Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2012 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2012 Open Access

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2012

National health financing policy in Eritrea: a survey of preliminary considerations

Zeitschrift:
BMC International Health and Human Rights > Ausgabe 1/2012
Autoren:
Joses Muthuri Kirigia, Eyob Zere, James Akazili
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1472-698X-12-16) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JMK, EZ and JA contributed to the study design, analysis and writing of various sections of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

The 58th World Health Assembly and 56th WHO Regional Committee for Africa adopted resolutions urging Member States to ensure that health financing systems included a method for prepayment to foster financial risk sharing among the population and avoid catastrophic health-care expenditure. The Regional Committee asked countries to strengthen or develop comprehensive health financing policies. This paper presents the findings of a survey conducted among senior staff of selected Eritrean ministries and agencies to elicit views on some of the elements likely to be part of a national health financing policy.

Methods

This is a descriptive study. A questionnaire was prepared and sent to 19 senior staff (Directors) in the Ministry of Health, Labour Department, Civil Service Administration, Eritrean Confederation of Workers, National Insurance Corporation of Eritrea and Ministry of Local Government. The respondents were selected by the Ministry of Health as key informants.

Results

The key findings were as follows: the response rate was 84.2% (16/19); 37.5% (6/16) and 18.8% said that the vision of Eritrean National Health Financing Policy (NHFP) should include the phrases ‘equitable and accessible quality health services’ and ‘improve efficiency or reduce waste’ respectively; over 68% indicated that NHFP should include securing adequate funding, ensuring efficiency, ensuring equitable financial access, protection from financial catastrophe, and ensuring provider payment mechanisms create positive incentives to service providers; over 80% mentioned community participation, efficiency, transparency, country ownership, equity in access, and evidence-based decision making as core values of NHFP; over 62.5% confirmed that NHFP components should consist of stewardship (oversight), revenue collection, revenue pooling and risk management, resource allocation and purchasing of health services, health economics research, and development of human resources for health; over 68.8% indicated cost-sharing, taxation and social health insurance as preferred revenue collection mechanisms; and 68.75% indicated their preferred provider payment mechanism to be a global (lump sum) budget.

Conclusion

This study succeeded in gathering the preliminary views of senior staff of selected Eritrean ministries and agencies regarding the likely elements of the NHFP, i.e. the vision, objectives, components, provider payment mechanisms, and health financing agency and its governance. In addition to stakeholder surveys, it would be helpful to inform the development of the NHFP with other pieces of evidence, including cost-effectiveness analysis of health services and interventions, financial feasibility analysis of financing options, a survey of the political and professional acceptability of financing options, national health accounts, and equity analyses.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1:APPENDIX 1. Questionnaire for Government Ministries and Partners. (DOC 38 KB)
12914_2011_213_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12914_2011_213_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12914_2011_213_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 3
12914_2011_213_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 4
12914_2011_213_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 5
12914_2011_213_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
Authors’ original file for figure 6
12914_2011_213_MOESM7_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 7
12914_2011_213_MOESM8_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 8
12914_2011_213_MOESM9_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 9
12914_2011_213_MOESM10_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 10
12914_2011_213_MOESM11_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 11
12914_2011_213_MOESM12_ESM.doc
Authors’ original file for figure 12
12914_2011_213_MOESM13_ESM.doc
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe