Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2017 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

Molecular Autism 1/2017

No evidence of early head circumference enlargements in children later diagnosed with autism in Israel

Zeitschrift:
Molecular Autism > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
Ilan Dinstein, Shlomi Haar, Shir Atsmon, Hen Schtaerman
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13229-017-0129-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Large controversy exists regarding the potential existence and clinical significance of larger brain volumes in toddlers who later develop autism. Assessing this relationship is important for determining the clinical utility of early head circumference (HC) measures and for assessing the validity of the early overgrowth hypothesis of autism, which suggests that early accelerated brain development may be a hallmark of the disorder.

Methods

We performed a retrospective comparison of HC, height, and weight measurements between 66 toddlers who were later diagnosed with autism and 66 matched controls. These toddlers represent an unbiased regional sample from a single health service provider in the southern district of Israel. On average, participating toddlers had >8 measurements between birth and the age of two, which enabled us to characterize individual HC, height, and weight development with high precision and fit a negative exponential growth model to the data of each toddler with exceptional accuracy.

Results

The analyses revealed that HC sizes and growth rates were not significantly larger in toddlers with autism even when stratifying the autism group based on verbal capabilities at the time of diagnosis. In addition, there were no significant correlations between ADOS scores at the time of diagnosis and HC at any time-point during the first 2 years of life.

Conclusions

These negative results add to accumulating evidence, which suggest that brain volume is not necessarily larger in toddlers who develop autism. We believe that conflicting results reported in other studies are due to small sample sizes, use of misleading population norms, changes in the clinical definition of autism over time, and/or inclusion of individuals with syndromic autism. While abnormally large brains may be evident in some individuals with autism and more clearly visible in MRI scans, converging evidence from this and other studies suggests that enlarged HC is not a common etiology of the entire autism population. Early HC measures, therefore, offer very limited clinical utility for assessment of autism risk in the general population.
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Molecular Autism 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie