Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Surgery International 10/2022

03.08.2022 | Original Article

Nationwide outcomes of incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy versus cholecystectomy alone in children: a propensity score-matched analysis

verfasst von: Carlos Theodore Huerta, Andrew Sundin, Antoine J. Ribieras, Rebecca Saberi, Walter Ramsey, Gareth Gilna, Hallie J. Quiroz, Chad M. Thorson, Juan E. Sola, Eduardo A. Perez

Erschienen in: Pediatric Surgery International | Ausgabe 10/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The utility of incidental appendectomy, appendectomy during another index surgery in the absence of appendicitis, has not been evaluated in the pediatric population during cholecystectomy. This study sought to compare nationwide outcomes after cholecystectomy with incidental appendectomy in children.

Methods

Patients ≤ 18 years old who underwent cholecystectomy from 2010–2014 were identified from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. A propensity score-matched analysis (PSMA) with > 40 covariates including demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization factors was performed between those receiving cholecystectomy alone versus incidental appendectomy at the time of cholecystectomy.

Results

34,390 patients underwent cholecystectomy (median age 15 [13–17] years). Laparoscopic (92%) approach was utilized most frequently, with 2% requiring conversion to open cholecystectomy. PSMA demonstrated a higher frequency of perforation or laceration of adjacent organs occurring in those receiving cholecystectomy alone during index admission. No significant differences in readmissions within 30 days or the calendar year were detected. Those undergoing cholecystectomy alone had higher overall readmission costs ($11,783 [$4942–$39,836] vs. $6,100 [$2358–$19,719] cholecystectomy with appendectomy; p = 0.010).

Conclusion

This nationwide PSMA indicates that incidental appendectomy in pediatric cholecystectomies is not associated with higher postoperative complications, cost, or readmissions. This suggests that incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy is safe, cost-effective, and worthy of future study.

Level of evidence

Level III.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollock AV, Evans M (1977) Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy: effect of incidental appendicectomy. Br Med J 1:20–22CrossRef Pollock AV, Evans M (1977) Wound sepsis after cholecystectomy: effect of incidental appendicectomy. Br Med J 1:20–22CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson DR, Jones K, Aubrey DA (1989) Appendicectomy at cholecystectomy–an appraisal. Br J Clin Pract 43:15–18PubMed Donaldson DR, Jones K, Aubrey DA (1989) Appendicectomy at cholecystectomy–an appraisal. Br J Clin Pract 43:15–18PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrew MH, Roty AR (1987) Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified? Am Surg 53:553–557PubMed Andrew MH, Roty AR (1987) Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified? Am Surg 53:553–557PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Nationwide outcomes of incidental appendectomy during cholecystectomy versus cholecystectomy alone in children: a propensity score-matched analysis
verfasst von
Carlos Theodore Huerta
Andrew Sundin
Antoine J. Ribieras
Rebecca Saberi
Walter Ramsey
Gareth Gilna
Hallie J. Quiroz
Chad M. Thorson
Juan E. Sola
Eduardo A. Perez
Publikationsdatum
03.08.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Surgery International / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05172-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

Pediatric Surgery International 10/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Pädiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.