Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Geriatrics Reports
Erschienen in: Current Geriatrics Reports 1/2019

28.01.2019 | Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly (M Chen, Section Editor)

Mobile Health Technologies for Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions

verfasst von: Ryan P. Searcy, Jenny Summapund, Deborah Estrin, John P. Pollak, Antoinette Schoenthaler, Andrea B. Troxel, John A. Dodson

Erschienen in: Current Geriatrics Reports | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review documents the most promising domains of mobile health (mHealth) use in cardiovascular disease, current barriers to mHealth adoption in older adults, and future directions of mHealth utilization that may increase engagement in this population.

Recent Findings

Mobile health technologies are being rapidly adopted as smartphones and wearable biometric devices enable increasingly sophisticated health monitoring. Cardiovascular disease management is particularly conducive to mobile health utilization, as many mobile platforms currently support software capable of sophisticated cardiovascular data collection. While cardiovascular disease most commonly affects older adults, these individuals also have the greatest barriers to mHealth adoption, limiting the potential for current technologies to achieve benefit.

Summary

Recent studies investigating mHealth interventions for older adults with cardiovascular disease have yielded mixed results. More work is needed to create engaging mHealth platforms that provide the necessary level of support to create sustained behavioral change. Addressing specific motivational, physical, and cognitive barriers to mHealth adoption among older adults may increase utilization of future interventions.
Literatur
1.
2.
Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies. World Health Organ. 2011;64:66–71.
3.
Lind L, Karlsson D. Digital pen-based telemonitoring of elderly heart failure patients. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1062.PubMed
4.
Matthew-Maich N, Harris L, Ploeg J, Markle-Reid M, Valaitis R, Ibrahim S, Gafni A, Isaacs S. Designing, implementing, and evaluating mobile health technologies for managing chronic conditions in older adults: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4:e29.
5.
Gilbert BJ, Goodman E, Chadda A, Hatfield D, Forman DE, Panch T. The role of mobile health in elderly populations. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015;4:347–52.CrossRef
6.
Kim BYB, Lee J. Smart devices for older adults managing chronic disease: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 5:e69.
7.
Seto E, Leonard KJ, Cafazzo JA, Barnsley J, Masino C, Ross HJ. Mobile phone-based telemonitoring for heart failure management: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e31.CrossRef
8.
Augustyniak P. Wearable wireless heart rate monitor for continuous long-term variability studies. J Electrocardiol. 2011;44:195–200.CrossRef
9.
Haynes S, Kim KK. A mobile care coordination system for the management of complex chronic disease. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:505–9.PubMed
10.
Jung H, Lee JE. The impact of community-based eHealth self-management intervention among elderly living alone with hypertension. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:167–73.CrossRef
11.
12.
Shalan A, Abdulrahman A, Habli I, Tew G, Thompson A. YORwalK: designing a smartphone exercise application for people with intermittent claudication. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:311–5.PubMed
13.
Macinnes M, Martin N, Fulton H, McLeod KA. Comparison of a smartphone-based ECG recording system with a standard cardiac event monitor in the investigation of palpitations in children. Arch Dis Child. 2018;104:43–47.
14.
Yazdanyar A, Newman AB. The burden of cardiovascular disease in the elderly: morbidity, mortality, and costs. Clin Geriatr Med. 2009;25:563–vii.CrossRef
15.
Wildenbos GA, Peute L, Jaspers M. Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: a literature based framework (MOLD-US). Int J Med Inform. 2018;114:66–75.CrossRef
16.
Foster MV, Sethares KA. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of telehealth in older adults: an integrative review. CIN Comput. Informatics, Nurs. 2014;32:523–533.
17.
Baig MM, GholamHosseini H, Moqeem AA, Mirza F, Linden M. A systematic review of wearable patient monitoring systems - current challenges and opportunities for clinical adoption. J Med Syst. 2017;41:115.CrossRef
18.
Cajita MI, Hodgson NA, Lam KW, Yoo S, Han H-R. Facilitators of and barriers to mHealth adoption in older adults with heart failure. CIN Comput. Informatics, Nurs. 36:376–382.
19.
20.
Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Pew Res Cent Internet & Tech.; 2017
21.
•• Lee C, Coughlin JF. Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J Prod Innov Manag. 2014;32:747–59 This study provides a thorough summary of motivational barriers to older adult adoption of mHealth technologies. CrossRef
22.
Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform. 2017;101:75–84.CrossRef
23.
Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57:635–52.CrossRef
24.
Parker SJ, Jessel S, Richardson JE, Reid MC. Older adults are mobile too! Identifying the barriers and facilitators to older adults’ use of mHealth for pain management. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:43.CrossRef
25.
Rodríguez MD, Gonzalez VM, Favela J, Santana PC. Home-based communication system for older adults and their remote family. Comput Human Behav. 2009;25:609–18.CrossRef
26.
Eisma R, Dickinson A, Goodman J, Syme A, Tiwari L, Newell AF. Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2004;3:131–40.CrossRef
27.
Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf M, Wei E. “You get reminded you’re a sick person”: personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e202.CrossRef
28.
Fletcher J, Jensen R. Mobile health: barriers to mobile phone use in the aging population. Online J Nurs Inform. 2015;19.
29.
Wang A, Redington L, Steinmetz V, Lindeman D. The ADOPT model: accelerating diffusion of proven technologies for older adults. Ageing Int. 2011;36:29–45.CrossRef
30.
Walsh K, Callan A. Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: a case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing Int. 2011;36:102–22.CrossRef
31.
Winberg C, Kylberg M, Pettersson C, Harnett T, Hedvall PO, Mattsson T, et al. The use of apps for health in persons with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke - barriers and facilitators. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:638–41.PubMed
32.
Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:788–801.CrossRef
33.
Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, Morin PC, Pevzner J, Weinstock RS, et al. Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:45–60.CrossRef
34.
Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21:333–52.CrossRef
35.
Fanning J, Brooks AK, Ip E, Nicklas BJ, Rejeski WJ. A mobile health intervention to reduce pain and improve health (MORPH) in older adults with obesity: protocol for the MORPH trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018;7:e128.CrossRef
36.
Aula A. User study on older adults’ use of the Web and search engines. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2005;4:67–81.CrossRef
37.
Kang HG, Mahoney DF, Hoenig H, Hirth VA, Bonato P, Hajjar I, et al. In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:1579–86.CrossRef
38.
Taylor R, Bower A, Girosi F, Bigelow J, Fonkych K, Hillestad R. Promoting health information technology: is there a case for more-aggressive government action? Health Aff. 2005;24:1234–45.CrossRef
39.
40.
Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Pirogowicz I. Support for e-health services among elderly primary care patients. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20:696–704.CrossRef
41.
•• Farage MA, Miller KW, Ajayi F, Hutchins D. Design principles to accommodate older adults. Glob J Health Sci. 2012;4:2–25 This paper reviews the numerous barriers (physical and cognitive) faced by older adults in their adoption of mHealth technologies. PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Gassmann O, Reepmeyer G. Universal design – innovations for all ages BT - the silver market phenomenon: business opportunities in an era of demographic change. In: Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2008. p. 125–140.
43.
Davis AC, Ostri B, Parving A. Longitudinal study of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:12–22.PubMed
44.
Pedersen KE, Rosenhall U, Moller MB. Changes in pure-tone thresholds in individuals aged 70-81: results from a longitudinal study. Audiology. 1989;28:194–204.CrossRef
45.
Gitlow L. Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2014;32:271–80.CrossRef
46.
Arning K, Ziefle M. Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance. Behav Inform Technol. 2009;28:251–68.CrossRef
47.
48.
Karhula T, Vuorinen AL, Raapysjarvi K, et al. Telemonitoring and mobile phone-based health coaching among Finnish diabetic and heart disease patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e153.CrossRef
49.
Anglada-Martinez H, Rovira-Illamola M, Martin-Conde M, Sotoca-Momblona JM, Codina-Jane C. mHealth intervention to improve medication management in chronically ill patients: analysis of the recruitment process. Postgr Med. 2016;128:427–31.CrossRef
50.
Scherr D, Kastner P, Kollmann A, Hallas A, Auer J, Krappinger H, et al. Effect of home-based telemonitoring using mobile phone technology on the outcome of heart failure patients after an episode of acute decompensation: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e34.CrossRef
51.
Buck H, Pinter A, Poole E, Boehmer J, Foy A, Black S, et al. Evaluating the older adult experience of a web-based, tablet-delivered heart failure self-care program using gerontechnology principles. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap). 2017;38:537–41.CrossRef
52.
53.
Wijsman WL, Richard E, Cachucho R, de Craen JMA, Jongstra S, Mooijaart PS Evaluation of the use of home blood pressure measurement using mobile phone-assisted technology: the iVitality proof-of-principle study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 4:e67.
54.
Morawski K, Ghazinouri R, Krumme A, et al. Association of a smartphone application with medication adherence and blood pressure control: the mediSAFE-BP randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:802–9.CrossRef
55.
Kim JY, Wineinger NE, Steinhubl SR. The influence of wireless self-monitoring program on the relationship between patient activation and health behaviors, medication adherence, and blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e116.CrossRef
56.
Kario K, Tomitani N, Kanegae H, Ishii H, Uchiyama K, Yamagiwa K, et al. Comparative effects of an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)/diuretic vs. ARB/calcium-channel blocker combination on uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension evaluated by information and communication technology-based nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring. Circ J. 2017;81:948–57.CrossRef
57.
MM MD, Spring B, Berger JS, et al. Effect of a home-based exercise intervention of wearable technology and telephone coaching on walking performance in peripheral artery disease: the honor randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1665–76.CrossRef
58.
McGillion M, Yost J, Turner A, Bender D, Scott T, Carroll S, et al. Technology-enabled remote monitoring and self-management - vision for patient empowerment following cardiac and vascular surgery: user testing and randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5:e149.CrossRef
59.
Prescott E, Meindersma EP, van der Velde AE, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Iliou MC, Ardissino D, et al. A EUropean study on effectiveness and sustainability of current Cardiac Rehabilitation programmes in the Elderly: design of the EU-CaRE randomised controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:27–40.CrossRef
60.
Comin-Colet J, Enjuanes C, Verdu-Rotellar JM, Linas A, Ruiz-Rodriguez P, Gonzalez-Robledo G, et al. Impact on clinical events and healthcare costs of adding telemedicine to multidisciplinary disease management programmes for heart failure: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22:282–95.CrossRef
61.
Guo Y, Chen Y, Lane DA, Liu L, Wang Y, Lip GYH. Mobile health technology for atrial fibrillation management integrating decision support, education, and patient involvement: mAF app trial. Am J Med. 2017;130:1388–1396.e6.CrossRef
62.
Steinhubl SR, Waalen J, Edwards AM, Ariniello LM, Mehta RR, Ebner GS, et al. Effect of a home-based wearable continuous ECG monitoring patch on detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation: the mSToPS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:146–55.CrossRef
63.
64.
Brath H, Morak J, Kastenbauer T, Modre-Osprian R, Strohner-Kastenbauer H, Schwarz M, Kort W, Schreier G, et al. Mobile health (mHealth) based medication adherence measurement - a pilot trial using electronic blisters in diabetes patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(Suppl 1):47–55.
65.
Harte R, Hall T, Glynn L, Rodríguez-Molinero A, Scharf T, Quinlan LR, et al. Enhancing home health mobile phone app usability through general smartphone training: usability and learnability case study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018;5:e18.CrossRef
66.
Piette JD, Striplin D, Marinec N, Chen J, Trivedi RB, Aron DC, et al. A mobile health intervention supporting heart failure patients and their informal caregivers: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e142.CrossRef
67.
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367:1747–57.CrossRef
68.
Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Banegas JR, et al. Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States. JAMA. 2003;289:2363–9.CrossRef
69.
Gutiérrez-Misis A, Sánchez-Santos MT, Banegas JR, Zunzunegui MV, Castell MV, Otero A. Prevalence and incidence of hypertension in a population cohort of people aged 65 years or older in Spain. J Hypertens. 2011;29:1863–70.CrossRef
70.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Levy D. Hypertension in adults across the age spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. JAMA. 2005;294:466–72.CrossRef
71.
Moon JY, Park KJ, Hwangbo Y, Lee MR, Yoo BI, Won JH, et al. A trend analysis of the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension by age group. J Prev Med Public Health. 2013;46:353–9.CrossRef
72.
Egan BM, Li J, Shatat IF, Fuller JM, Sinopoli A. Closing the gap in hypertension control between younger and older adults: NHANES 1988 to 2010. Circulation. 2014;129:2052–61.CrossRef
73.
Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation endorsed by the World. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2432–46.CrossRef
74.
Thomas RJ, Balady G, Banka G, Beckie TM, Chiu J, Gokak S, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA clinical performance and quality measures for cardiac rehabilitation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on performance measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:1814–37.CrossRef
75.
Gravely-Witte S, Leung YW, Nariani R, Tamim H, Oh P, Chan VM, et al. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:87–96.CrossRef
76.
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:e1–e76.CrossRef
77.
Wodchis WP, Bhatia RS, Leblanc K, Meshkat N, Morra D. A review of the cost of atrial fibrillation. Value Health. 2012;15:240–8.CrossRef
78.
Becker C. Cost-of-illness studies of atrial fibrillation: methodological considerations. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:661–84.CrossRef
79.
Bumgarner JM, Lambert CT, Hussein AA, Cantillon DJ, Baranowski B, Wolski K, et al. Smartwatch algorithm for automated detection of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:2381–8.CrossRef
80.
Koshy AN, Sajeev JK, Nerlekar N, Brown AJ, Rajakariar K, Zureik M, et al. Smart watches for heart rate assessment in atrial arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol. 2018;266:124–7.CrossRef
81.
Dalen JE, Alpert JS. Silent atrial fibrillation and cryptogenic strokes. Am J Med. 2017;130:264–7.CrossRef
82.
Dilaveris PE, Kennedy HL. Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:413–8.CrossRef
83.
Steinhubl SR, Mehta RR, Ebner GS, Ballesteros MM, Waalen J, Steinberg G, et al. Rationale and design of a home-based trial using wearable sensors to detect asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in a targeted population: the mHealth Screening To Prevent Strokes (mSToPS) trial. Am Heart J. 2016;175:77–85.CrossRef
84.
Mairesse GH, Moran P, Van Gelder IC, et al. Screening for atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiologi. Europace. 2017;19:1589–623.CrossRef
85.
Jamerson BD, Fillenbaum GG, Sloane R, Morey MC. A new method for identifying characteristics of needing help to take medications in an older representative community-resident population: the Duke medication assist scale. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:1195–202.CrossRef
86.
Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–97.CrossRef
87.
Shah NB, Der E, Ruggerio C, Heidenreich PA, Massie BM. Prevention of hospitalizations for heart failure with an interactive home monitoring program. Am Heart J. 1998;135:373–8.CrossRef
88.
Mertens A, Brandl C, Miron-Shatz T, Schlick C, Neumann T, Kribben A, et al. A mobile application improves therapy-adherence rates in elderly patients undergoing rehabilitation: a crossover design study comparing documentation via iPad with paper-based control. Medicine. 2016;95:e4446.CrossRef
89.
Escourrou E, Herault M, Gdoura S, Stillmunkés A, Oustric S, Chicoulaa B (2018) Becoming frail: a major turning point in patients’ life course. Fam Pract cmy043-cmy043.
90.
Villalva CM, Alvarez-Muiño XLL, Mondelo TG, Fachado AA, Fernández JC. Adherence to treatment in hypertension BT - hypertension: from basic research to clinical practice. In: Islam MS, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 129–147.
91.
Arranz L, Gimenez-Llort L, De Castro NM, Baeza I, De la Fuente M. Social isolation during old age worsens cognitive, behavioral and immune impairment. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2009;44:137–42.CrossRef
92.
Li CL, Tung HJ, Yeh MC. Combined effect of eating alone and a poor nutritional status on cognitive decline among older adults in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27:686–94.PubMed
93.
Dromey C, Boyce K, Channell R. Effects of age and syntactic complexity on speech motor performance. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014;57:2142–51.CrossRef
94.
Palumbo F, Ullberg J, Štimec A, Furfari F, Karlsson L, Coradeschi S. Sensor network infrastructure for a home care monitoring system. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:3833–60.CrossRef
95.
Melillo P, Orrico A, Scala P, Crispino F, Pecchia L. Cloud-based smart health monitoring system for automatic cardiovascular and fall risk assessment in hypertensive patients. J Med Syst. 2015;39:109.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Mobile Health Technologies for Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions
verfasst von
Ryan P. Searcy
Jenny Summapund
Deborah Estrin
John P. Pollak
Antoinette Schoenthaler
Andrea B. Troxel
John A. Dodson
Publikationsdatum
28.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Geriatrics Reports / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-7865
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-019-0270-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Current Geriatrics Reports 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Palliative Care (D Wu, Section Editor)

Disease-Specific Advance Care Planning Interventions for Older Adults

Palliative Care (D Wu, Section Editor)

Pharmacologic Management of Agitation in Patients with Dementia

Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly (M Chen, Section Editor)

Reduced Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation

Neurology of Aging (KS Marder, Section Editor)

Wearable Sensor Technology to Measure Physical Activity (PA) in the Elderly

Palliative Care (D Wu, Section Editor)

Deprescribing: Right-Sizing Medication Regimens to Optimize Outcomes in Palliative Care

Underserved Populations (H Fernandez, Section Editor)

Workforce Issues in Geriatrics in Rural America

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Thrombophiliescreening – Wenn, dann richtig und nur bei therapeutischer Konsequenz

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise