nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.06.2019 | Review

MRI of common penile pathologies and penile prostheses

verfasst von: Abdul-Rahman Abualruz, Ryan O’Malley, Janardhana Ponnatapura, Brenda L. Holbert, Pat Whitworth, Rafel Tappouni, Neeraj Lalwani

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

MRI can delineate finer details of penile anatomy and pathology due to inherent higher soft-tissue contrast and spatial resolution. It can characterize inflammation and identify abscesses, localize penile fractures, guide surgical planning in penile fibrosis and Peyronie’s disease, and depict components of the penile prosthesis and its complications. MRI is a great investigative tool for penile neoplasms, including locally infiltrative neoplasms where clinical examination is limited, and local staging is crucial for surgical planning.

Kaneko K, De Mouy EH, Lee BE. Sequential contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the penis. Radiology. 1994;191(1):75-7.PubMed

Kirkham A. MRI of the penis. The British journal of radiology. 2012;85 Spec No 1(Spec Iss 1):S86-S93.PubMedPubMedCentral

Eke N. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg. 2002;89(5):555-65.PubMed

Jack GS, Garraway I, Reznichek R, Rajfer J. Current treatment options for penile fractures. Reviews in urology. 2004;6(3):114-20.PubMedPubMedCentral

Whitworth PW, 3rd, Ramchandani P, Dyer RB. The “eggplant penis” sign. Abdominal radiology. 2017;42(1):332-3.

Morey AF, Brandes S, Dugi DD, 3rd, Armstrong JH, Breyer BN, Broghammer JA, et al. Urotrauma: AUA guideline. The Journal of urology. 2014;192(2):327-35.PubMedPubMedCentral

Saglam E, Tarhan F, Hamarat MB, Can U, Coskun A, Camur E, et al. Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of penile fracture: A controlled study. Investigative and clinical urology. 2017;58(4):255-60.PubMedPubMedCentral

Uder M, Gohl D, Takahashi M, Derouet H, Defreyne L, Kramann B, et al. MRI of penile fracture: diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up. European radiology. 2002;12(1):113-20.PubMed

Li CY AV, Minhas S, Ralph DJ. The penile suspensory ligament: abnormalities and repair. BJU international. 2007;99(1):117-20.PubMed

10.

Kirkham AP IR, Minhas S, Minhas S, Allen C. MR imaging of nonmalignant penile lesions. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2008;28(3):837-53.PubMed

11.

Levenson RB SA, Novelline RA. Fournier gangrene: role of imaging. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2008;28(2):519-28.

12.

Laucks SS. Fournier’s Gangrene. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1994;74(6):1339-52.PubMed

13.

Morpurgo E GS. Fournier’s gangrene. The Surgical clinics of North America. 2002;82(6):1213-24.PubMed

14.

Sanders CJ, Mulder MM. Periurethral gland abscess: aetiology and treatment. Sexually transmitted infections. 1998;74(4):276-8.PubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Jones RB, Hirschmann JV, Brown GS, Tremann JA. Fournier’s syndrome: necrotizing subcutaneous infection of the male genitalia. The Journal of urology. 1979;122(3):279-82.PubMed

16.

Parker RA, Menias CO, Quazi R, Hara AK, Verma S, Shaaban A, et al. MR Imaging of the Penis and Scrotum. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2015;35(4):1033-50.PubMed

17.

Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. Peyronie’s Disease: AUA Guideline. The Journal of urology. 2015;194(3):745-53.PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Pryor JP, Ralph DJ. Clinical presentations of Peyronie’s disease. International journal of impotence research. 2002;14(5):414-7.PubMed

19.

Pretorius ES, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P, Banner MP. MR Imaging of the Penis. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2001;21(suppl_1):S283-S98.PubMed

20.

Hauck EW, Hackstein N, Vosshenrich R, Diemer T, Schmelz HU, Bschleipfer T, et al. Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Peyronie’s Disease—A Comparison Both with Palpation and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Plaque Formation. European Urology. 2003;43(3):293-300.PubMed

21.

Helweg G JW, Buchberger W, Wicke K, Oberhauser H, Knapp R, Ennemoser O, Zur Nedden D. Peyronie’s disease: MR findings in 28 patients. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 1992;158(6):1261-4.PubMed

22.

Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Penile prosthesis implantation. Urol Clin North Am (2001);28(2):355–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70144-0.CrossRef

23.

Lightfoot AJ, Rosevear HM, Kreder KJ. Inflatable penile prostheses: an update. Current opinion in urology. 2010;20(6):459-64.PubMed

24.

Garber BB, Bickell M. Subcutaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoirs. Urology. 2016;88:93-6.PubMed

25.

Lowe G, Smith RP, Costabile RA. A catalog of magnetic resonance imaging compatibility of penile prostheses. The journal of sexual medicine. 2012;9(5):1482-7.PubMed

26.

Ramanathan S, Bertolotto M, Shamsodini A, Heidous M, Dogra V, Ramchandani P, et al. Comprehensive Multimodality Imaging Review of Complications of Penile Prostheses. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2018;210(6):1200-7.PubMed

27.

McPhail EF, Nehra A, Bruner BC, Kawashima A, King BF, Kim B. MRI and its role in the evaluation and surgical decision making in patients with challenging IPP presentations: descriptions of MRI findings and algorithm for patient management. BJU Int. 2012;109(12):1848-52.PubMed

28.

Hartman RP, Kawashima A, Takahashi N, LeRoy AJ, King BF. Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP): diagnosis of complications. Abdominal radiology. 2016;41(6):1187-96.

29.

Ramanathan S, Bertolotto M, Shamsodini A, Heidous MA, Dogra V, Ramchandani P, et al. Introduction to Imaging of Penile Prostheses: A Primer for the Radiologist. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2018;210(6):1192-9.PubMed

30.

Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Cylinder sizing: less is more. International journal of impotence research. 2003;15 Suppl 5:S132-3.PubMed

31.

Sadeghi-Nejad H. Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Review of Prosthetic Devices and Associated Complications. The journal of sexual medicine. 2007;4(2):296-309.PubMed

32.

Navarrete RA, Cui T, Carson C, Terlecki R. Failure of the inflatable penile prosthesis due to abnormal folding of a low-profile reservoir - A selected case from an overall series and systematic review. Urology case reports. 2017;14:56-8.PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Alarcon JA. Penile Pump Placement for the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. The journal of sexual medicine. 2013;10(2):309-12.PubMed

34.

Chou HL, Mohsen NA, Garber BB, Feldstein DC. CT imaging of inflatable penile prosthesis complications: a pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1764-0.

35.

Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, Giuliano A, Goodman MT, King JB, et al. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998-2003. Cancer. 2008;113(10 Suppl):2883-91.PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA, et al. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. International journal of cancer. 2005;116(4):606-16.PubMed

37.

Alemany L, Cubilla A, Halec G, Kasamatsu E, Quiros B, Masferrer E, et al. Role of Human Papillomavirus in Penile Carcinomas Worldwide. Eur Urol. 2016;69(5):953-61.PubMed

38.

Lont AP, Besnard AP, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Horenblas S. A comparison of physical examination and imaging in determining the extent of primary penile carcinoma. BJU Int. 2003;91(6):493-5.PubMed

39.

Vapnek JM, Hricak H, Carroll PR. Recent advances in imaging studies for staging of penile and urethral carcinoma. The Urologic clinics of North America. 1992;19(2):257-66.

40.

Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, Nigam R, Muneer A, Ralph DJ, et al. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. The Journal of urology. 2012;188(3):803-8.PubMed

41.

Zhang K, Da J, Yao H-j, Zheng D-c, Cai Z-k, Jiang Y-q, et al. Metastatic tumors of the penis: a report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Medicine. 2015;94(1):e132-e.PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Mearini L, Colella R, Zucchi A, Nunzi E, Porrozzi C, Porena M. A review of penile metastasis. Oncology reviews. 2012;6(1):e10-e.PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Swartz MA, Porter MP, Lin DW, Weiss NS. Incidence of primary urethral carcinoma in the United States. Urology. 2006;68(6):1164-8.PubMed

44.

Visser O, Adolfsson J, Rossi S, Verne J, Gatta G, Maffezzini M, et al. Incidence and survival of rare urogenital cancers in Europe. European journal of cancer. 2012;48(4):456-64.PubMed

45.

Gakis G, Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Lebret T, et al. EAU guidelines on primary urethral carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2013;64(5):823-30.PubMed

46.

Stewart SB, Leder RA, Inman BA. Imaging tumors of the penis and urethra. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2010;37(3):353-67.

47.

Del Gaizo A, Silva AC, Lam-Himlin DM, Allen BC, Leyendecker J, Kawashima A. Magnetic resonance imaging of solid urethral and peri-urethral lesions. Insights into imaging. 2013;4(4):461-9.PubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Altun E. MR Imaging of the Penis and Urethra. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2019;27(1):139-50.PubMed

49.

Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. Male Urethral Stricture: American Urological Association Guideline. The Journal of urology. 2017;197(1):182-90.PubMed

50.

Domino PM, Kim JT, Yeung LL. Development of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Buccal Mucosa Graft Used for Urethroplasty: A Case Report. Urology case reports. 2017;10:60-2.PubMed

51.

NCCN clinical practice guidelines Penile carcinoma. 2018 (Version 2.2018).

52.

Kulungowski AM, Schook CC, Alomari AI, Vogel AM, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ. Vascular anomalies of the male genitalia. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(6):1214-21.PubMed

Titel: MRI of common penile pathologies and penile prostheses
verfasst von: Abdul-Rahman Abualruz
Ryan O’Malley
Janardhana Ponnatapura
Brenda L. Holbert
Pat Whitworth
Rafel Tappouni
Neeraj Lalwani
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02080-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

MRI of common penile pathologies and penile prostheses

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Boba sign: a novel sign for floating balls within a mature cystic teratoma

CT and MR imaging surveillance of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma after microwave ablation

Discrimination of serous cystadenoma from mucinous cystic neoplasm and branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in the pancreas with CT

Durability of partial splenic artery embolization on platelet counts for cancer patients with hypersplenism-related thrombocytopenia

MR elastography, T1 and T2 relaxometry of liver: role in noninvasive assessment of liver function and portal hypertension

Quantification of pancreas fat on dual-energy computed tomography: comparison with six-point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie