Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2020

01.04.2020 | Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Missing duct sign

verfasst von: Kabilan Chokkappan, Rahul Lohan, Sundeep Punamiya

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Missing duct sign is produced when an intrahepatic stone completely obstructs the orifice of a segmental or subsegmental bile duct on cholangiogram in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis [1] (Figs. 1, 2). In an opacified biliary tree, the stones appear as filling defects. When a segmental duct fails to completely opacify due to an obstructing calculus, it is difficult to detect the calculus. Normal ducts, especially the left ducts, are sometimes not opacified, mimicking an intraductal calculus. However, the use of Trendelenburg, prone or left lateral positions would help to fill the patent unopacified ducts in this setting. Other characteristic imaging features of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis on cholangiogram include disproportionate dilatation of the extrahepatic bile ducts with minimal to no dilatation of intrahepatic ducts, multifocal intrahepatic biliary strictures, decreased arborization, and peripheral tapering of the intrahepatic ducts [2]. Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis represents a syndrome characterized by repeated episodes of bacterial cholangitis and the formation of pigment stones in the intrahepatic bile ducts. The disease is mainly seen in the Asian population with equal distribution in men and women in the 3rd and 4th decades of life [3]. Although the etiology is unknown, the disease is known to be associated with parasites such as Ascaris lumbricoides and Clonorchis sinensis. Inflammation caused by parasitic infestation of the biliary tree, resulting in scarring, strictures, bile stasis, and formation of intrahepatic pigment stones is the postulated pathophysiology. Complications of the disease include cholangitic abscess, segmental atrophy, biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and cholangiocarcinoma [4].
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim JH (1991). Oriental cholangiohepatitis: pathologic, clinical, and radiologic features. Am J Roentgenol 157(1):1-8.CrossRef Lim JH (1991). Oriental cholangiohepatitis: pathologic, clinical, and radiologic features. Am J Roentgenol 157(1):1-8.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heffernan EJ, Geoghegan T, Munk PL et al (2009) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: from imaging to intervention. Am J Roentgenol 192(1):W28-35.CrossRef Heffernan EJ, Geoghegan T, Munk PL et al (2009) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: from imaging to intervention. Am J Roentgenol 192(1):W28-35.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakayama F (1982). Intrahepatic calculi: a special problem in East Asia. World J Surg 6:802-4.CrossRef Nakayama F (1982). Intrahepatic calculi: a special problem in East Asia. World J Surg 6:802-4.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Park MS, Yu JS, Kim KW et al (2001). Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: comparison between MR cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Radiology 220:677–682.CrossRef Park MS, Yu JS, Kim KW et al (2001). Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: comparison between MR cholangiography and direct cholangiography. Radiology 220:677–682.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Missing duct sign
verfasst von
Kabilan Chokkappan
Rahul Lohan
Sundeep Punamiya
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02397-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Abdominal Radiology 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.