Background
Bladder cancer is one of the most lethal urological malignant tumors worldwide [
1]. A multistep accumulation of genetic and epigenetic factors result in uncontrolled cellular invasion, migration, proliferation, increased cell survival, and metastatic spread. Although the treatment of bladder cancer has improved greatly in recent years, the incidence of this disease is gradually increasing. Recent advances in the use of high-throughput methods of molecular analysis have made it easier to identify genetic profiles characteristic of distinct tumor types and to identify targets and pathways that may underlie a particular clinical behavior; however, systemic chemotherapy remains palliative and only modestly effective [
2].
A biological process known as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been reported as having a role in tumor invasion, migration and metastasis [
3]. EMT is characterized by losing epithelial cell marker such as E-cadherin, and gaining of a mesenchymal phenotype with expression of mesenchymal proteins including vimentin [
4]. During EMT, down-regulation of E-cadherin induces epithelial cells undergoing changes in cell morphology and motility so that they adopt mesenchymal characteristics [
5]. Expression of E-cadherin is controlled by several transcriptional repressors, including Twist, Snail1, Snail2/Slug, E47, ZEB1/TCF8, and ZEB2/SIP1, which bind to E-boxes in the E-cadherin promoter [
6]. The transcriptional repressors also induce the mesenchymal genes N-cadherin and Vimentin [
7].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNAs of approximately 20–22 nucleotides that function in post-transcriptional gene regulatory pathways [
8]. Alterations in miRNA expression have been described in many different human tumors, and numerous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs function as key pathogenic components, impacting cancer cell growth, survival, and the capacity to metastasize [
9]-[
14]. Recent studies have shown that ZEB1 and ZEB2 are direct targets of the miR-200 family in human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231), canine kidney cells (MDCK), murine models, and a NCI-60 panel of cell lines [
15]-[
17]. The down-regulation of ZEB1 and ZEB2 increased E-cadherin expression; in contrast, loss of miR-200, which occurs in many different human cancers, including breast cancer [
18], ovarian cancer [
19], prostate cancer [
20], and endometrial carcinoma [
21], results in increased ZEB1/ZEB2 and repression of E-cadherin [
16],[
22]-[
24]. This latter change is coincident with more aggressive biological behavior in cancer (increased invasion and migration) [
16],[
18],[
24],[
25]. Hundreds of miRNAs are encoded in the human genome, with an estimated 30% of mRNAs possessing conserved miRNA-binding sites, suggesting that miRNA-based regulation is an integral component of the global gene expression program [
26].
The Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins comprises an important class of transcriptional repressors that orchestrate changes in chromatin structure to regulate gene activity, and many of the PcG proteins demonstrate altered expression in human cancers [
27],[
28]. BMI-1 is a PcG protein that has been shown to be an important transcriptional repressor of the Ink4a/Arf gene locus [
29]-[
31], which encodes two separate gene products (p16 ink4a and p14 Arf) from two distinct reading frames. P16ink4a inhibits CDK activity and, thereby, blocks entry into the cell cycle by preventing phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) by cyclin D-CDK4/6 complexes. P14 ARF arrests cell cycle progression and promotes apoptosis by promoting the stability of p53 [
32]. BMI-1 also plays a critical role in the maintenance of stem cells [
33]. Consistent with these observations suggesting an important oncogenic role for BMI-1, and up-regulated BMI-1 expression has been demonstrated in numerous human cancers [
27],[
28], including bladder cancer [
34]. High expression of BMI-1 has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in bladder cancer [
35].
E2F3, a key regulator of G1/S transition, plays major roles in regulating both cell proliferations [
36]. More recently, several miRNAs, such as miR-34a, miR-20a and miR-125b have been reported to inhibit cell proliferation by negatively regulating E2F3 in tumor cells [
37]-[
39]. Notably, E2F3 is over-expressed in almost all bladder cancer and cell lines [
40],[
41], suggesting that E2F3 is important for human bladder cancer development.
The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying the EMT process in bladder cancer. Our results revealed a close, direct association between expression of miR-200c, BMI-1, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, P14, P16 and E2F3 expression, representing a pivotal cellular axis impacting not only the capacity of bladder cancer cells to metastasize but also the ability of proliferation. In this study, we found that down-regulated expression of miR-200c and up-regulation of its direct target BMI-1 and E2F3 in bladder cancer tissue and cell lines. MiR-200c suppressed tumorigenesis through targeting BMI-1 and E2F3.
Methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human bladder cancer cell lines (UMUC-3 and T24) were purchased from Guangzhou Jennio Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China. All cell lines were maintained in high glucose DMEM medium (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C with an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in humidified air.
Tissue specimens
Clinical tissue samples used in this study were histopathologically and clinically diagnosed at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College (Zhanjiang, China) from 2012 to 2014. For the use of these clinical materials for research purposes, prior patients’ consents and approval from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee were obtained.
RNA Isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA and miRNA were isolated using the Total RNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc, Guangzhou, China) and miRNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc, Guangzhou, China) respectively followed by cDNA synthesis with 5 ng of total RNA using the TaqMan miRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (TaKaRa). BMI-1, E2F3, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin, p16INK4a, and p14ARF expression levels in cells and clinical specimens were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa; Dalian, Liaoning, China). PCR was carried out with a two-step qRT-PCR with specific primers for GAPDH (as internal control) at 95°C for 30s, followed by 40 cycles of amplification at 95°C for 5 s and 56°C for 30s. All results were representative of three independent assays, and the expression levels of miRNAs and mRNAs were expressed as 2
-ΔΔCT. The designed specific primers were listed in Table
1.
Table 1
Sequences for target gene primers for qRT-PCR
RNU6B | F: CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA | 59.42 |
R: AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT | 55.75 |
miR-200c | F: TAATACTGCCGGGTAATGATGG | 58.21 |
R: TCGTATCCAGTGCAGGGTC | 59.72 |
GAPDH | F: TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAG | 60.07 |
R: AGTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTC | 59.72 |
Bmi1 | F: TGGATCGGAAAGTAAACAAAGAC | 56.60 |
R: TGCATCACAGTCATTGCTGCT | 58.01 |
E2F3 | F: TGCCTGACTCAATAGAGAGCCTAC | 61.97 |
R: TCCCATTGTGGTCTTGGTTGT | 58.01 |
E-cadherin | F: GAAAGCGGCTGATACTGACC | 59.85 |
R: CGTACATGTCAGCCGCTTC | 59.72 |
Vimentin | F: GGGAGAAATTGCAGGAGGAG | 59.85 |
R: AGGTCAAGACGTGCCAGAGAC | 61.92 |
Western blot analysis
Western blotting was conducted using standard procedures, using anti-BMI-1 (40kD, 1:20000, Abcom; Cambridge, USA), anti E2F3 (37kD, 1:2000, Abcom; Cambridge, USA), anti-E-cadherin (135kD, 1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology; Boston, USA), anti-N-cadherin (140kD, 1:1000, Abcom; Cambridge, USA), anti-Vimentin, anti-p16INK4a (16kD, 1:500, Abcom; Cambridge, USA), anti-p14ARF (14kD, 1:500, Cell Signaling Technology; Boston, USA), or anti-β-tubulin antibody (55kD, 1:50000, Pure Earth Biotechology Co. Ltd.; Guangzhou, China, as a loading control), respectively. And then the membrane strips were probed with a secondary antibody (1:10000, Pure Earth Biotechology Co. Ltd.), β-tubulin was used as a loading control. Relative protein levels were quantified by scanning densitometry (Alpha View SA 3.4.0, ProteinSimple, USA), and the relative gray value of protein was calculated as band intensity of protein of interest/band intensity of loading control.
Infection of miRNAs
Vector control (pEZX-MR03, GeneCopoeia; Guangzhou, China), miR-200c over-expression plasmid (pEZX-MR03, GeneCopoeia; Guangzhou, China), and miR-200c inhibit plasmid (CMV- RFP- U6- miRNA inhibitor-PGK-puromycin, GeneCopoeia; Guangzhou, China) were transfected into 293 T cells, and viral supernatants were collected 48 h after transfection to infect human bladder cancer cells (UMUC-3, T24). After a 72-hour infection period, miR-200c-infected cells were seen accounting approximately 70% in the dish at which point we change the culture medium containing puromycin at 1 μg/ml for about 48 h post-transfection.
Luciferase reporter assay
3’-Untranslated region (3’-UTR) reporter plasmids for miR-200c were constructed via insertion of miR-200c seed sequence into the XbaI restriction site 3’ to luciferase gene in the pGL3-control plasmid (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, HEK-293 cells were seeded in 24 well cell culture clusters (Corning Incorporated; Corning, NY, USA). When reached 70% confluences, the cells were co-transfected with hsa-miR-200c/control miRNA and wild/mutated 3’-UTR of BMI-1, E2F3. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were harvested for firefly and Renilla luciferase activity assay. The Renilla luciferase activities were used to normalize the transfection efficiency.
Cell proliferation assay
Cells (5 × 103) transfected with control vectors, miR-200c over-expression, and miR-200c inhibitor vector were plated in 96-well plates (Corning Incorporated; Corning, NY, USA) for 6 days, separately. The CCK-8 reagent was added into each well of the 96-well assay plate each day and incubated for 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a 96-well plate reader.
Colony formation assay was performed by a slightly modified method, briefly, 1000 cells were seeded into 60 mm plastic dishes (Nest Biotechnology, Hong Kong, China), and cultured with 3 mL DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in humidified air (UMUC-3 cells were cultured for 7 days and T24 cells were cultured for 12 days, respectively). The numbers of colonies were counted after staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. All studies were conducted with 3 replications.
In vitro wound healing (migration) assay
UMUC-3 and T24 cells (5 × 105) were plated in 6-well plates and cultured until they reached confluence. A diametric scratch was done using a pipette tip followed by two culture medium changes. Cells were photographed in several pre-marked spots as 0 h. Multiple photographs were then taken at 24 h in the same spots for comparison.
In vitro transwell (invasion and migration) assay
In vitro transwell (invasion) assay was performed by a modified method, briefly, 3 × 104 cells in 150 μL serum-free medium supplemented with 1% FBS were seeded into the upper chamber of the insert (growth surface area, 0.33°Cm2; membrane pore size, 8 μm; Corning Incorporated; Corning, NY, USA) with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, MA), and 500 μL medium supplemented with 10% FBS was added into the lower chamber of 24-well plastic plate. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, the cells remained in the upper chamber or on the membrane were removed. Cells adhering to the lower membrane of the inserts were stained with DAPI after which were captured with confocal microscopy. The numbers of cells were counted in the images. Transwell (migration) assay was conducted the same as described above but not with Matrigel.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was done at least twice and at least one duplicate. The results were presented as mean ± SD. All calculations including statistical analysis were done by one-way ANOVA (SPSS 18.0). miRNA target prediction and associated mRNA pathway analysis were done using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and TargetScan. Differences between treatments were assessed using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference test (LSD (L)). Significant difference was inferred for P < 0.05 and extremely significant difference P < 0.01 and P < 0.001.
Discussion
The current study has indicated that miR-200c is a tumor-suppressive miRNA in bladder cancer, and that oncogene and transcription promoters, namely, BMI-1 and E2F3, are functional targets of miR-200c. Our data demonstrated that miR-200c is remarkably down-regulated in bladder cancer cell lines and surgically excised bladder tumors. In this context, we have found that experimental up-regulation of miR-200c expression in bladder cancer cells leads to suppression of BMI-1 and E2F3, and disrupted invasion, migration and proliferation of the bladder cancer cells, whereas completely silencing miR-200c further up-regulates BMI-1 and E2F3 and promotes progression. Furthermore, inverse correlation between miR-200c level and expression of BMI-1, as well as tumor progression, is evidenced in our clinical relevance study. Particularly, miR-200c over-expression is significantly associated with improved survival in patients with bladder cancer, further suggesting a tumor-suppressive function of the molecule.
Interestingly, miR-200c is up-regulated in pancreatic cancer and the ability of proliferation of which was strengthen [
42]. Moreover, a study by LIU [
43] and colleagues suggests that the expression levels of miR-200c in non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC] were higher than those in normal tissues, and high expressions of tumor miR-200c was associated with a poor survival in NSCLC patients. On the other hand, however, Chang [
18] and colleagues found that miR-200c inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cells by targeting HMGB1.
But how could miR-200c mediated the tumor suppressive effects? By miRNA target prediction and dual reporter gene, we confirmed oncogene BMI-1 as a directly target of miR-200c. And up-regulation of miR-200c decreased the BMI-1 gene expression, which inhibited the process of bladder cancer [
44]. Chang and Boominathan L [
45],[
46] and colleagues reported that miR-200c was a direct target of p53 transcription factor. P53 could inhibit cell proliferation through cell cycle arrest [
29],[
30]. In this study we also found that over-expression of miR-200c caused similar effects that inhibited proliferation. It was also reported that over-expression of BMI-1 could cause p53 suppression, which provided evidence for the existence of some positive feedbacks [
47],[
48]. In our study, we up-regulated BMI-1 through down-expression of miR-200c and found the approximate phenomenon, increased proliferation. BMI-1 expression inversely correlates with expressions of p14 and p16 in colorectal carcinomas [
31]. BMI-1 has also been reported as an oncogene by regulating cell cycle inhibitors, p16 and p14 [
49], which our consequences also proved. p16 was identified as an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 and thereby leads to hypophosphorylation of pRb [
49]. On the other hand, p14ARF prevents the degradation and inactivation of p53 by binding to MDM-2 [
50]. BMI-1, as a molecule of accelerating tumor progress, will promote proliferation of bladder cancer cells. Our results clearly demonstrate that ectopic miR-200c inhibits cell proliferation in T24 and UMUC-3 bladder cancer cells. Speaking of inhibition of cell proliferation, E2F3 maybe one of the targets miR-200c modulated that played a role in it. E2F3 is a member of the E2F family that is often dysregulated during tumorigenesis and over-expressed in a variety of cancers, including bladder cancer [
39]. Recent studies suggest a critical role of E2F3 in gene expression control during the G1/S transition. Inhibitory antibodies against E2F3 blocked cell entry into the S phase [
51]. In our study, we found that E2F3 was down-regulated in the miR-200c over-expression bladder cancer cell lines and consequently the proliferation was inhibited which was proved by CCK-8 assay and clone formation assay.
Several recent publications have suggested that regulation of the epithelial phenotype contributes to the miR-200c by acting on the E-cadherin repressors such as ZEB1/2 [
17],[
52], the predominant target and negative regulators of miR-200c, through which the capabilities of invasion and migration of cancer cells was regulated. In our study, we found the same tendency; miR-200c directly mediated transcriptional up-regulation of E-cadherin through translational repression of ZEB1, the same as in MDAMB-231 cells [
53], and down-regulation of the mesenchymal marker N-cadherin and vimentin. We also obtained the results of invasion and migration which were coincident with EMT hallmark E-cadherin.
By conducting the current study, we provide compelling biologic as well as clinical evidence that in bladder cancer miR-200c expression is markedly down-regulated, and that miR-200c acts to suppress the invasion, migration and proliferation of bladder cancer cells in vitro, suggesting that miR-200c plays a tumor suppressive role in the cancer type. These findings together indicate a dual role of miR-200c as either a tumor-promoting or suppressive miRNA, underscoring the need to define the specific role of a miRNA in a certain type of cancer. In this context, genetic and micro-environmental cues are believed to be important to determining whether, and how, a miRNA molecule functions to promote or to suppress oncogenes. Thus, it remains important to thoroughly understand the molecular mechanisms mediating the differential biologic effects and targets of miR-200c in bladder cancer and other cancer types.
Our current study has identified invasion, migration and proliferation regulator BMI-1, proliferation regulator E2F3 which was a transcriptional factor as bonafide targets of miR-200c. These genes control the characters of invasion, migration and proliferation and thus BMI-1 have been implicated as proto-oncogenes and E2F3 the transcriptional factor attractive therapeutic targets against cancer. Over-expression of BMI-1 is one of the hallmarks of various cancer types, due to its relatively high amplification frequency and up-regulated expression of its mRNA and protein in a variety of tumors including bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and breast cancer.
The research above, on the one hand provide new insights in our need to develop more efficacious therapeutic approach to improved treatment of bladder cancer. On the other hand, however, the mechanism via which miR-200c is down-regulated in bladder cancer remains uninvestigated.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.