Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

18.04.2018 | Breast Oncology

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy is Not Associated with a Delay of Adjuvant Treatment

verfasst von: Emily L. Albright, MD, Mary C. Schroeder, PhD, Kendra Foster, MS, Sonia L. Sugg, MD, Lillian M. Erdahl, MD, Ronald J. Weigel, MD, PhD, Ingrid M. Lizarraga, MBBS

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

High-volume single-institution studies support the oncologic safety of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). Concerns remain regarding the increased potential for complications, recurrence, and delays to subsequent adjuvant therapy. A national database was used to examine treatment and outcomes for NSM patients.

Methods

Women undergoing unilateral NSM or skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) for stage 0–4 breast cancer from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Demographic and oncologic characteristics, short-term outcomes and time to local and systemic treatment were compared.

Results

NSM was performed on 8173 patients: 8.7% were node positive, and for stage 1–4 disease, 10.6% were triple negative (TN) and 15.3% were HER2-positive. NSM patients were less likely than SSM patients to receive chemotherapy [CT] (37.4 vs. 43.4%) or radiation [PMRT] (15.6 vs. 16.9%), and were also more likely to present with clinically early-stage disease. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive CT in the neoadjuvant [NCT] than adjuvant setting [AC] (OR 3.76, 1.81, and 1.99 for clinical N2/3, TN, and HER2-positive disease, all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, NSM patients had a higher rate of pathologic complete response [pCR] (OR 1.41, p < 0.001). Readmission rate, positive margin rate and time to CT, PMRT or hormonal therapy were not increased for NSM compared to SSM patients.

Conclusions

Over one third of NSM patients received chemotherapy and/or radiation. NSM patients with high-risk features were more likely to receive NAC and obtain a pCR. NSM patients did not experience worse outcomes or delayed adjuvant therapy compared to SSM.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sisco M, Kyrillos AM, Lapin BR, Wang CE, Yao KA. Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 160:111–20.CrossRefPubMed Sisco M, Kyrillos AM, Lapin BR, Wang CE, Yao KA. Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 160:111–20.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat de La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:3241–9.CrossRef de La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:3241–9.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Piper M, Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Moore DH, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy—a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Pl Surg. 2013; 70:435–437.CrossRef Piper M, Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Moore DH, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy—a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Pl Surg. 2013; 70:435–437.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Frey JD, Alperovich M, Kim JC et al. Oncologic outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-institution experience. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(1):8–11.CrossRefPubMed Frey JD, Alperovich M, Kim JC et al. Oncologic outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-institution experience. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113(1):8–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moo T, Pinchinat T, Mays S et al. Oncologic Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3221–5.CrossRefPubMed Moo T, Pinchinat T, Mays S et al. Oncologic Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3221–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):361–5.CrossRefPubMed Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):361–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavez-MacGregor M, Clarke CA, Lichtensztajn DY, Giordano SH. Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:322–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chavez-MacGregor M, Clarke CA, Lichtensztajn DY, Giordano SH. Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:322–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat de Melo Gagliato D, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lei X, et al. Clinical impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:735–44.CrossRef de Melo Gagliato D, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lei X, et al. Clinical impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:735–44.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J, Barbera L, Brouwers M, Browman G, Mackillop WJ. Does delay in starting treatment affect the outcomes of radiotherapy? A systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:555–63.CrossRefPubMed Huang J, Barbera L, Brouwers M, Browman G, Mackillop WJ. Does delay in starting treatment affect the outcomes of radiotherapy? A systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:555–63.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivotto I, Lesperance M, Truong P, et al. Intervals longer than 20 weeks from breast-conserving surgery to radiation therapy are associated with inferior outcome for women with early-stage breast cancer who are not receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:16–23.CrossRefPubMed Olivotto I, Lesperance M, Truong P, et al. Intervals longer than 20 weeks from breast-conserving surgery to radiation therapy are associated with inferior outcome for women with early-stage breast cancer who are not receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:16–23.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:3294–302.CrossRefPubMed Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, et al. Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:3294–302.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled WA, Wang F, Foster RD, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Sbitany H, Esserman LJ. Expanding the indications for total skin-sparing mastectomy: is it safe for patients with locally advanced disease? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23:87–91.CrossRefPubMed Peled WA, Wang F, Foster RD, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Sbitany H, Esserman LJ. Expanding the indications for total skin-sparing mastectomy: is it safe for patients with locally advanced disease? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23:87–91.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Jakub JW, Jacobson SR, Hoskin TL, Hieken TJ. Expanded indications and improved outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:3317–23.CrossRefPubMed Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Jakub JW, Jacobson SR, Hoskin TL, Hieken TJ. Expanded indications and improved outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22:3317–23.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guarneri V, Broglio K, Kau SW, et al. Prognostic value of pathological complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:1037–44.CrossRefPubMed Guarneri V, Broglio K, Kau SW, et al. Prognostic value of pathological complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24:1037–44.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Azzawi K, Iasmail A, Earl H, Forouhi P, Malata CM. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126:1–11.CrossRefPubMed Azzawi K, Iasmail A, Earl H, Forouhi P, Malata CM. Influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y, Weeks CM, In H, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2011; 117:2833–41.CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Weeks CM, In H, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2011; 117:2833–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Peled WA, Itakura K, Foster RD, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010; 145:880–5.CrossRef Peled WA, Itakura K, Foster RD, et al. Impact of chemotherapy on postoperative complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2010; 145:880–5.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat American Medical Association. CPT 2017 professional edition. American Medical Association, New York. 2017. American Medical Association. CPT 2017 professional edition. American Medical Association, New York. 2017.
Metadaten
Titel
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy is Not Associated with a Delay of Adjuvant Treatment
verfasst von
Emily L. Albright, MD
Mary C. Schroeder, PhD
Kendra Foster, MS
Sonia L. Sugg, MD
Lillian M. Erdahl, MD
Ronald J. Weigel, MD, PhD
Ingrid M. Lizarraga, MBBS
Publikationsdatum
18.04.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6446-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Akute Cholezystitis bei multimorbiden Älteren: Operation nicht sofort ausschließen!

Bei älteren, multimorbiden Menschen mit akuter Cholezystitis wird eine Operation häufig nicht erwogen. Eine Studie aus Philadelphia zeigt nun jedoch, dass auch diese Patientinnen und Patienten von einer chirurgischen Therapie profitieren können.

Was geschehen muss, damit Prähabilitation in die Leitlinien kommt

Eine Prähabilitation vor einem viszeralchirurgischen Eingriff ist Experten zufolge äußerst sinnvoll, dennoch wird sie in Leitlinien derzeit nicht empfohlen. Beim DCK erklärte Prof. Tim Vilz aus Bonn, woran das liegt und was benötigt wird, um die Situation zu ändern.

Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom nur in Ausnahmefällen operieren!

Das Thoracic-Outlet-Syndrom erfordert nur in ganz bestimmten Fällen ein operatives Vorgehen. Beim DCK wurde vor schwerwiegenden Komplikationen des anspruchsvollen Eingriffs gewarnt.

Statine: Was der G-BA-Beschluss für Praxen bedeutet

Nach dem G-BA-Beschluss zur erweiterten Verordnungsfähigkeit von Lipidsenkern rechnet die DEGAM mit 200 bis 300 neuen Dauerpatienten pro Praxis. Im Interview erläutert Präsidiumsmitglied Erika Baum, wie Hausärztinnen und Hausärzte am besten vorgehen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.