nach oben

Indian Journal of Surgery

Erschienen in:

27.01.2023 | Review Article

Modifications of Glasgow Coma Scale—a Systematic Review

verfasst von: Jitin Bajaj, Yadram Yadav, Dhananjaya Sharma

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Glasgow coma scale has been the mainstay of scoring traumatic brain injury patients for nearly five decades. It has seen several modifications based on various parameters; which include age, pupils, and brainstem reflexes. The objective of this article was to systematically review all the modifications of the Glasgow coma scale in the English literature by searching PubMed and Scopus. We searched using the keywords “Glasgow coma scale modification” and “pediatric coma scales” in the PubMed and Scopus search string from inception until 15 August 2022. The manuscript excludes articles not related to scoring, articles dedicated to non-traumatic brain injury patients, case reports and opinions, and articles lacking full-length and non-English texts. The search yielded 5718 articles of which 54 were eligible. The modifications were based on age, brainstem reflexes, motor score alone, serum factors, etc. The use of the majority of 54 eligible articles was limited to the index centers that have designed them; however, the pediatric Glasgow coma score and the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score hold promise.

Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0CrossRefPubMed

Nesiama J-AO, Pirallo RG, Lerner EB, Hennes H (2012) Does a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score predict pediatric outcomes? Pediatr Emerg Care 28:1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826cac31CrossRefPubMed

Reith FCM, Van den Brande R, Synnot A et al (2016) The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 42:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4124-3CrossRefPubMed

Bajaj J, Rathore S, Parihar V et al (2020) Teaching Glasgow Coma Scale Assessment by videos: a prospective interventional study among surgical residents. J Neurosci Rural Pract 11:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709263CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Salottolo K, Panchal R, Dhakal L et al (2021) Recalibrating the Glasgow Coma Score as an age-adjusted risk metric for neurosurgical intervention. J Surg Res 268:696–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.08.002CrossRefPubMed

Seshia SS, Seshia MM, Sachdeva RK (1977) Coma in childhood. Dev Med Child Neurol 19:614–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1977.tb07995.xCrossRefPubMed

Simpson D, Reilly P (1982) Pediatric coma scale. Lancet 2:450. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90486-xCrossRefPubMed

Raimondi AJ, Hirschauer J (1984) Head injury in the infant and toddler. Coma scoring and outcome scale. Childs Brain 11:12–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120157CrossRefPubMed

Morray JP, Tyler DC, Jones TK et al (1984) Coma scale for use in brain-injured children. Crit Care Med 12:1018–1020. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198412000-00002CrossRefPubMed

10.

Reilly P, Simpson D, Sprod R, Thomas L (1988) Assessing the conscious level in infants and young children: a paediatric version of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Childs Nerv Syst 4:30–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274080CrossRefPubMed

11.

Beni-Adani L, Flores I, Spektor S et al (1999) Epidural hematoma in infants: a different entity? J Trauma 46:306–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199902000-00018CrossRefPubMed

12.

Tatman A, Warren A, Williams A et al (1997) Development of a modified paediatric coma scale in intensive care clinical practice. Arch Dis Child 77:519–521. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.77.6.519CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

13.

Kirschen MP, Snyder M, Smith K et al (2019) Inter-rater reliability between critical care nurses performing a pediatric modification to the Glasgow Coma Scale. Pediatr Crit Care Med 20:660–666. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001938CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nell V, Yates DW, Kruger J (2000) An extended Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS-E) with enhanced sensitivity to mild brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:614–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90044-3CrossRefPubMed

15.

Drake AI, McDonald EC, Magnus NE et al (2006) Utility of Glasgow Coma Scale-Extended in symptom prediction following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 20:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600676370CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bouzarth WF (1968) Neurosurgical watch sheet for craniocerebral trauma. J Trauma 8:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-196801000-00004CrossRefPubMed

17.

Benzer A, Mitterschiffthaler G, Marosi M et al (1991) Prediction of non-survival after trauma: Innsbruck Coma Scale. Lancet 338:977–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91840-qCrossRefPubMed

18.

Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E (1988) The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 91:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01400521CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bae I-S, Chun H-J, Yi H-J et al (2019) Modified Glasgow Coma Scale using serum factors as a prognostic model in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg 126:e959–e964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.197CrossRefPubMed

20.

Borgman MA, Maegele M, Wade CE et al (2011) Pediatric trauma BIG score: predicting mortality in children after military and civilian trauma. Pediatr 127:e892-897. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2439CrossRef

21.

Yi W, Liu R, Chen J et al (2010) Trauma infant neurologic score predicts the outcome of traumatic brain injury in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321800CrossRefPubMed

22.

Holmes JF, Palchak MJ, MacFarlane T, Kuppermann N (2005) Performance of the pediatric Glasgow coma scale in children with blunt head trauma. Acad Emerg Med 12:814–819. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2005.04.019CrossRefPubMed

23.

Salottolo K, Levy AS, Slone DS et al (2014) The effect of age on Glasgow Coma Scale score in patients with traumatic brain injury. JAMA Surg 149:727–734. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.13CrossRefPubMed

24.

Salcman M, Schepp RS, Ducker TB (1981) Calculated recovery rates in severe head trauma. Neurosurg 8:301–308. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198103000-00001CrossRef

25.

Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV et al (2005) Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol 58:585–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20611CrossRefPubMed

26.

Stead LG, Wijdicks EFM, Bhagra A et al (2008) Validation of a new coma scale, the FOUR Score, in the emergency department. Neurocrit Care 10:50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-008-9145-0CrossRefPubMed

27.

Iyer VN, Mandrekar JN, Danielson RD et al (2009) Validity of the FOUR Score Coma Scale in the medical intensive care unit. Mayo Clin Proc 84:694–701CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

28.

Cohen J (2009) Interrater reliability and predictive validity of the FOUR score coma scale in a pediatric population. J Neurosci Nurs 41:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnn.0b013e3181b2c766. (quiz 268–269)CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sadaka F, Patel D, Lakshmanan R (2012) The FOUR score predicts outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 16:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-011-9617-5CrossRefPubMed

30.

Khajeh A, Fayyazi A, Miri-Aliabad G et al (2014) Comparison between the ability of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score to predict the mortality and discharge rate of pediatric intensive care unit patients. Iran J Pediatr 24:603–608PubMedCentralPubMed

31.

Kochar GS, Gulati S, Lodha R, Pandey R (2014) Full outline of unresponsiveness score versus Glasgow Coma Scale in children with nontraumatic impairment of consciousness. J Child Neurol 29:1299–1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073813514293CrossRefPubMed

32.

Czaikowski BL, Liang H, Stewart CT (2014) A pediatric FOUR score coma scale: interrater reliability and predictive validity. J Neurosci Nurs 46:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000041CrossRefPubMed

33.

Benzer A, Traweger C, Ofner D et al (1995) Statistical modelling in analysis of outcome after trauma Glasgow-Coma-Scale and Innsbruck-Coma-Scale. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 30:231–235. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-996481CrossRefPubMed

34.

Starmark JE, Stålhammar D, Holmgren E, Rosander B (1988) A comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). J Neurosurg 69:699–706. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0699CrossRefPubMed

35.

Walther SM, Jonasson U, Gill H (2003) Comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale for assessment of cerebral responsiveness in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 29:933–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1757-4CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sugiura K, Muraoka K, Chishiki T, Baba M (1983) The Edinburgh-2 coma scale: a new scale for assessing impaired consciousness. Neurosurg 12:411–415. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198304000-00007CrossRef

37.

Tesseris J, Pantazidis N, Routsi C, Fragoulakis D (1991) A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS(M)). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 110:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01402050CrossRefPubMed

38.

Hoffmann F, Schmalhofer M, Lehner M et al (2016) Comparison of the AVPU Scale and the Pediatric GCS in prehospital setting. Prehosp Emerg Care 20:493–498. https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2016.1139216CrossRefPubMed

39.

Raman S, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM, Kumar N (2011) Comparison of alert verbal painful unresponsiveness scale and the Glasgow Coma Score. Indian Pediatr 48:331–332PubMed

40.

Zadravecz FJ, Tien L, Robertson-Dick BJ et al (2015) Comparison of mental status scales for predicting mortality on the general wards. J Hosp Med 10:658–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2415CrossRefPubMed

41.

McNarry AF, Goldhill DR (2004) Simple bedside assessment of level of consciousness: comparison of two simple assessment scales with the Glasgow Coma scale. Anaesthesia 59:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03526.xCrossRefPubMed

42.

Gill M, Martens K, Lynch EL et al (2007) Interrater reliability of 3 simplified neurologic scales applied to adults presenting to the emergency department with altered levels of consciousness. Ann Emerg Med 49:403-407-407.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.031CrossRef

43.

Mena JH, Sanchez AI, Rubiano AM et al (2011) Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13. J Trauma 71:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31823321f8. (discussion 1193)CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

44.

McNett M, Amato S, Gianakis A et al (2014) The FOUR score and GCS as predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 21:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-013-9947-6CrossRefPubMed

45.

Gordon NS, Fois A, Jacobi G et al (1983) The management of the comatose child. Neuropediatrics 14:3–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1059545CrossRefPubMed

46.

Nuttall AG, Paton KM, Kemp AM (2018) To what extent are GCS and AVPU equivalent to each other when assessing the level of consciousness of children with head injury? A cross-sectional study of UK hospital admissions. BMJ Open 8:e023216. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023216CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

47.

Yager JY, Johnston B, Seshia SS (1990) Coma scales in pediatric practice. Am J Dis Child 144:1088–1091. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150340032019CrossRefPubMed

48.

Matis G, Birbilis T (2008) The Glasgow Coma Scale–a brief review. Past, present, future. Acta Neurol Belg 108:75–89PubMed

49.

Middleton PM (2012) Practical use of the Glasgow Coma Scale; a comprehensive narrative review of GCS methodology. Australas Emerg Nurs J 15:170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2012.06.002CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kirkham FJ, Newton CRJC, Whitehouse W (2008) Paediatric coma scales. Dev Med Child Neurol 50:267–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02042.xCrossRefPubMed

51.

Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F et al (2014) The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol 13:844–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6CrossRefPubMed

52.

Zuercher M, Ummenhofer W, Baltussen A, Walder B (2009) The use of Glasgow Coma Scale in injury assessment: a critical review. Brain Inj 23:371–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050902926267CrossRefPubMed

53.

Brennan PM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM (2018) Simplifying the use of prognostic information in traumatic brain injury. Part 1: the GCS-Pupils score: an extended index of clinical severity. J Neurosurg 128:1612–1620. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.12.JNS172780CrossRefPubMed

54.

Healey C, Osler TM, Rogers FB et al (2003) Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. J Trauma 54:671–678. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000058130.30490.5D. (discussion 678-680)CrossRefPubMed

55.

Caterino JM, Raubenolt A, Cudnik MT (2011) Modification of Glasgow Coma Scale criteria for injured elders. Acad Emerg Med 18:1014–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01164.xCrossRefPubMed

56.

Emami P, Czorlich P, Fritzsche FS et al (2017) Impact of Glasgow Coma Scale score and pupil parameters on mortality rate and outcome in pediatric and adult severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. J Neurosurg 126:760–767. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.1.JNS152385CrossRefPubMed

57.

James H, Trauner D (1985) The Glasgow Coma Scale. In: James HE, Anas NG, Perkin RM (eds) Brain insults in infants and children: pathophysiology and management. Grune and Stratton Inc, Orlando, Florida, pp 179–182

58.

Born JD, Hans P, Dexters G et al (1982) Practical assessment of brain dysfunction in severe head trauma (author’s transl). Neurochirurgie 28:1–7PubMed

59.

Kortbeek JB, Al Turki SA, Ali J et al (2008) Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change. J Trauma 64:1638–1650. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181744b03CrossRefPubMed

60.

Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, van der Sande J (1978) Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:603–610CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

61.

Grote S, Böcker W, Mutschler W et al (2011) Diagnostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale for traumatic brain injury in 18,002 patients with severe multiple injuries. J Neurotrauma 28:527–534. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1433CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Modifications of Glasgow Coma Scale—a Systematic Review
verfasst von: Jitin Bajaj
Yadram Yadav
Dhananjaya Sharma
Publikationsdatum: 27.01.2023
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03678-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Modifications of Glasgow Coma Scale—a Systematic Review

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

Laparascopic Adjustable Gastric Band Leading to Delayed Achalasia-Like Symptoms and Presentation

V. N. Shrikhande: Reflections of A Surgeon

Soft Tissue Tumours—Study of a Short Panel of 8 Immunohistochemical Markers

Pubic Accessory Scrotum: a Case Report of a Rare Position

Surgical Management of a Large, Adult-Onset Axillary Lymphangioma

Effects of Disease Characteristics on the Sleep Quality in Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“