Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016

11.01.2016 | Original Article

Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system

verfasst von: Estelle Jeanditgautier, Olivier Mayeur, Mathias Brieu, Gery Lamblin, Chrystele Rubod, Michel Cosson

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We aim to analyze the combined influence of the size of the mesh, the number of sutures, the combined use of an anterior and posterior mesh, and the tension applied to the promontory, on the mobility of the pelvic organs and on the sutures, using a Finite Element (FE) model of the female pelvic system during abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Methods

We used a FE model of the female pelvic system, which allowed us to simulate the mobility of the pelvic system and to evaluate problems related to female prolapse. The meshes were added to the geometrical model and then transferred to computing software. This analysis allowed us to compare the stress and mobility during a thrust effort in different situations.

Results

The bigger the mesh, the less mobility of both anterior and posterior organs there would be. This is accompanied by an increase in stress at the suture level. The combination of a posterior mesh with an anterior one decreases mobility and stress at the suture level. There is a particularly relevant stressing zone on the suture at the cervix. The increase in the number of sutures induces a decrease in the tension applied at each suture zone and has no impact on organ mobility.

Conclusion

Our model enables us to simulate and analyze an infinite number of surgical hypotheses. Even if these results are not validated at a clinical level, we can observe the importance of the association of both an anterior and a posterior mesh or the number of sutures.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):20–26CrossRefPubMed Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ (2004) Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(1):20–26CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):805–823CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):805–823CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz JF, Dubois P, Brieu M (2013) Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model. Int Urogynecol J 24(1):105–112CrossRefPubMed Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz JF, Dubois P, Brieu M (2013) Simulation of normal pelvic mobilities in building an MRI-validated biomechanical model. Int Urogynecol J 24(1):105–112CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz J-F, Brieu M (2011) Biomechanical modeling of pelvic organ mobility: towards personalized medicine. Bull Acad Natl Med 195(8):1869–1883; discussion 1883PubMed Cosson M, Rubod C, Vallet A, Witz J-F, Brieu M (2011) Biomechanical modeling of pelvic organ mobility: towards personalized medicine. Bull Acad Natl Med 195(8):1869–1883; discussion 1883PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayeur O, Witz J-F, Lecomte P, Brieu M, Cosson M, Miller K (2015) Influence of geometry and mechanical properties on the accuracy of patient-specific simulation of women pelvic floor. Ann Biomed Eng doi:10.1007/s10439-015-1401-9 PubMed Mayeur O, Witz J-F, Lecomte P, Brieu M, Cosson M, Miller K (2015) Influence of geometry and mechanical properties on the accuracy of patient-specific simulation of women pelvic floor. Ann Biomed Eng doi:10.​1007/​s10439-015-1401-9 PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubod C, Lecomte-Grosbras P, Brieu M, Giraudet G, Betrouni N, Cosson M (2013) 3D simulation of pelvic system numerical simulation for a better understanding of the contribution of the uterine ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 24(12):2093–2098CrossRef Rubod C, Lecomte-Grosbras P, Brieu M, Giraudet G, Betrouni N, Cosson M (2013) 3D simulation of pelvic system numerical simulation for a better understanding of the contribution of the uterine ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 24(12):2093–2098CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Petros PEP, Woodman PJ (2008) The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(1):35–40CrossRefPubMed Petros PEP, Woodman PJ (2008) The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(1):35–40CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724; discussion 1724–1728CrossRefPubMed DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724; discussion 1724–1728CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Jean-Charles C, Dubois P, Cosson M (2008) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):811–816 Rubod C, Boukerrou M, Brieu M, Jean-Charles C, Dubois P, Cosson M (2008) Biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue: preliminary results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(6):811–816
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd JP, Feola AJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA (2012) Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):613–620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shepherd JP, Feola AJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA (2012) Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(5):613–620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang R, Abramowitch S, Knight K, Palcsey S, Nolfi A, Feola A et al (2013) Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):233–243CrossRef Liang R, Abramowitch S, Knight K, Palcsey S, Nolfi A, Feola A et al (2013) Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):233–243CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S et al (2013) Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):224–232CrossRef Feola A, Abramowitch S, Jallah Z, Stein S, Barone W, Palcsey S et al (2013) Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):224–232CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamina P (2008) Anatomie clinique, vol 4. Organes urinaires et génitaux, pelvis, coupes du tronc. Maloine, Paris Kamina P (2008) Anatomie clinique, vol 4. Organes urinaires et génitaux, pelvis, coupes du tronc. Maloine, Paris
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (1994) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 84(5):885–888PubMed Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (1994) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 84(5):885–888PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensinger G, Lind L, Lesser M, Guess M, Winkler HA (2005) Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(6):2094–2098CrossRefPubMed Bensinger G, Lind L, Lesser M, Guess M, Winkler HA (2005) Abdominal sacral suspensions: analysis of complications using permanent mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(6):2094–2098CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, Zyczynski HM, Nager CW, Norton PA et al (2008) Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):688.e1–688.e5CrossRef Cundiff GW, Varner E, Visco AG, Zyczynski HM, Nager CW, Norton PA et al (2008) Risk factors for mesh/suture erosion following sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):688.e1–688.e5CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Govier FE, Kobashi KC, Kozlowski PM, Kuznetsov DD, Begley SJ, McGonigle KF et al (2005) High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh. Urology 65(6):1099–1103CrossRefPubMed Govier FE, Kobashi KC, Kozlowski PM, Kuznetsov DD, Begley SJ, McGonigle KF et al (2005) High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh. Urology 65(6):1099–1103CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Quiroz LH, Gutman RE, Shippey S, Cundiff GW, Sanses T, Blomquist JL et al (2008) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(5):557.e1–557.e5CrossRef Quiroz LH, Gutman RE, Shippey S, Cundiff GW, Sanses T, Blomquist JL et al (2008) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(5):557.e1–557.e5CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Manodoro S, Endo M, Uvin P, Albersen M, Vláčil J, Engels A et al (2013) Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):244–250CrossRef Manodoro S, Endo M, Uvin P, Albersen M, Vláčil J, Engels A et al (2013) Graft-related complications and biaxial tensiometry following experimental vaginal implantation of flat mesh of variable dimensions. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 120(2):244–250CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizée D, Cotelle O, Bolner B, Van Den Akker M et al (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed Gadonneix P, Ercoli A, Salet-Lizée D, Cotelle O, Bolner B, Van Den Akker M et al (2004) Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):29–35CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol 115(2, Part 1):325–330CrossRefPubMed Feiner B, Maher C (2010) Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol 115(2, Part 1):325–330CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wattiez A, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (2001) Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse. Urol Clin N Am 28(1):151–157CrossRef Wattiez A, Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA (2001) Promontofixation for the treatment of prolapse. Urol Clin N Am 28(1):151–157CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Antiphon P, Elard S, Benyoussef A, Fofana M, Yiou R, Gettman M et al (2004) Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory? Eur Urol 45(5):655–661CrossRefPubMed Antiphon P, Elard S, Benyoussef A, Fofana M, Yiou R, Gettman M et al (2004) Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory? Eur Urol 45(5):655–661CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Barone WR, Amini R, Maiti S, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD (2015) The impact of boundary conditions on surface curvature of polypropylene mesh in response to uniaxial loading. J Biomech 48(9):1566–1574CrossRefPubMed Barone WR, Amini R, Maiti S, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD (2015) The impact of boundary conditions on surface curvature of polypropylene mesh in response to uniaxial loading. J Biomech 48(9):1566–1574CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Boukerrou M, Orazi G, Nayama M, Boodhun R, Crépin G, Cosson M (2003) Promontofixation procedure: use of non-absorbable sutures or tackers? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 32(6):524–528 Boukerrou M, Orazi G, Nayama M, Boodhun R, Crépin G, Cosson M (2003) Promontofixation procedure: use of non-absorbable sutures or tackers? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 32(6):524–528
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosson M, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crépin G (2001) Experimental use of laparoscopic material: report of a case of spondylodiscitis after laparoscopic sacropexy with Taker. Ann Chir 126(6):554–556CrossRefPubMed Cosson M, Narducci F, Querleu D, Crépin G (2001) Experimental use of laparoscopic material: report of a case of spondylodiscitis after laparoscopic sacropexy with Taker. Ann Chir 126(6):554–556CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system
verfasst von
Estelle Jeanditgautier
Olivier Mayeur
Mathias Brieu
Gery Lamblin
Chrystele Rubod
Michel Cosson
Publikationsdatum
11.01.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2917-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.