Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
Erschienen in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 8/2016

01.08.2016 | Cardiac Nuclear Imaging (A Cuocolo, Section Editor)

Normal Databases for the Relative Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion

verfasst von: Mathieu Rubeaux, Yuan Xu, Guido Germano, Daniel S. Berman, Piotr J. Slomka

Erschienen in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT is performed clinically worldwide to detect and monitor coronary artery disease (CAD). MPI allows an objective quantification of myocardial perfusion at stress and rest. This established technique relies on normal databases to compare patient scans against reference normal limits. In this review, we aim to introduce the process of MPI quantification with normal databases and describe the associated perfusion quantitative measures that are used.

Recent Findings

New equipment and new software reconstruction algorithms have been introduced, which require the development of new normal limits. The appearance and regional count variations of normal MPI scans may differ between these new scanners and standard Anger cameras. Therefore, these new systems may require the determination of new normal limits to achieve optimal accuracy in relative myocardial perfusion quantification. Accurate diagnostic and prognostic results rivaling those obtained by expert readers can be obtained by this widely used technique.

Summary

Throughout this review, we emphasize the importance of the normal databases and the need for specific databases relative to distinct imaging procedures. Use of appropriate normal limits allows optimal quantification of MPI by taking into account subtle image differences due to the hardware and software used, and the population studied.
Literatur
1.
Garcia E, Maddahi J, Berman D, Waxman A. Space/time quantitation of thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1981;22(4):309–17.PubMed
2.
Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J, Prigent F, Friedman J, Areeda J, et al. Quantification of rotational thallium-201 myocardial tomography. J Nucl Med. 1985;26(1):17–26.PubMed
3.
4.
Berman DS, Kang X, Gransar H, Gerlach J, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormality on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is more reproducible than expert visual analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16(1):45–53. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-008-9018-0.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
6.
Wolak A, Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, Acampa W, Berman DS, et al. Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(1):27–34.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Slomka PJ, Van Kriekinge SD, Pollard G, Berman DS. Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(4):433–54.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Garcia EV, Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Chen J, Santana C. The increasing role of quantification in clinical nuclear cardiology: the Emory approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(4):420–32.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Ficaro EP, Lee BC, Kritzman JN, Corbett JR. Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(4):455–65.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Liu YH. Quantification of nuclear cardiac images: the Yale approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(4):483–91.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Faber TL, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Vansant JP, Nichols KJ, DePuey EG, et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(4):650–9.PubMed
12.
Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Su HT, Mazzanti M, Kiat H, Hachamovitch R, et al. Automatic reorientation of three-dimensional, transaxial myocardial perfusion SPECT images. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(6):1107–14.PubMed
13.
Caldwell JH, Williams DL, Harp GD, Stratton JR, Ritchie JL. Quantitation of size of relative myocardial perfusion defect by single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 1984;70(6):1048–56.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105(4):539–42.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Slomka PJ, Hurwitz GA, Stephenson J, Cradduck T. Automated alignment and sizing of myocardial stress and rest scans to three-dimensional normal templates using an image registration algorithm. J Nucl Med. 1995;36(6):1115–22.PubMed
16.
Declerck J, Feldmar J, Goris ML, Betting F. Automatic registration and alignment on a template of cardiac stress and rest reoriented SPECT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997;16(6):727–37.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12(1):66–77.
18.
Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:1350–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Slomka PJ, Fish MB, Lorenzo S, Nishina H, Gerlach J, Berman DS, et al. Simplified normal limits and automated quantitative assessment for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13(5):642–51.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(9):1494–502.PubMed
21.
22.
Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, Wang FP, et al. Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: a basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26(3):639–47.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Berman DS, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Wang FP, van Train K, Matzer L, et al. Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(5):1455–64.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Berman D, Abidov A, Kang X, Hayes SW, Friedman J, Sciammarella M et al. Prognostic Validation of a 17-Segment Score Derived from a 20-Segment Score for Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 (accepted).
25.
Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Kang X, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, et al. Automatic quantification of myocardial perfusion stress-rest change: a new measure of ischemia. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(2):183–91.PubMed
26.
27.
Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, Courter SA, Golub RA, Case JA, et al. Multicenter investigation comparing a highly efficient half-time stress-only attenuation correction approach against standard rest-stress Tc-99m SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16(5):726–35.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Herzog BA, Buechel RR, Husmann L, Pazhenkottil AP, Burger IA, Wolfrum M, et al. Validation of CT attenuation correction for high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging using a novel cadmium-zinc-telluride detector technique. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(10):1539–44. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​110.​078170.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Berman DS, Kang X, Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Shaw LJ, Hayes SW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of gated Tc-99m sestamibi stress myocardial perfusion SPECT with combined supine and prone acquisitions to detect coronary artery disease in obese and nonobese patients. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13(2):191–201.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovitch R, Dhar SC, Hsu P, Cohen I, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(10):1633–40.PubMed
31.
Nakazato R, Tamarappoo BK, Kang X, Wolak A, Kite F, Hayes SW, et al. Quantitative upright-supine high-speed SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: correlation with invasive coronary angiography. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(11):1724–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Einstein AJ, Blankstein R, Andrews H, Fish M, Padgett R, Hayes SW, et al. Comparison of image quality, myocardial perfusion, and left ventricular function between standard imaging and single-injection ultra-low-dose imaging using a high-efficiency SPECT camera: the MILLISIEVERT Study. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(9):1430–7. doi:10.​2967/​jnumed.​114.​138222.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Mouden M, Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Reiffers S, Oostdijk AH, Knollema S, et al. Impact of a new ultrafast CZT SPECT camera for myocardial perfusion imaging: fewer equivocal results and lower radiation dose. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(6):1048–55. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-012-2086-z.PubMedCrossRef
34.
35.
Sweeny JM, Baber U, Croft LB, High-efficiency GKA, SPECT MPI. Comparison of automated quantification, visual interpretation, and coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20:763–73.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Duvall WL, Slomka PJ, Gerlach JR, Sweeny JM, Baber U, Croft LB, et al. High-efficiency SPECT MPI: comparison of automated quantification, visual interpretation, and coronary angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(5):763–73. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-013-9735-x.PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Nishiyama Y, Miyagawa M, Kawaguchi N, Nakamura M, Kido T, Kurata A, et al. Combined Supine and Prone Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography With a Cadmium Zinc Telluride Camera for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease. Circ J. 2014;78(5):1169–75. doi:10.​1253/​circj.​CJ-13-1316.PubMedCrossRef
39.•
Nakazato R, Slomka PJ, Fish M, Schwartz RG, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, et al. Quantitative high-efficiency cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT with dedicated parallel-hole collimation system in obese patients: results of a multi-center study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-014-9984-3. This study presents the construction of a normal database for obese patients using new CZT cameras. It showed that new CZT cameras allow high image quality and accurate quantitative analysis of obese patients.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.••
Sharir T, Slomka PJ, Hayes SW, DiCarli MF, Ziffer JA, Martin WH, et al. Multicenter trial of high-speed versus conventional single-photon emission computed tomography imaging: quantitative results of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(18):1965–74. This is the first multicenter trial comparing characteristics of the normal databases constructed from CZT (D-SPECT) and conventional Anger cameras. It shows differences in the count rates of the 17 segment model that can be partially explained by the specific (sitting) position of the D-SPECT system.PubMedCrossRef
41.••
Nakazato R, Berman D, Hayes M, Fish M, Padgett R, Xu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with a solid state camera: simulation of a very low dose imaging protocol. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(3):373–9. This is the first study simulating count-specific normal databases in the context of very low dose imaging. These specific normal limits allow a significant reduction of the TPD bias.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Sharir T, Pinskiy M, Pardes A, Rochman A, Prokhorov V, Kovalski G, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of very low stress-dose with standard-dose myocardial perfusion imaging: automated quantification of one-day, stress-first SPECT using a CZT camera. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;23(1):11–20. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-015-0130-7.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Esteves FP, Galt JR, Folks RD, Verdes L, Garcia EV. Diagnostic performance of low-dose rest/stress Tc-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion SPECT using the 530c CZT camera: quantitative vs visual analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21(1):158–65. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-013-9827-7.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Links JM, DePuey EG, Taillefer R, Becker LC. Attenuation correction and gating synergistically improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9(2):183–7.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Thompson RC, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Case JA, Cullom SJ, Garcia EV, et al. Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12(2):195–202.PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
Grossman GB, Garcia EV, Bateman TM, Heller GV, Johnson LL, Folks RD, et al. Quantitative Tc-99m sestamibi attenuation-corrected SPECT: development and multicenter trial validation of myocardial perfusion stress gender-independent normal database in an obese population. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(3):263–72.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Ficaro EP, Fessler JA, Shreve PD, Kritzman JN, Rose PA, Corbett JR. Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography: diagnostic accuracy of Attenuation-Corrected 99mTc-SestamibiSingle-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Circulation. 1996;93(3):463–73.PubMedCrossRef
49.
50.
Heller GV, Links J, Bateman TM, Ziffer JA, Ficaro E, Cohen MC, et al. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine joint position statement: attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigraphy. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004;11(2):229–30.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Kiat H, Van Train KF, Friedman JD, Germano G, Silagan G, Wang FP, et al. Quantitative stress-redistribution thallium-201 SPECT using prone imaging: methodologic development and validation. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(8):1509–15.PubMed
52.
Hayes SW, De Lorenzo A, Hachamovitch R, Dhar SC, Hsu P, Cohen I, et al. Prognostic implications of combined prone and supine acquisitions in patients with equivocal or abnormal supine myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(10):1633–40.PubMed
53.
Nishina H, Slomka PJ, Abidov A, Yoda S, Akincioglu C, Kang X et al. Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. Soc Nuclear Med; 2006. p. 51–8.
54.
Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Abidov A, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Berman DS, et al. Combined quantitative supine-prone myocardial perfusion SPECT improves detection of coronary artery disease and normalcy rates in women. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14(1):44–52. doi:10.​1016/​j.​nuclcard.​2006.​10.​021.PubMedCrossRef
55.
56.
Nakajima K, Matsuo S, Kawano M, Matsumoto N, Hashimoto J, Yoshinaga K, et al. The validity of multi-center common normal database for identifying myocardial ischemia: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24(2):99–105. doi:10.​1007/​s12149-009-0331-8.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Nakajima K, Okuda K, Kawano M, Matsuo S, Slomka P, Germano G, et al. The importance of population-specific normal database for quantification of myocardial ischemia: comparison between Japanese 360 and 180-degree databases and a US database. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16(3):422–30. doi:10.​1007/​s12350-009-9049-1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.•
Nakajima K, Matsumoto N, Kasai T, Matsuo S, Kiso K, Okuda K. Normal values and standardization of parameters in nuclear cardiology: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;30(3):188–99. doi:10.​1007/​s12149-016-1065-z. This study conducted by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine aims at building a population specific database for the japanese population. This population exhibits regional particularities that have to be taken into account for the normal databases generation.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
60.
Cuberas-Borros G, Aguade-Bruix S, Boronat-de Ferrater M, Muxi-Pradas MA, Romero-Farina G, Castell-Conesa J, et al. Normal myocardial perfusion SPECT database for the Spanish population. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(8):934–42.PubMedCrossRef
61.••
Sonia Merlano-Gaitan FE. Russell Folks and Ernest Garcia. Diagnostic performance of a normal myocardial perfusion SPECT database specific for patients with end stage renal disease. the journal of nuclear medicine. 2014;55(1):1753. This is the first disease-specific normal database reported. An effective normal database has been developed for patients with end-stage renal disease who have a myocardial perfusion disease-specific signature.
62.
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2985–3023. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2013.​11.​004.PubMedCrossRef
63.
DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts [see comments]. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(4):441–9.PubMed
64.
DePuey 3rd EG. How to detect and avoid myocardial perfusion SPECT artifacts. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(4):699–702.PubMed
65.
Gimelli A, Bottai M, Giorgetti A, Genovesi D, Filidei E, Marzullo P. Evaluation of ischaemia in obese patients: feasibility and accuracy of a low-dose protocol with a cadmium-zinc telluride camera. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39(8):1254–61. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-012-2161-5.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Metadaten
Titel
Normal Databases for the Relative Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion
verfasst von
Mathieu Rubeaux
Yuan Xu
Guido Germano
Daniel S. Berman
Piotr J. Slomka
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Elektronische ISSN: 1941-9074
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-016-9385-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Prävention und Rehabilitation in der Kardiologie | Nachrichten

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation
weitere anzeigen

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen