nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015 | Original Paper

New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures

verfasst von: Jie-Feng Huang, Jian-Jian Shen, Jun-Jie Chen, Yang Zheng, Wen-Xi Du, Fu-Cun Liu, Pei-Jian Tong

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The Vancouver Classification System (VCS) for assessing periprosthetic femoral fractures has become universally accepted. The Unified Classification System (UCS) has expanded upon and updated the VCS and applied treatment principles to all periprosthetic fractures. However, periprosthetic femoral fractures accompanied by stem fracture after hip arthroplasty were not classifiable under the original VCS or the UCS.

Results

Our new fracture pattern is based on the periprosthetic femoral fracture as well as stem fracture after hip arthroplasty, and its treatment is dependent upon the stability of the proximal portion of the fractured femoral prosthesis.

Conclusion

We believe that our new fracture pattern, a supplement to the VCS and UCS, is useful in the establishment of a therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The unified classification system (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-B:713–716CrossRefPubMed

Vioreanu MH, Parry MC, Haddad FS, Duncan CP (2014) Field testing the unified classification system for peri-prosthetic fractures of the pelvis and femur around a total hip replacement: an international collaboration. Bone Joint J 96-B:1472–1477CrossRefPubMed

Naqvi GA, Baig SA, Awan N (2012) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:1047–1050CrossRefPubMed

Corten K, Vanrykel F, Bellemans J, Frederix PR, Simon JP, Broos PL (2009) An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91:1424–1430CrossRef

Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20:857–865CrossRefPubMed

Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2000) The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 15:59–62CrossRefPubMed

Baba T, Homma Y, Momomura R, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto M, Futamura K, Mogami A, Kanda A, Morohashi I, Kaneko K (2014) New classification focusing on implant designs useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 39:1–5CrossRefPubMed

Drexler M, Dwyer T, Chakravertty R, Backstein D, Gross AE, Safir O (2014) The outcome of modified extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA for Vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty 29:1598–1604CrossRefPubMed

Rayan F, Dodd M, Haddad FS (2008) European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90:1576–1579CrossRef

10.

Froberg L, Troelsen A, Brix M (2012) Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C1 fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop 83:648–652PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

11.

Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P (2002) The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):2–20PubMed

12.

Learmonth ID (2004) The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:13–19

13.

Dzaja I, Lyons MC, McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Howard JL (2014) Revision hip arthroplasty using a modular revision hip system in cases of severe bone loss. J Arthroplasty 29:1594–1597CrossRefPubMed

14.

Parrish TF, Jones JR (1964) Fracture of the femur following prosthetic arthroplasty of the hip: report of nine cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:241–248PubMed

15.

Johansson JE, McBroom R, Barrington TW, Hunter GA (1981) Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:1435–1442PubMed

16.

Bethea JS 3rd, DeAndrade JR, Fleming LL, Lindenbaum SD, Welch RB (1982) Proximal femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 170:95–106PubMed

17.

Cooke PH, Newman JH (1988) Fractures of the femur in relation to cemented hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 70:386–389

18.

Jensen JS, Barfod G, Hansen D, Larsen E, Linde F, Menck H, Olsen B (1988) Femoral shaft fracture after hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 59:9–13CrossRefPubMed

19.

Roffman M, Mendes DG (1989) Fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1067–1070PubMed

20.

Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed

21.

Charnley J (1975) Fracture of femoral prostheses in total hip replacement. A clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 111:105–120

22.

Murray P, Rorabeck H (1998) Bilateral femoral component breakage in total hip replacement: a case report. Can J Surg 41:236–238PubMedCentralPubMed

Titel: New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures
verfasst von: Jie-Feng Huang
Jian-Jian Shen
Jun-Jie Chen
Yang Zheng
Wen-Xi Du
Fu-Cun Liu
Pei-Jian Tong
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2830-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures

Abstract

Purpose

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty

Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates

Adequate surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty does not correlate with functional outcome and quality of life

Oblique femoral shortening osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for high dislocation in patients with hip dysplasia

Erratum to: Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee

Erratum to: Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur—an experimental biomechanical analysis

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie