Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2022

10.01.2022 | Reports of Original Investigations

Noise in the operating room during induction of anesthesia: impact of a quality improvement initiative

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Noise in the operating room (OR) is common and associated with negative effects on anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patient outcomes. Induction of anesthesia is among the loudest perioperative periods. Despite its critical nature, there is little data on noise levels during induction, associated patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction, and the effects of noise reduction strategies.

Methods

We conducted a two-part prospective interventional quality improvement project on the care of adult patients receiving general anesthesia for elective noncardiac surgery. For part A, we measured average and peak noise (dB[A]) levels during anesthesia induction in N = 100 cases and administered a satisfaction questionnaire to anesthesiologists. We then applied a multidisciplinary educational program to OR personnel on active noise reduction strategies and subsequently collected data during N = 109 cases in a post-intervention phase. For part B, we administered satisfaction questionnaires to N = 100 patients pre- vs postintervention, respectively.

Results

Median [interquartile range] noise levels throughout induction were 66.0 [62.5–68.6] dB(A) preintervention vs 63.5 [60.1–65.4] dB[A] post-intervention (Hodges–Lehmann estimator of the difference, − 2.7 dB[A]; 95% confidence interval [CI], − 4.0 to − 1.5; P < 0.001). Peak noise levels during induction were 87.3 [84.0–90.5] dB(A) preintervention and 86.2 [81.8–89.3] dB(A) postintervention (Hodges–Lehmann estimator of the difference, − 1.8 dB[A]; 95% CI, − 3.3 to − 0.3; P = 0.02). Noise-related anesthesiologist satisfaction postintervention was significantly improved in multiple domains, including assessment of noise having distracted anesthesiologists. Patient satisfaction was high pre-intervention and did not significantly improve further.

Conclusion

In this quality improvement project, average noise levels during induction of anesthesia, anesthesiologist satisfaction, and anesthesiologists’ perceived ability to perform were improved following a multidisciplinary educational program on noise reduction in the OR.

Study registration

www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (NCT04204785); registered 19 December 2019.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
EQUATOR Network. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. Available from URL: https://​www.​equator-network.​org/​reporting-guidelines/​squire/​ (accessed November 2021).
 
2
Wilson DB. George Mason University. Practical Meta-Analysis Effect Size Calculator. Available from URL: https://​www.​campbellcollabor​ation.​org/​escalc/​html/​EffectSizeCalcul​ator-SMD-main.​php (accessed November 2021).
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz JD. Noise in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2014; 121: 894-8.CrossRef Katz JD. Noise in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2014; 121: 894-8.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ginsberg SH, Pantin E, Kraidin J, Solina A, Panjwani S, Yang G. Noise levels in modern operating rooms during surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 528-30.CrossRef Ginsberg SH, Pantin E, Kraidin J, Solina A, Panjwani S, Yang G. Noise levels in modern operating rooms during surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27: 528-30.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R. Noise in the operating room-what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesthesia Nurs 2010; 25: 380-6.CrossRef Hasfeldt D, Laerkner E, Birkelund R. Noise in the operating room-what do we know? A review of the literature. J Perianesthesia Nurs 2010; 25: 380-6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu EH, Tan SM. Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 298-302.CrossRef Liu EH, Tan SM. Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 298-302.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Degrandi Oliveira CR, Nogueira Arenas GW. Occupational exposure to noise pollution in anesthesiology. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2012; 62: 253-61.CrossRef Degrandi Oliveira CR, Nogueira Arenas GW. Occupational exposure to noise pollution in anesthesiology. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2012; 62: 253-61.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritsch MH, Chacko CE, Patterson EB. Operating room sound level hazards for patients and physicians. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 715-21.CrossRef Fritsch MH, Chacko CE, Patterson EB. Operating room sound level hazards for patients and physicians. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 715-21.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G. Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 175-9.CrossRef Broom MA, Capek AL, Carachi P, Akeroyd MA, Hilditch G. Critical phase distractions in anaesthesia and the sterile cockpit concept. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 175-9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat McNeer RR, Bennett CL, Bodzin Horn D, Dudaryk R. Factors affecting acoustics and speech intelligibility in the operating room: size matters. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1978-85.CrossRef McNeer RR, Bennett CL, Bodzin Horn D, Dudaryk R. Factors affecting acoustics and speech intelligibility in the operating room: size matters. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 1978-85.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevenson RA, Schlesinger JJ, Wallace MT. Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 376-81.CrossRef Stevenson RA, Schlesinger JJ, Wallace MT. Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 376-81.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, et al. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 933-8.CrossRef Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, et al. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 933-8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Engelmann C, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Ure BM. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1025-33.CrossRef Engelmann C, Neis JP, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Ure BM. A noise-reduction program in a pediatric operation theatre is associated with surgeon’s benefits and a reduced rate of complications: a prospective controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 1025-33.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F, Mühlemann K, Candinas D, Beldi G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1021-5.CrossRef Kurmann A, Peter M, Tschan F, Mühlemann K, Candinas D, Beldi G. Adverse effect of noise in the operating theatre on surgical-site infection. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 1021-5.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U, Dholakia S, D’Souza C, Nemeth K. The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 2015; 157: 1153-6.CrossRef Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U, Dholakia S, D’Souza C, Nemeth K. The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 2015; 157: 1153-6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hepner DL, Bader AM, Hurwitz S, Gustafson M, Tsen LC. Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1099-105.CrossRef Hepner DL, Bader AM, Hurwitz S, Gustafson M, Tsen LC. Patient satisfaction with preoperative assessment in a preoperative assessment testing clinic. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1099-105.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro FE, Everett LL, Urman RD. Quality management in outpatient surgical care. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52: 97-108.CrossRef Shapiro FE, Everett LL, Urman RD. Quality management in outpatient surgical care. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2014; 52: 97-108.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung D, Cohen MM, Stewart S, Davies A. What determines patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation in a community hospital setting? Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1644-50.CrossRef Fung D, Cohen MM, Stewart S, Davies A. What determines patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation in a community hospital setting? Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1644-50.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.CrossRef Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink DJ. What is a safe noise level for the public? Am J Public Health 2017; 107: 44-5.CrossRef Fink DJ. What is a safe noise level for the public? Am J Public Health 2017; 107: 44-5.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Darbyshire JL, Müller-Trapet M, Cheer J, Fazi FM, Young JD. Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1018-25.CrossRef Darbyshire JL, Müller-Trapet M, Cheer J, Fazi FM, Young JD. Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 1018-25.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e498-501. Mirza R, Kirchner DB, Dobie RA, Crawford J; ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med 2018; 60: e498-501. 
Metadaten
Titel
Noise in the operating room during induction of anesthesia: impact of a quality improvement initiative
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2022
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02187-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.