EEG and amplitude-EEG
There are many different clinical situations in which electroencephalogram (EEG) would be indicated. First of all, as it is non-invasive, it should be considered together with neurological examination, in case of concerns about the neonate’s neurological status or the possibility of seizures [
3], especially if specific risk factors are present [
4‐
7]. Neonatal seizures have been classified into subtle, clonic, myoclonic and tonic, based on their clinical characteristics [
8]. However, clinical definition of neonatal seizures alone is not adequate as some clinical events might rather represent brain-stem release phenomena [
9].
When investigating suspicious clinical events, EEG is necessary to exclude or confirm a diagnosis of neonatal seizures [
10].
Neonatal seizures should be differentiated from paroxysmal non-epileptic motor phenomena. These are defined as movements standing out from the normal motor repertoire of newborns, for which there is no association with EEG changes [
10]. In some cases, consideration of clinical characteristics of the paroxysmal event suffices for the differential diagnosis, while in others polygraphic video-EEG is mandatory [
10,
11]. Subtle motor phenomena (such as cycling, pedalling or boxing) are of controversial interpretation: they were considered as brain-stem release phenomena or of spinal origin by Mizrahi [
9]. but classified by Volpe as subtle seizures [
12], because occasionally associated with epileptiform ictal discharges on EEG.
The use of conventional polygraphic video-EEG allows description of a series of clinically-relevant neurophysiological characteristics of neonatal seizures (definition of seizure onset and spread, seizure duration, correlation with motor phenomena). The onset is typically focal, especially in full-term newborns, while in preterm newborns both regional [
13] and focal [
14] onset have been commonly reported. Description of seizure onset is important in clinical practice as the consistent presence of a single onset focus is highly suggestive of focal injury, even though diffuse pathology can also manifest as focal discharges [
13]. Furthermore, documentation of a spread from one hemisphere to the contralateral one has been associated with worse outcome and development of epilepsy [
15].
However, after confirmation of neonatal seizures, prolonged or continuous monitoring is required for correct quantification of “seizure burden” and for neonatal status epilepticus diagnosis [
4], in an attempt to contrast its unfavourable prognostic consequences [
16,
17].
The diagnosis and the definition of neonatal status epilepticus (NSE) is still controversial. It has been usually defined either as continuous seizures lasting for more than 30 min or seizures present for at least 50 % of the recording time, with no return to the baseline neurologic condition between episodes [
18]. An association with severe brain damage has been demonstrated and NSE is prognostically more detrimental than recurrent seizures [
19,
20].
EEG is mandatory to monitor efficacy of anticonvulsants and for detection of the uncoupling phenomenon [
21]. Consequently, continuation of EEG monitoring for at least 24 h of seizure freedom has been recommended. With the advent of continuous EEG monitoring, it has become apparent that a great bulk of neonatal seizures are electrographic-only [
22].
Furthermore, the assessment of background activity with conventional EEG allows documentation of brain injury and evaluation of its degree of severity, especially using serial recordings. This represents a strong predictor of outcome [
4], independent of aetiology.
With the availability of therapeutic hypothermia, there has been a great impulse into the spreading of amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) use in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Among its biggest strengths are the easiness of use by neonatologists [
23], the compressed time scale and the reduced montage, which shorten the time required for application and interpretation of tracings.
Although reliability in assessing background activity and degree of HIE, with good correlation with outcome, has been demonstrated [
24], aEEG has to be considered as a screening tool [
4,
25] for seizure detection, and reference to conventional or “raw” EEG should be made in order to increase its sensitivity and specificity whenever suspicious neonatal seizures are detected [
26,
27]. In conclusion, aEEG limitations must be taken into account to correctly use it: for example it might miss brief seizures or seizures originating far from recording electrodes (false negative results) or generate false positives due to artefacts [
5,
25,
28].
EEG in the evaluation of prematurity
In preterm newborns, EEG can be used to estimate the timing of a brain insult and its severity degree with serial recordings beginning soon after birth [
29].
Acute stage abnormalities reflect the acute phase of brain injury. EEG is mainly characterised by changes in continuity, amplitude and dominating frequencies. On the contrary, two different patterns are recognised as chronic stage abnormalities: the dysmature and the disorganized pattern. The dysmature pattern is characterised by the presence of EEG features that would be physiological for an infant 2 weeks or more younger than the conceptional age (CA) of the patient [
30,
31]. It is typically reported following prolonged mild acute stage abnormalities without ultrasonographic changes or with IVH without parenchymal involvement [
31].
A disorganised pattern describes a background activity characterised by distorted delta waves associated with abnormal sharp waves [
31]. It is mainly reported in infants between 32 and 36 weeks of CA [
29] and in association with white matter injury, sometimes pre-dating cranial ultrasound evidence [
32,
33]. It is associated with the subsequent development of cerebral palsy [
29,
31].
The literature recommends to start with a first recording in the immediate post-natal period, in order to establish the timing of injury. Knowledge on both the severity of acute stage abnormalities and the type and severity of chronic stage abnormalities can improve prognostication. Tracings with increased discontinuity and decreased amplitude are associated with unfavourable prognosis [
34] and show the best sensitivity in the first two days of life [
35].
EEG in the evaluation of HIE
An algorithm for the EEG surveillance of full-term newborns with HIE has been proposed [
36]. Different time points have been considered as the best predictors of normal outcome in different studies: within the first 12 h of life [
36], or within 24–36 h [
37]. Time-appropriate evaluation of background activities is paramount for correct planning of subsequent recordings, and for optimal prognostic accuracy [
38], as tracings tend to progressively improve with time [
39]. In fact, one single normal EEG obtained more than one week after an hypoxic-ischemic event has no prognostic value [
39]. On the contrary, a severely abnormal EEG can be related to an unfavourable outcome if recorded from 12 h of life, although a follow-up EEG after 24 h is helpful to rule out potential confounding factors [
36]. Finally, in case of intermediate findings in the initial EEG, a control EEG during the first week of life is important for prognostic purposes [
36].
The accurate assessment of the severity of background EEG abnormalities in the first 6 h of life has become one of the criteria to select newborns for therapeutic hypothermia [
40], even if this task is usually accomplished by means of aEEG [
3]. With the spreading in clinical use of therapeutic hypothermia, it has become clear that it determines a slower recovery rate of background EEG activity compared to normothermic condition [
41]. While the time to recovery of a normal background activity on aEEG in the normothermic newborn is predictive of a favourable outcome within 24 h, in the hypothermic newborn 48 h are necessary. Similarly, while the reappearance of sleep-wake cycle within 36 h is a marker of good prognosis, in hypothermic newborns there is a shift to up to 60 h after birth [
41].
Standard or Continuous conventional EEG?
Conventional polygraphic video-EEG represents the current gold standard for seizure diagnosis and quantification in newborns, as it allows evaluation of the site of onset and propagation of seizures [
4] and provides detailed information on background activity, reflecting brain maturation and presence of ongoing or previous brain injury.
Conventional EEG can be performed as either a standard EEG or as a continuous or prolonged recording. Standard neonatal EEG recordings differ from the ones undertaken at older ages because a complete cycle of wakefulness, active and quiet sleep should be recorded in newborns aged ≥ 30 weeks CA, and the most continuous and discontinuous patterns in younger newborns should be obtained for at least 40 min [
29,
44]. These recommendations are motivated by the higher sensitivity of quiet sleep for background abnormalities detection.
Continuous cEEG has now been advocated as the preferable monitoring tool in high risk newborns, especially to correctly quantify neonatal seizures. In this case, continuous monitoring has been recommended for at least the first 24 h of life, as the majority of seizures would be identified within this time frame [
45‐
47], although some researchers have proven an increased risk in the first 24–36 h period [
45‐
47] and additional studies reported seizures in preterm newborns to occur later than in full-term ones, secondary to the timing of IVH [
20]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated within 48 h from birth in only approximately 10 % of preterm newborns below 29 weeks CA and in 50 % of those ≥30 weeks, while the mean onset time in the first group was 8.3 days versus 3.2 days in the second [
48].