nach oben

Skeletal Radiology

Erschienen in:

05.04.2016 | Case Report

Multifocal low-grade central osteosarcoma: a rare case

verfasst von: Richard Boyle, Bruno Giuffre, S. Fiona Bonar

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Low-grade central osteosarcoma (LGCOS) is a rare variant of osteosarcoma. We present a rare case of multifocal LGCOS located in two distinct skeletal sites, initially noted as incidental findings on imaging for distant traumatic pathology. Both sites seemed small and innocuous on initial imaging, and were quiescent clinically, illustrating the value of close interval multimodal surveillance scanning.

Silverman G. Multiple osteogenic sarcoma. Arch Pathol. 1936;21(5):88–95.

Kurt AM, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ. Low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1990;65(6):1418–28.CrossRefPubMed

Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Fabbri N, Mercuri M, Picci P, Ruggieri P, et al. Osteosarcoma: low-grade intraosseous-type osteosarcoma, histologically resembling parosteal osteosarcoma, fibrous dysplasia, and desmoplastic fibroma. Cancer. 1993;71(2):338–45.CrossRefPubMed

Choong PF, Pritchard DJ, Rock MG, Sim FH, McLeod RA, Unni KK. Low grade central osteogenic sarcoma: a long-term followup of 20 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:198–206.CrossRefPubMed

Andresen KJ, Sundaram M, Unni KK, Sim FH. Imaging features of low-grade central osteosarcoma of the long bones and pelvis. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(7):373–9.CrossRefPubMed

Unni KK, Dahlin DC, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ. Intraosseous well-differentiated osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1977;40(3):1337–47.CrossRefPubMed

Anninga JK, Picci P, Fiocco M, Kroon HM, Vanel D, Alberghini M, et al. Osteosarcoma of the hands and feet: a distinct clinico-pathological subgroup. Virchows Arch. 2013;462(1):109–20.CrossRefPubMed

Ellis JH, Siegel CL, Martel W, Weatherbee L, Dorfman H. Radiologic features of well-differentiated osteosarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151(4):739–42.CrossRefPubMed

Okada K, Nishida J, Morita T, Kakizaki H, Ishikawa A, Hotta T. Low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma in northern Japan: advantage of AgNOR and MIB-1 staining in differential diagnosis. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(6):633–9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Malhas AM, Sumathi VP, James SL, Menna C, Carter SR, Tillman RM, et al. Low-grade central osteosarcoma: a difficult condition to diagnose. Sarcoma. 2012;2012:764796.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Kenan S, Ginat DT, Steiner GC. Dedifferentiated high-grade osteosarcoma originating from low-grade central osteosarcoma of the fibula. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36(4):347–51.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Simpfendorfer CS et al. Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37(9):797–804.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Antonescu CR, Huvos AG. Low-grade osteogenic sarcoma arising in medullary and surface osseous locations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;114(Suppl):S90–103.PubMed

14.

Enneking WF, Kagan A. “Skip” metastases in osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1975;36(6):2192–205.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Bonar SF. Central low-grade osteosarcoma: a diagnostic challenge. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(4):365–7.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ogose A, Hotta T, Emura I, Imaizumi S, Takeda M, Yamamura S. Repeated dedifferentiation of low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(5):615–8.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Franceschina MJ, Hankin RC, Irwin RB. Low-grade central osteosarcoma resembling fibrous dysplasia: a report of two cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997;26(6):432–40.

18.

Muramatsu K, Hashimoto T, Seto S, Gondo T, Ihara K, Taguchi T. Low-grade central osteosarcoma mimicking fibrous dysplasia: a report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Franchi A, Bacchini P, Della Rocca C, Bertoni F. Central low-grade osteosarcoma with pagetoid bone formation: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Mod Pathol. 2004;17(3):288–91.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Klein MJ, Siegal GP. Osteosarcoma: anatomic and histologic variants. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(4):555–81.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Steiner GC, Forest M, Vacher-Lavenu MC. Ultrastructure of low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma of bone: a comparative study with fibrous dysplasia and parosteal osteosarcoma. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2006;30(4):293–9.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Pollandt K, Engels C, Kaiser E, Werner M, Delling G. Gsalpha gene mutations in monostotic fibrous dysplasia of bone and fibrous dysplasia-like low-grade central osteosarcoma. Virchows Arch. 2001;439(2):170–5.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Idowu BD, Al-Adnani M, O’Donnell P, Yu L, Odell E, Diss T, et al. A sensitive mutation-specific screening technique for GNAS1 mutations in cases of fibrous dysplasia: the first report of a codon 227 mutation in bone. Histopathology. 2007;50(6):691–704.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Park HR, Jung WW, Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Park JH, Kim YW, et al. Molecular analysis of p53, MDM2 and H-ras genes in low-grade central osteosarcoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2004;200(6):439–45.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lee WI, Bacchni P, Bertoni F, Maeng YH, Park YK. Quantitative assessment of HER2/neu expression by real-time PCR and fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis in low-grade osteosarcoma. Oncol Rep. 2004;12(1):125–8.PubMed

26.

Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Shibata T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of MDM2 and CDK4 distinguishes low-grade osteosarcoma from benign mimics. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(9):1279–88.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Dujardin F et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcomas and other primary fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(5):624–37.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, Tsuda H, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemical coexpression in high-grade osteosarcoma: correlation with a dedifferentiated subtype. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(3):423–31.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ragazzini P, Gamberi G, Benassi MS, Orlando C, Sestini R, Ferrari C, et al. Analysis of SAS gene and CDK4 and MDM2 proteins in low-grade osteosarcoma. Cancer Detect Prev. 1999;23(2):129–36.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nishio J, Iwasaki H, Takagi S, Seo H, Aoki M, Nabeshima K, et al. Low-grade central osteosarcoma of the metatarsal bone: a clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic analysis. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(12):5429–35.PubMed

31.

Jeon DG, Koh JS, Cho WH, Song WS, Kong CB, Cho SH, et al. Clinical outcome of low-grade central osteosarcoma and role of CDK4 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic adjunct. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(3):529–37.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Lietman SA, Ding C, Levine MA. A highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction method detects activating mutations of the GNAS gene in peripheral blood cells in McCune-Albright syndrome or isolated fibrous dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2489–94.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Lee SE, Lee EH, Park H, Sung JY, Lee HW, Kang SY, et al. The diagnostic utility of the GNAS mutation in patients with fibrous dysplasia: meta-analysis of 168 sporadic cases. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(8):1234–42.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Carter JM, Inwards CY, Jin L, Evers B, Wenger DE, Oliveira AM, et al. Activating GNAS mutations in parosteal osteosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(3):402–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Iemoto Y, Ushigome S, Fukunaga M, Nikaido T, Asanuma K. Case report 679: central low-grade osteosarcoma with foci of dedifferentiation. Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(5):379–82.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Mirra JM. Osseous tumors of intramedullary origin. In: Bone Tumors. Clinical, radiologic and pathologic correlations. Vol 1. London: Lea and Febiger Philadelphia; 1989. p 143–488.

37.

Price CH, Truscott DE. Multifocal osteogenic sarcoma; report of a case. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1957;39-b(3):524–33.

38.

Amstutz HC. Multiple osteogenic sarcomata: metastatic or multicentric? Report of two cases and review of literature. Cancer. 1969;24(5):923–31.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Daffner RH, Kennedy SL, Fox KR, Crowley JJ, Sauser DD, Cooperstein LA. Synchronous multicentric osteosarcoma: the case for metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(10):569–78.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Enneking WF, Springfield D, Gross M. The surgical treatment of parosteal osteosarcoma in long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(1):125–35.PubMed

41.

Hatori M, Ohtani H, Yamada N, Uzuki M, Kokubun S. Synchronous multifocal osteosarcoma with lymphatic spread in the lung: an autopsy case report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31(11):562–6.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bacci G, Picci P, Ferrari S, Mercuri M, Briccoli A, Donati D, et al. Synchronous multifocal osteosarcoma: results in twelve patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and simultaneous resection of all involved bones. Ann Oncol. 1996;7(8):864–6.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey J, Huvos A, Lane J, Marcove R, et al. Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. 1992;10(1):5–15.

44.

McCarthy EF, Tolo VT, Dorfman HD. Case report 446. Multicentric, metachronous, low-grade, sclerosing osteogenic sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 1987;16(7):592–6.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Arkader A, Huvos AG, Healey JH. Multifocal synchronous low-grade intramedullary and juxtacortical osteogenic sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:265–70.PubMed

Titel: Multifocal low-grade central osteosarcoma: a rare case
verfasst von: Richard Boyle
Bruno Giuffre
S. Fiona Bonar
Publikationsdatum: 05.04.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2384-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Multifocal low-grade central osteosarcoma: a rare case

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

Prevalence of asymptomatic chondrocalcinosis in the pelvis

ISS 2016 Annual meeting Paris, France: scientific paper presentations

Predictive MRI correlates of lesser metatarsophalangeal joint plantar plate tear

T2 mapping of articular cartilage of the glenohumeral joint at 3.0 T in healthy volunteers: a feasibility study

T2 map signal variation predicts symptomatic osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Sex differences in the radial grooves in the first extensor compartment

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie