Background
Methods
Case definition and case finding
Study site
Case-control study
Study variables
Data analysis
Results
Trends of TIPs and other IPs, January 2013–December 2015
Risk factors for TIP, January–June 2015
Characteristic | % TIP cases (N = 50) | % Controlsa
(N = 145) |
P-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Male | 86 | 87 | 0.87 |
Female | 14 | 13 | |
Mean age(±SD) | 28(±8.4) | 28(9.0) | 0.96 |
Education level | |||
None | 6 | 3 | 0.57 |
Primary | 28 | 21 | |
Secondary | 47 | 55 | |
Tertiary | 19 | 21 | |
Number of clinics visited before | |||
0 | 32 | 26 | 0.51 |
1 | 50 | 57 | |
2 | 13 | 14 | |
3 | 3 | 3 | |
4 | 3 | 0 | |
Time to admission (Days) | |||
< 7 | 40 | – | |
7–13 | 30 | – | |
≥ 14 | 30 | – | |
Post-surgery complications | |||
None | 60 | – | |
Burst abdomen | 2 | – | |
Fistula | 2 | – | |
Repeat surgeries | 4 | – | |
Wound gaping | 4 | – | |
Wound infection | 28 | – |
Variable | % of TIP cases (N = 45) | % of controlsa
(N = 137) | ORcrude
(95% CI) | ORadj
(95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Days before seeking treatment | ||||
0–3 | 29 | 63 | ref | |
4–9 | 42 | 32 | 3.0(1.8–5.7) | 2.2(0.83–5.8) |
10+ | 29 | 5.1 | 13(3.8–43) | 11(1.9–61) |
Heard of typhoid fever before | ||||
Yes | 64 | 82 | ref | |
No | 36 | 18 | 2.5(1.0–5.9) | NS |
Heard of typhoid outbreak in Kampala | ||||
Yes | 41 | 75 | ref | |
No | 59 | 25 | 4.4(1.9–10) | 5.2(1.8–15) |
Got treatment beforeb
| ||||
No | 45 | 77 | ref | |
Yes | 96 | 23 | 7.0(1.5–31) | 9.0(1.1–78) |