Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 4/2020

29.05.2019 | Original Article

Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury

verfasst von: Niels Vass Johnsen, Rachel A. Moses, Sean P. Elliott, Alex J. Vanni, Nima Baradaran, Garrick Greear, Thomas G. Smith III, Michael A. Granieri, Nejd F. Alsikafi, Bradley A. Erickson, Jeremy B. Myers, Benjamin N. Breyer, Jill C. Buckley, Lee C. Zhao, Bryan B. Voelzke, For the Trauma Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons(TURNS)

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze outcomes of posterior urethroplasty following pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) and to determine risk factors for surgical complexity and success.

Methods

Patients who underwent posterior urethroplasty following PFUI were identified in the Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons (TURNS) database. Demographics, injury patterns, management strategies, and prior interventions were evaluated. Risk factors for surgical failure and the impact of ancillary urethral lengthening maneuvers (corporal splitting, pubectomy and supracrural rerouting) were evaluated.

Results

Of the 436 posterior urethroplasties identified, 122 were following PFUI. 83 (68%) patients were acutely managed with suprapubic tubes, while 39 (32%) underwent early endoscopic realignment. 16 (13%) patients underwent pelvic artery embolization in the acute setting. 116 cases (95%) were completed via a perineal approach, while 6 (5%) were performed via an abdominoperineal approach. The need for one or more ancillary maneuvers to gain urethral length occurred in 4 (36%) patients. Of these, 44 (36%) received corporal splitting, 16 (13%) partial or complete pubectomy, and 2 (2%) supracrural rerouting. Younger patients, those with longer distraction defects, and those with a history of angioembolization were more likely to require ancillary maneuvers. 111 patients (91%) did not require repeat intervention during follow-up. Angioembolization (p = 0.03) and longer distraction defects (p = 0.01) were associated with failure.

Conclusions

Posterior urethroplasty provides excellent success rates for patients following PFUI. Pelvic angioembolization and increased defect length are associated with increased surgical complexity and risk of failure. Surgeons should be prepared to implement ancillary maneuvers when indicated to achieve a tension-free anastomosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Webster GD, Selli C (1983) Management of traumatic posterior urethral stricture by one stage perineal repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156(5):620–624PubMed Webster GD, Selli C (1983) Management of traumatic posterior urethral stricture by one stage perineal repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156(5):620–624PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Morey AF, McAninch JW (1997) Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol 157(2):506–510CrossRef Morey AF, McAninch JW (1997) Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol 157(2):506–510CrossRef
15.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mundy AR (1999) Pelvic fracture injuries of the posterior urethra. World J Urol 17(2):90–95CrossRef Mundy AR (1999) Pelvic fracture injuries of the posterior urethra. World J Urol 17(2):90–95CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Webster GD, Guralnick ML (2002) Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption. Urol Clin North Am 29(2):429–441, viiiCrossRef Webster GD, Guralnick ML (2002) Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption. Urol Clin North Am 29(2):429–441, viiiCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Multicenter analysis of posterior urethroplasty complexity and outcomes following pelvic fracture urethral injury
verfasst von
Niels Vass Johnsen
Rachel A. Moses
Sean P. Elliott
Alex J. Vanni
Nima Baradaran
Garrick Greear
Thomas G. Smith III
Michael A. Granieri
Nejd F. Alsikafi
Bradley A. Erickson
Jeremy B. Myers
Benjamin N. Breyer
Jill C. Buckley
Lee C. Zhao
Bryan B. Voelzke
For the Trauma Urologic Reconstruction Network of Surgeons(TURNS)
Publikationsdatum
29.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02824-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

World Journal of Urology 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.