Background
Acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses play a pivotal role in controlling viral infection [
1,
2]. The first appearance of CTL response coincides with [
3,
4] and makes a contribution to the decline of peak viremia in acute infection [
5,
6]. Acute CTL response is a critical determinant of the viral set point [
7‐
9], which has been proven to be a strong predictor of the rate of disease progression [
10]. Under the pressure of CTL response, HIV mutates to escape from recognition [
6,
11]. Escape mutation may revert to the wild type upon viral transmission into a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatched individual [
12]. Although compelling evidence suggests that HIV-1-specific CD8
+ T-cells play an important role in viral control, antiviral efficacy is heterogeneous. First, CTLs have different antiviral effectiveness when they target different viral proteins [
13‐
16]. Many studies have shown that targeting the Gag protein, but not the Env or Nef proteins, is associated with improved disease control [
17,
18]. Second, certain HLA types are associated with different outcomes of HIV infection [
19,
20]. For example, expression of HLA-*B57, B*5801 and B*27 is associated with successful HIV control [
12,
17]. In contrast, expression of HLA-B*5802 and B*3502/03 is associated with failure to control HIV [
20,
21]. These HLA associations suggest that the specificity of HLA-restricted CTL responses is linked to the rate of disease progression. Third, the characteristics and effectiveness of CTL responses may be discordant among populations with different HLA distributions and viral subtypes [
22,
23]. For example, CTL responses restricted by HLA-B*1503, which was shown to be rare in a B subtype cohort but common in a C subtype cohort, were associated with a lower viral load in the B subtype cohort. However, such responses were not associated with a lower viral load in the C subtype cohort [
22].
HIV-1-specific CTL responses present clear immunodominance patterns during early HIV-1 infection, with a small number of epitopes being targeted in a distinct hierarchical order [
6,
11,
24‐
26]. The immunodominance patterns of T-cell responses are determined by multiple factors, including kinetics of viral protein expression, virus sequence, HLA distribution, binding avidity of peptides to the HLA molecule and T-cell receptor repertoire [
27,
28]. Immunodominant responses can be defined as common reactive epitopes targeted by individuals with a specific HLA distribution at the population level [
26,
29] and the strongest response in a subject who has developed more than one varying response, which can be highly variable in different subjects and may change over time largely due to HIV-1 sequence variation [
6,
11]. Immunodominance at the population level has been widely investigated. Studies have previously identified several immunodominant responses as being associated with improved HIV control [
9,
26]. Immunodominance at the individual level was found to be a major determinant of epitope escape [
11], although information regarding the relationship between immunodominant responses at the individual level and virus control are lacking [
6,
11,
30].
In China, the number of people living with HIV has increased in recent years [
31], and the incidence of transmission through men who have sex with men (MSM) has shown a marked uptrend, increasing from 2.5% in 2006 to 25.8% in 2014 [
31]. CRF01_AE has become the predominant genotype among MSM in China [
32‐
34]. Two CRF01_AE lineages have been identified in this population, with cluster I spread widely across China and cluster II observed mainly as an epidemic in northern China [
32]. By far, the information on early CTL responses regarding the CRF01_AE subtype in Chinese MSM subjects is limited. Data from CTL studies in early infection have primarily been acquired from Caucasian or African populations infected with B or C subtype viruses [
6,
17,
26]. The HLA distributions among Caucasian and African populations differed from Chinese populations [
35], thus, it is urgent to clarify the characteristics of CTL responses and their relationship with virus control.
In this study, we aimed to elucidate the characteristics of CTL responses to CRF01_AE subtype virus during the early stage of infection and explore the protective CTL responses correlative with viral control. We designed a set of overlapping peptides to HIV-1 Gag, Pol and Nef proteins based on the previously identified CRF01_AE cluster II consensus sequence [
32]. The CTL responses at 3 months and 1 year post infection were detected longitudinal with 15 primary CRF01_AE cluster II HIV-1 infected MSM subjects. The viral quasispecies sequences from the synchronous plasma were also analyzed.
Discussion
Evidence has suggested that early CTL responses to HIV-1 infection are vital to viral control [
8,
39]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of effective CTL response parameters during early infection are important for vaccine design and therapeutic strategy [
2]. Through longitudinal analysis of 15 Chinese MSM subjects infected with the CRF01_AE subtype, which is dominant among Chinese MSM subjects and has shown a dramatic uptrend in recent years [
32‐
34], we clarified the characteristics of early CTL responses in CRF01_AE using unique cluster-specific peptides and found that multi-layered immunodominant responses targeting Gag during the first year of infection were significantly associated with improved viral control. This information is useful in vaccine design targeting Chinese MSM subjects infected with the CRF01_AE subtype.
In this study, Gag and Nef proteins were the main targets of CTL responses during the first year of HIV-1 infection, and this was evident from the data after adjusting for the length of amino acids by dividing the amino acids number of the corresponding protein and multiplying by 100 (Fig.
1). These results were similar to the cohort study regarding the B subtype in Streeck et al. [
40], although differed from the cohort study in the C subtype in Radebe et al. [
41] in which the breadth of Pol was broader at 3 months post infection. This discordance may be due to differences in viral subtype and HLA distribution.
It was generally believed that the viral set point was established about 4 months post infection [
42]. CTL responses at 3 months post infection were detected to find host response contribute to viral set point. Moreover, CTL responses at 1 year post infection were also detected to illustrate the CTL responses dynamics. Through correlation analysis between CTL responses and viral set points, we found that the relative magnitude of Gag was significantly negatively correlated with viral set point in CRF01_AE during the first year of infection (Fig.
2), suggesting that the higher proportion of Gag magnitude was associated with improved viral control. This is similar to the results presented in Masemola et al. [
16] and Zuniga et al. [
37]. Through longitudinal analysis of Gag immunodominant responses and viral set points in each subject, we found that multi-layered immunodominant responses targeting Gag during the first year of infection were correlated with viral control (Fig.
3). In addition, we noticed that subject 12, who had a relatively high viral set point (4.62 log
10 copies/ml), had a Gag immunodominant response at 3 months. Under host immune pressure, the immunodominant epitope mutated and magnitude was decreased at 1 year post infection. However, no immunodominant responses targeting Gag developed during later stages of infection (Fig.
3f and Table
2), suggesting that only having an immunodominant Gag response in early infection is not sufficient to control the virus. Two other subjects (subject 9 and 10) with relatively high viral set points (4.49 and 4.50 log
10copies/ml, respectively) only had Gag immunodominant responses at 1 year post infection, which suggests that developing Gag immunodominant responses in early stages of infection is important for viral control (Fig.
3h, k). These data suggest that multi-layered defenses during the first year of infection are needed to effectively control the virus. Tulk et al. found that Gag immunodominance during early infection was correlated with increased plasma IL-2 and MIP-β levels [
14], which are associated with better disease control [
43,
44]. This may provide one of the reasons why multi-layered Gag immunodominant responses during the first year of infection were correlated with viral control.
We observed that both the magnitude and relative magnitude of Nef responses at 1 year post infection were significantly positively correlated with viral set point (Fig.
2), which was similar to results from Kiepiela et al. [
13]. We also found that the viral set points in 4 subjects (subject 8, 13, 14 and 15) who had persistent immunodominant responses targeting Nef were high (Fig.
3), which was consistent with the study of Radebe et al. [
45], suggesting that these responses targeting Nef protein are driven by the level of viremia, rather than being responsible for lowering viral load.
Through longitudinal analysis of Gag cloning sequences during the first year of infection, we found that Gag immunodominant responses at 3 months may exert strong pressure on the virus. Five out of 6 Gag immunodominant epitopes or their flanking regions had mutations at 1 year post infection (Table
2). Moreover, the magnitude of the 5 epitopes with mutations within epitopes or their flanking regions all decreased over time, except for the OLP-10 peptide in subject 3 in which the magnitude slightly increased (Fig.
3 and Table
2). Although we did not validate mutated immunodominant epitopes at 1 year post infection, the decline in magnitude suggests that epitope and flanking region mutations could hinder CTL responses [
6,
38]. Only the B27 restricted KK10 epitope in subject 2 had no mutations and still maintained an immunodominant response at 1 year post infection (Fig.
3 and Table
2). Many studies have shown that targeting the KK10 epitope could effectively control the virus [
17], because escape mutations in the KK10 epitope could confer a large fitness cost to the virus. Escape mutations did not occur until the development of compensatory mutations restored viral replication in chronic infection [
17]. This result was similar to the Liu et al. [
11] study, which reported that immunodominant responses within an individual were a key reason for escape mutations. These data suggest that Gag immunodominant responses at 3 months exert strong pressure on the virus, which drives the virus to mutate and escape immune pressure. Several subjects (subject 1, 3, 4 and 5) with improved viral control gained another layer of defense, developing new Gag immunodominant responses at later stages of infection and forcing persistent strong immune pressure on the virus, thereby indicating that multi-layered Gag-specific immunodominant responses during the first year of infection may contribute to better viral control.
In this study, we aimed to explore the protective CTL responses to CRF01_AE correlative with viral control, which were suitable for vaccine design and immunotherapy among Chinese MSM subjects, so the published optimal epitopes restricted by the most common HLA-I alleles in the Chinese population were also selected and tested [
35]. Some responses might be missed, but the conclusion was believed not to be affected, because most of the known protective epitopes were located in Gag, Pol and Nef proteins [
46], which had been screened with the CRF01_AE cluster II specific overlapping peptides. Additionally, only CRF01_AE cluster II HIV-1 infected cases were included in this study, since predominant proportion (81.3 %) of MSM subjects infected HIV-1 strains belonged to CRF01_AE cluster II in this Liaoning MSM prospective cohort [
32]. However, whether the results of this study were also appropriate for CRF01_AE cluster I infected cases need further validation.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the patients for their participation in this study. This work was supported in part by mega projects of national science research for the 12th Five-Year Plan (2012ZX10001–006 to Hong Shang), “Innovation Team Development Programme 2012” of the Ministry of Education to Hong Shang, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program 81371787 to Xiaoxu Han) and Natural Science Foundation of China (81001316 to Bin Zhao).