Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020

19.02.2020 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles

verfasst von: Dongna Hui, Xiaofang Han, Xiaocheng Wang, Wenjuan Ren, Xin Lei, Jianrong Liu, Lina Dong, Hong Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of morula stage transfer derived from post-thawed cleavage embryos undergoing overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study that included 392 FET cycles with 784 thawed embryos undergoing overnight culture between January 2014 and December 2018. Embryos were divided into three groups in terms of their status: 8–16 cells without morula (group I), one morula (group II), and two morulae (group III). The clinical outcomes of these cycles were then compared between the three groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to control for confounders.

Results

Group III was associated with a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–4.27; P = 0.005), implantation rate (OR 3.00; CI 1.75–5.16; P < 0.001), multiple pregnancy rate (OR 4.91; CI 2.11–11.40; P < 0.001), and live birth rate (OR 1.96; CI 1.10–3.49; P = 0.022) than group I. Group II had a higher live birth rate than group I after adjustment (OR 1.70; CI 1.04–2.79; P = 0.035). There was no difference in the rate of premature delivery when compared across the three groups after adjustment.

Conclusion

The transfer of morula stage embryos following the overnight culture of post-thawed cleavage embryos led to an improvement in the clinical outcomes of FET cycles. It is important to reduce the number of morula embryos transferred in order to achieve a singleton pregnancy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1067–80.CrossRef Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Chambers GM, Zegers-Hochschild F, Mansour R, Ishihara O, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology: world report on assisted reproductive technology, 2011. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1067–80.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.CrossRef Roque M, Haahr T, Geber S, Esteves SC, Humaidan P. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(1):2–14.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82.CrossRef Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRef Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(2):389–92.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541–6.CrossRef Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. Society for assisted reproductive technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):541–6.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1610–20.CrossRef Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(7):1610–20.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.CrossRef Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, et al. Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):523–33.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo L, Luo C, Quan S, Chen LN, Li H, Guo YC, et al. The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1589–94.CrossRef Guo L, Luo C, Quan S, Chen LN, Li H, Guo YC, et al. The outcome of different post-thawed culture period in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(12):1589–94.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Robert F. Prolonged culture of blastocysts after thawing as a tool for improving prediction of success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(12):2195–9.CrossRef Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Robert F. Prolonged culture of blastocysts after thawing as a tool for improving prediction of success. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(12):2195–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Coticchio G, Lagalla C, Sturmey R, Pennetta F, Borini A. The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):422–38.CrossRef Coticchio G, Lagalla C, Sturmey R, Pennetta F, Borini A. The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):422–38.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Huisman GJ, Alberda AT, Leerentveld RA, Verhoeff A, Zeilmaker GH. A comparison of in vitro fertilization results after embryo transfer after 2, 3 and 4 days of embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(5):970–1.CrossRef Huisman GJ, Alberda AT, Leerentveld RA, Verhoeff A, Zeilmaker GH. A comparison of in vitro fertilization results after embryo transfer after 2, 3 and 4 days of embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(5):970–1.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Grifo JA, Giatras K, Tang YX, Krey LC. Successful outcome with day 4 embryo transfer after preimplantation diagnosis for genetically transmitted diseases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1656–9.CrossRef Grifo JA, Giatras K, Tang YX, Krey LC. Successful outcome with day 4 embryo transfer after preimplantation diagnosis for genetically transmitted diseases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1656–9.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K, Williams B, Nelson-White T, Craig R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1513–8.CrossRef Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K, Williams B, Nelson-White T, Craig R. The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1513–8.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Skorupski JC, Stein DE, Acholonu U, Field H, Keltz M. Successful pregnancy rates achieved with day 4 embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):788–91.CrossRef Skorupski JC, Stein DE, Acholonu U, Field H, Keltz M. Successful pregnancy rates achieved with day 4 embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4):788–91.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, Biba M, Perdikaris A, Dafereras A. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):573–7.CrossRef Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, Biba M, Perdikaris A, Dafereras A. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(3):573–7.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon S-H, Koh MW, Lim J-H, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423–8.CrossRef Kang SM, Lee SW, Jeong HJ, Yoon S-H, Koh MW, Lim J-H, et al. Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(5):423–8.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabozzi G, Alteri A, Rega E, Starita MF, Piscitelli C, Giannini P, et al. Morphological assessment on day 4 and its prognostic power in selecting viable embryos for transfer. Zygote. 2016;24(4):477–84.CrossRef Fabozzi G, Alteri A, Rega E, Starita MF, Piscitelli C, Giannini P, et al. Morphological assessment on day 4 and its prognostic power in selecting viable embryos for transfer. Zygote. 2016;24(4):477–84.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef ALPHA Scientists In Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group Embryology. Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22(6):632–46.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez T, Seidler EA, Gardner DK, Needleman D, Sakkas D. Will noninvasive methods surpass invasive for assessing gametes and embryos? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):730–7.CrossRef Sanchez T, Seidler EA, Gardner DK, Needleman D, Sakkas D. Will noninvasive methods surpass invasive for assessing gametes and embryos? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):730–7.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N. Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):511–6.CrossRef Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N. Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(2):511–6.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei DM, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi YH, Zhang B, Chen ZJ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–8.CrossRef Wei DM, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi YH, Zhang B, Chen ZJ, et al. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1310–8.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):244–50.CrossRef Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(2):244–50.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rijnders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(10):2869–73.CrossRef Rijnders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(10):2869–73.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Ma’mari Al N, Shavit T, Son W-Y, et al. Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):44–51.CrossRef Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Ma’mari Al N, Shavit T, Son W-Y, et al. Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):44–51.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:3.CrossRef Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Is it time for a paradigm shift in understanding embryo selection? Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13:3.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobson Samuel JA, Lao MT, Essam M, Varghese AC, Kannamannadiar J. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):655–9.CrossRef Dobson Samuel JA, Lao MT, Essam M, Varghese AC, Kannamannadiar J. Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):655–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Morula transfer achieves better clinical outcomes than post-thawed cleavage embryos after overnight culture in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles
verfasst von
Dongna Hui
Xiaofang Han
Xiaocheng Wang
Wenjuan Ren
Xin Lei
Jianrong Liu
Lina Dong
Hong Li
Publikationsdatum
19.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01708-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.