Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2021

28.11.2020 | Leading Article

Modernization and Strengthening of Bioequivalence Guidelines in Japan

verfasst von: Ryosuke Kuribayashi, Toru Yamaguchi, Kazunori Takagi

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Until now, human bioequivalence (BE) studies were conducted based on the revised ‘Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Products’ issued in 2012 by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan. However, revisions of BE guidelines were required to account for the globalization of pharmaceutical development, new technology, and scientific rationales over the last 8 years. Therefore, the MHLW published the revised ‘Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Products’ in 2020. In this article, we introduce the main revised contents, such as the addition of a fed-state BE study, reconsideration of the pilot study and add-on study, acceptance of foreign subjects in a BE study, and clarification of the requirement of a reference product. Furthermore, we compare the BE evaluations of generic oral solid dosage forms with those of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Literatur
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuribayashi R, Takishita T, Mikami K. Regulatory considerations of bioequivalence studies for oral solid dosage forms in Japan. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(8):2270–7.CrossRef Kuribayashi R, Takishita T, Mikami K. Regulatory considerations of bioequivalence studies for oral solid dosage forms in Japan. J Pharm Sci. 2016;105(8):2270–7.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies for Different Strengths of Oral Solid Dosage Forms and Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies for Formulation Changes of Oral Solid Dosage Forms Q&A [in Japanese]. 2020. Available at: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000234570.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2020. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies for Different Strengths of Oral Solid Dosage Forms and Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies for Formulation Changes of Oral Solid Dosage Forms Q&A [in Japanese]. 2020. Available at: https://​www.​pmda.​go.​jp/​files/​000234570.​pdf. Accessed 27 Jun 2020.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wonnemann M, Frömke C, Koch A. Inflation of the type I error: investigations on regulatory recommendations for bioequivalence of highly variable drugs. Pharm Res. 2015;32(1):135–43.CrossRef Wonnemann M, Frömke C, Koch A. Inflation of the type I error: investigations on regulatory recommendations for bioequivalence of highly variable drugs. Pharm Res. 2015;32(1):135–43.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2008;7(4):245–62.CrossRef Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, Smith RA. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2008;7(4):245–62.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Montague TH, Potvin D, Diliberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ. Additional results for Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2012;11(1):8–13.CrossRef Montague TH, Potvin D, Diliberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ. Additional results for Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat. 2012;11(1):8–13.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Maurer W, Jones B, Chen Y. Controlling the type I error rate in two-stage sequential adaptive designs when testing for average bioequivalence. Stat Med. 2018;37(10):1587–607.CrossRef Maurer W, Jones B, Chen Y. Controlling the type I error rate in two-stage sequential adaptive designs when testing for average bioequivalence. Stat Med. 2018;37(10):1587–607.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen ML, Blume H, Beuerle G, Davit B, Mehta M, Potthast H, et al. The Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative: Summary report for EUFEPS international conference. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;111:153–7.CrossRef Chen ML, Blume H, Beuerle G, Davit B, Mehta M, Potthast H, et al. The Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative: Summary report for EUFEPS international conference. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;111:153–7.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Davit B, Braddy AC, Conner DP, Yu LX. International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences. AAPS J. 2013;15(4):974–90.CrossRef Davit B, Braddy AC, Conner DP, Yu LX. International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences. AAPS J. 2013;15(4):974–90.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen ML, Blume H, Beuerle G, Mehta M, Potthast H, Brandt A, et al. Summary report of second EUFEPS/AAPS conference on global harmonization in bioequivalence. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;127:24–8.CrossRef Chen ML, Blume H, Beuerle G, Mehta M, Potthast H, Brandt A, et al. Summary report of second EUFEPS/AAPS conference on global harmonization in bioequivalence. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;127:24–8.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia Arieta A, Simon C, Lima Santos GM, Calderón Lojero IO, Rodríguez Martínez Z, Rodrigues C, et al. A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for the Acceptance of Foreign Comparator Products by Participating Regulators and Organizations of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;22(1):28–36.CrossRef Garcia Arieta A, Simon C, Lima Santos GM, Calderón Lojero IO, Rodríguez Martínez Z, Rodrigues C, et al. A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for the Acceptance of Foreign Comparator Products by Participating Regulators and Organizations of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;22(1):28–36.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Modernization and Strengthening of Bioequivalence Guidelines in Japan
verfasst von
Ryosuke Kuribayashi
Toru Yamaguchi
Kazunori Takagi
Publikationsdatum
28.11.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-020-00965-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe