were enrolled. A new parameter, ΔDM, which corresponded to the pathological extension distal to the gross tumor boundary towards the resection stump, was evaluated. The maximum ΔDM, which is the length ensuring a pathologically negative DM, was first determined. Furthermore, the possible incidences of pathologically positive DM were calculated for each pathological type and clinical tumor (cTumor) size.

Results

Of 361 patients eligible for this study, 190 and 171 were assigned to differentiated (Dif) and undifferentiated types (Und), respectively. The maximum ΔDM was 30 and 40 mm in Dif and Und, respectively. Considering a correlation between cTumor size and ΔDM, and possible incidences of pathologically positive DM, 10, 20, and 30 mm were the minimal gross DM lengths in Dif when cTumor size was ≤ 15 mm, > 15 and ≤ 50 mm, and > 50 mm, respectively. In Und, the incidences of pathologically positive DM were 0.59% and 2.3% for gross DM lengths of 30 and 20 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The minimum DM lengths to ensure a pathologically negative DM in PG are proposed according to the pathological type of early upper gastric cancer.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Deans C, Yeo MS, Soe MY, Shabbir A, Ti TK, So JB. Cancer of the gastric cardia is rising in incidence in an Asian population and is associated with adverse outcome. World J Surg. 2011;35:617–24.CrossRef Deans C, Yeo MS, Soe MY, Shabbir A, Ti TK, So JB. Cancer of the gastric cardia is rising in incidence in an Asian population and is associated with adverse outcome. World J Surg. 2011;35:617–24.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Wu J, Ren D, Yan X, Wang Q, et al. A rising trend of gastric cardia cancer in Gansu Province of China. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:18–25.CrossRef Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Wu J, Ren D, Yan X, Wang Q, et al. A rising trend of gastric cardia cancer in Gansu Province of China. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:18–25.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, et al. Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2011;98:255–60.CrossRef Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, Jeong SH, Park DJ, Kim HH, et al. Changes in clinicopathological features and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer over a 20-year period. Br J Surg. 2011;98:255–60.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (ver. 5). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (ver. 5). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:558–62.CrossRef Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:558–62.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A, et al. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2013;37:558–64.CrossRef Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A, et al. Long-term outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg. 2013;37:558–64.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Otsuji E, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:141–5.CrossRef Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Otsuji E, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:141–5.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kano Y, Ohashi M, Ida S, Kumagai K, Sano T, Hiki N, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique versus laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Br J Surg Open. 2020;4:252–9. Kano Y, Ohashi M, Ida S, Kumagai K, Sano T, Hiki N, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique versus laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Br J Surg Open. 2020;4:252–9.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:407–16.CrossRef Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:407–16.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasufuku I, Ohashi M, Eto K, Ida S, Kumagai K, Nunobe S, et al. Size-dependent differences in the proximal remnant stomach: how much does a small remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy work? Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5540–9.CrossRef Yasufuku I, Ohashi M, Eto K, Ida S, Kumagai K, Nunobe S, et al. Size-dependent differences in the proximal remnant stomach: how much does a small remnant stomach after subtotal gastrectomy work? Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5540–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–8.CrossRef Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayami M, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, Sano T, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. A “Just Enough” gross proximal margin length ensuring pathologically complete resection in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Open. 2020;1(2):pe026.CrossRef Hayami M, Ohashi M, Kumagai K, Sano T, Hiki N, Nunobe S, et al. A “Just Enough” gross proximal margin length ensuring pathologically complete resection in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Open. 2020;1(2):pe026.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, Gerdes H, Hayman JA, Scott WJ, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2. 2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:531–46.CrossRef Ajani JA, Bentrem DJ, Besh S, Gerdes H, Hayman JA, Scott WJ, et al. Gastric cancer, version 2. 2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11:531–46.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:38–49.CrossRef Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:38–49.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–12.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Muraoka A, Kobayashi M, Kokudo Y. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with the hinged double flap method. World J Surg. 2016;40:2419–24.CrossRef Muraoka A, Kobayashi M, Kokudo Y. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with the hinged double flap method. World J Surg. 2016;40:2419–24.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mine S, Nunobe S, Watanabe M. A novel technique of anti-reflux esophagogastrostomy following left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. World J Surg. 2015;39:2359–61.CrossRef Mine S, Nunobe S, Watanabe M. A novel technique of anti-reflux esophagogastrostomy following left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. World J Surg. 2015;39:2359–61.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kosuga T, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Ohashi M, Kubota T, Kamiya S, et al. Does the single-stapling technique for circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy reduce anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3606–12.CrossRef Kosuga T, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Ohashi M, Kubota T, Kamiya S, et al. Does the single-stapling technique for circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy reduce anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3606–12.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin D, Park SS. Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;5:4–11.CrossRef Shin D, Park SS. Clinical importance and surgical decision-making regarding proximal resection margin for gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013;5:4–11.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McAuliffe JC, Tang LH, Kamrani K, Olino K, Klimstra DS, Coit DG, et al. Prevalence of false-negative results of intraoperative consultation on surgical margins during resection of gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2018;154:126–32.CrossRef McAuliffe JC, Tang LH, Kamrani K, Olino K, Klimstra DS, Coit DG, et al. Prevalence of false-negative results of intraoperative consultation on surgical margins during resection of gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma. JAMA Surg. 2018;154:126–32.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA, Poultsides GA, Pawlik TM, Saunders N, Jin LX, et al. Is it time to abandon the 5-cm margin rule during resection of distal gastric adenocarcinoma? A multi-institution study of the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1243–51.CrossRef Squires MH 3rd, Kooby DA, Poultsides GA, Pawlik TM, Saunders N, Jin LX, et al. Is it time to abandon the 5-cm margin rule during resection of distal gastric adenocarcinoma? A multi-institution study of the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1243–51.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Berlth F, Kim WH, Choi JH, Park SH, Kong SH, Lee HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of frozen section investigation and extent of proximal safety margin in gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2020;272:871–8.CrossRef Berlth F, Kim WH, Choi JH, Park SH, Kong SH, Lee HJ, et al. Prognostic impact of frozen section investigation and extent of proximal safety margin in gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2020;272:871–8.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayami M, Ohashi M, Ishizuka N, Hiki N, Kumagai K, Souya N, et al. Oncological impact of gross proximal margin length in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: is the Japanese recommendation valid? Ann Surg Open. 2021;2(1):pe036.CrossRef Hayami M, Ohashi M, Ishizuka N, Hiki N, Kumagai K, Souya N, et al. Oncological impact of gross proximal margin length in distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: is the Japanese recommendation valid? Ann Surg Open. 2021;2(1):pe036.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Minimum resection length to ensure a pathologically negative distal margin and the preservation of a larger remnant stomach in proximal gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer
verfasst von
Yasufumi Koterazawa
Manabu Ohashi
Masaru Hayami
Rie Makuuchi
Satoshi Ida
Koshi Kumagai
Takeshi Sano
Souya Nunobe
Publikationsdatum
26.05.2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Gastric Cancer / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-022-01304-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Hochrisiko-Spinaliom am besten mit der Mohs-Chirurgie entfernen

Die Mohs-Chirurgie ist zwar mit mehr Aufwand verbunden als die herkömmliche Exzision; für die Versorgung kutaner Hochrisiko-Plattenepithelkarzinome lohnt sich die zeitintensive Technik aber in jedem Fall. Laut einer aktuellen Studie sinkt im Vergleich das Sterberisiko.

Darmpolyp weg – Peptid-Gel gegen Nachblutungen drauf?

Das Nachblutungsrisiko nach einer endoskopischen Mukosaresektion von flachen kolorektalen und duodenalen Adenomen war in der deutschen PURPLE-Studie mit einem hämostatischen Gel nicht kleiner als ohne Prophylaxe.

Krebs-Op. besser erst nach mehrwöchigem Rauchverzicht?

Aktive Raucher haben nach onkologischen Operationen ein höheres Komplikationsrisiko als Nieraucher, aber auch als Exraucher. Damit der Rauchstopp einen Nutzen hat, darf er aber nicht zu kurz vor der Op. erfolgen, wie eine Metaanalyse nahelegt.

Periprozeduraler Myokardschaden nach NSTEMI prognostisch bedeutsam

Erleiden NSTEMI-Patienten und -Patientinnen infolge einer PCI Myokardschädigungen mit oder ohne Infarkt, erhöht das die Gesamtmortalität und das Risiko für weitere schwere Herzereignisse. Dafür sprechen zumindest Daten aus zwei italienischen Zentren.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.