Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
Erschienen in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports 1/2021

23.01.2021 | Neurogenic Bladder (C Powell, Section Editor)

Neurogenic Bowel in the Pediatric Patient—Management from Childhood to Adulthood

verfasst von: Michael Daugherty, Andrew C. Strine

Erschienen in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The current literature on neurogenic bowel will be addressed with a specific focus on spina bifida population. Topics will include bowel management, clinical care pathways, variation in care, quantification of dysfunction, and quality of life outcomes.

Recent Findings

There have been several recent studies that retrospectively review the outcomes from a national spina bifida registry as well as ongoing work regarding the development and validation of quality of life (QOL) instruments for the neurogenic populations. These studies have highlighted the significance of any fecal incontinence and its negative effect on QOL.

Summary

Although there has been a recent increase in publications regarding this neurogenic population, a significant amount of further work is required. Through multi-institutional collaboration and standardization of care pathways, there can be significant advances in the care of these patients.
Literatur
1.
Johnston AW, Wiener JS, Todd Purves J. Pediatric neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction: will my child ever be out of diapers? Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(5):838–67.
2.
Cameron AP, et al. The severity of bowel dysfunction in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol. 2015;194(5):1336–41.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Radojicic Z, et al. The impact of bowel management on the quality of life in children with spina bifida with overactive bladder and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(5):457–66.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Radojicic Z, et al. The influence of bowel management on the frequency of urinary infections in spina bifida patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):318.e1–7.CrossRef
5.
Radojicic Z, et al. Impact of bowel management in alleviating symptoms of urinary incontinence in patients with spina bifida associated with overactive bladder and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. BJU Int. 2019;123(1):118–23.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Eid AA, et al. Prospective evaluation of the management of bowel dysfunction in children with neuropathic lower urinary tract dysfunction and its effect on bladder dynamics. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(4):805–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
King SK, et al. Retrograde continence enema in children with spina bifida: not as effective as first thought. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(4):386–90.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Axelrod CH, Saps M. The role of fiber in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1650.
9.
Lever E, et al. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(7):750–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Lever E, et al. The effect of prunes on stool output, gut transit time and gastrointestinal microbiota: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):165–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Santos-Jasso KA, et al. Effectiveness of senna vs polyethylene glycol as laxative therapy in children with constipation related to anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(1):84–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Levitt M, Pena A. Update on pediatric faecal incontinence. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009;19(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Bray L, Sanders C. An evidence-based review of the use of transanal irrigation in children and young people with neurogenic bowel. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(2):88–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Pires JM, et al. Assessment of neurogenic bowel dysfunction impact after spinal cord injury using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(6):873–9.PubMed
15.
Vu Minh Arnell M, et al. Adults with myelomeningocele: an interview study about life situation and bladder and bowel management. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(3):267–71.PubMedCrossRef
16.
• Wiener JS, et al. Bowel management and continence in adults with spina bifida: results from the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry 2009–15. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(3–4):335–43 Provides nationwide-level data regarding continence in adults with spina bifida.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Bischoff A, et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence with a comprehensive bowel management program. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(6):1278–83 discussion 1283–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Alhazmi H, et al. Long-term results using a transanal irrigation system (Peristeen((R))) for treatment of stool incontinence in children with myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(1):34.e1–5.CrossRef
19.
Kelly MS, et al. Prospective evaluation of Peristeen(R) transanal irrigation system with the validated neurogenic bowel dysfunction score sheet in the pediatric population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(3):632–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Midrio P, et al. Peristeen((R)) transanal irrigation in paediatric patients with anorectal malformations and spinal cord lesions: a multicentre Italian study. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18(1):86–93.PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
Halleran DR, et al. A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):123–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Ibrahim M, et al. Managing fecal incontinence in patients with myelomeningocele in Sub-Saharan Africa: role of antegrade continence enema (ACE). J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(4):554–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Li C, et al. Malone appendicostomy versus cecostomy tube insertion for children with intractable constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(5):885–91.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Mohamed H, et al. Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2020:55(7):1196–1200.
26.
Chu DI, et al. Experience with glycerin for antegrade continence enema in patients with neurogenic bowel. J Urol. 2013;189(2):690–3.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Chelluri R, et al. Robotic conversion of cecostomy tube to catheterizable antegrade continence enema (ACE): Surgical technique. J Pediatr Surg. 2018;53(9):1871–4.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Lu PL, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence in children: long-term outcomes, patient benefit, and parent satisfaction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(2):e13184.
29.
Fuchs ME, et al. Factors predicting complications after sacral neuromodulation in children. Urology. 2017;107:214–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Clark C, et al. Sacral nerve stimulator revision due to somatic growth. J Urol. 2011;186(4 Suppl):1576–80.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Vriesman MH, et al. Comparison of antegrade continence enema treatment and sacral nerve stimulation for children with severe functional constipation and fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(8):e13809.
32.
Lu PL, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation allows for decreased antegrade continence enema use in children with severe constipation. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(4):558–62.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Guys JM, et al. Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder dysfunction in children. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 2):1673–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Haddad M, et al. Sacral neuromodulation in children with urinary and fecal incontinence: a multicenter, open label, randomized, crossover study. J Urol. 2010;184(2):696–701.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Schober MS, et al. Novel use of pudendal neuromodulation in a pediatric patient with caudal regression and partial sacral agenesis for refractory bowel bladder dysfunction. Urology. 2016;94:224–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Ambartsumyan L, Rodriguez L. Bowel management in children with spina bifida. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2018;11(4):293–301.PubMedCrossRef
37.
• Beierwaltes PS, et al. Using a decision tree to guide bowel management in spina bifida. J Pediatr Nurs. 2019;47:68–72 Establishes a well defined decision tree to help with bowel management, making it easy for families to see current process and next steps.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Sawin KJ, et al. The National Spina Bifida Patient Registry: profile of a large cohort of participants from the first 10 clinics. J Pediatr. 2015;166(2):444–50.e1.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Thibadeau JK, et al. Testing the feasibility of a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2013;97(1):36–41.PubMedCrossRef
40.
•• Freeman KA, et al. Variation in bowel and bladder continence across US spina bifida programs: a descriptive study. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(3–4):231–41 Highlights the low continence rates overall in this population and there are differences amongst institutions.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
• Routh JC, et al. Variation in surgical management of neurogenic bowel among centers participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(3–4):303–12 There is significant variation in surgical management across institutions in regards to bowel management.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Large T, et al. Ambulatory patients with spina bifida are 50% more likely to be fecally continent than non-ambulatory patients, particularly after a MACE procedure. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):60.e1–6.CrossRef
43.
de Blaauw I, et al. First results of a European multi-center registry of patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(12):2530–5.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Hubert K, et al. Validation of a bowel dysfunction instrument for adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(4):199.e1–7.CrossRef
45.
Kelly MS, et al. Development, reliability and validation of a neurogenic bowel dysfunction score in pediatric patients with spina bifida. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(2):212–7.PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
Kulkarni AV, Rabin D, Drake JM. An instrument to measure the health status in children with hydrocephalus: the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(2 Suppl):134–40.PubMed
48.
MacNeily AE, et al. Health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida: a prospective assessment before and after lower urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol. 2009;182(4 Suppl):1984–91.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Nanigian DK, et al. Development and validation of the fecal incontinence and constipation quality of life measure in children with spina bifida. J Urol. 2008;180(4 Suppl):1770–3 discussion 1773.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Olesen JD, Kiddoo DA, Metcalfe PD. The association between urinary continence and quality of life in paediatric patients with spina bifida and tethered cord. Paediatr Child Health. 2013;18(7):e32–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Parkin PC, et al. Development of a health-related quality of life instrument for use in children with spina bifida. Qual Life Res. 1997;6(2):123–32.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Sawin KJ, Bellin MH. Quality of life in individuals with spina bifida: a research update. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010;16(1):47–59.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Vajda P, et al. Quality of life: urinary bladder augmentation or substitution in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25(2):195–201.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Kurian JJ, Jacob TJK, Mathai J. Encouraging results of bowel and bladder management in spina bifida aperta in south india with quality of life scores in a tertiary care institution in South India. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2019;24(1):21–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
• Szymanski KM, et al. QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Adults (QUALAS-A): development and international validation of a novel health-related quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(10):2355–64 Describes a simple patient-reported quality of life instrument for adults with spina bifida.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Szymanski KM, et al. Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C): Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument. Urology. 2016;87:178–84.PubMedCrossRef
57.•
Szymanski KM, et al. Validation of QUALAS-T, a health-related quality of life instrument for teenagers with spina bifida. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):306–13 Describes a simple patient-reported quality of life instrument for teenagers with spina bifida.PubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Luther SL, et al. A comparison of patient outcomes and quality of life in persons with neurogenic bowel: standard bowel care program vs colostomy. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(5):387–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.••
Szymanski KM, et al. All incontinence is not created equal: impact of urinary and fecal incontinence on quality of life in adults with spina bifida. J Urol. 2017;197(3 Pt 2):885–91 The amount of urinary incontinence matters to quality of life, but any fecal incontinence has a significant detrimental impact on quality of life.PubMedCrossRef
60.
•• Szymanski KM, et al. Incontinence affects health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(3):279.e1–8 The amount of urinary incontinence matters to quality of life, but any fecal incontinence has a significant detrimental impact on quality of life.CrossRef
61.
• Szymanski KM, et al. Quantity, not frequency, predicts bother with urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life in adults with spina bifida. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 2):1263–9 The amount of urinary incontinence matters to quality of life more so than how often it occurs.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Best KL, et al. Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for neurogenic bladder function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(5):505–29.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Choukou MA, et al. Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019;25(1):1–22.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Kyrklund K, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ. Long-term bowel function, quality of life and sexual function in patients with anorectal malformations treated during the PSARP era. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2017;26(5):336–42.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Neurogenic Bowel in the Pediatric Patient—Management from Childhood to Adulthood
verfasst von
Michael Daugherty
Andrew C. Strine
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1931-7212
Elektronische ISSN: 1931-7220
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-020-00624-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

18.04.2024 | Infertilität | Nachrichten

Viele Ärzte haben Probleme mit der Zeugungsfähigkeit

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

10.04.2024 | PSA-Screening | Nachrichten

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet
weitere anzeigen

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen