Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016

01.02.2016 | Clinical trial

Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor

verfasst von: Brandon S. Sheffield, Zuzana Kos, Karama Asleh-Aburaya, Xiu Qing Wang, Samuel Leung, Dongxia Gao, Jennifer Won, Christine Chow, Rakesh Rachamadugu, Inge Stijleman, Robert Wolber, C. Blake Gilks, Nickolas Myles, Tom Thomson, Malcolm M. Hayes, Philip S. Bernard, Torsten O. Nielsen, Stephen K. L. Chia

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a key predictive biomarker in the treatment of breast cancer. There is uncertainty regarding the use of hormonal therapy in the setting of weakly positive ER by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We report intrinsic subtype classification on a cohort of ER weakly positive early-stage breast cancers. Consecutive cases of breast cancer treated by primary surgical resection were retrospectively identified from 4 centers that engage in routine external proficiency testing for breast biomarkers. ER-negative (Allred 0 and 2) and ER weakly positive (Allred 3–5) cases were included. Gene expression profiling was performed using qRT-PCR. Intrinsic subtype prediction was made based upon the PAM50 gene expression signature. 148 cases were included in the series: 60 cases originally diagnosed as ER weakly positive and 88 ER negative. Of the cases originally assessed as ER weakly positive, only 6 (10 %) were confirmed to be of luminal subtype by gene expression profiling; the remaining 90 % of cases were classified as basal-like or HER2-enriched subtypes. This was not significantly different than the fraction of luminal cases identified in the IHC ER-negative cohort (5 (5 %) luminal, 83(95 %) non-luminal). Recurrence-free, and overall, survival rates were similar in both groups (p = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively) despite adjuvant hormonal therapy prescribed in the majority (59 %) of weakly positive ER cases. Weak ER expression by IHC is a poor correlate of luminal subtype in invasive breast cancer. In the setting of highly sensitive and robust IHC methodology, cutoffs for ER status determination and subsequent systemic therapy should be revisited.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beatson GT (1896) On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment, with illustrative cases. Lancet 148(3803):162–165CrossRef Beatson GT (1896) On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment, with illustrative cases. Lancet 148(3803):162–165CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolff AC, Dowsett M (2011) Estrogen receptor: a never ending story? J Clin Oncol 29(22):2955–2958CrossRefPubMed Wolff AC, Dowsett M (2011) Estrogen receptor: a never ending story? J Clin Oncol 29(22):2955–2958CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784CrossRef
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gown AM (2004) Unmasking the mysteries of antigen or epitope retrieval and formalin fixation. Am J Clin Pathol 121(2):172–174CrossRefPubMed Gown AM (2004) Unmasking the mysteries of antigen or epitope retrieval and formalin fixation. Am J Clin Pathol 121(2):172–174CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabattini E, Bisgaard K, AScani S, Poggi S, Piccioli M, Ceccarelli C, Pieri F, Fraternali-Orcioni G, Pileri SA (1998) The EnVision++ system: a new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research. Critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques. J Clin Pathol 51(7):506–511PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sabattini E, Bisgaard K, AScani S, Poggi S, Piccioli M, Ceccarelli C, Pieri F, Fraternali-Orcioni G, Pileri SA (1998) The EnVision++ system: a new immunohistochemical method for diagnostics and research. Critical comparison with the APAAP, ChemMate, CSA, LABC, and SABC techniques. J Clin Pathol 51(7):506–511PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheang MC, Treaba DO, Speers CH, Olivotto IA, Bajdik CD, Chia SK, Goldstein LC, Gelmon KA, Huntsman D, Gilks CB, Nielsen TO, Gown AM (2006) Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5637–5644CrossRefPubMed Cheang MC, Treaba DO, Speers CH, Olivotto IA, Bajdik CD, Chia SK, Goldstein LC, Gelmon KA, Huntsman D, Gilks CB, Nielsen TO, Gown AM (2006) Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival. J Clin Oncol 24(36):5637–5644CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Terry J, Tolakovic EE, Garrat J et al (2009) Implementation of a Canadian external quality assurance program for breast cancer biomarkers: an initiative of Canadian Quality Control in immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 17(5):375–382CrossRefPubMed Terry J, Tolakovic EE, Garrat J et al (2009) Implementation of a Canadian external quality assurance program for breast cancer biomarkers: an initiative of Canadian Quality Control in immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 17(5):375–382CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-biding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1474–1481PubMed Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-biding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17(5):1474–1481PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Dowsett M et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(16):2784–2795PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P, Morales AR (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5993 breast cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 123(1):21–27CrossRefPubMed Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P, Morales AR (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5993 breast cancers. Am J Clin Pathol 123(1):21–27CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoshnoud MR, Löfdahl B, Fohlin H et al (2011) Immunohistochemistry compared to cytosol assays for determination of estrogen receptor and prediction of the long-term effect of adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(2):421–430CrossRefPubMed Khoshnoud MR, Löfdahl B, Fohlin H et al (2011) Immunohistochemistry compared to cytosol assays for determination of estrogen receptor and prediction of the long-term effect of adjuvant tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(2):421–430CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwamoto T, Booser D, Valero V et al (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10 % ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30(7):729–734CrossRefPubMed Iwamoto T, Booser D, Valero V et al (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10 % ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30(7):729–734CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Allred DC, Carlson RW, Berry DA et al (2009) NCCN task force report: estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(S6):s1–s21PubMed Allred DC, Carlson RW, Berry DA et al (2009) NCCN task force report: estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer by immunohistochemistry. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(S6):s1–s21PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM et al (2000) Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors in routine practice: inter-laboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol 53:125–130PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM et al (2000) Reliability of immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors in routine practice: inter-laboratory variance in the sensitivity of detection and evaluation of scoring systems. J Clin Pathol 53:125–130PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker RL, Huntsman DG, Lesack DW et al (2002) Assessment of inter-laboratory variation in immunohistochemical determination of estrogen receptor using a breast cancer tissue microarray. Am J Clin Pathol 117:723–728CrossRefPubMed Parker RL, Huntsman DG, Lesack DW et al (2002) Assessment of inter-laboratory variation in immunohistochemical determination of estrogen receptor using a breast cancer tissue microarray. Am J Clin Pathol 117:723–728CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cm Perou, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752CrossRef Cm Perou, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406(6797):747–752CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8418–8423PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8418–8423PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genom 7:96CrossRef Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genom 7:96CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Won JR, Gao D, Chow C et al (2013) A survey of immunohistochemical biomarkers for basal-like breast cancer against a gene expression profile gold standard. Mod Pathol 26(11):1438–1450CrossRefPubMed Won JR, Gao D, Chow C et al (2013) A survey of immunohistochemical biomarkers for basal-like breast cancer against a gene expression profile gold standard. Mod Pathol 26(11):1438–1450CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Park Y, Moryama A, Kithara T, Yoshida Y, Urita T, Kato R (2012) Triple-negative breast cancer and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 12(6):672–677CrossRefPubMed Park Y, Moryama A, Kithara T, Yoshida Y, Urita T, Kato R (2012) Triple-negative breast cancer and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 12(6):672–677CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC et al (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1160–1167PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC et al (2009) Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 27(8):1160–1167PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia SK, Bramwell VH, Tu D et al (2012) A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 18(16):4465–4472PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chia SK, Bramwell VH, Tu D et al (2012) A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 18(16):4465–4472PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez T, Makretsov N, Garatt J, Torlakovic E, Gilks CB, Mallett S. Modeling Canadian quality control test program for steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol [Epub ahead of print] PMID2620083 Perez T, Makretsov N, Garatt J, Torlakovic E, Gilks CB, Mallett S. Modeling Canadian quality control test program for steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol [Epub ahead of print] PMID2620083
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullins M, Perreard L, Quackenbush JF et al (2007) Agreement in breast cancer classification between microarray and quantitative reverse transcription PCR from fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Clin Chem 53:1273–1279CrossRefPubMed Mullins M, Perreard L, Quackenbush JF et al (2007) Agreement in breast cancer classification between microarray and quantitative reverse transcription PCR from fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Clin Chem 53:1273–1279CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard PS (2012) Personalized medicine for breast cancer. In: Ginsburg G (ed) Genomic and personalized medicine, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 707–713 Bernard PS (2012) Personalized medicine for breast cancer. In: Ginsburg G (ed) Genomic and personalized medicine, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 707–713
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Perreard L, Fan C, Quackenbush JF et al (2006) Classification and risk stratification of invasive breast carcinomas using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. Breast Cancer Res 8:R23PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Perreard L, Fan C, Quackenbush JF et al (2006) Classification and risk stratification of invasive breast carcinomas using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. Breast Cancer Res 8:R23PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen TO, Parker JS, Leung S et al (2010) A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(21):5222–5232PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Nielsen TO, Parker JS, Leung S et al (2010) A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 16(21):5222–5232PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin CM, Jaswal J, Vandenberg T, Tuck A, Brackstone M (2013) Weakly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and use of adjuvant hormonal therapy. Curr Oncol 20(6):e612–e613PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lin CM, Jaswal J, Vandenberg T, Tuck A, Brackstone M (2013) Weakly hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and use of adjuvant hormonal therapy. Curr Oncol 20(6):e612–e613PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Prabhu JS, Korlimarla A, Desai K et al (2014) A majority of low (1–10%) ER positive breast cancers behave like hormone receptor negative tumors. J Cancer 5(2):156–165PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Prabhu JS, Korlimarla A, Desai K et al (2014) A majority of low (1–10%) ER positive breast cancers behave like hormone receptor negative tumors. J Cancer 5(2):156–165PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, Ellseworth RE (2013) Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol 20(1):87–93CrossRefPubMed Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, Ellseworth RE (2013) Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol 20(1):87–93CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Rakha EA, Lee AH, Roberts J, Villena Salinas NM, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Reis-Filho JS (2012) Low-estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the impact of tissue sampling, choice of antibody, and molecular subtyping. J Clin Oncol 30(23):2929–2930CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, Lee AH, Roberts J, Villena Salinas NM, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Reis-Filho JS (2012) Low-estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the impact of tissue sampling, choice of antibody, and molecular subtyping. J Clin Oncol 30(23):2929–2930CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor
verfasst von
Brandon S. Sheffield
Zuzana Kos
Karama Asleh-Aburaya
Xiu Qing Wang
Samuel Leung
Dongxia Gao
Jennifer Won
Christine Chow
Rakesh Rachamadugu
Inge Stijleman
Robert Wolber
C. Blake Gilks
Nickolas Myles
Tom Thomson
Malcolm M. Hayes
Philip S. Bernard
Torsten O. Nielsen
Stephen K. L. Chia
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3689-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.