Background
Caused by Newcastle disease virus (NDV), Newcastle disease (ND) is one of the most critical diseases in poultry and wild birds, largely due to its high morbidity and mortality, as well as its worldwide distribution and threat of considerable economic losses to avian industries [
1]. NDV is a negative-sense, single-stranded and enveloped RNA virus with approximately 15.2 kb genome composed of six genes encoding at least six structural proteins and additional non-structural proteins—namely, hemagglutinin–neuraminidase (HN), nucleoprotein (NP), fusion (F), phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (L) [
2], V, and possibly the W protein, produced by RNA editing of the P coding region [
3,
4]. With a wide range of hosts, NDV is known to infect at least 250 bird species through either experimental or natural routes [
1]. Given the cleavage site of the F protein and due to the severity of disease, NDV strains in 1-d-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens are categorized as highly virulent (i.e., velogenic), intermediate virulent (i.e., mesogenic) or nonvirulent (i.e., lentogenic) [
1,
5] according to the Intracerebral Pathogenicity Index.
Wild waterfowl and shorebirds can act as reservoir hosts, as well as hosts by which viruses with pandemic potential are known to be effectively transmitted to other avian species, and have thus gained attention with the emergence and perpetuation of virulent NDV through serial passage in susceptible animals [
6‐
9]. Even so, few studies have addressed viral pathogenesis and host innate immune response in avian species, thereby leaving gaps in the knowledge of NDV in avian hosts. In particular, chickens and ducks respond to virulent NDV infections differently, and many cases have demonstrated that infection with a specific virulent NDV strain may cause lesions and even death in chickens, whereas a duck infected with the same virus would be asymptomatic and rarely die due to the infection [
10,
11]. Moreover, NDV shedding in infected chickens is transient and involves the host’s rapid clearance [
12,
13], whereas infected ducks exhibit intermittent, prolonged shedding [
11]. Another difference is chickens’ greater probability than ducks of an earlier, stronger humoral immune response to NDV infection [
14]. Furthermore, though previous studies have shown that NDV replicates preferentially in both specifies’ respiratory systems and lymphoid tissues, including the lungs, spleen, thymus and bursa of Fabricius [
10,
11], only in ducks does NDV’s distribution remain limited to lymphoid tissues [
15]. Perhaps more significantly, though having adapted efficient replication in chickens, NDV does not always replicate in ducks, yet depends on its adaptation to different hosts and vice versa. However, to our knowledge, very few studies have compared the viral pathogenesis of or host innate immune responses to the same NDV in chicken and duck embryonic fibroblasts.
At the cellular level, a host’s recognition of viruses is mediated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs), such as TLR3 and TLR7, which recognize viral components and activate intracellular signal transduction pathways. Those processes result in the production of antiviral cytokines such as type I interferons (
IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine, including
IL-6 and
IL-1beta, as well as major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) that support host defenses against clearance of viruses [
16]. MHCs of classes I and II exhibit an antigen presentation associated with cell-mediated immunity (CMI) that plays an important role in defending T lymphocytes (e.g., cytokine-secreting CD4+ T helper cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes) against viral infection and is essential for viral clearance [
17,
18]. Previous studies have reported that in MHC class I and II molecules, pattern recognition receptor (PRRs) and antiviral cytokines were involved in the host innate immune response of avian species, including chickens and ducks, when infected with NDV [
19‐
21]. Nevertheless, very few studies have compared the induction and role of MHC class I and II molecules, PRRs and antiviral cytokines in avian embryo fibroblasts when infected with NDVs of different pathogenicities.
For this study, we selected a model of chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEFs) and duck embryo fibroblasts (DEFs) to observe host innate immune responses in vitro following infection with NDVs of different pathogenicities. To better understand the host immune responses and mechanisms supporting the different pathogeneses of NDV infection of two the highly relevant avian species of chickens and ducks, we compared the expression of cytokines and PRRs, including TLRs and proinflammatory and antiviral cytokines, in response to NDV infection, all with the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) method. With that same method, we also examined cell-mediated immune responses and MHC class I and II molecules in CEFs and DEFs.
Discussion
ND is a highly devastating viral disease in avian species that results high mortality and morbidity [
1]. A wide variety of birds infected with NDV have been reported, though different species have exhibited different pathogenicities following infection with specific NDVs [
26,
27]. Moreover, various NDV strains induce different host innate immune responses in specific animals [
20,
21]. In this study, according to the results of replication kinetics in CEFs and DEFs when infected by virulent NDVs, the titers in CEFs were higher than in DEFs at each time point. However, the reason for this varying replication ability between the two species remains unknown, as does the role that the difference of disease severity plays in host pathogen immune responses to NDV infection.
Studies have demonstrated that NDV infection in immune cells—for instance, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and macrophages—results in extremely robust proinflammatory and antiviral cytokine induction both in vivo and in vitro [
14,
20,
28,
29]. The expression of cytokines such as
LITAF,
IL-1beta,
IL-8 and
IL-6 in splenic leukocytes, macrophages and lymphoid tissues in chickens, ducks, geese and pigeons immediately are distinct in response to NDV infection [
19‐
21,
30]. Our results show that proinflammatory cytokines
IL-1beta,
IL-6, chemokine
IL-8, antiviral cytokines
IFNs and PRRs such as
TLR3 and
TLR7, as well as MHC class I and II molecules, show different expression patterns, whereas
LITAF is indistinct between the two species. The production of higher inflammatory immune responses to CEFs furthermore contrasts that of DEFs, which might at least partially explain the high morbidity and mortality of these birds following virulent NDV infection. Positive control stimulation with poly(I:C) in embryo fibroblast cultures also shows that differences in species are specific to the NDV. The increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and the severity of the cytopathic effect in CEFs when compared with DEFs following NDV infection might provide a plausible explanation for retinoic acid–inducible gene I (RIG-I) absence in CEFs, a viral RNA sensor that plays a crucial role in IFN-mediated antiviral immunity responses [
31].
Our study has moreover shown an elevated induction of type I and II IFNs in CEFs and a weak production of type I and II IFNs in DEFs in response to NDV infection, which suggests the relative susceptibility of CEFs to NDV infection over DEFs, as consistent with previous observations of pathogenicity variation in different birds [
11,
27]. The infection of CEFs and DEFs with SS-10 resulted in the weak induction of type I IFN compared to NH-10, likely due to cysteine-rich C terminus deletion in its V protein, which is critical for blocking IFN induction in embryo fibroblast cells [
32]. The interaction of V and laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 or melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 required for targeting STAT1 for degradation results in the inhibition of IFN signaling in chicken cells and Vero cells [
32‐
34]. Rue et al. have shown that highly virulent NDV induces higher host innate immune responses compared with avirulent NDV in chicken spleens [
19]. In our study, we found that CEFs induce significantly higher levels of IFN than DEFs following virus infection when compared with the expression levels of type I and II IFNs (Fig.
4). Studies have shown that the infection of chickens with virulent NDV resulted in a weak induction of IFNs that correlated with a longer shedding period, higher virus titers and greater disease severity [
11,
35]. According to the above results, we speculate that the higher overall induction of IFNs by CEFs following infection with virulent NDV reflects what happens at the level of the organism, meaning shorter shedding and more rapid viral clearance in chickens and and lower virus replication and weaker viral clearance in ducks, as well as a longer shedding period.
We also found that the
IL-6 mRNA transcript was upregulated in CEFs with both viruses and in treatment with polyI:C. By contrast, it was downregulated in DEFs with virulent NDV infection at 24 h p.i. (Fig.
3b).
IL-6 mediates the limit and containment of NDV replication in the spleen of infected chickens during the early phase of infection, namely through the activation of host innate immune mechanisms such as macrophages and TLRs, which can contribute to pathological damage observed in NDV-infected chickens [
19,
36]. Studies have shown that
TLR3 plays a fundamental role in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as
IL-6 and
IL-1beta in fibroblasts or classical dendritic cells derived from
TLR3-deficient mice after infection with NDV [
37].
TLR3-deficient mice exhibited prolonged survival accompanied with reduced proinflammatory cytokines
IL-6 and
IFNs when infected with the Sendai virus, an enveloped animal virus of the family
Paramyxoviridae similar to NDV [
37]. Based on our results, there is a positive correlation in CEFs and DEFs infected with NDV in terms of the expression level of
IL-6 and
TLR3, which suggests the fundamental role of
IL-6 in NDV pathogenesis.
TLRs such as
TLR3 and
TLR7 play an essential role in producing inflammatory cytokines and IFNs, as well as in activating host innate immune responses by triggering pathogen-associated molecular patterns, including the nucleic acid of RNA viruses such as NDV in mammals, insects and domestic poultry [
38]. Yilmaz et al. [
39] have reported that chicken
TLR3 and
TLR7 were highly expressed in the kidneys, liver, heart, spleen, intestines, lungs and oviduct, whereas
TLR3 mRNA in ducks was only highly expressed in the spleen and lungs, moderately expressed in the intestines, liver and kidneys, poorly expressed in the heart, brain, bursa, and skin and not expressed whatsoever in muscle tissue [
40]. Duck
TLR7 mRNA was moreover highly expressed in the spleen, lungs and bursa, poorly expressed in the kidneys and liver, and not expressed whatsoever in the heart and brain, which is distinct from the expression patterns of
TLR3 and
TLR7 in chickens [
41]. Our results reveal distinct expression patterns for
TLR3 and
TLR7 in CEFs and DEFs when exposed to NDV infection or treatment with polyI:C (Fig.
2a and b). The observed difference in
TLR3 and
TLR7 expression may be due to differences in the genome of tissues of chickens and ducks, or else the presence of resident cells that express
TLR3 and
TLR7 receptors absent in chickens.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
YFK, TR participated in the design of the experiments and performed the experiments. MSF, XQZ, BX conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. PG YLL TR contributed reagents and performed the statistical analysis. YFK Wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.