nach oben

Die Radiologie

Erschienen in:

01.06.2014 | CME Zertifizierte Fortbildung

Morphologische und funktionelle Knorpeldiagnostik

verfasst von: Dr. C. Rehnitz, M.-A. Weber

Erschienen in: Die Radiologie | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Heutzutage ist eine exzellente morphologische Knorpelbildgebung möglich, die auch feinste Knorpelpathologien darstellen kann. Neben den Standard-2-D-Sequenzen ist eine Vielzahl von 3-D-Sequenzen zur hochaufgelösten Knorpeldarstellung verfügbar. Im ersten Teil dieses Artikels werden daher die aktuellen Möglichkeiten der morphologischen Diagnostik beleuchtet. Der zweite Teil behandelt die funktionelle Knorpelbildgebung. Mit ihr ist es möglich, Veränderungen der Knorpelkomposition und somit Frühformen von Knorpelschädigungen zu erfassen bzw. diese biochemischen Veränderungen nach therapeutischer Intervention zu evaluieren. Hierbei werden bereits validierte Techniken wie dGEMRIC oder „T2-Mapping“ besprochen, aber auch neueste Techniken wie die gagCEST-Technik beleuchtet.

Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg) (2013) Arthrose. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Heft 54. RKI, Berlin

Roemer FW, Crema MD, Trattnig S, Guermazi A (2011) Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage. Radiology 260:332–335PubMedCrossRef

Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Amin S, LaValley MP, Guermazi A et al (2005) The relationship between cartilage loss on magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic progression in men and women with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 52:3152–3159PubMedCrossRef

Lecouvet FE, Simoni P, Koutaïssoff S et al (2008) Multidetector spiral CT arthrography of the shoulder. Clinical applications and limits, with MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlations. Eur J Radiol 68:120–136PubMedCrossRef

Lecouvet FE, Dorzée B, Dubuc JE et al (2007) Cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of multidetector spiral CT arthrography and comparison with arthroscopy. Eur Radiol 17:1763–1771PubMedCrossRef

Rizzo C, Ceccarelli F, Gattamelata A et al (2013) Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis. Med Ultrason 15:199–208PubMedCrossRef

Jacobson JA (2007) Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 152–155

Chan WP, Lang P, Stevens MP et al (1991) Osteoarthritis of the knee: comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging to assess extent and severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:799–806PubMedCrossRef

10.

Rogers AD, Payne JE, Yu JS (2013) Cartilage imaging: a review of current concepts and emerging technologies. Semin Roentgenol 48:148–157PubMedCrossRef

11.

Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B:752–757

12.

Noyes FR, Stabler CL (1989) A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 17:505–513PubMedCrossRef

13.

Baudendistel KT, Heverhagen JT, Knopp MV (2004) Klinisches MRT bei 3 Tesla: Aktueller Stand. Radiologe 44:11–18PubMedCrossRef

14.

Weber MA, Stillfried F von, Kloth JK, Rehnitz C (2012) Cartilage imaging of the hand and wrist using 3-T MRI. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 16:71–87PubMedCrossRef

15.

Link TM, Stahl R, Woertler K (2007) Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. Eur Radiol 17:1135–1146PubMedCrossRef

16.

Palmer AJ, Brown CP, McNally EG et al (2013) Non-invasive imaging of cartilage in early osteoarthritis. Bone Joint J 95-B:738–746

17.

Woertler K, Strothmann M, Tombach B, Reimer P (2000) Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T. J MagnReson Imaging 11:678–685CrossRef

18.

Vahlensieck M, Schnieber O (2003) Routineperformance eines offenen Niederfeld-MRT-Geräts in der Beurteilung des Kniebinnenschadens und Vergleich mit Hochfeldsystemen. Orthopäde 32:175–178PubMedCrossRef

19.

Link TM, Sell CA, Masi JN et al (2005) 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology – ROC analysis in an experimental model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14:63–70PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Davis KW et al (2009) Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 250:839–848PubMedCrossRef

21.

Trattnig S, Zbýň S, Schmitt B et al (2012) Advanced MR methods at ultra-high field (7 Tesla) for clinical musculoskeletal applications. Eur Radiol 22:2338–2346PubMedCrossRef

22.

Welsch GH, Juras V, Szomolanyi P et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee at 3 and 7 tesla: a comparison using dedicated multi-channel coils and optimised 2D and 3D protocols. Eur Radiol 22:1852–1859PubMedCrossRef

23.

Krug R, Stehling C, Kelley DA et al (2009) Imaging of the musculoskeletal system in vivo using ultra-high field magnetic resonance at 7 T. Invest Radiol 44:613–618PubMedCrossRef

24.

Glaser C (2006) Knorpelbildgebung. Radiologe 46:16–25PubMedCrossRef

25.

Mosher TJ, Smith H, Dardzinski BJ et al (2001) MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:665–669PubMedCrossRef

26.

Goodwin DW, Zhu H, Dunn JF (2000) In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:405–409PubMedCrossRef

27.

Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:857–864PubMedCrossRef

28.

Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA et al (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1276–1284PubMed

29.

Gold GE, Chen CA, Koo S et al (2009) Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:628–638PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

30.

Gold GE, McCauley TR, Gray ML, Disler DG (2003) What’s new in cartilage? Radiographics 23:1227–1242PubMedCrossRef

31.

Siemens Healthcare (2010) MRI Acronyms. http://www.healthcare.siemens.com/siemens_hwem-hwem_ssxa_websites-context-root/wcm/idc/groups/public/@global/@imaging/@mri/documents/download/mdaw/mty1/~edisp/mri_acronyms-00033460.pdf

32.

Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA et al (1996) Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 198:209–212PubMed

33.

Murphy BJ (2001) Evaluation of grades 3 and 4 chondromalacia of the knee using T2*-weighted 3D gradient-echo articular cartilage imaging. Skeletal Radiol 30:305–311PubMedCrossRef

34.

Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D et al (1996) Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:329–335PubMedCrossRef

35.

Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W et al (2006) Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 65:433–441PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

36.

Peterfy CG, Schneider E, Nevitt M (2008) The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 16:1433–1441PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

37.

Kijowski R, Gold GE (2011) Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:758–771PubMedCrossRef

38.

Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD et al (2011) Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Radiographics 31:37–61PubMedCrossRef

39.

Lenk S, Ludescher B, Martirosan P et al (2004) 3.0 T high-resolution MR imaging of carpal ligaments and TFCC. Rofo 176:664–667PubMedCrossRef

40.

Lee MJ, Motamedi K, Chow K, Seeger LL (2008) Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum. Skeletal Radiol 37:19–25PubMedCrossRef

41.

Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Koch P et al (2005) Imaging of patellar cartilage with a 2D multiple-echo data image combination sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1744–1748PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ristow O, Steinbach L, Sabo G et al (2009) Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee – image quality and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 19:1263–1272PubMedCrossRef

43.

Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Kuschel B et al (2012) 3D-imaging of the knee with an optimized 3D-FSE-sequence and a 15-channel knee-coil. Eur J Radiol 81:3441–3449PubMedCrossRef

44.

Stevens KJ, Wallace CG, Chen W et al (2001) Imaging of the wrist at 1.5 T using isotropic three-dimensional fast spin echo CUBE. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:908–915CrossRef

45.

Chhabra A, Soldatos T, Thawait GK et al (2012) Current perspectives on the advantages of 3-T MR imaging of the wrist. Radiographics 32:879–896PubMedCrossRef

46.

Hegenscheid K, Puls R, Rosenberg C (2012) Bildgebungsstrategie bei Kniegelenkverletzungen. Radiologe 52:980–986PubMedCrossRef

47.

Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A et al (2014) Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage? AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:160–169PubMedCrossRef

48.

Becce F, Richarme D, Omoumi P et al (2013) MR arthrography of the shoulder under axial traction: feasibility study to evaluate the superior labrum-biceps tendon complex and articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1228–1233PubMedCrossRef

49.

Guntern D, Becce F, Richarme D et al (2011) Direct magnetic resonance arthrography of the wrist with axial traction: a feasibility study to assess joint cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:239–244PubMedCrossRef

50.

Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ (2004) Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8:355–368PubMedCrossRef

51.

Burstein D, Velyvis J, Scott KT et al (2001) Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation ofarticular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 45:36–41PubMedCrossRef

52.

Van Ginckel A, Baelde N, Almqvist KF et al (2010) Functional adaptation of knee cartilage in asymptomatic female novice runners compared to sedentary controls: a longitudinal analysis using delayed Gadolinium Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage (dGEMRIC). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 18:1564–1569CrossRef

53.

Matzat SJ, Tiel J van, Gold GE, Oei EH (2013) Quantitative MRI techniques of cartilage composition. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3:162–174PubMedCentralPubMed

54.

Venn M, Maroudas A (1977) Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. I. Chemical composition. Ann Rheum Dis 36:121–129PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

55.

Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D (1996) Gd-DTPA2- as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med 36:665–673PubMedCrossRef

56.

Bashir A, Gray ML, Boutin RD, Burstein D (1997) Glycosaminoglycan inarticular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 205:551–558PubMed

57.

Bashir A, Gray ML, Hartke J, Burstein D (1999) Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI. Magn Reson Med 41:857–865PubMedCrossRef

58.

Trattnig S, Mlynarik V, Breitenseher M et al (1999) MRI visualization of proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage via intravenous administration of Gd-DTPA. Magn Reson Med 17:577–583

59.

Roos EM, Dahlberg L (2005) Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage: a four-month, randomized, controlled trial in patients at risk of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 52:3507–3514PubMedCrossRef

60.

Anandacoomarasamy A, Leibman S, Smith G et al (2012) Weight loss in obese people has structure-modifying effects on medial but not on lateral knee articular cartilage. Ann Rheum Dis 71:26–32PubMedCrossRef

61.

Kim YJ, Jaramillo D, Millis MB et al (2003) Assessment of early osteoarthritis in hip dysplasia with delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1987–1992

62.

Mamisch TC, Kain MS, Bittersohl B et al (2011) Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in femoacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 29:1305–1311PubMedCrossRef

63.

Trattnig S, Domayer S, Welsch GW (2009) MR imaging of cartilage and its repair in the knee – a review. Eur Radiol 19:1582–1594PubMedCrossRef

64.

Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Quirbach S et al (2009) Evaluation and comparison of cartilage repair tissue of the patella and medial femoral condyle by using morphological MRI and biochemical zonal T2 mapping. Eur Radiol 19:1253–1262PubMedCrossRef

65.

Trattnig S, Marlovits S, Gebetsroither S et al (2007) Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) for in vivo evaluation of reparative cartilage after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3.0 T: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:974–982PubMedCrossRef

66.

Apprich S, Mamisch TC, Welsch GH et al (2012) Evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using T2* mapping at different time points at 3.0 T MRI: a feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol 41:987–995PubMedCrossRef

67.

Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Munoz Del Rio A et al (2013) Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol. Radiology 267:503–513PubMedCrossRef

68.

Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S et al (1997) Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 205:546–550PubMed

69.

Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Marlovits S et al (2009) Quantitative T2 mapping during follow-up after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT): full-thickness and zonal evaluation to visualize the maturation of cartilage repair tissue. J Orthop Res 27(7):957–963PubMedCrossRef

70.

Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Domayer SE et al (2008) Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures – initial experience. Radiology 247:154–161PubMedCrossRef

71.

Ling W, Regatte RR, Navon G, Jerschow A (2008) Assessment of glycosaminoglycan concentration in vivo by chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:2266–2270PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

72.

Schmitt B, Zbýn S, Stelzeneder D et al (2011) Cartilage quality assessment by using glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer and (23)Na MR imaging at 7-T. Radiology 260:257–264PubMedCrossRef

73.

Reddy R, Insko EK, Noyszewski EA et al (1998) Sodium MRI of human articular cartilage in vivo. Magn Reson Med 39:697–701PubMedCrossRef

74.

Zbýň S, Stelzeneder D, Welsch GH et al (2012) Evaluation of native hyaline cartilage and repair tissue after two cartilage repair surgery techniques with 23Na MR imaging at 7 T: initial experience. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20:837–845PubMedCrossRef

75.

Duvvuri U, Kudchodkar S, Reddy R, Leigh JS (2002) T(1rho) relaxation can assess longitudinal proteoglycan loss from articular cartilage in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10:838–844PubMedCrossRef

76.

Binks DA, Hodgson RJ, Ries ME et al (2013) Quantitative parametric MRI of articular cartilage: a review of progress and open challenges. Br J Radiol 86:20120163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Titel: Morphologische und funktionelle Knorpeldiagnostik
verfasst von: Dr. C. Rehnitz
M.-A. Weber
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2014
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Die Radiologie / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2731-7048
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7056
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-014-2663-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Morphologische und funktionelle Knorpeldiagnostik

Zusammenfassung

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

PET-CT in der nuklearmedizinischen Diagnostik des multiplen Myeloms

Radiologische Diagnostik des multiplen Myeloms

Terminvergabe in Echtzeit

Multiples Myelom

Zufallsbefund einer seltenen zerebellären Raumforderung

Mitteilungen BDR

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie