nach oben

Erschienen in:

12.07.2019 | Original Research Article

Motor Competence Levels and Developmental Delay in Early Childhood: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in the USA

verfasst von: Ali Brian, Adam Pennell, Sally Taunton, Angela Starrett, Candice Howard-Shaughnessy, Jacqueline D. Goodway, Danielle Wadsworth, Mary Rudisill, David Stodden

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Developmental delay in motor competence may limit a child’s ability to successfully participate in structured and informal learning/social opportunities that are critical to holistic development. Current motor competence levels in the USA are relatively unknown. The purposes of this study were to explore motor competence levels of US children aged 3–6 years, report percentages of children demonstrating developmental delay, and investigate both within and across childcare site predictors of motor competence, including sex, race, geographic region, socioeconomic status, and body mass index percentile classification. Potential implications from results could lead to a greater awareness of the number of children with developmental delay, the impetus for evidence-based interventions, and the creation of consistent qualification standards for all children so that those who need services are not missed.

Methods

Participants included children (N = 580, 296 girls) aged 3–6 years (M_age = 4.97, standard deviation = 0.75) from a multi-state sample. Motor competence was assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development, Second Edition and the 25th and 5th percentiles were identified as developmental delay-related cutoffs.

Results

For both Test of Gross Motor Development, Second Edition subscales, approximately 77% of the entire sample qualified as at risk for developmental delay (≤ 25th percentile), while 30% of the entire sample were at or below 5th percentile. All groups (e.g., sex, race, socioeconomic status) were prone to developmental delay. Raw object control scores differed by sex.

Conclusions

Developmental delay in motor competence is an emerging epidemic that needs to be systematically acknowledged and addressed in the USA. By shifting norms based upon current data, there may be a lower standard of “typical development” that may have profound effects on factors that support long-term health.

Pate R, Pfeiffer K, Trost S, Ziegler P, Dowda M. Physical activity among children attending preschools. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1258–63. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2003-1088-L.CrossRefPubMed

Piercy K, Troiano R, Ballard R, Carlson S, Fulton J, Galuska D, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14854.CrossRefPubMed

Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd K, Masse L, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.CrossRefPubMed

Hales C, Carroll M, Fryar C, Ogden C. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017;288:1–8.

Sekhobo J, Edmunds L, Whaley S, Koleilat M. Obesity prevalence among low-income, preschool-aged children: New York City and Los Angeles County, 2003–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(2):17–22.PubMedCentral

Dollman J, Norton K, Norton L. Evidence for secular trends in children’s physical activity behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(12):892–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2004.016675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tomkinson G, Olds T. Secular changes in pediatric aerobic fitness test performance: the global picture. Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:46–66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000101075.CrossRefPubMed

Bethell C, Simpson L, Stumbo S, Carle AC, Gombojav N. National, state, and local disparities in childhood obesity. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2010;29(3):347–56. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0762.CrossRef

Nelson D, Gerras J, McGlumphy K, Shaver E, Gill A, Kanneganti K, et al. Racial discrimination and low household education predict higher body mass index in African American youth. Child Obes. 2018;14(2):114–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2017.0218.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Rossen L, Schoendorf K. Measuring health disparities: trends in racial-ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in obesity among 2- to 18-year old youth in the United States, 2001-2010. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22(10):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.07.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Harris K, Kuramoto L, Schulzer M, Retallack J. Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;180(7):719–26. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080966.CrossRef

12.

van Sluijs E, McMinn A, Griffin S. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(8):653–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39320.843947.BE.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Barnett L, van Beurden E, Morgan P, Brooks L, Beard J. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(3):252–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.004.CrossRef

14.

D’Hondt E, Deforche B, Gentier I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vaeyens R, Philippaerts R, et al. A longitudinal analysis of gross motor coordination in overweight and obese children versus normal-weight peers. Int J Obesity. 2013;37(1):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.55.CrossRef

15.

Lima R, Bugge A, Ersboll A, Stodden D, Andersen L. The longitudinal relationship between motor competence and measures of fatness and fitness from childhood into adolescence. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.02.010.CrossRef

16.

Lima R, Pfeiffer K, Larsen L, Bugge A, Moller N, Anderson L, et al. Physical activity and motor competence present a positive reciprocal longitudinal relationship across childhood and early adolescence. J Phys Act Health. 2017;14(6):440–7. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2016-0473.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Robinson L, Stodden D, Barnett L, Lopes V, Logan S, Rodrigues L, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1273–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Rodrigues L, Stodden D, Lopes V. Developmental pathways of change in fitness and motor competence are related to overweight and obesity status at the end of primary school. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2015.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Vandorpe B, Vandendriessche J, Vaeyens R, Pion J, Matthys S, Lefevre J, et al. Relationship between sports participation and the level of motor coordination in childhood: a longitudinal approach. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(3):220–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.09.006.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Vlahov E, Baghurst T, Mwavita M. Preschool motor development predicting high school health-related physical fitness: a prospective study. Percept Motor Skill. 2014;119(1):279–91. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.25.PMS.119c16z8.CrossRef

21.

Clark J, Metcalf J. The mountain of motor development: a metaphor. In: Clark J, Humphrey J, editors. Motor development: research and reviews. Reston (VA): National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002. p. 163–90.

22.

Stodden D, Goodway J, Langendorfer S, Roberton M, Rudisill M, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Quest. 2008;60(2):290–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582.CrossRef

23.

Clark J. Pentimento: a 21st century view on the canvas of motor development. Kines Rev. 2017;6(3):232–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2017-0020.CrossRef

24.

Logan S, Robinson L, Wilson A, Lucas W. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38(3):305–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Iivonen S, Sääkslahti A. Preschool children’s fundamental motor skills: a review of significant determinants. Early Child Dev Care. 2014;184(7):1107–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2013.837897.CrossRef

26.

Goodway J, Branta C. Influence of a motor skill intervention on fundamental motor skill development of disadvantaged preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003;74(1):36–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609062.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rudisill M, Martin E, Weimar W, Wall S, Valentini N. Fundamental motor skill performance of young children living in urban and rural Alabama. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2002;73(1):A52.

28.

Logan S, Scrabis-Fletcher K, Modlesky C, Getchell N. The relationship between motor skill proficiency and body mass index in preschool children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(3):442–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599776.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Morgan A, Ziglio E. Revitalising the evidence base for public health: an assets model. Glob Health Promot. 2007;14(2 Suppl.):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140020701x.CrossRef

30.

Kit B, Akinbami L, Isfahani N, Ulrich D. Gross motor development in children aged 3-5 years, United States 2012. Maternal Child Health J. 2017;21(7):1573–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2289-9.CrossRef

31.

Morano M, Colella D, Caroli M. Gross motor skill performance in a sample of overweight and non-overweight preschool children. Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2 Suppl.):42–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/17477166.2011.613665.CrossRef

32.

Williams H, Pfeiffer K, O’Neill J, Dowda M, McIver K, Brown W, et al. Motor skill performance and physical sctivity in preschool children. Obesity. 2008;16(6):1421–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.214.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Robinson L, Goodway J. Instructional climates in preschool children who are at-risk. Part I: object-control skill development. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009;80(3):533–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599591.

34.

Valentini N, Rudisill M. Motivational climate, motor-skill development, and perceived competence: two studies of developmentally delayed kindergarten children. J Teach Phys Educ. 2004;23(3):216–34. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.23.3.216.CrossRef

35.

Malina R, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2004.

36.

Goodway J, Robinson L, Crowe H. Gender differences in fundamental motor skill development in disadvantaged preschoolers from two geographical regions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2010.10599624.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Thomas J, French K. Gender differences across age in motor performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):260–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.260.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Hardy L, King L, Farrell L, Macniven R, Howlett S. Fundamental movement skills among Australian preschool children. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(5):503–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2009.05.010.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Tonelli M, Parkin P, Brauer P, Leduc D, Pottie K, Jaramillo Garcia A, et al. Recommendations on screening for developmental delay. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(8):579–87. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.151437.CrossRef

40.

Bellman M, Byrne O, Sege R. Developmental assessment of children. BMJ. 2013;346:e8687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e8687.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Shevell M, Majnemer A, Platt R, Webster R, Birnbaum R. Developmental and functional outcomes at school age of preschool children with global developmental delay. J Child Neurol. 2005;20(8):648–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738050200080301.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Levy Y. ‘Developmental delay’ reconsidered: the critical role of age-dependent, co-variant development. Front Psychol. 2018;9:503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Pub. L. No. 101-476, Stat. 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

44.

Center ECTA. States’ and territories’ definitions of/criteria for IDEA Part C eligibility. 2015. https://ectacenter.org/~pdfs/topics/earlyid/partc_elig_table.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2019.

45.

Brian A, Bardid F, Barnett L, Deconinck F, Lenoir M, Goodway J. Actual and perceived motor competence levels of Belgian and United States preschool children. J Mot Learn Dev. 2018;6(S2):S320–36. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0071.CrossRef

46.

Brian A, Goodway J, Logan J, Sutherland S. SKIPing with Head Start teachers: influence of T-SKIP on object-control skills. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017;88(4):479–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1375077.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Brian A, Goodway J, Logan J, Sutherland S. SKIPing with teachers: an early years motor skill intervention. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2017;22(3):270–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1176133.CrossRef

48.

Brian A, Taunton S. Effectiveness of motor skill intervention varies based on implementation strategy. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2018;23(2):222–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1413709.CrossRef

49.

Palmer K, Brian A. Test of Gross Motor Development-2 scores differ between expert and novice coders. J Mot Learn Dev. 2016;4(2):142–51. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0035.CrossRef

50.

True L, Brian A, Goodway J, Stodden D. Relationships between product- and process-oriented measures of motor competence and perceived competence. J Mot Learn Dev. 2017;5(2):319–35. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0042.CrossRef

51.

Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen M, Kimura N, Taylor H. Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chron Dis. 1972;25(6):329–43.CrossRef

52.

Flegal K, Ogden C. Childhood obesity: are we all speaking the same language? Adv Nutr. 2011;2(2):159S–66S. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.000307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Must A, Anderson S. Body mass index in children and adolescents: considerations for population-based applications. Int J Obesity. 2006;30(4):590–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803300.CrossRef

54.

Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Davey Smith G. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Commun H. 2006;60(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531.CrossRef

55.

Ratcliffe M, Burd C, Holder K, Fields A. Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau 2016. Report No.: ACSGEO-1.

56.

Ulrich D. Test of Gross Motor Development: examiner’s manual. 2nd ed. Austin (TX): PRO-Ed; 2000.

57.

Stekhoven D, Bühlmann P. MissForest-non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(1):112–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Tukey J. Exploratory data analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1977.

59.

Kim H, Carlson A, Curby T, Winsler A. Relations among motor, social, and cognitive skills in pre-kindergarten children with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;53–54:43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.01.016.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Leonard H, Hill E. The impact of motor development on typical and atypical social cognition and language: a systematic review. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014;19(3):163–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12055.CrossRef

61.

Niederer I, Kriemler S, Gut J, Hartmann T, Schindler C, Barral J, et al. Relationship of aerobic fitness and motor skills with memory and attention in preschoolers (Ballabeina): a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-11-34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Sacko R, McIver K, Brian A, Stodden D. New insight for activity intensity relativity, metabolic expenditure during object projection skill performance. J Sport Sci. 2018;36(21):2412–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1459152.CrossRef

63.

McWilliams C, Ball S, Benjamin S, Hales D, Vaughn A, Ward D. Best-practice guidelines for physical activity at child care. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):1650–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-0952.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Brian A, Pennell A, Sacko R, Schenkelburg M. Preschool teachers’ preparedness for knowing, enabling, and meeting the active start guidelines for physical activity. J Mot Learn Dev. 2018;6(2):333–44. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2017-0033.CrossRef

65.

Luz C, Cordovil R, Rodrigues L, Goodway J, Sacko R, Stodden D. Motor competence and health related fitness in children: a cross-cultural comparison between Portugal and the United States. J Sport Health Sci. 2019;8(2):130–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2019.01.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Hinkley T, Salmon J, Okely A, Crawford D, Hesketh K. Preschoolers’ physical activity, screen time, and compliance with recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(3):458–65. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318233763b.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Webster E, Ulrich D. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Test of Gross Motor Development-third edition. J Mot Learn Dev. 2017;5(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0003.CrossRef

Titel: Motor Competence Levels and Developmental Delay in Early Childhood: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in the USA
verfasst von: Ali Brian
Adam Pennell
Sally Taunton
Angela Starrett
Candice Howard-Shaughnessy
Jacqueline D. Goodway
Danielle Wadsworth
Mary Rudisill
David Stodden
Publikationsdatum: 12.07.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01150-5

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Motor Competence Levels and Developmental Delay in Early Childhood: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in the USA

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Should Competitive Bodybuilders Ingest More Protein than Current Evidence-Based Recommendations?

Use of Social or Behavioral Theories in Exercise-Related Injury Prevention Program Research: A Systematic Review

The Effects of Continuous Compared to Accumulated Exercise on Health: A Meta-Analytic Review

Test–Retest Reliability of the Yo-Yo Test: A Systematic Review

Match and Training Injuries in Women’s Rugby Union: A Systematic Review of Published Studies

Resistance Priming to Enhance Neuromuscular Performance in Sport: Evidence, Potential Mechanisms and Directions for Future Research

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie