Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

23.02.2016

Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort

verfasst von: Kjartan Stormark, Kjetil Søreide, Jon Arne Søreide, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Frank Pfeffer, Morten T. Eriksen, Bjørn S. Nedrebø, Hartwig Kørner

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Randomized trials show similar outcomes after open surgery and laparoscopy for colon cancer, and confirmation of outcomes after implementation in routine practice is important. While some studies have reported long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery from single institutions, data from large patient cohorts are sparse. We investigated short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for treating colon cancer in a large national cohort.

Methods

We retrieved data from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry for all colon cancer resections performed in 2007–2010. Five-year relative survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgeries were calculated, including excess mortality rates associated with potential predictors of death.

Results

Among 8707 patients with colon cancer that underwent major resections, 16 % and 36 % received laparoscopic procedures in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Laparoscopic procedures were most common in elective surgeries for treating stages I–III, right colon, or sigmoid tumours. The conversion rate of laparoscopic procedures was 14.5 %. Among all patients, laparoscopy provided higher 5-year relative survival rates (70 %) than open surgery (62 %) (P = 0.040), but among the largest group of patients electively treated for stages I–III disease, the approaches provided similar relative survival rates (78 vs. 81 %; P = 0.535). Excess mortality at 2 years post-surgery was lower after laparoscopy than after open surgery (excess hazard ratio, 0.7; P = 0.013), but similar between groups during the last 3 years of follow-up. Major predictors of death were stage IV disease, tumour class pN+, age > 80 years, and emergency procedures (excess hazard ratios were 5.3, 2.4, 2.1, and 2.0, respectively; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer was safe and achieved results comparable to those from previous randomized trials.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (2014) World Cancer Report 2014. In: Steward BWW, C.P. (ed), World Health Organization, pp 392–402 International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization (2014) World Cancer Report 2014. In: Steward BWW, C.P. (ed), World Health Organization, pp 392–402
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Di B, Li Y, Wei K, Xiao X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Gao P, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Zhang D, Wei X, Liu S, Wang J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cai H (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol 22:e39–e43CrossRefPubMed Di B, Li Y, Wei K, Xiao X, Shi J, Zhang Y, Yang X, Gao P, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Zhang D, Wei X, Liu S, Wang J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Cai H (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of 5-year follow-up outcomes. Surg Oncol 22:e39–e43CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Theophilus M, Platell C, Spilsbury K (2014) Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 16:O75–O81CrossRefPubMed Theophilus M, Platell C, Spilsbury K (2014) Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 16:O75–O81CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassen K, Hvarphiye A, Myrmel T (2012) Randomised trials in surgery: the burden of evidence. Rev Recent Clin Trials 7:244–248CrossRefPubMed Lassen K, Hvarphiye A, Myrmel T (2012) Randomised trials in surgery: the burden of evidence. Rev Recent Clin Trials 7:244–248CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25:1136–1142CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Carter F, Coleman MG, Hanna GB (2011) Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program. Surg Endosc 25:1136–1142CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrelli NJ (2015) Do we really need another article on minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery? J Natl Cancer Inst 107:376CrossRefPubMed Petrelli NJ (2015) Do we really need another article on minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery? J Natl Cancer Inst 107:376CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng Z, Jemal A, Lin CC, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 107 Zheng Z, Jemal A, Lin CC, Hu CY, Chang GJ (2015) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopy vs open colectomy among nonmetastatic colon cancer patients: an analysis using the National Cancer Data Base. J Natl Cancer Inst 107
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alnasser M, Schneider EB, Gearhart SL, Wick EC, Fang SH, Haider AH, Efron JE (2014) National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 28:49–57CrossRefPubMed Alnasser M, Schneider EB, Gearhart SL, Wick EC, Fang SH, Haider AH, Efron JE (2014) National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 28:49–57CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Neudecker J, Bergholz R, Junghans T, Mall J, Schwenk W (2007) Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in Germany—a standardised procedure? Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:573–579CrossRefPubMed Neudecker J, Bergholz R, Junghans T, Mall J, Schwenk W (2007) Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in Germany—a standardised procedure? Langenbecks Arch Surg 392:573–579CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, Initiative S (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18:805–835CrossRefPubMed Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, Initiative S (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18:805–835CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Norwegian Gastro-Intestinal Cancer Group (2015) Nasjonalt handlingsprogram for kreft i tykk- og endetarm. Helsedirektoratet Norwegian Gastro-Intestinal Cancer Group (2015) Nasjonalt handlingsprogram for kreft i tykk- og endetarm. Helsedirektoratet
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, Bharathan B, Wilson RG, Ratcliffe AA, Kelly SB, Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit Group (2010) Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 97:1416–1430CrossRefPubMed Borowski DW, Bradburn DM, Mills SJ, Bharathan B, Wilson RG, Ratcliffe AA, Kelly SB, Northern Region Colorectal Cancer Audit Group (2010) Volume-outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes. Br J Surg 97:1416–1430CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nedrebø BSO, Søreide K, Nesbakken A, Eriksen MT, Søreide JA, Kørner H (2013) Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort. Colorectal Dis 15:E301–E308CrossRefPubMed Nedrebø BSO, Søreide K, Nesbakken A, Eriksen MT, Søreide JA, Kørner H (2013) Risk factors associated with poor lymph node harvest after colon cancer surgery in a national cohort. Colorectal Dis 15:E301–E308CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) The TNM classification of malignant tumours (7th edn). Wiley-Blackwell, New York, p 336 Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) The TNM classification of malignant tumours (7th edn). Wiley-Blackwell, New York, p 336
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pohar M, Stare J (2006) Relative survival analysis in R. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 81:272–278CrossRef Pohar M, Stare J (2006) Relative survival analysis in R. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 81:272–278CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr (1982) A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 115:92–106PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickman PW, Sloggett A, Hills M, Hakulinen T (2004) Regression models for relative survival. Stat Med 23:51–64CrossRefPubMed Dickman PW, Sloggett A, Hills M, Hakulinen T (2004) Regression models for relative survival. Stat Med 23:51–64CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Perme MP, Stare J, Esteve J (2012) On estimation in relative survival. Biometrics 68:113–120CrossRefPubMed Perme MP, Stare J, Esteve J (2012) On estimation in relative survival. Biometrics 68:113–120CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg 97:1180–1186CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 (discussion 662–654) CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 (discussion 662–654) CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Jeng YM (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14:109–117CrossRefPubMed Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Jeng YM (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 14:109–117CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Surg Endosc 29:916–924CrossRefPubMed Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colon cancer: 10-year outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Surg Endosc 29:916–924CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Group COcLoORS (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Group COcLoORS (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Stucky CC, Pockaj BA, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Sargent DJ, O’Connell MJ, Beart RW, Skibber JM, Nelson H, Weeks JC (2011) Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146). Ann Surg Oncol 18:2422–2431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stucky CC, Pockaj BA, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Sargent DJ, O’Connell MJ, Beart RW, Skibber JM, Nelson H, Weeks JC (2011) Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146). Ann Surg Oncol 18:2422–2431CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Hewett PJ, McMurrick PJ, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stevenson AR, Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study Group (2012) Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256:915–919CrossRefPubMed Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Hewett PJ, McMurrick PJ, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stevenson AR, Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study Group (2012) Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg 256:915–919CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Corcione F (2015) Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in high-volume surgical centers: long-term outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group trial. World J Surg Huscher CG, Bretagnol F, Corcione F (2015) Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in high-volume surgical centers: long-term outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group trial. World J Surg
Metadaten
Titel
Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort
verfasst von
Kjartan Stormark
Kjetil Søreide
Jon Arne Søreide
Jan Terje Kvaløy
Frank Pfeffer
Morten T. Eriksen
Bjørn S. Nedrebø
Hartwig Kørner
Publikationsdatum
23.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4819-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.