Anzeige
Erschienen in:
20.11.2017 | Clinical trial
Nestin expression in breast cancer: association with prognosis and subtype on 3641 cases with long-term follow-up
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2018
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Basal-like breast cancers, originally recognized by gene expression profiling, can be clinically identified using immunohistochemical (IHC) definitions that require estrogen receptor (ER) negativity. However, some basal cases are ER positive and are mistakenly considered to be luminal by standard IHC approaches, leading to suboptimal treatment choices. Nestin, an intermediate filament expressed in many stem cells, is a recently identified positive marker of basal-like phenotype independent of ER status. In this study, we evaluated its clinical associations and prognostic capacity in a large breast cancer cohort.
Methods
A tissue microarray series of clinically annotated invasive breast cancers with 12.6-year median follow-up was assessed for nestin expression by IHC. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of nestin status, for the primary endpoint of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).
Results
Among 3641 cases interpretable for nestin by IHC, positive staining was found in 371 cases (10%) and was significantly associated with poor prognostic factors including other markers of basal-like differentiation. Patients with nestin-positive tumors had a significantly lower 10 year BCSS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.62–2.40; P < 0.001). Importantly, within the large group of 2323 ER+ cases, nestin positivity identified a subgroup of 120 patients (5%) with a significantly inferior 10-year BCSS (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.10–2.13; P = 0.02).
Conclusions
Nestin IHC positivity is associated with the poor clinical outcomes and reduced survival rates that characterize the gene expression basal-like subtype. This easily applicable tool identifies ER+ poor prognosis basal phenotype patients that are currently being missed by “Triple negative” or “Core basal” IHC definitions.